Metacritic: Batman Is Highest Rated Game Of 2011
Well, at least so far.
If you check Metacritic, the recently released Batman: Arkham City is tearing down huge review scores. We're not disagreeing, or anything.
But it's interesting to note that it's the highest-rated title of 2011 on both the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 charts; the PS3 version of Rocksteady's latest holds a 97 rating while the 360 version is at 95. This also means it's one of the best received games of the entire generation. On Sony's side, Batman currently even outstrips the award-winning Uncharted 2: Among Thieves, which is at 96. On both platforms, Grand Theft Auto IV is the top scoring game of the generation, with a 98 average metascore.
Only Portal 2, which also has a 95 metascore for the 360 version, can compete with the greatness of Arkham City this year. Of course, more heavy hitters are on the way, as Uncharted 3: Drake's Deception, Battlefield 3, and The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim have a shot at becoming top dog. Still, Rocksteady's accomplishment is duly noted.
Related Game(s): Batman: Arkham City
Tags: batman arkham city, batman review scores, metacritic
10/19/2011 10:52:26 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (35 posts)
Lotusflow3r
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 11:11:56 AM
Reply
I just wanted to say that Metacritic is definitely not the place to go to search quality, and i hate it's looked at so religiously like that.
Some great games (films, music) get ignored because people tend to sheep to that place.
Example, it'll be almost unanimously agreed that GTA4, as good as it is, doesn't deserve that spot above so many hard hitters across time.
AshT
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 11:30:40 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 11:54:58 AM
Beamboom
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:00:46 PM
One can argue if gta4 deserved a 98 or a 95 but that's details imo. One have to take release date into consideration when reading meta scores too.
On the other hand, are there releases that goes "under the radar"? A few yes, especially niche titles for those who has a particular interest in that niche, but a good metarating score *is* the most overall precise measure of quality we got today.
Last edited by Beamboom on 10/19/2011 12:03:06 PM
Lotusflow3r
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:26:30 PM
AshT. That's exactly my point...it's always 50/50, i merely insinuated that some games get missed due to the religious embrace Metacritic gets. So in the end, you can't rely on it for quality as i said.
Another case in point, WKC2...but the list is huge and i'm sure my small point that shouldn't of evoked such defensive behaviour is understood ala AshT by most.
Last edited by Lotusflow3r on 10/19/2011 12:31:43 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:29:57 PM
Of course games that score highly in the Metascore are probably receiving near universal acclaim, and are probably not niche titles. For those kinds of game, Metacritic works well enough. for some games though, the metascore is a liability that punishes some niche titles.
Beamboom
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 2:47:10 PM
Gamerankings holds approx 200 titles released for the ps3 in 2011, with Batman on top and Thor at the bottom. That's pretty much the head and tail of the PSXE ratings too. In fact, Ben is usually within a very, very few percent off the metascore of any given title. You simply can't say Ben is the good guy and metascore the bad, cause they nearly always sing the same tune!
How large is your list of metarating failures for 2011?
Last edited by Beamboom on 10/19/2011 2:54:57 PM
Shams
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 5:26:39 PM
What does that mean to me? Metacritic is a useful barometer, but far from an absolute measure. It is an arbitrarily weighted average of a select number of review scores, some more professional than others. A game with the highest metacritic scores WILL have quality to be found therein. However, if a game that does not have as favorable a score DOES NOT mean it has less quality to be found therein.
Beamboom
Thursday, October 20, 2011 @ 1:31:13 AM
I think any fan of any title should be happy with a 90+ rating. If a title is a 91 or a 92 or a 94, really, should be of lesser importance. It is a very high score.
Also, producing a list of metarating of ALL time, across all platforms, genre and generations, makes little sense for anything but pure entertainment. :)
Single out at least a generation or platform, or genre for it to be of more use as comparison. Especially genre.
... But of course, far from an ABSOLUTE measure. You need to read the reviews, all of them, then. Plus probably play the game too. :D
Last edited by Beamboom on 10/20/2011 1:47:54 AM
Bjorn77
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 11:35:15 AM
matt99
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 11:44:19 AM
Beamboom
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:12:42 PM
flamefury42
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:15:46 PM
Reply
Highlander
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:24:01 PM
Reply
No, seriously, I can tell it has that darker, grittier feel to it. It's just not my cup of tea. Although, if the game focused more on Catwoman, and perhaps featured more female characters with cleavage than shirtless muscle men, then I might be more interested...
Oh, did I just write all that in a comment? oopsie...
:D
Lotusflow3r
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:34:09 PM
Ludicrous_Liam
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:34:17 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 1:06:11 PM
Eros Twixfreak
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 2:14:15 PM
DemonNeno
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 2:31:27 PM
Beamboom
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 3:53:10 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 4:04:26 PM
Ludicrous_Liam
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 4:24:37 PM
Personally, I prefer Nathan Drake's dress sense; 3/4-semi-tucked t-shirts ftw!
EDIT: Since were all using our avatar's to illustrate our points, I suggest you look at Eros Twixfreak's avatar. :P
Last edited by Ludicrous_Liam on 10/19/2011 4:27:10 PM
Deleted User
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:54:18 PM
Reply
Was I mean to say that? Yes. I was.
oONewcloudOo
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 1:13:02 PM
Reply
bigrailer19
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 1:35:07 PM
Reply
Nas Is Like
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 1:39:38 PM
Reply
maxpontiac
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 2:15:23 PM
Reply
Now while PSXE is my most trusted source out there, I also tend to listen to people like friends or individuals who enjoy the same type of genre I do.
I will not even bother to read a review of (for example) Ace Combat from someone who doesn't love the series. Reviewers have a tendancy to want their opinions to be taken as 100% fact. That should never be the case.
Ludicrous_Liam
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 4:30:17 PM
Reply
sha4dowknight05
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 5:36:06 PM
Reply
Gordo
Thursday, October 20, 2011 @ 3:00:47 AM
Reply
I feel that you can't compare apples and oranges and need to bring "genre" into focus more.
To have people arguing over a 95% review score for Madden, Skyrim, Uncharted 2 and Modern Warfare 2 is pointless obviously...
Games need to be reviewed within their Genre. Is MW3 the best of class? Is NHL 2012 a 90+ rating game in regards to other sports game?
I'm always puzzled when you see heated discussions over "what scored best" like Dark Souls versus Batman or Dead Island versus Resistance 3.
Battlefield 3 versus MW3 by all means compare but to compare them with Uncharted 3 is a bit esoteric.
To then go wild over the difference between a 93 and a 95. Splitting hairs!
(Obviously not too prevalent on this site but N4G is a cracker)
I always take the genre into consideration (I'm sure most do). Batman may be getting 95+ review scores but I don't like comics that much so may not be my cup of tea. I like medieval fantasy so Dark Souls is more like it so it's 90 review is more than reasonable.
Just my tuppence worth by the way!

Batman: Arkham City









Ole_Gunner
Reply
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 11:10:20 AM