PS3 News: MLB 11: The Show Picks Texas In The Fall Classic - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

MLB 11: The Show Picks Texas In The Fall Classic

The World Series kicks off tonight and the best baseball simulator out there has a prediction.

Check out the PlayStation Blog; MLB 11: The Show ran a simulated series between the Texas Rangers and St. Louis Cardinals and as you can see, it's gonna be Texas in 6.

After the Cardinals took game one behind a great performance from their best pitcher, Chris Carpenter, the Rangers won Game 2. Then St. Louis stole back the momentum behind some hot hitting from Matt Holiday and Lance Berkman, before Texas went on a series-ending tear. The last two games were close but at the end of the day, Texas earns their very first WS title.

Now, scoff all you want, but MLB 10: The Show correctly predicted the World Series champion from last year: the San Francisco Giants. The game got the American League champion wrong (it predicted the Yankees would go down to the Giants), but the end result was right. So when given the two correct teams for the Series, don't you think the new MLB simulator can come through?

By the way, the game in question is pretty damn good.

Related Game(s): MLB 11: The Show

Tags: mlb 11 the show, world series, mlb 11 world series prediction

10/19/2011 11:55:23 AM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (13 posts)

mike rlz
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 12:11:42 PM
Reply

for a 'team of destiny' i'm just proud the tigers were able to push them to six games while decimated by injuries.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Cuetes
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 3:41:03 PM

Excuses, excuses, they just lost. Better luck NEXT year.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

mike rlz
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 3:47:27 PM

oh whatever. texas was the better team on paper. all i said was i was proud of my team. they played with heart, and pushed your powerhouse team to six games. good luck... but not too much ;)

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

wackazoa
Thursday, October 20, 2011 @ 10:22:01 AM

Only propblem with the Tigers (I am a Tigers fan) was they went to bat everytime trying to get the Home Run. As evidence I think they hit 12 home runs in the ALCS and all but 2 of them were solo.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

telly
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 1:04:18 PM
Reply

Ugh, I wish I could believe it. I think St. Louis takes it all this year.

Sorry Cardinals fans, a bitter and devastated Phils fan can't help it :)

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Thursday, October 20, 2011 @ 8:48:44 AM

Halladay is my favorite baseball player of all time. He's hands down the best pitcher in the game right now.

As a Jays fan, I miss him, but I was really hoping he'd get a major league pennant this year.

At least if he had to lose, he lost to Chris Carpenter... another Blue Jays first round draft pick.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

wackazoa
Thursday, October 20, 2011 @ 10:23:07 AM

I would take Verlander in a game against Halladay anytime.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Thursday, October 20, 2011 @ 3:29:22 PM

lol... yeah... no. Every professional knows Halladay is the best. The difference between the two is that Halladay is lights out year in and year out. His 3 Cy Youngs and playoff perfect game are a testament to that.

With his work ethic, incredibly high number of complete games, and lack of injuries prove he knows what he's doing.

But hey... feel free to take Verlander. I'll stick with Halladay with knowledge that I make better decisions.

This is the first year verlander posted an ERA under 3.00. Halladay has done it 7 times.

Verlander has 14 complete games, and 5 shutouts. Halladay has 66 complete games and 20 shutouts.

Halladay's career ERA is 0.32 points lower. And he has a higher innings pitched per game average.

Verlander's good. But there is no contest here.

Halladay is also 17 spots higher on the All Time Best Pitcher's rankings.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 10/20/2011 3:37:04 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Geobaldi
Thursday, October 20, 2011 @ 3:49:59 PM

Halladay has two Cy Young's not three. His perfect game was in May so that's not the playoffs, he threw a no hitter in the playoffs. He's also been around longer, 13 seasons as opposed to 6, and on a better team so of course his stats are better then Verlander. Verlander won the pitching triple crown this year and will win his first Cy Young this year most likely.

Personally I don't really care about either one since they're not on the team I follow, but I'd gladly take either one if given the choice.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, October 21, 2011 @ 8:30:24 AM

Verlander has appeared in 7 seasons. Not 6. And if you want to say it's only because he pitched 11 innings, fine. Halladay's first season only had 14 innings. So by those standards it's 12 and 6. Or 13 and 7. Not 13 and 7.

Halladay pitched all but 2 seasons with the Jays... How is that a better team than Detroit? (I'm a Jays fan)

Verlander would need to double his pace for many of the stats I listed to catch Halladay.

The site I referenced claimed he won a Cy in 2008. That is incorrect, as he was only the runner up.

Tell ya what... Let's go with when Halladay was Verlander's age... no... not age... Let's go with same number of years in the majors. (Halladay got the call a full year younger than Verlander)

I will remove the first year for both, as they were small, (although, to support my case, I should as Verlander's ERA over 11 innings was 7.15 as opposed to Halladays 1.93)

Halladay's first appearance was a complete game shut-out. Second was 1 run allowed over 5 innings. Verlander was chased early twice.

SO here we go. First 6 full seasons.

They both have 1 Cy Young.

The both have 1 full season under 3.00. Halladay is a 3.26 to Verlander's 3.62.

They both have 14 complete games, although Halladay had 1 more shutout. Verlander gave up 30 more home runs.

Bear in mind, Halladay took over the spotlight in Toronto from Roger Clemmens. Clemmens didn't like not being the best in Toronto anymore. lol

Oh... and the Tigers had a good enough team to make the playoffs twice. Halladay's first 6 years were with the Jays. Who saw none.

So that stuff about Halladay pitching for a better team? Bull-huckey and completely untrue. Verlander's great, but the best he has ever done in any stat category is tie Halladay. He has had 14 complete games in 6 seasons. In the next 6 seasons he will need 52.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 10/21/2011 8:50:16 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

JRA696
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 2:10:23 PM
Reply

Cards have been proving people wrong all year. Might as well keep it up and make it one more...

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Cuetes
Wednesday, October 19, 2011 @ 3:39:32 PM
Reply

Texas will take it all the way. To much offense for the St. Louis fartnals to handle. Let's go Rangers!!!!!!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Thursday, October 20, 2011 @ 8:49:31 AM

hmm... I actually think the Cards have a better offense. At least, they have the best complimented line-up, if not the best individuals. Texas has the better defense, though.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 10/20/2011 8:50:01 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Got the Wii U?
Yep, had mine since day one.
Yeah; I just recently picked it up.
No, but I might get one soon...
No, and I don't ever want one.

Previous Poll Results