: Editorial: The Lure Of Multiplayer

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Editorial: The Lure Of Multiplayer

Anybody remember the days when "multiplayer" involved two players - each with one joystick - trying to play virtual goalie with a little white dot in Pong? Or when Luigi was "Player 2" in the original Super Mario Bros.? Well, here we sit, about a quarter-century later, and the term "multiplayer" can now imply any number of things. Come fall, this could mean you're one of 60 people in the same game at the same time, and each one of those 60 could occupy any corner of the world available to semi-civilized society. Quite obviously, things have changed.

But for me, it goes well beyond the technology. Back then, gaming was mostly a lone hobby for one individual, and we all knew it. The reason why gamers carry the "geek" stigma is because so many of us were geeks, and geeks weren't commonly invited to any parties on the weekend. They had to find a way to entertain themselves with no help from others, which is often where gaming came into play (pun intended). We could hide in our rooms and conquer the latest level of whatever 2D side-scrolling piece of action we had, and boy, we could have a hell of time. Sure, a few gamers would get together sometimes and play two-player Contra or something, but that's a far cry from Guitar Hero parties they have today. These days, some of those hot chicks that would never dare associate with the "geeks" are now showing up at such parties and having the time of their lives. Playing video games. At this point, multiplayer - both online and offline - has become so advanced, it has literally taken over the industry.

And I understand the attraction. No matter how much technology we have, artificial intelligence will never be as challenging or as unpredictable as a human. Plus, being able to communicate with our opponents is another huge draw, and for the most part, I have no trouble understanding why so many people flock to multiplayer. However, I'm just wondering if anybody else my age misses those single-player games that have no multiplayer option; the ones that are perfect for horrible rain days. You know, just sit back with Final Fantasy Tactics or something and spend a few hours of "me time" with your favorite game and console. Hell, that's what this hobby used to be all about: "me time." Don't get me wrong; I think it's great that multiplayer is so popular, because it helps to erase a lot of the stereotypes that go along with gamers, and I like going online every now and then myself. I have to limit that experience to playing with people I know, though, just because the immaturity level of many gamers is...staggering.

It's just that everything has changed so drastically. Today, when someone goes to pick up a game at the store, they might not play when they get home. They might wait to get a few friends over (depending on the title, of course). They might go online first without ever touching the single-player campaign. They might even return the game if they find they don't like the multiplayer. This is a whole new phenomenon. And again, it's not that I don't like it, but I'm not the biggest fans of those who only play online and that's it. These be the "twitch gamers;" those who aren't capable of following a storyline because they can't sit still long enough for a 2-minute cut-scene, and really don't have the patience for many of the gameplay trials that are required for a single-player excursion. Obviously, not all online-only players are like this, but in my experience, those that live online are exactly like this. I'm a big fan of remaining diverse in all life pursuits, and I really don't think we should be abandoning single-player entirely.

Furthermore, there is some concern circulating through the gaming community that due to this huge multiplayer craze, developers may be sacrificing effort when it comes to single-player campaigns and playthroughs. This, I would hate to see. I might stop gaming altogether if that started to happen. But contrary to what some may say, I don't see this happening just yet. Yeah, Grand Theft Auto IV has multiplayer for the first time in the franchise's history, but that doesn't mean the single-player adventure sucks. It's fantastic. And the other big release, Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, is all about the single-player experience. I think Konami did something ingenious by making an entirely separate game - Metal Gear Online - for those who want the multiplayer MGS fun. And later this year, I'm sure the multiplayer for Resistance 2 and Gears of War 2 will be amazing, but I also have no doubt that the single-player campaigns will be awesome. And down the road, Final Fantasy XIII, God of War III, Gran Turismo 5 and more will prove to be excellent for single-player (even though I know GT5 will have multiplayer).

So while I know multiplayer has gotten huge, I haven't seen any evidence of this negatively impacting our single-player experiences. I do worry a little, though. Multiplayer still isn't really my thing, but I have thoroughly enjoyed myself when playing online this generation with the likes of Warhawk and Resistance: Fall of Man. All that being said, I will always take a day or two to play through some of my favorite games, and none of that will involve anyone but myself. So sue me; I'm old-fashioned. I still think it's the backbone of this hobby.

6/6/2008 Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

New Comment System

Legacy Comment System (7 posts)

Friday, June 06, 2008 @ 10:24:55 PM

Good article Ben.
I agree completely. Some multiplayer is appealing, but I prefer single player the most. My favorite games ever are Resident Evil 4 and Uncharted:Drakes Fortune - only reinforcing my love of single player.
I love playing MLB:08 The Show, and while I occasionally play against a friend, I usually play against the compluter.
Multiplayer is a nice bonus in games, but I look at how good the single player aspect is first.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Saturday, June 07, 2008 @ 2:03:30 AM

I prefer single player myself as well. Too bad the next SOCOM is multi player only.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Saturday, June 07, 2008 @ 2:03:54 AM

Same here Ben.

I'm not much of an online gamer, I prefer to be in the same living room with my buddies when it comes to multiplayer. I feel like I'm wasting time playing games, if I don't have a story, or a goal to reach while I'm playing. I always try to get something out of the games I play, and I just feel like I don't get anything from playing multiplayer online. Call me weird.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Saturday, June 07, 2008 @ 8:45:14 AM

I'm in the same boat, Ben. I've learned to enjoy some multiplayer games (Warhawk's one of the few FPS-type games I enjoy and I /really/ like it), but with the exception of fighting games, I've always been about the single player experience. It's not that I'm anti-social: I enjoy hanging out with people. But I love stories and multiplayer doesn't have that.

It comes down to enjoying competition or story more, as far as I can tell.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, June 07, 2008 @ 11:00:30 AM

Good to see I'm not the only one. :)

Yeah, I like playing online every once in a while, too, but you can never have a story that way. And after many years of gaming, many of my most memorable moments have come from a great storyline. And if it's not the story, just sitting down to play an RPG has a singular appeal to it; an appeal that multiplayer gaming, no matter how advanced it gets, will ever match. That's just my opinion.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Monday, June 09, 2008 @ 1:18:25 AM

Your article hits the nail squarely on the head Ben.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Monday, June 09, 2008 @ 10:45:43 AM

I am completely with you. Multi player has come a long way and is entertaining for a while but nothing compares to losing a whole day to a great single player story.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

How often do you visit the site?
Once a day
Several times a day
Every few days
Once a week
This is my first visit
I've never been here, even now I am not here

Previous Poll Results