: If You're A Former JRPG Fan, Raise Your Hand

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

If You're A Former JRPG Fan, Raise Your Hand

I can't remember the last time I played and completed a new JRPG.

And I'm not alone. I know several people who fall into the "former JRPG fan" group, as we were all about games like Final Fantasy, Suikoden, Wild ARMs, Chrono Cross, Legend of Dragoon, SaGa Frontier, Breath of Fire, Legend of Legaia, Star Ocean, Threads of Fate, etc. back in the glory days of the original PlayStation.

Most have no comprehension of the massive amount of gameplay variety in those games, by the way, as many just assume they all had very much the same turn-based mechanic. None of that was even remotely true, of course, as here you could find more variety within one genre than you could in any other genre on the planet. The deep, intricate systems in one was nothing like the systems and mechanics in another; playing Star Ocean: The 2nd Story was absolutely nothing like playing Breath of Fire III, for instance. So different in fact, that the uninitiated would probably consider them two completely different games.

But there was something else: Then, and into the PS2 generation, so many JRPGs were good. They're not anymore. I'm sorry, they're just not. I mean, some are fine, like the games in the Atelier and Tales franchises but they just don't provide the same memorable experiences. They also tend to lag well behind the AAA productions in the West, which also wasn't true back in the day. Furthermore, as Japanese games still dominated then, it's true that gamers in North America and Europe had little choice but to play all Japanese titles (on consoles, at any rate). So, you either accepted the very different Japanese culture and style, or you didn't play much. These days, we obviously have plenty of Western-oriented options and I'm sure that has had an impact as well.

And of course, you could always argue that as just about every major RPG, Japanese ones included, are basically real-time and nothing but real-time, those who actually enjoyed turn-based mechanics just don't care anymore. It also offers less variety when you completely cut out turn-based and partly cut out hybrids, and solely focus on flashy action, which is apparently what most JRPGs do today. They also haven't taken the time to produce better scripts and voice acting; they haven't advanced at an acceptable rate, and neither have other technical and artistic elements. All of this combined has resulted in the demise of the "JRPG fan," as far as many are concerned.

Do you qualify?

10/2/2015 Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous




New Comment System


Legacy Comment System (59 posts)


Draguss
Friday, October 02, 2015 @ 9:57:46 PM
Reply

Seems a bit odd and bitter to phrase it that way. Question, if no recent horror flick has tickled your fancy, are you a 'former' horror fan? What about if you only like old books?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 1:19:59 PM

"Question, if no recent horror flick has tickled your fancy, are you a 'former' horror fan?"

Um, yeah. If you don't care about horror movies anymore and you haven't seen one in 15 years, how exactly are you still a fan?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Draguss
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 2:14:55 PM

Simple, by still watching the ones you like. Unless you stopped liking those too I still don't get how you can be a 'former' fan. I consider myself a former fan of racing games because I just can't seem to enjoy them as much as I used to, old or new ones. JRPGs I still love very much.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

SaiyanSenpai
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 7:26:03 PM

Ben, I'm still playing Persona 4 Golden, so...STILL a JRPG fan.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Shauneepeak
Sunday, October 04, 2015 @ 6:35:58 PM

I get where Ben is coming from I don't think "former" is the right word maybe Jaded would be better due to the current state of the industry.

Also Saiyan Golden is just a remake of a game that came out in 2008 on the PS2, still a freaking amazing game but can't really be considered "new".

Hopefully Persona 5 can breathe some life into the genre, seriously the decision to put it on the PS4 was the smartest move possible.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 1:12:19 AM

I'm confused. How do you not watch a horror flick in 15 years but still keep watching them at the same time?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

trumpetmon65
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 12:31:28 AM
Reply

I'm still a fan myself, but it is very hard to find a game I like. Honestly, I think voice acting and bad scripts hurt the genre more than anything. It's hard to find a good epic with good pacing and character development and dialogue and acting.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 12:07:23 PM

jrpg fans didn't care about those things at the time.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

trumpetmon65
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 12:32:41 AM
Reply

Let's face it. A forty hour story is really hard to make with today's expectations

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 1:32:09 AM
Reply

I think I threw my arm out of socket. Next time I'll raise my hand a little slower.

I'm hoping Level 5 gives us something close to a turn-based rpg with their new US studio they're opening up.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ryu
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 1:55:39 AM
Reply

i think i put like 80 hours in VP silmeria with no regrets, haven't finished another jrpg since..

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Corvo
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 2:09:04 AM
Reply

Yeah. Keeping my hand down. I still play some Japanese RPGs. I mean, Bloodborne ain't going anywhere and
Dark souls 3 is right around the corner along with Disgaea 5 and Persona 5. Just because I don't play Fairy Fencer or the Atelier series doesn't mean I'm not a fan.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

kokoro
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 3:16:27 AM
Reply

Parasite eve, anyone? I'm playing it now on my ps1.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Vivi_Gamer
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 3:53:51 AM
Reply

No I do not qualify. While the PS3 was lacking in JRPGs have you seen the line up for 2016 - Final Fantasy XV, Persona 5, Star Ocean 5, Kingdom Hearts 2.8 (Dream Drop Dostance in HD) and possible late Ron Dragon Quest XI, KH3 and NieR 2.... That is a lot to get excited about no? I think the potential of the JRPG is still there and I prey for much success as the genre does need it.

Last gen I didn't rely on my PS3, the Wii in its last breath of life released Pandoras Tower, The Last Story and Xenoblade Chronicles - all these games were phenomenal but Xenoblade was something else. It brought bald everything I loved about JRPGs. Grand scores as you travel across an exciting world, characters you get immersed with and care for, a battle system which is modern but full of tactical advantages. But most of all, it was an adventure - the key feature I ask for in a JRPG. A journey which has lost of twists and lessons along the way presenting a story which is memorable.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 12:08:19 PM

The only potential real JRPG in there is Persona 5.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 1:20:51 PM

Just all action, Vivi. Run around and hit things; they'll all play very similarly, and the emphasis will always be on how you press the buttons as opposed to role-playing strategy.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Draguss
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 2:25:54 PM

You know, sometimes you give the impression that you can't enjoy a JRPG if it's not turn-based. I miss the style a lot too, but that doesn't exactly make any other form of combat inherently less enjoyable. And honestly, aside from a handful of games, JRPGs didn't use strategy so much as just figuring out patterns and exploiting them. Oh and lots and lots of grinding for bonus bosses.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 4:37:27 PM

Wrong impression. It's also wrong to assume that every JRPG I list is turn-based. In fact, most of the ones, especially on PS2, weren't pure turn-based at all. From Star Ocean to Dark Cloud to Kingdom Hearts to Valkyrie Profile, most were hybrids.

It's also just a stupid stereotype that you have to constantly grind to beat bosses; that basically stopped being true after the 16-bit era was over. The only time grinding was ever necessary was if you wanted to do the optional stuff, like Mastering Knights of the Round Materia in FFVII, or something like that. I don't recall ever having to grind to beat regular storyline bosses, unless you count someone who runs from every battle like a moron and then wonders why they can't progress beyond a certain boss fight.

You also can't "exploit" much of anything in any decent JRPG I ever played. You have to learn the systems but as each one is completely different, you actually have to LEARN. The Judgment Ring in the Shadow Hearts games was nothing like the hybrid team combat in Star Ocean, which in turn was nothing like the Arts in Legaia or any of the systems in the FFs (Junction, Sphere Grid, whatever).

Did you even play the old games? Doesn't sound like you're remembering them very well at all.

Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 10/3/2015 4:39:33 PM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Draguss
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 9:16:24 PM

"Oh and lots and lots of grinding for BONUS bosses." Reading comprehension, Ben. Same when I mentioned exploiting patterns. I don't mean gameplay exploits, I mean figuring out the boss' pattern and then completely predicting it. That's really not what I'd define as strategy.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 9:25:15 PM

No? And I assume you can prove to me why real-time combat systems somehow do require you to use strategy as opposed to "exploits," as you call them?

Based on your definition, it sounds to me like every single video game on the planet is more about exploiting than learning.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Draguss
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 10:21:12 PM

You assume wrong, which is weird since I never said that. At least not in the sense I believe you're thinking of. There's no strategy required in KH, but certainly a lot in the Total War series. Just as there's a lot more strategic thinking needed in FFT than FFVII. Strategy is an overall plan to achieve a certain goal while attempting to account for variables. In the broadest sense many of the more well known turn-based RPGs can count, but there isn't really much to account for when it's easy to know exactly what the boss will do next turn.

Last edited by Draguss on 10/3/2015 10:22:02 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Sunday, October 04, 2015 @ 7:21:21 AM

Most JRPG bosses I've ever fought have been "figure out which element/attack it is weak against and spam that until they're dead" or "just level up enough that no matter what attack you use you will win". Occasionally you'll have to plan out your attacks one or two moves in advance because the boss will use some special attack that requires you to do something to defend/recover. There's no real strategy.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Sunday, October 04, 2015 @ 9:09:35 PM

Sounds like you've both played all of two JRPGs in your lifetimes.

There are bosses that you encounter in various franchises, and I can think of three off the top of my head (Shadow Hearts, Legaia, and Star Ocean), that if you don't have a strategy, you will invariably lose, regardless of your strength. You have to know how and when to execute a plan of action, not just what the boss is weak or strong against, or which attacks they'll use.

You all act like all turn-based RPGs are like, "oh, he's fire-based so I'll use a water spell, yay!" or some such dumbed-down stereotypical garbage. It's like you have zero experience with any other style.

I'm also still waiting to hear why real-time RPGs are just so much more strategic or really, how any action game requires a strategy while a turn-based mechanic doesn't. Planning moves in advance is just about the deepest any video game goes in any genre; acting like it's somehow shallower in turn-based systems just because you don't have to press the buttons faster is idiotic.

Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 10/4/2015 9:14:22 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Draguss
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 12:01:28 AM

You'll be waiting a while then, cause I still don't see anyone on this particular comment thread even trying to imply that. I already gave you two examples of games that require strategy, one turn-based and one real-time. Never implied either was superior. And really Ben, trying to accuse someone of only playing a couple of games in the genre is a terrible argument.

I was bloody addicted to them, the type to beat all the superbosses and 100% everything. Eventually even went back and played the pre-ps1 classics. I just acknowledge their flaws as well as everything I love about them. You act like turn-based RPGs were some sort of marvel of gameplay perfection. Planning moves in advance is not the deepest we've gotten with strategy in video games, not when you can perfectly predict what's coming next turn.

Ben, I honestly respect you as a reviewer, and I like this site. But whenever this topic comes up you seem so damn bitter and act so confrontational it's bloody annoying.

Last edited by Draguss on 10/5/2015 12:05:12 AM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 7:35:32 AM

The "you only played two JRPGs in your life" argument reminds me of the time you used to accuse people on the forum of not being 'real' Playstation fans when they disagreed with you. It's a really odd variation of a No True Scotsman argument, like no REAL JRPG fan could disagree with you because a REAL JRPG fan would have played all the same JRPGs you did and come to the same exact conclusions.

Whether it's Final Fantasy, Xenosaga, Chrono Cross, Jade Cocoon, Persona, Phantasy Star, or Dragon Quest etc., I've never encountered bosses that required any in depth strategy. I think some fans of the genre ascribe a certain mythological depth to the games as a defense of obviously obsolete mechanics.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 11:05:02 AM

Bio, I simply cannot agree that a simpler difficulty indicates obsolete mechanics. With the exception of games like Dark Souls, games today are infinitely more straightforward and easier than the games of old. In fact most games employ a very easy hack n' slash mentality for most everything along the main story arch.

With turn based games from the past like FF, Dragon Quest (Dragon Warrior 7 was not easy nor was it simplistic), or Xenosaga, if you simply tread along the storyline, it stays fairly difficult. Power leveling of course made it easy. And maybe there's a way to combat that.

But look at the evolution of turn based. FFXII, for example, was not that easy. I would agree that the main storyline was relatively straight-forward, but basically ALL games are for the main story. It only gets more difficult for the side stuff. Gilgamesh in FFXII was a challenge, for example, made easy only because you used a guide (but if you're gonna use a guide, don't complain about it being easy. Honestly.). And other turn-based/ATE/real-time hybrids like FFXIV are also a challenge.

I think my point is starting to spread out because there's just way too much information to disagree with the sentiment that "easy" means "obsolete". It just isn't true. If you're paying attention to the industry, "turn-based" has evolved to a bit of a hybrid, but it still exists, and it still works.

Dragon Quest 8 could have been far more advanced than the traditional line-up. So could have FFX. Even by the PS2 era. But they were turn-based. And they were successful. And it's NOT because it was all the PS2 tech allowed them to do.

There's a reason for that.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 12:05:26 PM

I'm not saying JRPGs were turn based on PS2 because of technological limitations. By that time they were just formulaic, relying on minor updates to systems that were created back when there were legitimate technological limitations. One reason JRPGs started losing their commercial appeal, IMO, is that they didn't evolve enough. The PS2 absolutely could have handled more complex systems than FFX's CTB, especially since FXII did just that. The problem is that JRPGs found themselves in the same pickle that traditional point-and-click adventure games did, in that they allowed themselves to become defined by gameplay mechanics they no longer needed to use. They didn't adapt, so now they're dying out (though we're getting Syberia III pretty soon and I'm hyped for that).

And I don't think JRPGs are necessarily any easier than WRPGs or action adventure games. I just disagree with this notion that they required more strategy or intelligence, because they didn't. Whether you're talking about Zelda, Final Fantasy, or even Ninja Gaiden, most games come down to recognizing and exploiting patterns/weaknesses. Final Fantasy Boss X will use Reflect followed by casting Flare on himself, so you need to use Dispel on him after he casts Reflect but before Flare, so he damages himself. That's not strategy, that's pattern recognition and exploitation. Alma has extra vulnerability frames after certain attacks, so Dragon Ninja Ryu Hayabusa needs to evade until she makes those attacks and then take advantage of the gap to unleash his attack. That's not strategy, that's pattern recognition and exploitation.

Games that require actual strategy are typically real time and turn based strategy, where you have to think several steps ahead and it can't be entirely reactionary. If all you ever do is react to your opponents in Starcraft or Civilization V, you're going to lose. You have to anticipate, you have to have a gameplan going in that is independent of the opposition's actions. That's strategy. Final Fantasy Tactics requires strategy. Final Fantasy Roman Numeral Goes Here does not.

Doesn't make Civ or Starcraft BETTER games. I like JRPGs way more than I like RTS or TBS. I just don't buy into this "JRPGs are so strategic" stuff. You can like, even love, a genre without ascribing false qualities to it.

Last edited by Bio on 10/5/2015 12:07:37 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 4:51:43 AM
Reply

With titles like FFXV, KH, Persona 5, Tales of Zestiria, Tales of Berseria, Star Ocean 5 and Ikenie to Yuki no Setsuna coming.
There's still hope for the "former" fans.

Oh, and I'm still a JRPG fan.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 12:14:45 PM

I'm hoping Suikoden is sold off to someone that wants to use it as Konami dies.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

MrAnonymity
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 2:18:38 AM

My concern with the future of Suikoden lies with the disbanding of the Suikoden team BEFORE all of this crap with Konami. Alas, IF Konami sold the rights to Suikoden, it is possible that there could be a future for the series.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

TheOldOne
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 8:08:08 AM
Reply

I think the last JRPG that I played was Resonance of Fate. Before that I have played american numbered Final Fantasy I, III, VII, VIII (the pic you used), IX, X, Suikoden III, etc.

Nowadays it needs to meet my expectations on a high review on graphics and story. Why? There are too many and I could not afford to lose too many hours in more than one or two games (got family now).

Last edited by TheOldOne on 10/3/2015 8:08:22 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 12:13:35 PM

Persona 5 man.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 12:13:08 PM
Reply

lol I was playing FF VIII last night for some fun.

Yes of course you know I am one but I'd like to center on something that the anti-turn based crowd doesn't seem to get.

We want to manage and direct a battle with many many options at each stage of the conflict that can't be just mapped to action buttons.

That's about it. We want to manage an ongoing conflict, not stomp the bad guy. In fact sometimes you even want to keep certain bad guys alive for awhile. There are big decisions to make. Action/auto RPGs don't allow for this.

Battle systems were not put in place because it was hard to have real time battles in early gaming. If that were so there would be no Zelda.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 1:22:25 PM

"Battle systems were not put in place because it was hard to have real time battles in early gaming. If that were so there would be no Zelda."

Very true. It is also true that to some extent, I think developers would've given us real-time if they had the technological means back in the day. But the idea that turn-based is inherently inferior has always been wrong. It's merely a different style of gameplay and one that requires a brain as opposed to dexterity.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Draguss
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 2:22:59 PM

Tales series has always had real-time combat as far as I can remember, so it's certainly true that we didn't just have turn-based because that's all we could do.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 1:15:16 AM

Tales was after the 16 bit era.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 9:41:56 AM

"We want to manage and direct a battle with many many options at each stage of the conflict that can't be just mapped to action buttons.

That's about it. We want to manage an ongoing conflict, not stomp the bad guy. In fact sometimes you even want to keep certain bad guys alive for awhile. There are big decisions to make. Action/auto RPGs don't allow for this."

That's a fine argument, and I agree for the most part, but wanting to micromanage battles is a lot different from saying those systems require some extra level of intelligence or strategy.

As for why we had systems like this back in the 8-bit days, Zelda is a far cry from FF or Dragon Quest. In Zelda you had your main weapon and a sub weapon and that was it. RPGs wanted to offer more complexity to encounters, with magic, potions, summons, etc. and mix that with multiple party members. The only way to do that back then was with menu-heavy, turn based systems.

These days we don't need menu-heavy turn based systems to manage that, because we have much more powerful machines that can handle complex enemy and ally AI, and controllers with more than 2 action buttons on them. If anything, FFXII requires a more forward thinking approach (if you use gambits) than FFVIII does, because if you're not properly managing gambits going into battle you're going to wind up with AI allies working against you. In FFVII/VIII etc. you have all the time in the world to select each individual action, and can play in a very reactionary way; oh the boss just nailed my whole party with status elements, now I can take some time and dig through my menus and see if I have any remedies or if I need to cast Esuna or what.

Pointing this out doesn't make someone "anti-turn based", it's just acknowledging the limitations and realities of the systems. I love those old ATB games, and I still replay FFVIII and IX once every other year or so. I just don't pretend they're something they're not.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 11:07:21 AM

Bio, if that's true about your point of turn based being obsolete only because we couldn't have complexity with multiple party members, etc., why were turn-based games still so wildly successful in the PS2 era when it was quite clear you could have a multitude of abilities and party members in games like Kingdom Hearts?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 12:11:03 PM

Because it was during the PS2 era when it started becoming clear that there were better uses of the more powerful technology, and it takes time for developers to adapt. Because people hadn't yet, for the most part, gotten tired of it by that point. Because any genre can rest on its laurels for a few years and still do well. Because it wasn't until the latter part of that era that WRPGs on PC and Xbox started really showing what new and interesting things you could do within the same framework, without relying on turn based systems.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 4:16:14 PM

There are TONS of PC games (which is presumably far more advanced, according to the PC master race, than consoles) that have staunchly turn-based mechanics that are held in high regard.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 5:18:37 PM

Yeah, and I made that point in my other reply to you in that other comment thread. Those games are turn based strategy games like Civ, or real time strategy games like Starcraft, depending on how nitpicky we want to be with what a 'turn' is. Entirely different genres than RPGs, and pretty much the two where actual strategy is required.

And the reason why they're almost entirely exclusive to PC is because there isn't a controller out there complex enough to handle all the shit you need to do in a Civ or Starcraft match with any semblance of efficiency; they're simply too complex.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Tuesday, October 06, 2015 @ 2:04:38 PM

I've never been into Starcraft, so I don't know. But civ on PS3 worked fine.

Still, nice to just tap "r" for build a road.

But if games like Valkyria Chronicles, Resonance of Fate, Eternal Sonata, Ni No Kuni (I'd call it a hybrid), WKC (I liked it, anyways), FFXIV, Torment, Wasteland 2, Bards tale 4, the remakes of FFX, etc. weren't so damn fun, I might be inclined to agree with you.

But they are. And many feel fresh, as well.

And don't forget how well received some handheld titles like Bravely Default were received.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 10/6/2015 2:11:00 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Tuesday, October 06, 2015 @ 2:12:12 PM

And despite their cheesiness, the Atelier games have a lot going on, too. I admit. I also liked them.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Wednesday, October 07, 2015 @ 9:31:02 AM

And how successful were those games, compared to JRPGs at their height?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, October 03, 2015 @ 1:39:18 PM
Reply

Hey I just thought of something, Selfie Tilmitt was the first selfie.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 10:02:57 AM

Except her name was Selphie, not Selfie, and people have been taking selfies as long as cameras have existed, and before that people paid other people to paint selfies of them :P

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 11:08:43 AM

LOL
There's actually some pretty cool fan art out there of Selphie taking Selfies.

If Bio's gonna be a party pooper, I feel it necessary to point out that portraits =/= selfies.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 12:12:35 PM

People have been painting self portraits for years. Portrait of a Man in Red Chalk, by da Vinci, is a good example ;)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 4:16:54 PM

Paaaaaaarty POOPER!

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bio
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 5:19:29 PM

What can I say I like to poop at parties. If you invite me to a party at your house the first thing I am going to do when I arrive is ask where the toilet is so I can wreck it.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

stealth
Sunday, October 04, 2015 @ 7:59:47 AM
Reply

I find all of the post completely untrue, they are better than ever.

Factually, most jrpgs are still turn based. Pokemon, Fire Emblem, Persona 5, Xenoblade X, and on and on

Last edited by stealth on 10/4/2015 8:02:54 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

VictorDeLeon
Sunday, October 04, 2015 @ 1:19:29 PM
Reply

I never adapted to the "real time" battles in new JRPGs (honestly Demon's souls is just an action game with heavy RPG elements). The PS1/2 period with Suikoden, FF7/9, Shadow hearts, Legend of Dragoon, Breath of fire .... is sadly now just a memory but I feel proud I knew this.
Now you find RPG elements in Shooters, racers, platformers, and those "western RPGs" like Skyrim or Witcher, they're not RPGs they're action games with RPG elements.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

GamerO1
Sunday, October 04, 2015 @ 7:37:00 PM
Reply

Fortunately JRPG's still exist, but unfortunately they are mainly on Hand Helds. But still Great Games to play. It so sad that FF7 may be remade, but as an "Action RPG", not like the Original. BTW I own several hundred games, 35+ consoles (all working), and I still go back to my old RPG's. Playing Fire Emblem GBA version on my Gamecube, and Fire Emblem: Shin Monshō no Nazo (English Patched) on my 3DS right now. Why Square destroyed Enix is anyone's guess. Last time I went to E3 and talked to the Square Developers I complained about Turn Based, and they got "very" upset, and ranted "All our games are Turn Based, you just have to Pause them!!!" Yeah Right !!! hahaha

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Looking Glass
Sunday, October 04, 2015 @ 8:23:02 PM

Mainly on handhelds? I'm not so sure about that. Maybe there are more JRPGs on handhelds (I don't know) but there still seems to be a pretty decent amount of console JRPGs either coming to, or already available on, the PS4.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Looking Glass
Sunday, October 04, 2015 @ 8:24:20 PM
Reply

I'm definitely still a fan.

And although JRPGs are nowhere near as popular as they once were I'm glad that the genre continues to survive in spite of it all.

And that doesn't seem likely to end.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

duomaxwell007
Sunday, October 04, 2015 @ 10:40:27 PM
Reply

Im STILL a JRPGs fan.... sure they release crap 90% of the time now.. that doesnt stop me from being a fan that just mean I skip those and play the 10% that arent crap

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

MrAnonymity
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 2:37:33 AM
Reply

I am still very much a JRPG fan. Like several others I acknowledge there have been some pretty stupid offerings in the genre as of late, but there continue to be games that are at least 'fun.' I just hope to see some of these JRPG devs take better advantage of the PS4. Omega Quintet is okay, but it looks like it'd be at home on either the Vita or PS3. However... Star Ocean 5 is coming...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

smileys_007
Monday, October 05, 2015 @ 5:47:44 PM
Reply

i still play jrpg games. in fact, i usually grab a jrpg game once or twice a year, mostly the tales games. it's good to play jrpgs once in a while, i hope they don't get phased out.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Banky A
Tuesday, October 06, 2015 @ 2:53:01 AM
Reply

I consider myself lucky and blessed to find huge enjoyment in colourful anime shit like Tales of etc.

JRPG fan forever.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

How often do you visit the site?
Once a day
Several times a day
Every few days
Once a week
This is my first visit
I've never been here, even now I am not here

Previous Poll Results