Could 3D Gaming Cross The Line?
View Large ImageMary Shelley wrote "Frankenstein" at the age of 19 and saw the book published - under the name of her husband's friend - in 1818. A far cry from the Hollywood depictions, the novel operated on a number of different levels and addressed everything from feminism to politics to the sociology of development. But above all else, it warned against "crossing the line." It warned against men attempting to play God and go against the natural order. Ironically enough, the day after Shelley died at the age of 53 of a brain tumor, the current Prince of England opened the world's first exhibition dedicated to the scientific and technological advancements men have made.
In looking at the new 3D technology, one almost starts to wonder when (perhaps not if) we will cross the line into virtual reality, and whether or not that will present a slew of physiological and psychological problems we can't foresee. This video, be it real or fake, actually frightened me on some level. There was excitement and a bit of wonder but lurking beneath was a significant thread of apprehension and anxiety. We've all wanted to see gaming advance, and so it has. In an extremely short span of time - relatively speaking - we've gone from Asteroids to Uncharted 2: Among Thieves. ...when you think about it, the advancement is downright insane. And we love to see new steps in the industry, although I admit to being more interested in the artistic jumps; i.e., storyline, character development, dialogue, original music compositions, artistry and choreography, etc.
But is there a line? Can we push it too far? Granted, this question is probably out of place; we're nowhere near the level of technology I refer to, and we know virtual reality is a long ways off. It may not even be possible. That being said, it's always a topic worth discussing, especially in a world that strives for bigger and supposedly "better" technological inventions, often at the expense of true humanity. Personally, I believe we've lost a lot of the traits that made civilization worth experiencing, but I'm aware I'm in the vast minority and most don't believe burying their noses in a cell phone doesn't have any effect on the quality of the arts available in society. I say otherwise, but whatever. 3D gaming, as it is interactive, may have a much more profound impact and effect than 3D movies, and the next step - perhaps sensation and feeling of some kind - legitimately scares the crap out of me.
Most aren't scared. They're elated at the thought. "Imagine that," they'd gleefully suggest. And while a part of me wholeheartedly agrees, I have to wonder...
6/11/2010 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (43 posts)
NightHawk17
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 9:57:44 PM
Reply
2 up, 0 down
prince_of_barja
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 9:59:29 PM
Reply
0 up, 5 down
BikerSaint
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 10:03:36 PM
Reply
... will also be the very first time my landlord also gets to see ectoplasm leaking from hundreds of holes in the wall, right where a 12guage sawed-off pump released all it's shells.
Last edited by BikerSaint on 6/11/2010 10:05:06 PM
1 up, 1 down
Kangasfwa
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 1:22:36 AM
Last edited by Kangasfwa on 6/12/2010 1:23:00 AM
2 up, 0 down
Qubex
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 10:12:40 PM
Reply
If humanity did stop imagining what it would be like to break the next horizon, what it would be like to push the limits of what we believe to be possible, our very survival comes into question ...by not pushing, by not striving for the "better"... we die!
When considering where gaming technologies are moving and where they fit into this equation, I feel strongly that holographic virtual reality entertainment will become a reality... but not for a long while yet.
The main point to be made is... what delivery system is used for a very immersive virtual reality experience?
Considering where 3D is... take the quality of the 3D we saw in the film "Avatar" for example.
If we had hardware that could create game worlds as detailed and lush as "Pandora" we would almost "be there" in a sense. By wearing glasses and being immersed at that level it was already close to something akin to virtual reality, minus your own freedom of movement within that world.
So what is missing is a delivery system and a "head rig" that is light and comfortable enough not to inhibit your gaming playing experience.
Motion and head tracking is already being planned, in a rudimentary sense, with "Move" and "Natal"... however your own POV does not change... the screen you look at stays still. Therefore, when you turn your head to the right your game view does not change... unless of course you use the wand "nub" to change camera direction, tilt and height.
Within the next 10 years a virtual reality headset could be a reality, especially on the PS4, the problem is comfort.
It has been done already, we have seen examples from companies in the past, and of course, examples in documentaries when seeing these system being run and tested in labs. The trick is to design the right type of gear that really works well, is lite and comfortable, and we have the console hardware power to create really immersive worlds... otherwise it will just be another cheap rendition.
I, for one, are very excited by the prospects, but it would need to be done right.
We already see that 3D on the PS3 is an after thought... meaning that Sony may implement it... but we know the hardware was not built from the ground up to actual handle full HD 3D visuals. To muscle this onto the PS3 means having to cut corners, lower resolutions and maybe produce an overall experience that is not completely up to par.
We may be fortunate that Sony, and developers like Guerilla and Naught (Good) Dog, squeeze the umpteenth out of the Cell+RSX brotherhood... and, whilst immersed in their worlds, not notice the lower graphical resolutions and corner cutting that has been done to get it to work; nevertheless... I think the PS4 is exactly the hardware we need to move this genre of immersive entertainment forward, because honestly...
...this time Sony will do it right!
Q!
"play.experience.enjoy"
Last edited by Qubex on 6/11/2010 10:16:32 PM
1 up, 0 down
BikerSaint
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 10:39:24 PM
Check it out....
We'll all be mech's soon....
New Company to Make Full Body Exoskeleton Game Controller
XIO will debut at E3, offering movement tracking and physical feedback.
http://www.1up.com/do/newsStory?cId=3179633
0 up, 0 down
coverton341
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 10:47:50 PM
1 up, 0 down
Shadow_Ninja
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 10:19:55 PM
Reply
anyways, back to the subject. i honestly can't give a educated opinion because i have never seen through a 3dtv. but basically, what i am trying to implement with all that i have wrote is that we need all of this new innovated technology to be able to advance into something better than 3d, like, i don't know, something crazier than 3d!!!
0 up, 0 down
BikerSaint
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 12:02:55 AM
Maybe you got some telekinesis flowing outward over the site that you weren't aware off
Actually, that was for Qubex in response to his post so I don't know why I wound up posting it to you, maybe just a late night brain fart on my part.
But certainly glad you liked it though.
The skel' suit really intrigues me too & I want to see the full body armor thing once they're all done making it.
BTW, I could see myself wearing it while roaring down the highway on my Harley!
But I'd just need to find a few Terminator weapons to go with that whole "King of the Road/Mad Max" Futurama thing I'd have goin' on too.
Last edited by BikerSaint on 6/12/2010 12:06:12 AM
0 up, 0 down
mehrab2603
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 10:31:17 PM
Reply
Last edited by mehrab2603 on 6/11/2010 10:33:38 PM
0 up, 0 down
Mavfan321
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 3:24:18 AM
1 up, 0 down
eLLeJuss
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 10:35:53 PM
Reply
1 up, 0 down
NeoHumpty
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 11:12:16 PM
Reply
0 up, 0 down
CharlesD
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 11:25:33 PM
Reply
I admit this can be a scary proposition but we can safely say we are a ways off from having a gaming experience seam completely real. I know the idea of touch and 3D might be combined but making it a means of controlling the game is certainly a step closer to the possible horrific or amazing future of gaming.
0 up, 0 down
Highlander
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 11:30:11 PM
1 up, 0 down
Highlander
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 11:29:18 PM
Reply
3D TV is all fin and goof, but the presentation will alter the experience compared to reality because vision will be different.There are a lot of visual cues to do with depth of field and focus that cannot translate to a 3D TV.
In the end I don't think that all that extra stuff to create a facsimile of reality is needed. I've played racing sims an slight simulators since the really early 80's, the first 8-bit home computers managed to create games that caused the player to lean into turns and duck instinctively because immersion was achieved despite primitive graphics and sound. The gameplay was fluid enough to convince the player's brain of the experience.
I don't think that all the extra bells and whistles can replace excellent writing (by the programmer) and a game that creates immersion just by being that good. Beyond that it's all bells, whistles. That, and people trying to create a virtual space so that they can 'enjoy' themselves in a guilt free environment.
3 up, 0 down
SvenMD
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 6:14:42 AM
I definitely feel that we have created a virtual world, but we are no where NEAR virtual reality...the idea of actually placing yourself within the game. (Your hands, your movement, "I see what the character sees") And I think we can only dream about the holo-deck or the X-Men's danger room...
But saying that 3D TV wont get all the cues of depth of field...well, we've done pretty damn good with our 2D system, so I think that even with current 3D tech they can do ALOT. Again, nowhere near virtual reality the way I see it.
I kinda agree that all the extra stuff to create a facsimile of reality may not be NEEDED, it sure does make gaming alot more fun. I think that it is more immersive the more realistic and lifelike it is. Everybody on this site used to lift their NES controller 3 feet in the air the first time they played Super Mario Brothers because they thought it might help, but we all grew out of it over time. Maybe we were tricked in the beginning that we somehow had some control, or that we were really driving those 8-bit cars. I guarantee you that I will be more immersed in GT5 than I ever was in Rad Racer.
I agree with the bells and whistles though...I don't want 3D or virtual reality to be a gimmick. Take the Wii (not saying the Wii is a total gimmick...I love mine...but it is kind of a "fad") Anyway, the Wii came out hot because it was new and innovative, and now you could "move" to make your character move, and that was cool...but then they never took it any further. Well that, and I got tired of flinging around on my couch all the time. But it was alot of bells and whistles but never any GREAT games with visuals, and story, and superb direction.
So I'm one of those people that's looking for 3D, or the PSMove, with great production values. And eventually I will be one of those people that's looking for VR - maybe I don't even care what it does to my brain ;)
3 up, 0 down
FatherSun
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 11:40:05 PM
Reply
Humankind has crossed the line long ago. Yet we have not even scratched the surface. We are simply not meant to get to a GOD level. Not in our current form anyway. Our curiosity will enlighten us but will also eventually bring about our demise. Funny cause this topic somehwhat reminds me of the Disney movie WALL-E. Humans becoming so dependent on technology that our bodies evolve into mush. Is this 3D push the beginning of humankinds newest era? CyberAge? VirtualAge? Who knows?
I have so many thoughts and questions inspired by this post that I must now slow down my thought process because this conversation can last forever.
OK! Back to earth. We are at the beginning stages of what will eventually lead to a HOLODECK. Imagine if 3D, MOVE and NATAL techs were intergrated along wth Holographic Projection tech that is also being further developed. This may become a reality sooner than we expect.
Lastly! Controller. Camera. Televison. Sound System. So much equipment at so much expense. An EXTERNAL experience. Meanwhile PS9 has spores entering our brains making the experience INTERNAL. Which would you prefer?
Last edited by FatherSun on 6/11/2010 11:45:35 PM
0 up, 0 down
Highlander
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 11:58:55 PM
3 up, 0 down
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 12:57:02 AM
...sadly, it's not the biggest group of gamers. But we still find a way to keep growing.
2 up, 0 down
Highlander
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 1:32:04 AM
We (our community) simply have to keep growing to effect change on the industry we love. All we need is intelligent readers and commenters and of course we need you, Arnold , John and the others at PSXExtreme to do that voodoo, that you do, so well....!
2 up, 0 down
FatherSun
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 7:20:11 AM
But as a PS loyalist I'd love it if SONY one upped MS and enhanced the XMB interface with all the features that NATAL is boasting. I know it can be done.
@Ben. What we lack in quantity we definitely make up for in QUALITY.
Highlander has now made me mentally link you with Screamin' Jay Hawkins..... original artist of the song, I Put a Spell on You. Keep up that VOODOO that YOU DO.
Last edited by FatherSun on 6/12/2010 7:27:29 AM
0 up, 0 down
BikerSaint
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 12:21:34 AM
Reply
In the year 2045 MS is caught making a helmet cam/controller that secretly released millions of microscopic nano-drones into their players brains, thereby giving MS full control over those players.
Oh wait, seeing how they keep buying 5,6,7, & 8 RROD'ed bot boxes, MS already has mind-control over the majority of them now.
And MS will never mind-meld and control me through my 360, cause I made an all-purpose aluminum foil helmet just for such an occasion.
Last edited by BikerSaint on 6/12/2010 12:22:40 AM
3 up, 0 down
FatherSun
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 7:33:08 AM
1 up, 0 down
maxpontiac
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 8:38:42 PM
It took 5 break downs before I got a clue.
1 up, 0 down
Milonakis
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 12:31:12 AM
Reply
4 up, 0 down
FatherSun
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 7:35:55 AM
2 up, 0 down
___________
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 12:54:00 AM
Reply
were still a long way from virtual reality.
ive always dreamed of being able to put sunnies on and they have a inbuilt screen that makes the game your playing look and feel like reality.
we may have 3D, we may have voice recognition, we may have motion controls but were still a long way from virtual reality.
curved screens will be next, i saw a video the other day of a OLED screen sony made that is so thin you can wrap it around a pencil!
imagine having a TV as a wrist band now how cool would that be!?
1 up, 0 down
fooosie
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 1:28:15 AM
Reply
1 up, 0 down
Kangasfwa
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 1:44:18 AM
Reply
Personally, I think it could be great fun...
http://www.mysticrev.com/index.php?cid=1
0 up, 0 down
SmokeyPSD
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 3:16:58 AM
Reply
3 up, 0 down
Lawless SXE
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 4:23:00 AM
Reply
I think that is the only problem with the idea of virtual reality. People don't realise that for sometihng to be real, you need to be able to do more than see and hear it. You need to be able to feel it. That can never be replicated in real space, in real time, unless through direct mental stimulation.
However. I think that through these emergent technologies, we really already have begun to cross the line of what is humanity. What is available now borders on the very lowermost limits of transhumanism, in our cosmetic enhancements: plastic surgery, rhinoplasty, boob jobs, etc. Then there are the biomechanic advancements, such as hearing aids, pacemakers, bionic eyes, and now prosthetic limbs capable of interacting with the neural network of the human body, or close to it. These technologies will continue to advance, and possibly to such an extent that the entire human body becomes a machine.
I've gone off track again. While VR could damage the mind, and indeed, gaming in general is already capable of doing that, as are many other forms of media, biotech and nanotech has the capability of damaging our souls. Taking our humanity by making us something we are not. Anyway, a very thought-provoking article, as always Ben. Thankyou for keeping this site intelligent.
Peace.
1 up, 0 down
kraygen
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 4:35:13 AM
Reply
People's mental state isn't going to change because of a video game, people are either stable or they're not. It's not a matter of how advanced technology is, it's a matter of peoples psyche.
4 up, 0 down
SolidFantasy
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 6:07:02 AM
Reply
The way I see it, we'll always hear a lot of talk over CPU, GPU, disc drives and what not. Those specs will always be challenged (excluding the Wii).
However, what I think the next limiting factor in gaming will be is how "plugged in" we are to the game. We can only put so many buttons on the controller and motion sensing has its limits. The future of gaming lies withing diminishing the difference between the person playing the game and the person in the game. In a sense it would be true "VR training" (MGS). Who knows what the limits of mental trauma this could lead to?
Those are my thoughts/predictions on this subject.
-sf out
0 up, 0 down
JackC8
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 7:29:51 AM
Reply
I think they're crossing the line into alienating their customer base.
0 up, 3 down
DeathOfChaos
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 2:55:32 PM
Reply
0 up, 0 down
maxpontiac
Saturday, June 12, 2010 @ 4:53:44 PM
Reply
1 - It's too expensive!
2 - It sucks!
3 - It's a gimmick!
Part of me tends to believe the majority of negativity stems from the individual not being able to afford it. I hear the same type of logic when it comes to people commenting on the size of an HDTV.
We live in a 3D world, do we not? Shouldn't gaming, movies, and all entertainment for that matter follow suit? I think so!
I am somewhat jealous to what technology my grandchildren will have at their disposal if they chose to be a gamer. It should be an amazing experience for them.
2 up, 1 down
nogoat23
Sunday, June 13, 2010 @ 1:13:40 PM
Reply
If we become able to step into a virtual world that can perfectly cater to our desires, will we lose the will to live in the real world? If we can spend our time living in a perfect virtual world, why should we go back to the imperfect real world? Why should we devote our lives to making the world a better place if we can achieve perfection in virtuality?
I think technology will make us lethargic and unimaginative. In life, if there is a problem, you have to think creatively to solve it. I presume that in a virtual world, to solve problems, you just adjust the settings on your program.
"I don't have enough money for rent this month. I'll just enter a cheat code and get 10,000 dollars."
You can already see glimpses of this happening with people trading their real lives for their virtual ones.
However, there are also people that know how to moderate themselves. They know that there is no substitute for human interaction. These people will still exist in the future, and hopefully they will be able to convince the others to go outside from time to time.
2 up, 0 down
spiderboi
Monday, June 14, 2010 @ 9:49:00 AM
Reply
In the same way how Blueray won its war with HD DVD, it all depends on 2 entertainment factors: gaming and..well...porn. I read somewhere that due to both industries (PS3 of course for the former)lead to the demise of the HD DVD format. Now, come 3D into the picture. And i won't even go into further detail on this....
0 up, 0 down
MartyRules
Reply
Friday, June 11, 2010 @ 9:53:41 PM