Hey Square-Enix, Did PlayStation Fans Betray You?
You know, I've been thinking. Somehow, this whole thing must be our fault. There's no other logical explanation. So my question is, what exactly did we do?
Reminisce with me for a bit, here. Back between the years of 1996 and 2000, RPG fans adored their PlayStations. They adored them for obvious reasons, but we knew one basic rule, and it's a rule that most any role-playing aficionado would agree with: if it says "Squaresoft" on the box, pick it up, and bring it over to the counter. It's a guaranteed winner, even if it doesn't say "Final Fantasy" anywhere on it. Chrono Cross, Xenogears and Vagrant Story were three of the best RPGs ever, and while they didn't get unbelievable review scores, most still loved the likes of Legend of Mana, Parasite Eve, Brave Fencer Musashi, Threads of Fate, and yeah, even Einhander. There were a few slips (some silly Chocobo Dungeon game and Ehrgeiz, for example), but for the most part, that rule was cut and dry. Then we moved on to the PS2, and Squaresoft became Square-Enix. Many will say everything went downhill from there, and while I agree S-E has never managed to repeat the heyday of Squaresoft, I don't agree that "everything" went downhill.
Let's just say that if you can make Final Fantasy XII, you've got my vote. Now, we're in a new generation and PlayStation owners take a look around, saying, "...hey, where'd Square go?" Well, to be perfectly honest, I have no effing idea. I understand their desire to appeal more to Western gamers, and I also understand Microsoft's desire to snag some Square-Enix property. This is why I also understand most next-generation S-E titles are headed to the Xbox 360, and for the record, I have no problem with that. But I do have a problem with the fact that PS3 owners are continually left out in the cold. Infinite Undiscovery, although not great, was a 360 exclusive. Star Ocean 4 is a 360 exclusive. The Last Remnant is coming to the PS3, but it will debut first on the 360. As for Final Fantasy XIII, I still like the fact the PS3 was the lead development platform, but if I firmly grasp the situation...shouldn't the PS3 version launch well ahead of the 360 version? Square-Enix has already said they won't even start on the 360 version until FFXIII is on Blu-Ray and ready to go.
Soooo...why are we waiting? Just because the U.S. is the only place getting the 360 version, and Square-Enix doesn't want to piss off the 360 owners? Whatever. And yeah, I know Final Fantasy Versus XIII is still a PS3 exclusive, but I'm not about to put a huge amount of faith into a game I know very little about. And today, another kicker- it seems Square-Enix and Microsoft's booth at the Tokyo Game Show are right next to each other, and they're all sorts of buddy-buddy, according to attendees. Okay, fine. Put stuff on the 360. Good. Have fun. More potential greatness for 360 owners, and I have a 360, anyway. But why, why are you ignoring the PS3? Correct me if I'm wrong, but haven't PlayStation owners treated you very well in the past 12 years or so? Square-Enix, I'm honestly not understanding this blatant snubbing of the PS crowd. I suppose I can take solace in the handheld stuff (Crisis Core: Final Fantasy VII, Dissidia: Final Fantasy and the Star Ocean remakes), but really, that's not good enough. I don't expect S-E to reclaim Squaresoft's former glory, but I do expect a little respect.
Perhaps it's just a business thing. The PS3 is still in third - although rising quickly - and maybe S-E wants to maximize profit potential. This is the argument the 360 owners make. Okay...to maximize profit potential, you release on multiple consoles. That's kinda logical. You know, unless someone gives you a large chunk of change to screw over loyal fans. I really don't see any reason why something like Star Ocean 4 can't come to the PS3; I really, really don't. So we PlayStation owners, as a unit, must've done something to piss off Square-Enix. Did one of you trip a S-E employee on his way to work? Did a bunch of you send nasty e-mails after FFX-2? Well now, see what you did? This isn't logical, either, so I'm just going to have to conclude that Square-Enix is voluntarily abandoning PS3 owners this generation when faced with a large check signed by Microsoft. And that, no matter how you slice it, is irritating.
10/8/2008 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (91 posts)
AceTatsujin
Wednesday, October 08, 2008 @ 11:26:47 PM
Reply
SHADOW [Moderator]
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 12:29:19 AM
ThePoetRazel
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 9:11:23 AM
LegioN
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 9:46:55 AM
Orvisman
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 10:07:02 AM
Without a doubt M$ft is writing checks. And that is the problem. That is why people hate M$ft. Now I have an Xbox and 360, so no hating going on here. But I do not want to see M$ft become a dominant player in the videogame industry. A perpetual third or second place would be nice. M$ft tries to buy thier and steal thier way into every industry -- the Zune, Xbox, Replay TV (thier TiVo knock off that thankfully failed) -- and who really wants them to succeed. Do we really want M$ft to do to videogames or MP3 players what they did to the PC industry.
We all know how M$ft throws thier weight around in the PC market, pretty much just ripping off every great idea and repackaging it with the M$ft logo and forcing stores to include thier versions (sometimes inferior, sometimes not) on PCs and not thier competitors (RealPlayer and IE come to mind).
Ed_Wayne
Wednesday, October 08, 2008 @ 11:58:59 PM
Reply
You know what's awesome? PS1 and PS2. We will never again see something so wonderful as those two systems and the support they had. Period. Abandon hope now.
1995-2005. Then the 360 came out. The successor to a system that sold 100 million LESS than the PS2. And now, for some reason it is taking away everything. Like I said, abandon hope.
AceTatsujin
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 12:22:04 AM
Reply
Advent Child
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 12:38:17 AM
Reply
www
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 8:08:33 AM
Because they provide u with quality Jrpg u want n the've proved that over the years most with billion hours of gameplay so they kinda monopolised the Jrpg bidness even though we have other competitors,FF's graphics n story line is un-matched just like MGS(splinter cell is always a substitute but the first-team playa will always be the best).So it's really difficult to say F u to S-E.
But on the other hand some us might be true loyal psfans,but do u pause to see that most ps2 owners dat contributed to that 150 million sales record were those who went the xbox 360 way.....That leaves S-E no choice than to give them some attention.
To dat question "Did Playstation fans betray you?" YES! not me,not Psxextreme members but most others not on this site ranting elsewhere on gamespot n other sites dat 360 is superior.......back-stabbers!
SHADOW [Moderator]
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 12:44:20 AM
Reply
Because of my general disinterest in the genre I could care less about most of these. I cannot however ignore the fact that square will FINISH the damn game (Final Fantatsy XIII) on PS3. Port it (and presumably localize it simultaneously). And THEN release mulit-plat. That all by itself is the most psychotic release strategy I have ever heard. I also know many a JRPG fan who bought a PS3 expecting companies (especially square) to continue their strategy of catering to the Sony fanbase. I, like Ben, have no problem but with SE also catering to (or even focusing on) the 360 owners (they do have a lot of users after all) but when this comes at the nearly complete disregard for your most loyal of fans then I have to question your plans.
I think that the only way that PS3 owners can forgive SE for this is if the executives stand outside and let everyone with a PS3-proof of purchase kick them in the nuts.
The only solace I feel is that Versus XIII should (in theory) be unfased by this shifting of ideals at Square. The tone of that one has appealed to me much more then XIII has.
Fatcat3788
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:23:41 AM
AceTatsujin
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:00:09 AM
LegendaryWolfeh
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 12:56:16 AM
Reply
Branko2166
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:00:56 AM
Reply
ps92117
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:05:06 AM
Reply
PhaQ
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:11:25 AM
Reply
PhaQ
Gabriel013
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:20:58 AM
Reply
LegendaryWolfeh
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:30:35 AM
Reply
Murdi
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:35:11 AM
Reply
Now.. You know, maybe Square-Enix think that they made Sony's consoles be what they are, while Sony take the role of "so.. S-E, which game you are going to gave us now? 'cause you need us to succeed" and I say this because Sony just do ANYTHING about this situation, like if they were saying "pff.. we don't need them" and, on the other hand, we have the treatment of Microsoft to S-E; I mean, they (M$) treat S-E like a queen, like if S-E were the most amazing game company in history. M$ gave them full suitcases of money, and all.. And S-E obviously like that treatment.
I think that the problem here is that both companys (Sony and S-E) think that they are the best of the best, and neither side want to get off of his cloud and accept that they now have more competition and are not the kings that they were. But hey, that's just my opinion =).
P.S. Greetings to pavlovic (yeah, the one of LevelUp) ;)
Murder Inc. =O
Last edited by Murdi on 10/9/2008 1:43:48 AM
pavlovic
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 10:30:52 AM
Deleted User
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:41:25 AM
Reply
Jed
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:56:43 AM
Reply
Geobaldi
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 2:00:57 AM
Reply
MetalHead09
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 2:27:43 AM
Geobaldi
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 4:40:53 AM
Geobaldi
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 2:05:32 AM
Reply
Murdi
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 2:28:47 AM
Geobaldi
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 4:23:14 AM
DIsmael85
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 3:18:30 AM
Reply
wldcrd26
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 3:43:34 AM
Reply
MetalHead09
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 5:05:01 AM
Reply
orangpelupa
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 5:23:31 AM
Reply
but holding the PS3 release is ridiculus.
all multiplatform games always released on the platform it finish first.
Call of duty 4 released on PC first then ps3 and x360.
Mass Effect released on xbox 360 first then PC.
oblivion relesed on pc first then ps3 and x360.
but why FF13 ps3 need to wait FF13 x360 to be released?
this decission really really annoy all ps3 owners.
Starkiller
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 5:38:50 AM
Reply
www
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 7:07:38 AM
Reply
"Okay...to maximize profit potential, you release on multiple consoles. That's kinda logical. You know, unless someone gives you a large chunk of change to screw over loyal fans. I really don't see any reason why something like Star Ocean 4 can't come to the PS3; I really, really don't.".................Yeah,i also don't see why,am sure MS paid dat large chunk of change,i don't blame them they businessmen simply at work and proving they efficiency.
Last edited by www on 10/9/2008 7:09:25 AM
aqwabawks
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 8:39:21 AM
Reply
What I don't get is that SCEA bought about 9-10% of Square-Enix shares (3rd or 4th largest shareholder) when The Spirits Within nearly ruined them yet they release software for a competitor. It's just a little disappointing... I don't really want to shell out $300 for a console that has 2, maybe 3 games I want (Star Ocean 4, Tales of Vesperia).
www
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 9:11:49 AM
aqwabawks
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 9:30:36 AM
aqwabawks
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 9:39:31 AM
www
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 9:50:53 AM
Last edited by www on 10/9/2008 10:10:26 AM
aqwabawks
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 10:07:11 AM
BlinkBoy
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 9:08:21 AM
Reply
So they have to go out and buy from other big independent development teams and beg for content for their machinery. If they didn't use their strength, which in this case is money.
In this financial crisis it is very easy to get tempted with when money is brought to the table or under the table, "cash is king" and all that...
But I don't care where S-E gets money from just that FFXIII and future titles will deliver the goods. For me it as a gamer, I don't want to be left out on the good titles just because I choose the other console. I am not and never was interested in Xbox 360, I am happy to hear that they get to play FFXIII because that title deserve the biggest userbase you can get.
LegioN
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 9:50:01 AM
It is probably easier to buy exclusives or "timed" exclusives than it is to create something off thier own back or find the talent to do it. For Microsoft anyways.
It will certainly be interesting to see how this game performs under the Xbox Fanbase compared to the Sony one. Who knows, maybe it was the right decision? Although i highly highly doubt it.. Time will be the teller of this story..
Last edited by LegioN on 10/9/2008 9:51:28 AM
Ultimadesires
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 10:10:20 AM
Reply
SHADOW [Moderator]
Saturday, October 11, 2008 @ 8:16:52 PM
Fabi
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 10:23:58 AM
Reply
I can accept everything, but like everyone else said, why make loyal FF fans all over the world wait longer to play FF13 just because it hasn't been finished on the X-Box? It doesn't make sense.
Squenix should just admit they have a contract with MS, and that was part of the deal.
m2tbo
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 10:33:31 AM
Reply
What happened Square-Enix, you've changed man. You've gotten too big and are taking advantage of the gamers that loved you.
DIsmael85
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 11:17:45 AM
Joe_III
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 11:17:17 AM
Reply
Every big innovation has come from M$ or Nintendo.
Sony's one good bet was the Blu-Ray player, but aside from that, nothing else is really going for them, and hasn't since the start.
Bluetooth controllers? fail. You can't add the PS3 to your universal remote.
Sixaxis over rumblepacks? fail. sixaxis was teh ghey.
PSN Store? fail. A poorly designed XBL knockoff.
Trophies? fail. Sad implementation of Achievements.
Cell processor? fail. really hard to code for. M$ is using a dumbed down version of DX10.
Allowing mandatory software installs? epic fail there. M$ is only starting to allow optional installs and that's only because the market asked for it.
The most damning thing tho is the number of titles, and that's even before we got into 08.
Microsoft got out a year earlier, and have been able to keep the lead because of 2 key factors: install base and achievements.
Achievements was a BIG factor in cross platform games.
What Sony needed to do early on was to lock up some big titles, get them out quick, and quit effing around with their console. They've gone thru more SKUs for the PS3 alone than they have the PS2 by now.
But the main thing -- and i haven't seen ANY change on this yet -- is that Sony's corporate logo is "F what you want, we're Sony."
M$ has been all about the gamer. It's cost them a bit -- especially with the whole RROD incidents -- but the core is still with them.
this is why I've gone through 3 360's and 60 games one one side, and still have my ps3 but only like 4 games for it.
DIsmael85
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 11:27:51 AM
PSN is free, and for free, it's way better than Xbox live. Some of you may disagree, but you cannot argue with something that is "FREE".
I never cared for the Trophies system, it's a nice added addition, some people wanted it. It's there, so I use it.
Your MS dumbed down thing is correct. Which is why games will never look any better than what the Xbox can do. Gears 2 is ugly, and shiny as a new penny. It's nasty to look at. Quit with the bloom effect it sucks to look at.
I will agree with the mandatory installs, that does suck, but man for games like Oblivion and such, I was able to enjoy those faster loading times and appreciate the games so much more on the PS3.
The Sixaxis was a good concept, I still don't care for it as much, but hey it's good they brought rumble back, it's got the nostalgia feel from the good ol' days.
Bluetooth controls is wonderful. I never have to run out to buy extra batteries or those crappy waste of money charger stations. I save a lot more money that way. To be honest, those are just useless gadgets made to help Retail stores maximize profit, they are selling tools. Just thought I should shed some light on you there.
I currently own over 30 PS3 games, and I enjoy them all. Most Multiplats, but some exclusive. I dont understand this over used statement of the PS3 having no games. Just because it doesnt have Gears 2, and Overrated Halo 3 on it, does not mean it doesnt have games. The only 2 games not coming out that are huge on the 360 are Gears 2 and Fable 2. PS3 has the games in the bag this year, with way more "EXCLUSIVES" not timed or anything.
You may have gone through 3 Xbox's, but I have gone through no PS3's and I have a 60GB, and have been enjoying it ever since.
pavlovic
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 11:38:46 AM
"M$ is only starting to allow optional installs and that's only because the market asked for it."
Really? I always tought that it was because not all the 360 versions had a HDD
"Cell processor? fail. really hard to code for." Konami, Naughty Dog and Insomniac wouldn't agree with this.
"PSN Store? fail. A poorly designed XBL knockoff." The redesigned PSN Store is actually easier than the marketplace.
"this is why I've gone through 3 360's and 60 games one one side, and still have my ps3 but only like 4 games for it." Wow, you are proud because you have gone trough 3 xbox's. I wonder what was the reason and some red lights come to my mind.
Don't get me wrong, I love my 360, but the DVD capabilities are holding down a lot of games... GTAIV anyone?
Orvisman
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 11:48:31 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 12:48:42 PM
First of all, I haven't seen a single "big innovation" from Microsoft this generation. One can argue the Wii as an innovation, but that gimmick WILL lag if the software isn't there...and it's not. As for innovation, MGS4 is the closest I've seen this generation, and that's a PS3 exclusive. Did you even play it?
You're living in 2006, and that's a bad idea. The PlayStation Store has LONG since improved and as far as I'm concerned, is most certainly on par with the Live Marketplace at this point. No industry analyst will call the Network, Trophies, Blu-Ray controllers, or the Cell processor a "fail." That's just inane.
Furthermore, for number of titles, the PS3 and 360 have an almost identical number of titles scheduled for 2008...like I said, stop living in 2006. And you may not have noticed, but besides Gears 2, the 360 has NOTHING that can compete with the PS3's exclusives this year in MGS4, LBP, and Resistance 2. That's a fairly big deal.
Lastly, here's how MS is "all about the gamer:" produce a sh**-ass piece of hardware that fails 25-30% of the time - an absolute catastrophe in any product in any industry - pretend it doesn't mean anything, force consumers to buy about a hundred 360s every year to make up for Microsoft's FAILING, and then refuse to offer any hot exclusives. The PS3? A 1% sold:defective return ratio since the launch. MS "all about the gamer" by incessantly charging for online access, as opposed to the FREE Network which has proven to be MORE reliable than Live (well-documented Live failures in the past year)?
Between MGS4, LBP, Resistance 2, and already-established great exclusives in Uncharted, Ratchet and Clank, Warhawk, Heavenly Sword, etc, and future titles like God of War 3, Killzone 2, Heavy Rain, Gran Turismo 5, the Uncharted sequel, and more...I'm sorry, what am I missing on the 360 that's going to compete within the next 6-12 months? Fable II? Pretty sure Too Human flopped like mad.
And by the way, having the ONLY console that can play high-definition movies AND high-definition games is kinda crucial. Standard DVDs aren't capable of true HD (I don't care about lame upscaling), and HD-DVD is dead. If you think that's not an issue for both filmmakers and developers, you're out of your mind. Lastly, given the fact the 360 has been outsold by the PS3 for many months already in 2008 - something the 360 fanboys said would never happen - and given the holiday momentum of the PS3, all agreed upon by analysts, I FAIL to see how the PS3 is a FAIL.
Get me?
Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 10/9/2008 12:51:15 PM
www
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:17:49 PM
I sometimes think these comments comin from the not-regular psxextreme member names i see every now and then are comin from somebody you do see postin comments everytime who logs in with a different "USERNAME" and bashes ps3 and later logs on with his original name and pretends to support ps3,u do realise most of the time they have no avatars n there names aint heard b4.
I don't think u should waste ur time respondin to these PRANKSTERS!
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 2:40:08 PM
Also, any online gaming network could be called a LIVE imitation, but that doesn't make it so.
SHADOW [Moderator]
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 3:33:30 PM
LightShow
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 5:49:37 PM
I'm not sure that trophies were possible, at least in their current form, on the PS2. It had no HDD. The only way you could view your trophies would be to go ingame or access the Mem Card Data.
It seems more likely this was a thing just for SO3, like skill points in the Ratchet games. The name similarity is prob just a coincidence.
note, i dont know for sure any of this, i just happen to have amazing hunches. no flames if i happen to be erroneous ^_^
missdelirium
Saturday, October 11, 2008 @ 8:06:09 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:28:46 PM
Reply
Bardock617
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 1:33:35 PM
Reply
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 3:53:58 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 2:01:22 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 2:16:17 PM
Reply
Riku994
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 2:30:48 PM
Reply
Minishmaru
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 6:01:53 PM
Reply
LightShow
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 6:03:00 PM
Reply
Microsoft is VERY good at making money. it also seems to be aloof as to the industries it changes while doing it.
Main Point: Gamer's are emotionally attached to series, Studios, and hardware manufacturers. It's all business to Microsoft. Gamers game because it's fun. That's why its ok to get emotionally attached (to a degree). Microsoft wants money. They don't have that luxury (or obligation, depending on how you see it). That's why they make decisions that seem stupid or unfair to us.
problem is, they aren't so compatible with gamers. They dominate business PCs because they're both about Money. They've failed to dominate Gaming because purists tend to despise those who are all about money.
Videogames have just as many rabid purists as the fine arts, and while both need money to exist, it's definitely not their goal in life to get rich.
I forsee a stalemate, leading to a slow withdrawal of MS. they dont like to be in markets they cant dominate.
oh and sorry if my train of thought isn't very cohesive. i often confuse myself ^_^
Last edited by LightShow on 10/9/2008 6:04:17 PM
AceTatsujin
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 7:24:30 PM
Reply
My friend sold his PS3 (80 GB) cu'z he wanted the 60 GB, he said he'll wait a bit more till all the good games come out which is this holiday or beginning of next year and he'll grab a 60 GB (it is still around, Internet is your best friend). He went with the Elite 360 which is a pretty good choice, and he wanted to actually play Gears 2 which should be a good game on the 360. But he knows by 2009 or 2010 360 is gonna get owned by the PS3. And FYI, he works at GameStop and he meets some corporate people and what not. I wouldn't press my words on these as much, but the future is nearing sooner then we all think. October will be the month to change things towards the PS3 ...
Last edited by AceTatsujin on 10/9/2008 7:26:15 PM
orangpelupa
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 10:27:29 PM
Reply
what i like from PS3 is only Disgaea3, MGS4 and the upcoming LBP.
if PS3 have many JRPG, more people will like it IMO.
look at the japanese market when x360 got IDOLM@STER (and IM@S L4U), ToV, and IU. x360 sales goes up.
its the games that make console win.
its the games that make people buy console.
i buy ps1 and ps2 because the rpgs
i buy x360 because the RPGs and Ace combat :)
i play PS3 on my friend because he have MGS4 >_<
if, PS3 got more exclussive JRPG. more will buy them. especially the japan and south east asia market.
Asia was a PS fan. now, there more x360 owners here (atlease in my town :p ). its cheaper, and have more JRPGs, ace combat also a good game.
its also have good games like IDOLM@STER L4U, CLANNAD (yes, its in allcaps).
but yes, x360 is a fragile and very noisy.
even with the falcon revision, x360 still like a ticking time bomb. we dont know when we will get RROD.
Last edited by orangpelupa on 10/9/2008 10:36:46 PM
Deleted User
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 11:00:48 PM
Reply
DIsmael85
Thursday, October 09, 2008 @ 11:53:37 PM
Joe_III
Friday, October 10, 2008 @ 1:43:55 AM
Reply
The fact that the 360 is doing better and will most likely still continue to do so does not make me a fan of it. Off the top of my head, I can think of 3 things Sony has taken from Microsoft and implemented -- and poorly at that: Marketplace, keyboard controller attachment, and Achievements.
Yes, the PS store is much better than it was, but there are still small things that make me prefer XBL to PSStore. Namely, it is easier to go through categories by going from button to button than using a joystick to control a mouse. Also, XBL doesn't charge for online connectivity, just multiplayer -- a model I expect to see go away soon. But compared to the nightmare that was the PS2 connectivity (or the drunken lunatic system nintendo currently uses called Friend Codes), XBL was a great choice.
I love the blu-ray player, as that is my only reason for not having traded it in (aside from MGS4). Calling Trophies a plus for the PS3. Bluetooth controllers is a huge pain in the ass, especially at my house because my phone's headset keeps syncing to my PS3 without my prompt.
Cell not harder to develop with?
http://gamer.blorge.com/2007/10/27/ex-guitar-hero-programmer-ps3-harder-to-develop-for-than-xbox-360/
http://www.joystiq.com/2007/08/17/graw-developer-ps3-not-harder-to-code-for-than-360/2
Granted, Now that developers are getting experience on the console things are getting better, but up until now it hasn't been all that great.
Yeah M$ mad a s*** console that breaks every couple of months. But then again, they've also pumped in something like 1.7 billion to mke up for it. They extended warranties out to 3 years and covered shipping costs to boot. What's Sony's hardwre policy? Using non-Sony /AV CABLES/ voids your warranty. Also, Sony had a huge problem with HDMI connectivity when it first launched. That was software, not hardware, so it was easily patched.
MGS4 is a great game, as was Resistance, Uncharted, and Warhawk. Killzone2 and GT5 (it's not out yet? gasp another delayed game!) I'm excited about. Hell I even enjoyed Dark Kingdom. Never been a God of War fan, and Heavenly Kingdom's controls were so broken I thought I was playing RE3.
However, Sony has also made some d*** moves. Changing SKUs and features every couple of months so buying a PS3 is like hitting the lotto is the only one that comes to my mind right now.
The PS3 has a lot of great points to it too, and I could go on for a while singing its praises, but everyone else here already does that.
It syncs to my PC faster and easier than my 360 does. I get High Def movies. I get to play any media on any kind of storage in my house through it. I could play my old PS2 games on it if I ever wanted to sell that console. I have been a solid PS player since '96. I always have, do and will love the Playstation.
All I'm saying is that compared to the 360 however, it could have done better, SO FAR.
The head of Sony even came out initially and said that the PS3 was not just another console, but a component for a home theater, and it fills that role perfectly. I get to play some games I have interest in, run all the music and videos on all the computers in my house thru it, and get excellent high def movies to watch to boot.
But it's easier to play games with friends since I've had their XBL gamer tag for 5 years now. I pick games so that I can edge out my friends by having 400 more gamerpoints that I've worked on for 2 years (or is it 3) now. If Sony had Trophies from Day 1 I probably could have made the switch on multiplat games to that console, because I would only have a year to catch up on.
I've never seen Sony developers at a single launch party for any game. No Sony employee found time to chat with me for 5 minutes at E306 even tho I wasn't anyone or from anywhere important. I haven't seen insomniac devs passing out exlusive DLC or shout outs for people who help keep communities growing.
Yeah Gears has a different look to it, and its one that's not pleasing to every eye. But that, Halo Wars, and Halo 3 Recon is really all M$ would probably need to have excusive this year to keep up with sales on Sony exclusives.
Oh, and the 360 Controller is more comfortable.
orangpelupa
Friday, October 10, 2008 @ 3:16:11 AM
Reply
illegalprelude
Friday, October 10, 2008 @ 2:25:26 PM
Reply
Were in year 2, almost 3 of the PS3 and not a single Square game....wtf is going on? And why are they ditching all of their loyal fans. Id love for them to read this and give a answer

View Large Image









LightShow
Reply
Wednesday, October 08, 2008 @ 11:01:24 PM
Catch up with everyone else, Enix. I'd hate to see you die because you keep pissing off the base that made you an RPG Juggernaut. You dont have to give us super special treatment, but EQUAL treatment has become priority. The occasional bone to attone for past misdeeds would be appreciated, like giving us FFXIII when it's done.