Interview: Gaming And The "Demise Of Guys"
| Pages: | | | 1 | | | 2 | | |
An article on CNN prompted quite the response from the video game community, as one might expect.
We at PSXE responded as well, challenging the assumption that video games are part of the reason why boys are slow to turn into young men. But we also wanted to tackle a few more difficult questions, so we approached the authors of the book, "The Demise of Guys: Why Boys Are Struggling And What We Can Do About It" to see if we could get some answers.
Dr. Philip Zimbardo was out of the country and unable to participate, but psychologist Nikita Duncan was good enough to participate; the following are her replies to our relatively complex (and admittedly leading) questions, and we thank her for her time.
PSXE: Historically, video games have been seen as a "nerd" hobby. They're mostly mainstream now, but those who grew up with games were typically seen as geeks; therefore, would it be correct to assume that they were - based on definitions of nerds and geeks - smarter and less likely to be involved with vices and bad behavior?
Duncan: "If you're Generation X or a Millennial pretty much everyone plays or has played games and it doesn't make you a geek at all, rather gaming is normal activity. Gamers aren't necessarily smarter, different games attract different kinds of people and there's a game out there for everyone. It doesn't make you less likely to be involved in vices or other bad behavior except that physically you're most likely sitting down somewhere focusing on the game so your options for causing trouble are limited. Games can be a way to blow off steam, so in that way they'd be a good alternative to negative coping behaviors."
PSXE: The Atlantic's "The End of Men" article had a lot of merit, but didn't necessarily mention video games as a possible cause. What aspects of interactive entertainment do you believe hinders the maturity process?
Duncan: "We focus on the excessive use of video games and porn and the book is meant to raise awareness about the possible consequences of that, especially for guys that use both excessively. Porn and video games are also symptoms of a larger problem: that, as Jane McGonigal put it, reality is broken. If you're a young guy and you're literally being left to your own devices (i.e. parents are not parenting or father is absent, school is not interesting or challenging, no clear need for you in society), why wouldn't you engage in fun activities, and in the case of video games, a fun challenge that provides results?
The main problem with these activities currently is that in many ways they are socially isolating and they can be addictive, potentially undermining guys' abilities in other areas of their lives (such academic motivation and later succeeding and deriving satisfaction in a career, or socializing with girls and later being sexual with women). The sheer amount of time spent on gaming - the average teenage guy plays 13 hours a week or 676 hours a year or the entire month of February - takes away from exploring other talents or developing social skills."
6/11/2012 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (45 posts)
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:13:59 PM
LimitedVertigo
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:16:19 PM
Axe99
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:25:38 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:51:19 PM
LimitedVertigo
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:52:28 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:20:41 AM
CH1N00K
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:26:06 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:29:30 AM
CH1N00K
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:34:42 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 2:26:06 AM
Temjin001
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 9:48:55 PM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 9:54:01 PM
Last edited by LimitedVertigo on 6/11/2012 9:57:06 PM
CH1N00K
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 10:08:04 PM
Reply
There are a lot of people out who spend all their lives trying to figure out a way that they don't have to work for a living. Is that the fault of TV or Movies or Video games? No, these people are just lazy...and except for installing shock collars around their necks, there isn't a whole lot you can do about them...
Last edited by CH1N00K on 6/11/2012 10:09:18 PM
LimitedVertigo
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 10:15:45 PM
CH1N00K
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 10:44:40 PM
Last edited by CH1N00K on 6/11/2012 10:45:24 PM
LimitedVertigo
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 10:48:23 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:23:06 PM
LimitedVertigo
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:27:09 PM
Axe99
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:28:46 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:31:40 PM
LimitedVertigo
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:34:19 PM
No longer do people grow up wanting or needing a better life when they can just coast their entire lives off the system and the best part is us working folk are the suckers!
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:44:44 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:53:08 PM
CH1N00K
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:56:52 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:06:36 AM
CH1N00K
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:46:22 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 2:26:42 AM
BikerSaint
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 10:20:33 PM
Reply
Metal Head
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 10:28:22 PM
Reply
Rogueagent01
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 10:46:56 PM
Reply
And even the usage of "other talents" is pretty close minded. There are people that are talented at video games and can make a living off of those talents, be it through competitions or getting involved with the industry. It's like saying someone who is too into music isn't exploring other talents. Sorry, but some people know right off the bat that they have found something they truely enjoy, and maybe, just maybe they can earn a living while doing it. Gamers in todays day are far more social than ever before and likely will become even more social as gaming continues to grow.
Many people have a self destructive personality and with no outside source i.e. gaming, TV, music, or any other hobbies will still find a way to self destruct.
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 11:29:31 PM
Reply
Do you think Don Draper would get very far these days? Hell no, he would be in jail. Nobody wants to hire men anymore, the number of men in college has dropped off, more and more guys are raised only by their mothers, and there just isn't much of a place for you unless you become a hipster. The world doesn't want us? Fine, we've got alternate worlds.
reryan
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:25:26 AM
Reply
As much as it pains me when I get crap from my girlfriend or anyone else who doesn't 'get' gaming, I can also see with my own two eyes friends and peers who neglect their own health and success because they are too wrapped up in games or other forms of entertainment. When I visit a friend who does nothing except drink vodka and play world of warcraft all day, it pains me. When I see an overweight teen who plays more hours of games in a day while in high school than I do in an average week as a working adult, I see why people think of gaming in a negative light.
And may I just say, the problem with Black and White thinking extends into all areas of society. The political conversation I saw unfold before me was kind of disturbing to me. The idea that everyone who is unemployed is scamming the system is totally wrong to me. It is very possible to be someone with a background rooted in hard work who has an advanced degree who got laid off through no fault of their own. Unemployment benefits exist as a temporary relief for people who are between jobs; the money lasts usually less than a year and you have to have worked full time for a certain amount of time to even qualify. You do not qualify if you were fired for incompetence, only if you were laid off or the company went bankrupt, etc.
'Welfare' as people think of it hasn't really existed in a long time. During the Clinton presidency most of what we consider welfare was shifted from cash payments into what is known as food assistance today (food stamps). There are fairly strict requirements on what kinds of food can be bought with food stamps based on cost and nutrition. I don't see why it should be looked on negatively that as a modern society that we don't allow the needy and the less fortunate in our country to go hungry.
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:32:46 AM
Vodka and WoW? That poor man...
Last edited by WorldEndsWithMe on 6/12/2012 12:38:07 AM
Highlander
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:47:27 PM
Warrior Poet
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 9:46:55 AM
Reply
I definitely agree that men are at a disadvantage today. When you ask someone to talk about masculinity, they always talk about anger, violence, aggression, impulsiveness - those are the defining traits of a maladjusted teenager, not a man. Look at the wikipedia article on masculinity. It has nothing good to say. Never once mentioned are the qualities of a loving father or a loyal brother.
We live in a country where food and protection are pretty much available as long as you work. The traditional role of protector and provider is unnecessary. That's a really sore spot for most of my male friends, because that's all they really wanted.
Highlander
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:38:29 PM
Reply
Duncan says this in her closing comment "Games have addictive qualities. Most games are perfectly in tune with a user's pleasure center because they have scheduled rewards like higher levels, weapons, or tools, reinforcing the user's desire to perform and keep them coming back for more. That's not to say gamers can't be well adjusted, most are."
let's take a step back and look again at what games do, and why it can be called addictive. Games provide pleasure - yes. But more than that games are designed to reward players for their effort. They constantly ping the reward system in the brain. ADD sufferers lost motivation because the reward - the gratification - for an action is too long term. The ADD sufferer needs more immediate rewards in order to maintain interest.
Call it instant gratification if you want, but it's more than that. If an ADD sufferer is doing something they are interested in, even if it's reading about their favorite topic, they can achieve a kind of hyper focus. That's because they are doing something that they enjoy and the reward system in the brain providing near constant positive feedback. But as soon as the task moves to something less interesting, that reward feedback is lost, and they person quickly loses interest, motivation and their attention begins to drift to something more interesting.
Often times ADD sufferers will zone out, and even fall asleep because they are literally bored by the topic at hand, and their brain could not find anything else sufficiently interesting to focus on.
My point being that video games do not cause this. Video games however are designed to ping the reward system which means that they are perfectly suited to anyone with even marginal attention deficiency. The addiction that we talk about with games is not a physical addiction to a substance, but it's more than a behavioral addiction because really what is happening is that you become conditioned to the very rapid reward cycles that games provide. So when that stimulus is removed, your brain feels an immediate change and you naturally want to restore the reward cycle. There is biochemistry involved because of the various neuro-transmitters and hormones that are involved. So in that sense it is a chemical addiction, that expresses in a behavioral manner.
The medications that help ADD/ADHD patients work on the biochemistry in the brain to better stimulate things like (but not limited to) the reward system and therefore raise the ability of the patient to focus on tasks that normally do not sufficiently engage them. ADD meds typically raise dopamine levels (as well as norepinephrine, and serotonin). Domapine is strongly associated with the reward system in the brain. The increased dopamine levels in patients taking ADD medication are thought to result in the reward system being more effective.
Duncan needs to take care in presenting this information and bringing topics like addiction and whether gamers are well adjusted, into the discussion. The reactions of ADD/ADHD suffers to video games - even those with symptoms so mild they are on the margins of diagnosis - are not based in addiction, nor do they reflect how well adjusted the player is.
Highlander
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 12:45:19 PM
http://psychcentral.com/news/2010/02/04/brain-reward-system-tied-to-adhd/11185.html
Dopamine and the reward system in the human brain...
http://wings.buffalo.edu/aru/ARUreport01.htm
http://www.bnl.gov/bnlweb/pubaf/pr/PR_display.asp?prID=998
How/why do I know all this? I am ADD, my son is severely ADD and suffered from a form of autism and my wife also has moderate ADD. I have researched and read, read and researched, and of course lived and experienced this all. I get tired of the misconceptions around ADD, and I found Nikita Duncan's answers did not really tell the whole story with respect to attention deficit and video games.
Highlander
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 1:50:09 PM
LimitedVertigo
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 1:50:31 PM
reryan
Tuesday, June 12, 2012 @ 6:13:45 PM
In terms of the interview, the main point I was trying to make before, and Highlander makes very well is that if excessive game playing is linked with addictive or destructive behavior, it is because it is a symptom, not a cause, of the true problem. I've seen people resort to constant game playing as an escape from depression just as some might turn to drugs or alcohol. To me, blaming the game is clearly backwards.

View Large Image










LimitedVertigo
Reply
Monday, June 11, 2012 @ 9:44:47 PM