Editorial: E3 2008 Impressions
Another E3 has come and gone, and while I wasn't there (I handled coverage from afar while Arnold attended), I saw Sony's press conference and in updating our videos, I've seen many of the games that were on display. Hence, I've formed some impressions. Oh, stop rolling your eyes; they're legitimate, even though I was 3000 miles away!
First of all, I must say I was more than a little impressed with what we saw of Resistance 2 during the press conference. That first video they showed - Massive Monster Gameplay - was just plain awesome, and from what I could tell, it definitely "wowed" the crowd. It was a great way to kick off the conference, primarily for two reasons: 1. it was an excellent gameplay video; not just FMV or CGI, and 2. it reminded us all that the PlayStation 3, despite losing Final Fantasy XIII, still has a lot of great exclusives on the way. Too many people were glossing over R2 going into this year's E3, in my humble opinion, but from what I've seen so far, I couldn't possibly have higher expectations for it. I think it will be more than a match for Gears of War 2, and that's saying something, considering how good I thought the original GeoW was. Furthermore, Killzone 2, still set for February, is just another great reason to own a PS3.
Secondly, I must say, as trivial as it may seem to some, that using LittleBigPlanet's Sackboy to help with the usually boring business and statistics information was very clever. You can hear people laughing in the audience when you watch the video, and it really added a nice amount of understated flair to the presentation. Thirdly, even though I'm most certainly not a fan of MMOs, I have to admit that M.A.G looked absolutely incredible. 256 players at once on a massive real-time battlefield is a concept that even appeals to me; someone who is staunchly set against the idea of the MMO. Something like DC Universe doesn't really interest me, but M.A.G...just, wow. As for one downside I have to harp on, I was really hoping to see more of God of War III, which supposedly has a tentative release date of early March (according to GameStop). The teaser trailer was cool and everything but it didn't quite cut the mustard.
I am not, however, hinting that GoWIII will be surprisingly mediocre; I'm fully convinced it'll be completely kick-ass from top to bottom, and if it's not a Game of the Year candidate in 2009, I'll be very surprised. I'm just saying a wanted a little something more at E3. Returning to exclusives for a moment - just because it's all anyone can talk about these days, after the FFXIII revelation - I can list out a great many more promising PS3 exclusives than I can 360 exclusives. While the 360 does have Too Human, Fable 2, Gears of War (which I still say will come to the PS3 at some point) and another Halo if Bungie does it, that's not good enough. I really don't think that can compete with what we already have in MGS4, Warhawk, Heavenly Sword and Ratchet and Clank Future: Tools of Destruction, and what's to come with Resistance 2, Killzone 2, LittleBigPlanet, M.A.G, Gran Turismo 5, God of War III, SOCOM: Confrontation, InFamous, Heavy Rain, etc. I'm trying to be as reasonable and objective about this as possible, but I can't come to any other conclusion.
Furthermore, if I had to examine the console war now, I do believe the PS3 - for the first time since the launch - is in the best position of the three. Blu-Ray has won, the Network is still free (and gaining on Live with almost every passing firmware update), the reliability is far and away superior, the games are here (with many still to come), the Store is shaping up quite nicely, PlayStation Home could be both innovative and revolutionary, and the PS3/PSP connectivity is always a nifty bonus. If one takes all this into account, and further believes Sony that the PS3 is a "10-year-vision" (and I do), then one must conclude that their flagship console is in a very good position only 20 months after its release. I hope everyone remembers the doom and gloom of the first few months, because the contrast between then and now is so extraordinary, it's difficult to put into words. In th end, I think I saw a lot from Sony at this year's E3 that I had either forgotten about or had never seen before, and when I put it all together, I come up with the aforementioned thoughts.
That's what I've got to say, but if you want more E3, make sure to check out all Arnold's Impressions for each game he got his hands on, the screenshots he will soon have for you, and the special E3 news and videos I've provided to bring you into close contact with this past week's goings-on at the L.A. Convention Center. We did what we could to deliver the best coverage possible; hope you all felt covered. :)
7/18/2008 Ben Dutka
Email this to a friend!
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Comments (Beta)
aaronisbla
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 12:04:24 AM
Reply
Fabi
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 2:58:35 AM
Reply
@Ben - Do you think Sony won E3? According to everyone on G4, MS won.
I think the 360 had the better conference. But Sony showed more games. But more than a few sites think that MS took it.
I thought the Sony conference started off with a bang, and at that point I could have sworn it was going to be better than last years, but while it had some decent moments, none of it really "wowed" me.
Qubex
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 8:57:37 AM
Q!
"aLL RoAdS LeAd ToO HoMe"
bugzbunny109
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 10:18:26 AM
Qubex
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 8:53:43 AM
Reply
Saying this, the "next gen" idea is coming through now... we see glimpses of it... but I have to still say this... I think the PS3 and xBox360 are a teaser for true "next gen"... with defacto HDEF graphics for all games and a stocking 60FPS without hardware issues and with enough memory to make granny want some... so here it is for PS4 then, in the meantime PS3 is still an entertaining stop gap until then... damn... I have 5 years to wait at minimum :)
My thoughts on the gamevids I saw: 10 = phenomenal
1] LittleBigPlanet | 8.5
2] Killzone2 | 9
3] Dead Space | 8.5
4] The Forced Unleashed |8.75
5] MotorStorm 2 | 8
6] Flower | 8
7] CODV World at War | 8.25
8] FallOut 3 | 8
9} FarCry | 8.75
10] Resident Evil 5 | 9
11] Resistance 2 | 9
12] Quest For Booty | 8.25
...a couple of my scores... after seeing the vids what I would expect anyways... who agrees?
Q!
"aLL RoAdS LeAd Too HoMe"
Last edited by Qubex on 7/19/2008 8:55:27 AM
The_Chimeran
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 1:38:09 PM
pavlovic
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 9:32:37 AM
Reply
If I had to choose in this moment only one console, I would choose the PS3, the lineup for the following months is quite impressive, and the 360's has Gears of War and...well it has Gears of War.
@Fabi: Some say MS won the E3 for the FFXIII anouncement, but from a gamer point of view, I think that Sony show the best games and lineup for 2008 - early 2009. I'll stick with Sony.
Last edited by pavlovic on 7/19/2008 9:35:52 AM
Nightshade386
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 9:41:37 AM
Reply
God of War 3 will probably be amazing, but if it's anything like the first 2 it'll be a grand total of 8 hours of gameplay. Infamous looked good, but after last years Sony E3 lineup failed to deliever on it's full promise (Heavenly Sword being a grand total of 6 hours, Lair being a critical flop), you'll forgive me if I remain skeptical.
Last edited by Nightshade386 on 7/19/2008 9:45:13 AM
Qubex
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 11:46:32 AM
Q!
"aLL RoAdS LeAd ToO HoMe"
daylight_dies
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 9:51:05 AM
Reply
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 10:27:06 AM
Reply
MS is always all about "look at us now" because of their current lead (entirely generated by that one-year head start). But Sony is all about "look at what we'll be," and that viewpoint has been proven over the past couple of years. Sony has narrowed the gap significantly - not just in terms of sales, but in terms of general console quality, appeal, and functionality - and the PS3 always had more potential. And I really don't think there was anything MS could say to combat that.
I may be biased, but only because I despise how MS does business and how they treat their customers. However, even so, in looking at E3 objectively, I won't say who "won," but I WILL say I think Sony is in the best position (currently) of the three. They haven't always been in the best position and I'm not saying they'll always BE in the best position, but for now...
Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 7/19/2008 10:27:38 AM
Nightshade386
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 12:35:36 PM
Say all you want about the 1 year head start, but if 90% of all games are multiplatform, and Sony's a year behind with a more expensive system, then they'd better bring a large catalog of absolutely killer exclusives to the party. Because they're currently not creating a whole lot of incentive for gamers like me to switch over.
Last edited by Nightshade386 on 7/19/2008 12:40:37 PM
The_Chimeran
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 1:45:01 PM
Last edited by The_Chimeran on 7/19/2008 1:49:53 PM
The_Chimeran
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 1:51:25 PM
pavlovic
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 12:43:41 PM
Reply
I'm not telling to switch, keep the 360 after all is a pretty good machine
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 2:21:56 PM
Reply
As true gamers, I think it's always our goal to provide ourselves with the capability of playing all the best games we can get our hands on. And in all honesty, I don't see how you can do that with owning EITHER the PS3 or 360. You need both. Plain and simple.
Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 7/19/2008 2:22:24 PM
Nightshade386
Sunday, July 20, 2008 @ 12:15:04 AM
Nightshade386
Sunday, July 20, 2008 @ 12:05:21 AM
Reply
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Sunday, July 20, 2008 @ 12:32:33 AM
Reply
I own a PS3 and a 360 and while I certainly play the PS3 more, I'm not about to say I don't want my 360. I know what games are coming for it, and that's why I have it. But above, you were simply dismissing the PS3 based entirely on FFXIII (as far as I can tell), and that is not - no matter how you spin in - something that appears "informed." That's all we're trying to say.
Nightshade386
Sunday, July 20, 2008 @ 11:41:56 AM
I own a PS, PS2 and PSP, so it's not like I have something against Sony. I subscribe to this site's newsletter because I keep hoping to see some games for the PS3 that could change my mind. I just haven't seen enough of them yet. So I'm not shelling out more money for a more expensive console with an inferior game lineup, no matter who's logo is on the system.
The point I'm trying to make here is that there are a lot of gamers like myself who aren't beholden to one particular brand who already bought their 360 at launch. And for a lot of us, Sony's not bringing enough to the table to justify buying their system. Not everyone who bought a PS2 is a Sony fanboy who will run off and buy their new system because it's "Sony." Not everyone who bought an XBOX will buy a 360 just because it says "microsoft" on the box. All that matters is the quality of the games.
Last edited by Nightshade386 on 7/20/2008 11:46:36 AM

View Large Image

Jed
Reply
Friday, July 18, 2008 @ 10:45:08 PM