PS2 Game Reviews: Alone in the Dark Review

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Alone in the Dark Review

More Game Info (Print This Article)

Graphics:

 

4.2

Gameplay:

 

3.6

Sound:

 

6.8

Control:

 

3.0

Replay Value:

 

3.5

Overall Rating:       3.9

 

 

Online Gameplay:

Not Rated

Earlier this year, we listed Alone in the Dark among our most anticipated games of 2008, simply because we loved the media and information we had seen at that point. Unfortunately, Atari delayed the PlayStation 3 version until later in the year, which meant we’d have to also delay our analysis of the promising survival/horror title. But even so, we’ve been able to examine the next-best thing- Alone in the Dark for the PS2. …and if this is any indication of what we’re going to get on the PS3 later, you can keep it to yourselves, Eden. Just don’t bother. A significant graphical upgrade might be nice, but it wouldn’t be able to save the game from atrocious controls and other significant drawbacks that make this particular adventure nigh-on unplayable. Sure, it’s currently available on the Xbox 360, but PS3 owners should know that owners of Microsoft’s console aren’t reveling in a creepy, involving, entertaining title. We assure you; they’re not doing anything of the sort.  If they have this game, they're likely suffering.

Even for a PS2 game, Alone in the Dark’s visuals fall well short of expectations. Everything is fuzzy and out of focus, the detail leaves a whole lot to be desired, there are numerous technical issues (clipping, aliasing, etc.), and when you get up close and personal with your environment, you’ll often cringe. It’s not exactly a horrendous graphics presentation, per se, but it’s hardly what you want to see from a game that relies so heavily on atmospheric impact. There are a few good special effects tossed in here and there, but the herky-jerky cut-scenes and drab backdrops dominate much of the visual palette. Titles in this genre have always had a bit of a problem when it comes to color, just because the developers are usually limited to the darker and supposedly more forbidding colors (gray, brown, dark green, etc.). We accept that, but this particular survival/horror game is simply too dark and too bland, creating a setting that falls well shy of the intended goal. There are a few saving graces sprinkled throughout, but for the most part, everything just looks…blech.

The sound is by far and away the best part of Alone in the Dark, and while that’s good news for the score we assign to this category, it’s not really helping too much in terms of the ultimate conclusion. But let’s get positive for a minute: the sound effects and soundtrack are both solid, and although the voice acting is a bit erratic, several characters really shine. If the graphics were better, the combined visual and auditory effect of the background would be significant, but as is, the sound attempts to shoulder the load all by itself. And while it’s definitely good, it’s not quite up to the task; there are just too many other problems (we’ll get to those in a second). And besides, many of the effects seem to be “outliers,” as the unrealistic and surprisingly annoying sound of a fire extinguisher contrasts sharply with the deep, intimidating rumbling of a collapsing building. So it’s not all roses, but it’s a good bit better than the graphics, and certainly better than any one aspect of the gameplay. The soundtrack, which consists of a nice array of classically composed and fitting music, helps a great deal, too.

But even the best sound in the world couldn’t override the critical flaws found in the gameplay. Eden Studios clearly wanted to introduce a number of unique control mechanics, but every last one of them fails to be either fluid or accessible. We can’t even tell if the initial idea was a good one just because the end result is often so awfully implemented. For example, the first supposedly original part of the gameplay kicks off in the intro, where we have to keep blinking to focus our fading eyesight. We’re obviously hampered by some sort of affliction – we don’t know what it is at the time – and when listening to the open dialogue and then walking for the first time, you’re blinking away the apparent grogginess. But all you do is press the R3 button to clear your eyesight, which just continues to fade in exactly the same fashion, over and over. It was kinda cool for about 30 seconds, but it quickly lost any cache it may have had. But hey, at least that’s better than several other gameplay aspects that are never cool and almost instantly frustrating.

Furthermore, we’re often left guessing what it is we’re supposed to do. Sometimes, this led to us dying for no reason besides the fact that we were completely in the dark (pun intended) in regards to our next move. A controller will pop up at the top of the screen during the early intro sections, but even that didn’t always explain the situation very well, and multiple times afterwards, we just felt lost. You know, dazed and confused, but with no relation to the classic teen angst movie. Anyway, the basic control isn’t any better, as just about everything feels loose and unrefined. The simple act of moving about, regardless of whether you’re in third-person or first-person mode, is an exercise in tedium and frustration. Your character moves very quickly, but with the inability to fine-tune his movements with any accuracy, you’re always overshooting or over-compensating or over-something. The camera sure as heck isn’t helping, either; you might be able to control it to some extent, but you can’t stop it from sitting far too close to the main character and adopting some crazy angles.

Many times during hectic, intense action, the camera just left us blind, which is the single biggest flaw a camera can have in any game. You fight with the controls, you fight with the camera, you fight with the unknowing (what the heck am I supposed to do now?), and all this before you ever fight a single enemy. The silver lining is that the story isn’t too bad and what you’re battling is indeed quite creepy, just because it’s another form of “unknown” that actually works to make the game semi-enjoyable. But these encounters only work if you can master the bad camera long enough to survive, and if you’re not floundering about due to the obscenely loose movement control. But if you can somehow come to terms with the poorly instituted gameplay foundation, you may find it possible to become absorbed in the plot. At the very least, the pacing is decent and due to some well-voiced and even compelling characters, the player isn’t always complaining about the shortcomings. On the other hand, there’s a seemingly never-ending supply of those aforementioned shortcomings, so you’ll be irritated quite a bit.

It’s never good when you’re irritated more than entertained. Isn’t that the opposite of entertainment…? Alone in the Dark may be a good deal better on the Xbox 360, but only because Eden probably used the extra power to add another dash of authenticity to the surrounding environment. The gameplay itself is crucially flawed from front to back, and most players won’t be able to ignore the problems. This isn’t what we were hoping for when viewing the first bit of media, and it certainly won’t be good enough to compete with the likes of Resident Evil 5 and (we hope) Dead Space. We don’t want to battle terrible controls all day, and we certainly don’t want to attempt to fight the nasties while still battling the terrible mechanics. Nothing about this adventure seems professionally crafted, and it almost appears as if parts of the game never even went through regular ol’ QA testing. Just about anyone could’ve spotted the failures within the first hour of play time, but for some reason, Atari just figured it was good enough to package and ship.

Alone in the Dark is ambitious, but it trips, stumbles, and…well, breaks. It’s a bad PS2 game and we can’t imagine it would get that much better on the PS3. Sorry, guys.

7/17/2008 Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (9 posts)

QuasarSquirrel
Friday, July 18, 2008 @ 12:11:06 AM
Reply

It sounds like it might be best to cancel the PS3 version, its a sunk cost, unless they overhall the whole game. Even so, this would probably get panned in the flood of excellent games due out in the holiday season. Too bad for Atari, they needed a hole in one and instead drove the golf cart into a pond.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, July 18, 2008 @ 12:39:09 AM

I know. I'm a little sad about it, actually. Atari was my induction into gaming, and it just seems as if they can't do anything right these days. I had high hopes for AitD. :(

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Daedusian
Friday, July 18, 2008 @ 12:12:16 AM
Reply

Ouch...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Friday, July 18, 2008 @ 2:14:13 AM
Reply

It's a damn shame really, I guess you feel Alone if you purchase this game... what I fail to understand is what on earth do people do in the testing department. There is something seriously wrong with quality control aspects of conceptualising, producing and testing games, and with varying degree of standards...

Q!

"aLL RoAdS LeAd ToO HoMe"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

pavlovic
Friday, July 18, 2008 @ 9:18:08 AM
Reply

3.9! Sorry Ben but I will not read the full review, just gonna erase AitD from the wish list

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bamf
Friday, July 18, 2008 @ 2:49:25 PM
Reply

There are mixed opinions of this game. IGN US gave it 3.5, while IGN UK gave it a 7. Other sites have given this game in the 7's too.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 12:17:54 AM

The PS2 version got the 7s? Or the PS3...?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

IonHawk
Saturday, July 19, 2008 @ 10:12:12 AM

Long time reader, but first time poster here.
Anyways, the PS2 version was almost universally panned, but some sites (like IGN UK as mentioned by bamf) were much kinder on the 360 version.
I've only played the 360 version and felt it's more of a 6/10. Graphics are pretty good, great atmosphere, some cool puzzles, and Eden games have definitely made every thing on-screen (even though scripted) undeniably cinematic. But, as Ben mentioned, these positives are brought down by the awful, awful controls, camera and the so-bad-its-terrible driving levels.
Overall its still worth a rental, IMHO.
Loved the background score, btw.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Vixen
Monday, February 09, 2009 @ 11:18:55 AM
Reply

I completely agree with this review. I just got the demo with a bundle pack. I played it for a grand total of 15 minutes, most of which was spent trying to configure the controls into something usable. After about 10 minutes I was in a foul mood and cursing the game controls as being impossible. I note that when you are in third person view you cease to be able to aim with the mouse, making the view even slower! ARGH without a doubt the stupidist controls on the market atm. Terrible!Wont be buying the full version and certainly wont play it again.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Got Madden NFL 25?
Yes, and it's great!
Yeah, but I'm a little disappointed.
No, but I plan to get it soon.
...they still make sports games?

Previous Poll Results