Editorial: Is Sony Off Base With Move?
I think by now people are aware of my stance on the Wii, which I consider to be more of a gadget than a video game console. But I certainly understand that it has proven to be insanely popular - despite a major falling off in the past year or so - and it's all due to that motion sensing feature.
And of course, both Sony and Microsoft want to grab a piece of that gigantic pie for themselves, which is only natural. And while I'll be interested to give the PlayStation Move a try, I find I'm mostly lukewarm on the whole idea...and I doubt I'm the only PS3 owner who feels this way. Look, I'm aware they're trying to cater to a younger demographic and come across as more family-friendly. There will be slightly more mature games designed for Move, but for the most part, I doubt they'll be offending anyone (at least, not at first). The EyePet is all sorts of cute and it's a great idea but I'm just wondering if this will appeal to the majority of the PS3 crowd. I mean, I'm no business executive but if I'm sitting there going, "this turned out to be a smash hit; we need to do it, too," I'm asking myself the follow-up question:
"Do we have the type of audience that would respond favorably to the concept?"
And this, I'm not 100% on. Right now, the PS3 is about cutting-edge video game productions and it typically appeals to the 18-35 age group, I believe. There are also a lot of long-time gamers who have been on board since the original PlayStation, and in my experience, the older they are, the less interested they are in Move. I'm not proposing that Move will fail; the technology is intriguing and I'm sure there are some current Wii owners going, "hmm, maybe I should upgrade," but I'm wondering what kind of investment this is for Sony. Did they really pump a ton of money and resources into this? Or is it not costing them as much as we think? It's all about returns on investments in business and I suppose I'm just questioning the size of that return for the Move. Am I off base or are they...?
I have my reservations about 3D, too, but for different reasons. I guess it's just very anti-progress of me to say I'm happy with the way things are, that I'm just now getting used to high-definition, online-everything and entirely new experiences like Heavy Rain. I'm perfectly satisfied with the ultra-polished, ceaselessly entertaining products like Uncharted 2 and to me, they just got here. Maybe it's just age, I dunno. But when I look at Move and then look at your standard, run-of-the-mill PS3 owner, I have to wonder if one is hot for the other. That's all.
5/7/2010 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (77 posts)
MyWorstNightmar
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 9:56:23 PM
At this point, I am not interested in the Move, as I have a Wii. The videos I saw of Move looked completely uninspiring to say the least. That is not to say they won't come out with something that is a must have, so I will keep an open mind, and a watchful eye.
Ben, the comment "despite a major falling off in the past year or so" describing the Wii's sales or popularity (not sure which you are describing) may be true, however, the numbers are still off the chart impressive, and it is still selling like hot cakes and outselling the competition. In a race, PS3 and 360 are doing 60 MPH, the Wii had been doing 120 MPH, but now it is just going at a steady pace of 90 MPH. So while technically your statement was true, there is another side of it in that it is still outpacing the competition.
Shams
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 1:32:47 PM
H8WL3R
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 9:44:51 PM
However if on the PS3 some of these games looked and played better I'd probably be more inclined to purchase the necessary hardware (bundled with a game at a reasonable price) and eventually include other games in my gaming library.
As some have stated as well (including a friendly and knowledgeable PS3 owner from my local EB Games) I hope this will not replace or overshadow the classic gameplay of the DualShock 3 configurations, but perhaps compliment it on some games giving us the option to use Move.
Thank you for your time and friendly feedback.
VicTheMighty
Sunday, May 09, 2010 @ 7:01:38 PM
The response is SLOW and unprecise.
The graphics blow.
And the games are 90% shovelware.
I only like the Mario/Zelda Nintendo offcial releases.
Now a PS3 with HD gaming and Move can appeal to ALOT of people. What you are saying is wrong. The adopters won't only be to those who think they might buy one for their kids. But also for all the people who cry because their Wii graphics look like puke on their HD tvs and want to train with an actual real person looking coach and not a hunk of pixels.
It will also appeal to new adopters who want to exercise aswell as having a BD player and good games.
Sry but the Wii nowhere near cuts it for motion sensing. Its only a huge advertisement trap. Unless youre a fan of mario, you shouldn't touch it with a 10 yard pole.
Last edited by VicTheMighty on 5/9/2010 7:03:31 PM
manofchao5
Thursday, May 13, 2010 @ 3:14:22 PM
when i was 14 and heard rumors, i was looking on this one hints site and was smashing my face across a crt monitor reading all the awesome tidbits that ps3 was gonna have
i owned 6 days after my 16th birthday and now enjoy a little over 20 disc games, 7 bluray's and 19 dl games
MyWorstNightmar
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 10:01:27 PM
Even with the Move coming out, the best PS3 games will still require a Dualshock controller.
I say get the Wii!!
JMO_INDY
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 9:38:17 PM
Reply
Last edited by JMO_INDY on 5/7/2010 9:39:02 PM
CH1N00K
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 9:45:13 PM
Reply
If the Software to support it is crap, then sales will be crap as well.
A few well done Kevin Butler ads though should get a few moves into some living rooms.
As I mentioned in a previous post, if they bundle it with a game I'm interested in, I'll probably pick it up, but when I go to a store to buy something for my PS3, I'll buy a game before I buy another controller/accessory unless I absolutely need one.
I bought my PSeye because it was with Eye of Judgment (which I was interested in) I bought my blutooth because it was bundled with Warhawk, I bought the PS Blutooth because it was bundled with Socom. I'll buy a Move if they bundle it with Socom 4, but if it's bundled with a better version of Wii Sports resort? I'll buy a different game.
Scarecrow
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 9:56:19 PM
Reply
At the end of the day they can go ahead and launch this device. But they better not expect everyone to buy it. If anything they should KNOW they created this for casual gamers.
I GUESS it's good for business. But it's so sad. V-game consoles were all 'bout attracting people through GAMES. It's always good being creative in controller design but this whole motion-sensing thing is no upgrade, is simply a dumbing down of gameplay.
Now it's all 'bout simple movements instead of strategic or complex usage of space and button commands.
Now it'll be just simple movements...
Anyway, this is all for casual gamers so I guess I can stand it for now
If only the MOVE was used to create really innovative games (maybe new genres? mix of genres?). Guess they won't bother, it's for the casuals........
MyWorstNightmar
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 10:05:14 PM
hellish_devil
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 10:02:46 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 10:06:42 PM
Reply
I think we all know that the "Move" controller is never going to replace our regular controllers, or ever become a hardcore mainstay either.
But looking at it as an addition to how we can play our games, and then it becomes a much richer BONUS added to our gaming pleasures.
I see the same for 3DTV's & it's games, but I believe over time if 3D's done right & we can lose those pesky glasses, it will have a much greater chance on becoming a hardcore feature & something that 10 years from now, that most of us will be saying..."Wow", how the hell did we live without it"????
As for myself, I hate that other 1% of my future in having to go to "non-physical" DL only.
So, I give it a Siskel styled "5 Flushes Down".....and by down, I mean....
right down my toilet bowl, along with ALL the rest of my purely "physical" crapping's.
johnld
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 10:07:02 PM
Reply
jaybiv
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 1:32:49 AM
Qubex
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 10:10:20 PM
Reply
Once E3 comes around I think enough will be shown, seen and played to get a better idea of how easy and effective it is to actually use practically. As said, for the casual games, the Move should work well, no reason why not. For the more complex game type mechanics I would need to get a very good idea of how it works before I can say if it really is for me or not...
For now I am happy with my trusty dual shock!
Q!
"play.experience.enjoy"
NeoHumpty
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 10:32:55 PM
Reply
It comes down to "light guns". I like the idea of them. If they do it right, it will lead to better aiming.
And, yes, I still miss Duck Hunt.
Best "light gun" game ever? Revolution X. I stole SO many quarters from my dad's coin jar to play that game. Ultimately, I'm hoping for that kind of aim.
I have the Wii for the family, but honestly, it's only Power Glove 2.0.
sunspider13
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 1:44:59 PM
DeathOfChaos
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 5:50:59 PM
Temjin001
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 10:38:26 PM
Reply
While I do own a Wii, mostly because of my wife’s interests, and I’ve spent a few hours with Metroid, the graphics and presentation are so dated and archaic it struggles to hold my interests. I will give props to Mario Galaxies. It is far and away the most enjoyable game I’ve played on the system with clever design and nostalgic appeal... sadly, I think those are the only games on that system I care to try.
As for the Playstation Move. It already bothers me that I’m reading headlines about Toy Story 3 having Move support. I really hope publishers do not pigeon-hole the Move audience as a platform that will pander to children, and simple minded entertainment demographics.
Sony embrace the technology of motion-control, but only if you marry it with a strong selection of cutting edge content that appeals to the identity of your audience. Otherwise, I’ll pass and put my money somewhere else.
Reccaman18
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 11:07:19 PM
Reply
Shams
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 1:20:43 PM
RebelJD
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 11:25:07 PM
Reply
The PS3 has awesome games. Anything over than a dozen awesome game is amazing. Seriously...If you fail to come into the system's early years, you have time to catch up on all the great games. Then come the new hot games that are on their way.
The Playstation Move is a great addition. We are at 35 million units sold world wide. When the move comes out and stupid Sony makes sure that demand is met...we can easily see this number double within a year.
I like my "cool" games and at the same time I like my "fun" games. I will enjoy throwing crap at the screen and thrusting my controller any which way and see what my actions complete on screen..simple as that.
jaybiv
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 1:41:12 AM
Qubex
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 11:41:01 PM
SmokeyPSD
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 1:16:15 AM
Reply
jaybiv
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 1:36:07 AM
Reply
unapersson
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 2:33:43 AM
Reply
frostface
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 2:38:08 AM
Reply
3D was a huge fad decades ago and then dropped off the map completely until recently when the technology advanced enough to put it back on the map. But even still, there hasn't been that many great 3D movies coming out. It works great for childrens cartoons and Avatar was good fun to watch but what sells these movies is the novelty of the technology and storylines and depth (emotional depth not in the context of visual dimension) usually gets pushed to the side in favour of cheap trickery. As of yet we're still in the dark as to how this will transfer over to games as we don't have the tv's yet but soon we'll see if our games are downgraded to facilitate 3D or if it really enhances the immersion factor.
As for motion sensing technology, it's great with a gang of friends over, to play during the holidays with your family or to give your mother/sister the false sense of an excercise workout but playing on your own it's pretty crap imo. It's strong points are when played in numbers but for the most part I'd personally want to sit down and relax and play my games old school without flaying my arms around like an idiot. I don't see it happening for older gamers unless they have kids, then I can see the attraction. I don't have kids and having the Wii already in the house is more than enough motion tech for me. It's seven months to Christmas before it'll be switched on again for a few games of bowling with the family.
___________
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 2:48:35 AM
Reply
1 being its seen as a family friendly console, soccer mums see it as the only console appropriate for kids.
you look at the 360 whats its mascot?
halo.
you look at the ps3s whats its mascot?
kratos.
you look at the wii whats its mascot?
mario.
2nd reason and i think the stronger one is it gives older gamers a serious nostalgia hit.
i absolutely loved playing pokemon red when i was a kid, the wii lets me play allot of the games i played when i was 6.
does the ps3 let me do that?
NOPE!
does the 360 let me do that?
NOPE!
thats one thing sony and M$ are missing, they think that if they bring in motion controllers that their console will automatically sell like a wii.
i dont like move only because there wasting time and money on this when they could be spending it somewhere else.
i dont hate move, im looking forward to how it can revolutionize the way we experience our games.
but is the cost worth it?
what would you rather?
sony spend tens of millions of dollars making move?
or them put that money towards saving their studios which have gone bankrupt?
sony london in particular has lost a sh*t load of employees due to budget cuts.
what would you rather?
move, or the re announcement of 8 days and the getaway 3?
i sure know which one i would pick!
johnld
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 6:06:13 AM
The wii's mascot is mario theres no argueing that, but thats because its the franchise that made nintendo great. Thats the game that people look back to as one of their favorite childhood franchise. hell, theres only 2 games i bought for the wii, new mario bros wii and mario galaxy. As for microsoft, they have master chief, mainly because they dont have anything else they can use imho. As for sony, they dont really have a mascot this gen. ps1 it probably was crash, ps2 probably was jak and daxter, and for the ps3, theres a lot to choose from because they've always had the most franchises that are just simply amazing. theres kratos, sackboy, drake, etc. Their library is just so diverse to actually focus on 1 mascot.
As for nostalgia hit, are you serious? first off you say you loved playing pokemon red then say the wii lets you play the games you loved when you were younger. unless i'm missing something, the wii doesnt let you play gameboy games. although i havent looked up my nintendo wii for a long time, i'm sure it doesnt let you play gameboy games. you can correct me on this if i'm wrong. How old are you by the way? when i go for nostalgia, i remember games like the first mario, super mario 3, contra, megaman, and all other older franchises.
as for the other systems not letting you play older games, have you been under a rock this whole time? ps3 can play ps1 and some play ps2 games. the 360 plays some older xbox games too. I believe that psn store and live marketplace offers older games too. Of course you wont see nintendo games on ps3 and 360 because they are nintendo games. what did you expect.
How can you even determine if move is worth the cost when you dont even know how much it will sell for? Lets see, should sony save that studio to create games that has a comparatively small audience or expand their reach to a bigger market which will also allow their system to expand into the casual market. i think its a pretty clear choice.
___________
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 9:31:25 AM
a boy and his blob looks like a really fun game, im actually cursing myself for buying a 360 instead of a wii!
and yes the wii does let you play gameboy games, its called a emulator.
ps1 games are near impossible to find, no stores sell them anymore, im not using ebay anymore because the last 3 times i bought something i did not get the item.
the PSN store sucks because all the ps1 classics are only on the US store, the only ones EU gets are the freaking disney titles!
as for move im not saying its not worth its price, im saying id rather sony use the money they spent making it on more useful things.
i thought the ps3 was made for games, not for gimmicks!
i would much rather have the getaway and 8 days than a motion controller.
sawao_yamanaka
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 10:00:03 AM
Last edited by sawao_yamanaka on 5/8/2010 10:03:41 AM
DeathOfChaos
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 6:14:27 PM
Mavfan321
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 4:15:59 AM
Reply
kraygen
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 4:28:08 AM
Reply
I personally think the 1:1 ratio will get me to play games I don't usually play that often. Like shooters, a simple gun attachment made for the move could make me play shooters for the feel and accuracy.
I really enjoyed fable on original xbox, I know ps3 doesn't have that, but an rpg like it being able to use move for the bow and sword/shield would be a lot of fun.
One big thing I want, I've said it before and will continue to say it until I get it, Demon's Souls 2 with Move. I can't wait.
WolfCrimson
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 5:07:19 AM
Imagi
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 4:48:58 AM
Reply
I shall be getting the move though as I do like the idea of the motion controlled games. Hopefully, Move will not annoy me and get in the way of the game. I am also a little annoyed at the lack of games that make use of the PS-EYE, Sony should have at least made it compatible with the eyetoy games, Move should fill that gap.
DeathOfChaos
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 6:09:38 PM
Deleted User
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 5:36:02 AM
Reply
(b.d)
currently playing
Ps3 - GTA EFLC (LATD)
360 - splintercell conviction
Ultimadream
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 6:22:21 AM
Reply
But in all seriousness, i just cant see it working on games i enjoy, I never liked it on the Wii, just becuase it is coming to the PS3 does not mean i am going to chance my mind anytime soon.
JackC8
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 6:52:05 AM
Reply
Personally I'm slightly interested in the Move. I have no intention of throwing out my DS3, and it will be the way I play 90+ percent of my games in the future, but I am fairly curious about what developers can do with mature titles on a powerful, hi-def console using motion controls. I dunno, I think it could be a lot of fun for an ocassional change of pace.
Axe99
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 6:56:57 AM
Reply
I also think it works well for the PS3 - the Playstation has always had the broadest appeal of the big three - casual, hardcore, and plenty of niche. And there are casual games (Singstar, Buzz, music-peripheral Rock Hero games by the dozen) that sell well on the PS3 now. While it may not appeal to many PS3 readers who visit the site, that doesn't mean there aren't PS3 owners out there keen on it.
CHAOS THEORY X
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 9:25:22 AM
Reply
DeathOfChaos
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 6:00:31 PM
Alienange
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 11:56:05 AM
Reply
If Sony wants some Move success they're going to need the games that appeal to women, children and older folk because the thirty year olds don't seem too keen on the idea of motion in their games.
Last edited by Alienange on 5/8/2010 11:56:31 AM
main_event05
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 11:56:55 AM
Reply
DeathOfChaos
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 5:57:41 PM
ebterp
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 12:30:13 PM
Reply
totozero18
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 1:25:32 PM
Reply
sunspider13
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 2:08:06 PM
Reply
I don't think devs should try and shoehorn the tech into games that are already far into being finished. Do it at the onset or don't do it at all.
Will I get the Move? Maybe, and I'm one of those 30-somethings, lol. I'm waiting for E3 to make my final decision. I'm just hoping that Sony has the sense to bundle the Move with the Eye. If that happens then I'll get it for sure.
Last edited by sunspider13 on 5/8/2010 2:09:08 PM
DeathOfChaos
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 5:54:06 PM
Jed
Sunday, May 09, 2010 @ 1:05:32 AM
Mornelithe
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 4:56:07 PM
Reply
Sure, you're going to have the Sony party, and the other more casual IP that'll cater to a different audience, and maybe even breath more fresh ideas into Sony's already fairly diverse library of family/kid friendly games. But, as I said, I think we'll have a MUCH better idea of whether or not this is a waste, after E3 or TGS (ie whenever Sony moves beyond tech demo's and to serious showings of what they're thinking).
Personally, I think there are several ways this tech could be adapted in a real usable way to certain genre's. And I think Sony's internal devs have given us enough ingenuity and brilliance to warrant a benefit of the doubt, at least for the time being.
DeathOfChaos
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 5:53:02 PM
Reply
ghinasky
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 8:39:49 PM
Reply
and the writer is the one off base but the PlayStation Move is a very important part of PS3. Very very important and the PS3's longevity depends on it. The PSMove will comprise 50% of the PS3's life.
The PS3 has the 13 years & up department fully covered but it has been lacking in the 12 below department. The PS1 & PS2 had all departments well covered and had an answer to anything Nintendo churns out before. LBP, Ratchet & Clank are certainly not enough to lure Mario, Pokemon & Zelda lubbers from Wii.
LBP2 ModNation Racers, 3-D Dot are good signs for the younger gamers below gamers to consider the PS3 but I don't feel they are compelling enough. Even the PlayStion Move might not be enough either unless they come up with a killer app. What Sony needs is a killer app for the kids just like the Teens & Mature counter parts. A game that again will rival Mario like Sonic the Hedgehog and Crash Bandicoot proportions with or with out the PlayStation Move.
Nintendo always had these games for the younger audience as their life blood and cash cow. Sony should do the same with its own first party exclusives. Until that happens, Nintendo will dominate the younger games, family, party games & hand held market.
I know Sony has already made its point that video game consoles are not just kid's toys but also for grown up's entertainment. Which is very good but Sony should never forget that as long as there are kids there will always be a need for games for the young.
I wish the PlayStation Move all the success for the PS3.
H8WL3R
Saturday, May 08, 2010 @ 10:10:02 PM
Secondly about the younger demographic and Nintendo icons/mascots, that apart from Crash Bandicoot (oh where oh where have you gone) I don't recall many other "Mario-like" icons/trademark characters/trademarks from the PS1 era. Honest question, anyone else? Crash and the gang seem to be MIA too. From PS2 on there's been Ratchet & Clank which is family friendly overall and is representing Sony. I do recall Jak & Daxter from PS2(and PSP no?),though I admittedly have not played any of those yet (who knows maybe someday). Sonic and Co. have made some PS2/PSP/PS3 appearances, however generally the non old school titles were iffy or just sub par to say the least (started ok early in the game but then got indescibably frustrating as it progressed, *growl* falling off the damn cliffs/edges).
Thanks for reading and any friendly feedback.
Parting food for thought, how about trying to revive Crash and letting him and co. star in a comeback kick ass title again? How does perhaps reviving others or creating a new one or two sound? What say you PSXtremers?
WolfCrimson
Sunday, May 09, 2010 @ 10:40:02 AM
Jed
Sunday, May 09, 2010 @ 1:00:55 AM
Reply
Move will bring attention to the PS3 from the motion crowd and the extra features of the PS3 will convince them to go SONY.
GamerO1
Thursday, May 13, 2010 @ 10:40:05 AM
Reply
I own over 1,000 Console Games and more than 20 Consoles, and out of these my Wii Library is very small. If I can buy the same game, even for more money, on a different system I will... I'll get the PS2 Version before I buy the Wii Version.
Motion Control is just "Okay" for Sports games, but most others are garbage.
They've ruined Zelda and Mario games, but I buy them anyway. I have to have them in my Library.
THE NTMIDTR
Thursday, May 13, 2010 @ 4:48:06 PM
Reply
My kids (9 & 8) have a Wii... it's theirs. The PS3 is Daddy's... you don't touch the PS3 unless Daddy is right there. I will be excited to try the Move hardware/software... but after buying a headset, an Eye, 4 DS3 controllers + 1 Sixaxis (mine shipped with the Sixaxis... and DS3 wasn't out when I wanted to play 2 player) I am a little hesitant to buy more gear until I see something that I "have to play".
PaiNT_kinG
Thursday, May 13, 2010 @ 10:47:27 PM
Reply
Sky_Genesis
Friday, May 14, 2010 @ 2:01:32 AM
Reply

PlayStation Move









LightShow
Reply
Friday, May 07, 2010 @ 9:30:43 PM
dad buys PS3 to play COD with his office buddies because its also a blu ray player.
move drops and he finds out he can give his kids something like the wii on hardware hes alread bought.
thats your audience, sony. theres probably like at least 2000 individuals that will buy your product. the rest of us have a wii, and move's gonna have to open up a hugegantic can of whup-ass to get everyone else to buy it. i'm talking like holographic projectors in the ball thingy. call me when that happens.