Is FFXIII A Casualty Of Twitch-Gaming?
Over the years, I've noticed a disturbing trend: the increasing ADD-like behavior of gamers. They can't sit through a cut-scene longer than two minutes without having a nervous breakdown, they have to be mashing buttons 99% of the time, and they require the constant flashing and rapid-fire animations and cinematics throughout. I find this annoying trend hitting movies as well; the camera can't sit still for half a second and we're shifting at lightning speed between scenes. Obviously, this is a direct result of a generation that values speed of communication over substance and quality, and I think it's beginning to have a detrimental effect on games that are supposed to be deep and strategic.
Take Final Fantasy XIII, for instance. While it can easily be argued that we left turn-based behind because we now have the technology to make combat feel more "realistic and involved," I also think it's because people quite honestly can't sit still long enough, anymore. Have you noticed the almost complete termination of the RTS genre? Sure, it still exists, but the days of Command & Conquer and Age of Empires are long gone; it used to be an insanely popular genre and now, only the select hardcore play these games. Same goes for flight sims (even though they've always been few and far between) and really, many RPGs and strategy-based titles. I'm not necessarily saying the depth is gone or even less obvious...that would be inaccurate. But it seems developers want to hide it more; they want most of that to happen automatically and behind the scenes.
In FFXIII - you'll have to wait a bit for our review, as Arnold and I intend to dive in fully - we've heard the same thing time and time again: the battle is extremely fast and actually encourages you to use the Auto-Battle function. Read a few of the reviews that have already hit; you'll see what I mean. Yes, you have to make strategic decisions, but they have to be lightning fast and the existing stratagems are used automatically and manually selecting abilities is not recommended. That's just too slow. The bottom line is that it appears we're thinking a lot less during combat. Furthermore, as you really never talk to NPCs and the exploration is cut way down due to the linear progression, all we can really do is keep moving forward. In other words, the pacing is pretty damn fast; taking time to stop and smell the roses likely isn't in the cards.
Bear in mind that I'm not providing you with any personal commentary prior to our review. I'm not saying the game is good or bad. I fully expect it to be beautiful and entertaining, as all FFs have been. I'm a huge FF fan and always have been; the idea of passing on FFXIII is so foreign to me, it's not even worth mentioning. However, the distinct - and relatively abrupt - change in the style of this franchise is worrisome; the "twitch-gaming" boom that apparently wishes to leave calm, enjoyable pacing behind and continues to assault our senses at faster and faster speeds is beginning to chafe. It's one thing to have this in games that might actually benefit (action titles and shooters, for instance), but a role-playing game is something very different to me. Maybe others will feel differently, but I believe the disturbing "can't-sit-still" trend is having a profoundly negative impact on the industry.
At the same time, we still do have games like Heavy Rain, which are wonderfully mature and promote real storytelling, character development and actual thought. And it's doing well, too, so that's great. But shouldn't FFXIII be a little closer to Heavy Rain than to God of War?
3/4/2010 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (198 posts)
Kowhoho
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:39:20 PM
rogers71
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:10:56 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:43:29 PM
Natalisrubbish
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:57:20 AM
Banky A
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:04:41 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:10:39 AM
FullmetalX10
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:43:39 AM
Cavan
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:02:20 AM
LimitedVertigo
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:25:41 AM
D1g1tal5torm
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 8:12:47 AM
looking at it from SE's point of view, the marginalised customer base they already have wasnt meeting it's targets in terms of forecasted growth.
It's not enough these days for a company to just stay in business.
So logically, what would you do?
You look at gaming trends, evolution if you prefer, and your current market exposure. You identify that making alterations to the gameplay may lure additional users, whilst still retaining your existing market.
How many of you FF fans really aren't going to buy this latest version?
And secondly you increase market exposure by going multiplatform.
It's a case of simple economics.
More sales = More Capital
Gamers never come first; they're going to only go down the pecking order in the future.
Last edited by D1g1tal5torm on 3/5/2010 8:19:43 AM
Silent_J
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 9:43:37 AM
Highlander
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 9:55:14 AM
@all
A man has to know his limitations, and I know mine. A commenter I am, and a commenter I shall be.
@D1g1tal5torm
Good counterpoint. In reply I'll just say that the point I am making is that SE and many other devs cannot serve both communities with the same product. I disagree about a part of the customer base being marginalized, that logic would mean that market segmentation never occurs and all that does happen is that non-core consumers become marginalized consumers who go un-served by the market place. That's a lot of dollars to leave on the table if that's the way people operate.
Game developers need to pay attention to the segmentation of the market. They have always had to recognize that the market did segment based on genre - fps vs racing games vs RPG. What is so hard about realizing that within a genre there is further segmentation solo fps vs multi-player fps, racing sim vs arcade racer, turn based vs real time based RPGs, and so on. As the pie get's bigger the slices become proportionately smaller. However I would rather have an eighth of a pie that weighs 4 pounds than have half of a two pound pie. I think that is the thing that some devs are utterly missing. In their drive to keep half the pie regardless of the size of the pie, they are missing the fact that a smaller fraction of the larger market is at least as lucrative as the larger fraction of a smaller market.
Last edited by Highlander on 3/5/2010 10:04:18 AM
Bobby_Kotick
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 10:40:26 AM
Highlander
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 11:33:31 AM
I was trying to say that a smaller fraction of a far larger pie was better than a larger fraction of a smaller pie. but an eighth of 4 is a half, and a half of 2 is 1, so my math is very poor. My apologies. Perhaps a better way to put it is I'd rather have 10% of 120 million customers than 30% of 30 million customers.
piratedrunk
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:06:11 PM
Reply
I love turn based games but I always look forward to the advances made in FF games. That said I would be stoked if the made a return to something closer to FFX some time that was not only turn based but about as fast as you could hope for if you were fast yourself.
inkme101
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:07:08 PM
Reply
piratedrunk
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:09:57 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:11:03 PM
SvenMD
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:23:45 PM
Kowhoho
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:35:23 PM
SnipeySnake
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:55:05 PM
Beamboom
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 5:43:26 AM
Instead I'd say get either Fallout (if sci-fi/apocalyptic setting is of interest) or Oblivion (if fantasy/elves & spells are your cup of tea) if you want a RPG that's filled with loads of stories and are slow paced. In those two games you can pretty much decide the speed and intensity, and they are both good games.
totozero18
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:42:09 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 10:23:47 AM
Besides the Forgotten Realms RPGs, which are still just full of titles that are more like one D&D clone after another, I found all older Western RPGs intensely boring.
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:09:14 PM
Reply
If too many concessions are made to the thoughtless, the automatic, and the flashy, I fear that genres will cease to exist and we will be left with one big pile of genre-less games that are all flash over substance. Nothing but sound and fury.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:44:48 PM
shadowscorpio
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:54:46 PM
Last edited by shadowscorpio on 3/4/2010 11:55:26 PM
Beamboom
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:05:17 AM
Speaking of Heavy Rain, I got around to try the demo only yesterday, and even though I got confirmed that this game is not for me (I *hate* games where I am instructed what buttons to press, I feel like a monkey!) I'll buy this one just to support the uniqueness of Heavy Rain. It deserves every bit of support it can get, I realized that after the demo.
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:16:37 PM
LittleBigMidget
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:11:17 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Sunday, March 07, 2010 @ 8:27:47 PM
inkme101
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:14:41 PM
Reply
Kowhoho
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:36:40 PM
Natalisrubbish
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:54:28 AM
totozero18
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:52:33 AM
SnipeySnake
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:22:09 PM
piratedrunk
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:24:22 PM
SnipeySnake
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:35:20 PM
darxed
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:36:36 PM
SnipeySnake
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:21:52 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:23:47 PM
LimitedVertigo
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:22:46 PM
Reply
I see just as many RTS today as before. The only difference is now there are far more FPS/TPS on the market so it seems like RTS have become fewer.
It makes sense that the majority of gamers would choose a game genre (fps/tps) that doesn't take as much time and dedication to excel at.
Highlander
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:24:58 PM
SvenMD
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:27:59 PM
Some PC loyalists say that you can't play an FPS without a keyboard and mouse...where I agree it's easier, you can quickly grasp the hang of it on the controller. However, RTS can really ONLY be done on a PC where you're able to drag and drop with multiple mouse clicks and hotkeys.
So I don't really think twitch-gamers hurt the RTS, I think the consoles did.
Also, command and conquer is just weird with all the live action stuff....
Kowhoho
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:28:39 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:48:27 PM
RTS games would also be in the running for many GotY awards and nominations in any given year back then. That hasn't happened in God knows how long. They just don't have much of a place, anymore.
Roach721
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:50:32 AM
Geobaldi
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:49:41 AM
LimitedVertigo
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:45:40 PM
Ben,
My RTS kick has not diminished, you're right they no longer get the spotlight they once had but I just see it as a sign of videogames expanding to attract the majority. I still see the RTS genre alive and well. It's certainly going stronger than the JRPG business. ::frown::
Last edited by LimitedVertigo on 3/5/2010 2:49:44 PM
Highlander
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 3:40:32 PM
My PS3 has a keyboard and mouse combo thanks to logitech and bluetooth keyboard products. They aren't expensive, and I believe that the PS3 will happily take a USB keyboard and mouse (as did the PS2). So there is no reason why an RTS game on the PS3 should not support the standard keyboard/mouse controls.
SvenMD
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 9:57:17 PM
But I will wait till that day and then be VERY happy.
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:26:38 PM
Reply
Kowhoho
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:30:47 PM
Geobaldi
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:51:00 AM
OtisFeelgood
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 7:38:44 AM
Jed
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:55:49 PM
rogers71
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:13:04 PM
geovanwitdakick
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:35:59 PM
Reply
geovanwitdakick
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:39:54 PM
Reply
Snicket
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:41:14 PM
Reply
FFXIII is getting great scores!! Oh No! I don't remember a game this gen that has gotten more flack pre-launch. Give credit to SE for completly re-inventing its game play with every new entry into the series. I notice that some FF fans are alot like Star Trek fans, they hate change. Even if the change is for the better.
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:47:14 PM
SnipeySnake
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:50:37 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:46:39 PM
aaronisbla
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 5:58:25 AM
Snicket
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 9:21:31 AM
I was not saying that this article was giving flack, just the commentary in general that is floating out there on the internerts.
Some scores for FFXIII so far:
Lost Gamer: 9/10
EuroGamer: 8/10
Computer and Videogames: 9.2
Games Radar: 10/10
There was also a very praise worthy review in OPM.
Highlander
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 10:06:56 AM
Snicket
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 10:35:51 AM
rogers71
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:55:58 PM
Geobaldi
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:53:57 AM
kokoro
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 7:31:43 AM
Qubex
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 10:10:23 AM
Highlander
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 10:18:10 AM
One of the worst gaming moments of this generation occurred when Burnout Paradise went the way of the entitlement generation. The plan was that there would be in-game competitions and you could win special cars or skins by competing in events. As a foretaste the boys at Criterion were running a few events and decided to let their community leaders test drive one of the prize cars early. Sadly the reaction of entitlement minded gamers was so intensely negative to this single test, that they decided to scrap the whole thing and gave the car to everyone. Yes, they scrapped all the planned events, everything. All the work that had been done on event planning and software modification to drive the planned events was scrapped. Thank you entitlement gamers.
Entitlement gamers are the ones who can't stand the idea that a game might have locked content that you unlock through play. They are the ones that demand instant and easy access to everything right away. So heaven forbid that the 'ultimate' sword is in the game but only available if you play a particular way on a particular setting and get things just right. The entitlement gamer with their instant gratification problem will demand that the ultimate sword be made available immediately with no effort required.
main_event05
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:59:12 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:57:20 PM
Reply
Scarecrow
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:04:46 PM
Highlander
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:05:57 PM
Alienange
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:00:17 PM
Reply
rogers71
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:07:33 PM
Can't believe I am saying it but, I agree with you wholeheartedly. Gamers these days just do not know what it is like to sit down with a game and have to actually think their way through it. I blame the creation of strategy (walkthrough) guides. Ever since those became prominent, gamers don't do anything for themselves.
Alienange
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:21:20 PM
shadowscorpio
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:05:23 AM
rogers71
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:08:46 PM
FullmetalX10
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 3:03:59 AM
just2skillf00l
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:20:49 PM
Reply
Alienange
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:26:26 PM
wakkaoaka
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:21:35 PM
Reply
I love being in New Zealand, it means I get Final Fantasy XIII first :D 9am nz time tuesday
Highlander
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 11:29:23 PM
Banky A
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:07:57 AM
Qubex
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 10:13:35 AM
Put simply, New Zealand is a spectacular country, and I cannot wait to move there :)
Q!
"speak to the droid"
Last edited by Qubex on 3/5/2010 10:14:13 AM
shadowscorpio
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 11:56:43 AM
BikerSaint
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:00:47 AM
Reply
Banky A
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:09:18 AM
Ayane
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:02:00 AM
Reply
Admittedly the first few (early, intro) battles might make one go "crap, this is too fast wtf???, in fact I felt that way.
But that was only for a very short time, as the game progressed slightly further and the all the battle fuctions are available, the battle speed (and battles themselves) feel really well balanced and very enjoyable, a great mix of speed and strategy. You even have to option to select a slow(er) ATB.
It is rather linear as a whole, compared to previous FFs, but I love every bit of it nonetheless, and at so many points in the game, the sceneries, etc are so breathtaking I stopped to gawk at them before moving on.
I take FF13 as the first step towards an even better future FF.
That's my two cents of course.
shadowscorpio
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:14:18 AM
Irievibes
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:03:02 AM
Reply
kinda like having some automation but sounds a lil "too" automatic form me, dunno guess il wait for your reviews
i guess i agree with your whole twitch gaming argument , personally , i blame the endless iteration of MW/gears clone games that are coming out this generation and m$ , has spawned a whole army of couchzombies that have the attention span of a nanosecond.
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:37:56 PM
kraygen
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:49:32 AM
Reply
I remember the first time I played ffvii. Every battle I took the time to experiment. I'd ask myself, what is this creature strong against, what is he weak against? How often do I need to heal, can I wait one more round? It was all strategy and thinking things through. I'll never forget it, it was my first rpg honestly.
I remember when I purchased my ps3 and I played mgs4 the first time thinking how wonderfully in depth the story was, each cut-scene felt as if it was emerging me in what it was going on. Then I remember how shocked I felt reading players say that they couldn't stand how long the cut scenes were. How ridiculous, what's the hurry? I bought this to enjoy, and how can you say you enjoy something that you're trying to end as quickly as possible?
Personally all the news about ffxiii was worrisome to me, no towns, no mp, but the most frightening thing to me that I read was that there was an auto-battle option and that we you were encouraged to use it. What? Have we really come so far that its either mash buttons or watch the screen as the console plays the game for you, but shows you fantastic, colorful, flashy scenes to keep you occupied? Seriously?
I hope there is more to ffxiii than that, but more than anything I want to sit, to think, to enjoy, every minute of my video game.
Geobaldi
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:59:16 AM
LimitedVertigo
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:54:05 AM
Roach721
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 4:34:47 AM
@ LVertigo My computer is from 98 am still running XP home edition. I really don't use it for gaming anymore since it can't runn much and I just put my car in the shop to get fix it will probably cost me about 2,000 bucks so aam straped for cash right now.Thats why I keep hoping Starcraft2 and Diablo3 will come out on the PS3.*I can dream right*
LimitedVertigo
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 4:59:46 AM
Roach721
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 5:25:53 AM
LimitedVertigo
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 5:33:42 AM
Well Blizzard is a lot like Valve. They design their games to run on almost every computer ever made. With those specs you'll be able to play both SC2 and Diablo3 so I suggest you try the open betas (when made available) or the demos and see for yourself.
Deleted User
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:06:34 AM
Reply
Jawknee
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:22:37 AM
Jawknee
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:23:47 AM
Reply
I agree to an extent that FPS's are what helped move the industry in this direction. When i saw the headline i immediately thought of what FFXIII's director said about FPS influence the how they told FFXIII's story. Namely the genre's fast paste story telling. A succession dramatic or plot filling events.
Blagh!
Geobaldi
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:01:39 AM
Last edited by Geobaldi on 3/5/2010 2:01:50 AM
Jawknee
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:08:30 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:13:49 AM
Jawknee
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:40:11 AM
aaronisbla
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:03:17 AM
Jawknee
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:43:34 AM
OriginalSin
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:56:26 AM
Reply
I will get FFXIII either way. Just want to get a better idea of all the "good" and "bad" sides of this new direction FF is going in. Then I will give it a go and see if I enjoy playing it.
In the end it's about how much fun YOU have playing a game and not what someone else thinks. But having a good guide (review) to let you know the technical side of things are great...
FullmetalX10
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 3:15:29 AM
Reply
Ergi
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 5:10:41 AM
Reply
aaronisbla
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:06:15 AM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:31:40 AM
SmokeyPSD
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:35:35 AM
LimitedVertigo
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 6:55:59 AM
Irievibes
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 9:16:53 AM
there is ACTUAL stuff to do in FFX
i dont care if you hate blitzball and the chocobo races, the monster arena, it all gave you STUFF TO DO
what im not liking about what ive heard about this new FF, is that its simply fights, A cgi marathon, and the story, no towns, no exploration , no sidequests minigames, or all that stuff that i actually liked about final fantasy's , still waiting for the reviews though, but i dont want a "pretty story with pretty cgi's and pretty music" ...im paying for a game not an overdone failure within movie.....
aaronisbla
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 10:52:24 AM
Shams
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 11:37:45 AM
Naturally, many ps3 owners are disappointed, but I still think it will sell considerable across both platforms.
Last edited by Shams on 3/5/2010 11:38:23 AM
Shams
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 11:47:30 AM
Last edited by Shams on 3/5/2010 11:54:26 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:20:01 PM
Shams
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:59:34 PM
Just as many people can get understandably annoyed when people talk smack or trash about this console, or that game, I'm sure it can be easily understood that people can get the feeling of being unwelcomed, or even disrespected, when matters even more important are insulted. Not just out of self-amusement, but out of hate. So again, just a humble request and a friendly reminder.
Last edited by Shams on 3/5/2010 1:00:49 PM
aaronisbla
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:37:15 PM
LimitedVertigo
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:48:40 PM
Jawknee
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 7:36:45 PM
Shams, im happy to talk about games all day long on this site even with you. i agree with you, Ben and everyone else that this isn't the place for religious discussion but you should try and lighten up a bit. if you don't like it, ignore it.
Last edited by Jawknee on 3/5/2010 7:42:20 PM
Jawknee
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 7:52:00 PM
Shams
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 8:06:56 PM
And believe me, I'm all for discussion. But, talking trash, and friendly intellectual discourse are two entirely different things, based on two entirely different intentions. Some are unable, or rather, unwilling to make the distinction, which is why Ben thought it necessary to close down a certain forum for good, and forbid it for good.
I'm sure you understand. Isn't it why you refused to answer a certain question I had asked you?
tes37
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 8:30:03 PM
Shams
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 9:29:37 PM
When your ancestor, or loved one, is falsely called a pedophile, and that you are a supporter for terrorism, or an apologist for it, perhaps you can take that lightly. But, I doubt it, especially if it continues to no end. You would complain at first, then probably ignore it as well as the person for as long as he continues that 'humor'.
So, if you tell me to lighten up, please pardon me for taking that advice as a little disingenuous.
Last edited by Shams on 3/5/2010 9:34:55 PM
tes37
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 9:54:25 PM
Shams
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 11:21:10 PM
Shams
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 2:38:49 AM
And LV, uh, formulaic response was only expected from you, so my response was in the comment you were responding to.
I'm glad to see the people who were 'unnamed' identified themselves by responding to the request, even if they entirely ignored it.
LimitedVertigo
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 4:33:07 AM
Roach721
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 4:38:40 AM
LimitedVertigo
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 4:56:32 AM
Roach721
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 5:16:51 AM
LimitedVertigo
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 5:37:40 AM
I've noticed this has become a trend with your posts as of late. The internet is great when it comes to commenting. You have plenty of time to think about what you're going to type. I suggest you use this time more wisely in the future.
Shams
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 1:09:59 PM
See, LV, unlike some, I don't feel the need to bash or ridicule someone else's personal beliefs in order to validate my own, or under the guise of 'entertainment'. No. But as you can very well understand, if some one else does, I won't always keep quiet.
Are my feelings hurt? Well, yes, I am disappointed, LV. I gave you simple request. And rather than saying, "Fair enough, Shams/Aftab, I acknowledge your request, and I as an adult will stop leaving deliberately inflammatory remarks, especially regarding certain things that you promise not to bring up, and that have been banned from discussion anywhere on this site", you, instead, chose to further ridicule that request.
LimitedVertigo
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 1:57:36 PM
My original comments and all my comments on this thread have had ZERO to do with your faith or your god. My original comment regarding corncobs and depths of 6feet was a joke, an obvious one too. You're the type of person that tries to find offense at anything and everything.
I make a generalized joke about the "2nd coming" which could very well have been in regards to Keanu Reeves character from the Matrix and you jump on it and spam this thread with your typical "me me me, my faith is being ridiculed".
It's not about you, never has been stop trying to play the victim, it's annoying as hell and the last time you pulled this crap you got banned for a week.
Last edited by LimitedVertigo on 3/6/2010 1:58:47 PM
Shams
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 3:58:25 PM
I know whistle-blowing is 'annoying'. I don't enjoy doing it either, which is why I made the request for an agreement: You stop, and so will I. Simple. But apparently, you take it as an infringement of your right to be clown. So, then never mind. Carry on.
Shams
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 4:14:03 PM
LimitedVertigo
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 4:19:52 PM
You took a comment made by me which was completely unrelated to religion and have flooded this thread with your typical outpouring for religious tolerance.
If you can't even handle some random comments on a videogame site I suggest you move to Antarctica.
Shams
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 5:52:58 PM
But, ha, I like the Antarctic joke. I get it, where there's no internet. See, your funny (sometimes), which is the only reason I can think of why Ben & Arnold keep you around.
LimitedVertigo
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 8:01:43 PM
I wasn't joking about Antarctica. I strongly suggest you move there so you can live in perfect harmony with nothing but yourself since you've proven anything else is intolerable.
I imagine they keep me around like quite a few others because I offer an interesting discussion on videogames. Seems you're far more interested in continuously hijacking threads for your own social/religious agenda.
So are you going to finally mean that goodbye or should I expect yet another reply from you showcasing your strong lack of ability when it comes to GETTING THE POINT.
Shams
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 11:44:37 PM
LimitedVertigo
Saturday, March 06, 2010 @ 11:57:04 PM
LimitedVertigo
Sunday, March 07, 2010 @ 12:36:31 AM
Shams
Sunday, March 07, 2010 @ 12:52:22 AM
LimitedVertigo
Sunday, March 07, 2010 @ 1:12:02 AM
Irievibes
Sunday, March 07, 2010 @ 10:57:07 AM
seriously, the guy said " the second coming of god" as a joke as a way to say that people's expectations with this game were a wee bit too high, yet you seem to think that anything containing the word "god" in it its automatically challenging your religious views and beliefs..
please, if you need validation for your faith or beliefs , then thats cool, but you cant expect other people to be so ...shall we say, uptight? ....about it like you are...
your beliefs are your beliefs and i will respect them, but please, stop acting like a spoiled brat craving for attention, those comments had NOTHING to do with YOUR,OR ANYONE ELSE'S religion, stop trying to act all important and hurt, no one cares if you worship god, alah , or circus monkeys, i personally couldnt care less, no one took a crack at your religion, jsut you seem to act like we did....
w/e your request is NOT unreasonable, but you exploded as if people were openly insulting your religion and/or God , you sir, need to CHILL!
Shams
Sunday, March 07, 2010 @ 11:32:23 AM
Scarecrow
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 1:26:53 PM
Buckeyestar
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 9:53:20 AM
Reply
Bobby_Kotick
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 10:28:49 AM
Reply
coverton341
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 2:03:47 PM
CH1N00K
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:00:22 PM
Reply
I'm Kidding!
The way things are going, soon all you'll have to do is go to a store, slap down your money for a game, take it home, open the case and you'll see a note that says:
"Congratulations, Achievement unlocked, you've beat the game 100%. Thank you for your money, you A.D.D riddled monkey."
I guess we should have seen this coming though. What do you expect from an entire generation raised with the concept of "We want it all and we want it now? Screw the costs!"
That's the reason when you go and buy an EA game on release day, you can get home and download all the unlockables. I mean really, who wants to actually play the game? Who wants the challenge of having to start out at the bottom and work your way up? That's ridiculous, that's like life or something!
Myself? I'm going to look into investing in Ridalin, Athritis medication and Carpal Tunnel. Because in 15 years or so when I'm looking to retire, all the ADD affected button masher are going to make me rich!
I just wish there was a way I could invest some money and get rich now....does EA have a download for that?
Last edited by CH1N00K on 3/5/2010 12:02:49 PM
main_event05
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 12:53:06 PM
Reply
main_event05
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 5:12:49 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 4:54:58 PM
shadowscorpio
Friday, March 05, 2010 @ 7:26:54 PM
Reply
Last edited by shadowscorpio on 3/5/2010 7:27:43 PM
just2skillf00l
Sunday, March 07, 2010 @ 5:05:50 PM
Reply
All I know is that I pre-ordered GOW3 and I'm getting Resonance of Fate because so far, the only negative thing people have pointed out about the game is that the gameplay is very complex and challenging. IMO, that's good news! So while all the other FF13 hopefuls purchase FF13 in a frozen state of anxiety, I'll collect my JRPG the following week with my head held high...along with GOW3 of course.
SilverLion
Monday, March 08, 2010 @ 2:13:12 PM
Reply
Although I'm an old-school gamer, I still love games like Dragon Age, Fallout, Oblivion. The main issues I have with the real-time aspect of these games is when the actual interface gets in the way of controlling the game. With the turn-based games of old, a small bug can remain a small irritation. In a real-time game a small bug can make a game unplayable , especially when its in the combat interface. I can't wait to see FF XIII, but I'm ready to be disappointed.
The return to a more linear interface is what concerns me the most. I always thought the point of role playing was defining your own role. Once you're hand-fed a storyline and personality (a la FF X) it becomes more like a graphical adventure with combat and leveling (like the old Quest For Glory games). The great thing about Fallout and Dragon age and other WRPGs is that you decide who you want to be: good, bad, neutral. Just like in the old paper and pencil RPGs.
The other aspect of classic RPGs that we lose with the linear gameplay is the exploration aspect that appeals to completist gamers with a touch of OCD. I want to get that whole map. I want to find that hidden area. Check out this cool easter egg!
I hear a lot of you saying that buying FF XIII is an imperative because of your tie to the series. I've gone through every FF (through IX) at least twice. I must have played through the original FF at least 5 times. Before the American versions of the "missing" FFs were ported I played the translated ROMs. Then I played them again when they were brought over by Square. But I think there was more to that series than great graphics (which the originals didn't really have). It was the world, the characters, the creatures, that you could interact with. I think the more recent forays into the FF universe have not been up to the standards set in their predecessors.
On a side-note, I think the FFX plot was a half-hearted attempt to recreate Cloud's story in FF VII. The whole "who am I" aspect seemed too familiar, even a bit contrived.
GamerO1
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 @ 9:27:11 AM
Reply
To rebut D1g1tal5torm's comment:
Since SE began converting from True Turn Based, way before FF VII, they have been determined to make these Action games. I was talking with the SE Developers at the E3, and they were totally adamant that this game was Turn Based. Yeah Right !!!
Okay, I'm getting off the subject... D1g1talStrom would be right if the amount of gamers never increased over the years, but it has, and the original customer base, plus many newbie's have stayed true to Turn Based Gaming. So his idea is sadly incorrect.
How many people won't buy this version he asks... Way more then you can possibly imagine. If you read all the articles SE has been publishing you will see they are extremely nervous.
I personally own every FF game, including imports, prior to FF XI, and plan to never buy another one. And I know for a fact of many others that have been turned off as well.
Can't see anyone wasting their hard earned money for something they won't play.
FF X (International was a little better), was still enough Turned Based to be Fun...
FYI, Vandal Hearts #3 DLC on the PS3 is a True Turned Based game, and although extremely "old school" and easy, it's a whole lot of fun.
The PS 1 Vandal Hearts was probably my favorite all time Turned Based RPG. This is "not" the same game...

Final Fantasy XIII









Highlander
Reply
Thursday, March 04, 2010 @ 10:04:20 PM
And yet game makers like SE look at the 120 million gamers as one market and assume (falsely) that they should be able to capture the same proportion of that market as they did before. When their traditional games do not in fact capture more users but the same old audience they start to change things up to meet the needs of all those new gamers. Slowly but surely they get close to a tipping point where the cumulative change to their formula is sufficient to alienate their existing audience, but not necessarily enough to grab the new audience.
So, why do it? Why not make games for the existing audience and make different games for the new audience? Instead of expanding their audience they are shrinking it. Right now it's the so called twitch-gamers vs more traditional hardcore gamers - the gray beards.
I think SE's biggest mistake (and it's one that many game makers are making) is failing to see the new market as an emerging market and the old market as a stable market. They missed the segmentation and are trying to cater to the whole as if it were one homogeneous mass of gamers. Which of course it is not. The sooner this lesson is learned, the better.
BTW, I noticed that you used the word linear...tsk, tsk... ;)
Last edited by Highlander on 3/4/2010 10:13:40 PM