What Will Separate The Two PS4 Models?
Obviously, this question assumes there will be two models of the PlayStation 4 when Sony's new console launches later this year.
The rumors are saying there will indeed be two different versions, possibly one priced at $430 and the other holding a $530 price tag. So let's say that information is accurate: What is going to separate the two systems? It can't just be a bigger hard drive, can it? I guess it's possible.
But given the sheer amount of options and features, perhaps it's feasible that the $430 model simply won't boast every last bell and whistle. On the other hand, maybe it's a matter of equipment; i.e., what comes packaged with the console. I keep wondering if any game company will go back to the days when a new video game console came with a freakin' game. And I'd be ecstatic if I got a bigger hard drive and a game for the extra $100. Or maybe they'll throw in another controller, or something. One thing's for damn sure, though- The PS4 better not come with only A/V cables. Seriously. Just...no. It's ridiculous that an HDMI cable doesn't come with the PS3; the PS4 not coming with one is just obscene.
Anyway, what do you think might be the differences between the two PS4 models (assuming there are two models from which to choose)? And what would make you pay the higher price? Is there something you feel you'd absolutely need to have? What is worth that extra hundred bucks to you?
3/8/2013 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (52 posts)
H0TSHELLZ
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 11:51:30 PM
touchyourtoes
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 2:13:42 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 11:08:07 AM
No system in the PS1/N64/Dreamcast era came with a game to my knowledge. The last consoles to do that were those that came out between the SNES/Genesis and N64/PS1; like the Jaguar, Saturn, 3DO, etc.
Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 3/9/2013 11:21:12 AM
Crabba
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:31:32 PM
Cesar_ser_4
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 10:20:53 AM
clockwyzebkny
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:23:01 PM
Reply
Crabba
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:32:46 PM
wiiplay
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:54:37 PM
The next generation of video game consoles, and even the current generation to some degree, is mostly focusing on high definition gameplay. Given the expected price of the PlayStation 4, and the general hardcore audience it's targeting, it would be safe to assume that well over 95% of all consumers interested in purchasing a PS4 will already have a television capable of at least 720p display, if not full 1080p.
If they do not yet have such a display, they can certainly afford to purchase one. This is especially true if they consider themselves 'hardcore' enough to even have the PS4 on their holiday wishlist. The fact is, if the can afford to purchase an expensive next generation device, they can afford an HDTV to go with it.
clockwyzebkny
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 12:21:01 AM
But when i think of it from Sony's perspective, they may feel like it'll hinder sales Think of a person who has the standard tv thinking theyll get to play their brand new ps4 unaware that they cant Whats sad is that i know ppl who still have a sdtv I tell them to get with the times...
Actually that may be a bit insensitive of me..
touchyourtoes
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 2:18:59 AM
wiiplay
Sunday, March 10, 2013 @ 1:33:19 AM
Heck, Amazon sells one for $37.50.
Honestly, if they cannot afford (or do not want) an HDTV, but intend to play a next generation device that primarily outputs in an HD format, going out to buy an additional $40 converter wouldn't be much of a bother for them.
I know people who have standard definition television sets as well, and do not have the money needed to purchase a new high definition display.
That's fair, and understandable in this current economy. However, I must stick with my initial point here. If they can afford to purchase a $400 (or higher) video game device, which is essentially a high end toy strictly for their own enjoyment, they should also be able to afford a television set.
And if they still cannot afford an HDTV as well as a PS4, that converter is still an option.
(or possibly the native Sony model that is likely going to be compatible with the PS4, as it was with all PlayStations before it. You can buy this cable for less than $5 nowadays, and if that cable is suddenly not compatible with the PS4, Sony will certainly sell an updated AV alternative for sale separately. This comment was mostly based on the assumption that Sony were to cut all support for standard definition displays, which just isn't likely to be the case. Although the SDTV market is certainly small, it does still exist. But, if they did happen to cut SD compatibility, that's where a converter would come in handy)
Last edited by wiiplay on 3/10/2013 1:40:29 AM
Metal Head
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:25:54 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:40:18 PM
Reply
JohnnyKey
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 3:21:08 AM
Crabba
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:45:32 PM
Reply
Other than that a PS3 BC Cell chip & PS2 chip would certainly make me more interested in the premium model.
I never understood why you would pay so much more for a "premium" ps3 when the only difference is a slightly bigger HD when you can buy a cheap 2.5" 1TB hard drive yourself and easily just plug it in.
I'm also hoping for these features, although they should really be standard in every model since they're really not adding any cost:
* More than 2 USB ports (bugging me to hell with these slim's without 4 usb ports which the original PS3 had)
* Make it possible to charge controllers in USB ports with console power off, really not rocket science here.
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:55:04 PM
PS3_Wizard
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 1:43:03 AM
If so, your comment would be a hassle to make games for the system.
Also, for every USB port that they add, it does increase the cost. Thats the whole reason they took some away after the PS3 launch to lower the cost.
Last edited by PS3_Wizard on 3/9/2013 1:46:33 AM
touchyourtoes
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 2:25:38 AM
Beamboom
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 5:37:40 AM
Crabba
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 7:10:23 AM
PS3_Wizard: Certainly not, if that was the case they would need to make hundreds of versions of that same game for every different piece of PC hardware out there, and as most know by now, the PS4 is just a PC in a console box.
Yes, usb ports add "cost", but that cost is VERY minimal, as in cents minimal, and it was a moronic decision by Sony to save those few cents when making the slim ps3.
Beamboom: There have already been rumors about this both for the new xbox and ps4, so it's certainly not that unlikely, and I don't see why that would go against the fundamentals of gaming consoles either, it would still be the same tech, only one clocking a bit higher than the other. In fact, the new PC technology used in both new consoles would be a perfect time to do this.
Beamboom
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 8:45:08 AM
The whole deal with consoles is that there is *one* set of hardware specs to develop for. The philosophy of consoles are to take computer gaming and make it as simple as possible. To operate with different performance model alternatives just *screams* wrong.
Just imagine releasing a game that only runs smooth on one of the versions of the PS4. This simply will not happen, trust me.
Or, if you don't trust me then let's make a bet, shall we? Care to make it interesting?
Let's say... The first PS4 game to be released in December to the one who's right?
Crabba
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 4:40:09 PM
I think it would be great if they did, and would probably increase sales a lot considering they could scale price & performance in a way they never did/could with the PS3, so the people who are only interested in getting it cheap would be able to do that, and the people interested in getting the better performance could do that, and would therefor be more likely to pick up a PS4 at launch.
You obviously didn't properly read my previous post, since I already explained that all games would obviously run smooth on both models, only the premium version COULD run some games with more detail, effects & possibly resolution, all easily scalable options that would be an easy thing for devs to do. Simpler games would run & look the same on both models, only more advanced games already scalable for higher performance like say Crysis, Battlefield and the like would include 2 tiers... Still very much the same code, simple & "consoley".
wiiplay
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:47:21 PM
Reply
Could it be possible that Sony is heading down the same road with the PS4, but rather than forcing you to pay for basic multiplayer functionality, they're making you pay for the cloud gaming privileges? So, without paying the subscription fee, which may be cleverly hidden behind a 'premium' console SKU, you would only have limited access to the cloud services that the PS4 is set to offer. Multiplayer, chat and other basic services already available for free on the PS3 would likely remain free, but the more advanced cloud networking services would need a subscription.
That's just my two cents. Seems fairly logical, given the high costs of managing a reliable cloud network.
I'm still rather uncertain as to the fate of the PS4. I love cloud gaming, but hate the seemingly forced social concepts that the PS4 proudly advertises as a key feature.
I buy game consoles to play games. If I wanted to be a social butterfly, I'd go out and join a club, or possibly even go to a bar every so often.
Really skeptical about how Sony will handle this. Going to buy a console nonetheless, possibly even a day 1 purchase. (if I can find one) I love Sony exclusive IPs, and will buy a PS4 just for them. (just like I bought a Wii U mostly for Nintendo games)
I just hope they don't try to force me into a social environment I don't want to be a part of.
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:56:08 PM
wiiplay
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:58:38 PM
Last edited by wiiplay on 3/8/2013 10:58:51 PM
Killa Tequilla
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 12:09:24 AM
After having PS+, I just don't like going back to normal, it's like a huge chunk of the experience went away, and it did.
If there are two models, I will get the more expensive one.
Killa Tequilla
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 12:19:23 AM
homura
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 12:35:42 AM
daus26
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 12:36:05 AM
Reply
I also hear they may come packaged with some sort of headset too, that can plug into your controller. That might be an additional accessory/possibility.
Solid Fantasy
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 2:50:49 AM
Reply
BigT_1980
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 3:11:28 AM
Reply
By the time the PS4 comes out surely the Vita will have had a price drop. Think about it, they can target the WiiU market with this bundle. Sony certainly liked pointing out the connectivity between the two devices at their recent conference.
Last edited by BigT_1980 on 3/9/2013 3:12:52 AM
taus90
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 3:52:12 AM
Reply
___________
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 7:26:36 AM
Reply
bundled hardware as well, the "deluxe" edition will probably come with the updated ps eye camera, and maybe even a move controller.
basically everything you need to play all the launch games.
hopefully will have some sort of reward program as well, a little thank you program only "deluxe" buyers have access too.
maybe throw in a free 3 month trial to plus too.
or maybe a free trial to the gaikai service.
i really cant see it restricting features, especially if its features games will use.
like saying oh you did not buy the deluxe version so you cant use the share button, you did not buy the deluxe version so your not able to play games you have not fully downloaded.
that would be stupid, shooting yourself in the foot big time!
Cesar_ser_4
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 10:42:40 AM
___________
Sunday, March 10, 2013 @ 8:22:39 AM
Highlander
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 9:05:50 PM
Reply
Actually, forget that, they could make the premium SKU with better HDD and a card reader, that kind of thing. But they should release a PlayStation Ultimate system. Since the system is a PC new, they could put the PS3 chipset on a expansion card along with the RSX memory and PS2 system on a chip, beef up the cooling in the system and sell them for $600 easily.
Seriously, a PlayStation Ultimate would be capable of playing every disc based PS1, PS2, PS3 and PS4 game along with all the PSN content you can shake a stick at. If that's not worth $600, what is?
Gorilla Biscuit
Saturday, March 09, 2013 @ 10:03:53 PM
Reply

View Large Image









firesoul453
Reply
Friday, March 08, 2013 @ 10:21:21 PM
Last edited by firesoul453 on 3/8/2013 10:21:37 PM