The Lure Of The New Console Is Losing Its...Allure
Maybe it's age. Maybe it's a shifting industry. Maybe it's my belief that the PlayStation 3 could last me until 2020 and I'd probably be fine with that.
I'm not sure what it is, but the days of becoming excited - I mean, excited to the point of giddy - for new systems may be gone for good. With all this talk of next-generation consoles, one would assume I'd be somewhat intrigued but the truth is, I'm fine with what I have. Furthermore, I believe a lot of gamers feel the same way.
Oddly enough, I was more than ready for the PS3. I was totally pumped for that thing, and I was pretty psyched for the Xbox 360, too. I don't really remember why now, but I was itching to move past the PS2 and Xbox, both of which sat on my entertainment center shelf for a good five years. No offense to Nintendo fans, but I left that company where it belongs back in the '85 - '95 period. Oh, don't take offense; I'll always love Ninty until the day I die; that company is the reason I do what I do today. The NES, GameBoy and SNES will always have a special place in my heart and will never be forgotten.
But anyway, getting back to the subject at hand- there's just something about the next generation that doesn't appeal to me. Maybe it's the belief that physical media may be left by the wayside (not immediately, but certainly in the future), or the sneaking suspicion that the industry's direction doesn't jive with my personal preferences. I've never been into multiplayer, I can't stand this virtual social explosion in general, and motion sensing and 3D may as well not exist, for all I care. Not that I've enjoyed various experiences with all those features at one time or another; it's just that I'm kinda set in my ways.
At the same time, I always love to see progression and advancement in this industry. I guess it's just that now, after so many technological leaps, I'm looking for something more creative and artistic, and I'm just not sure we need fancy new hardware for that. Maybe that's the reason I'm ambivalent. Maybe that's why when I see stories concerning the PS4 or Xbox 720, I just sort of frown and go, "...well, I don't have that feeling from the old days."
Tags: next-gen, next generation, new consoles, ps4, playstation 4
1/12/2012 9:12:46 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (56 posts)
AcHiLLiA
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 11:34:15 AM
BigBoss4ever
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 9:51:48 PM
Reply
"Maybe it's age. Maybe it's a shifting industry. Maybe it's my belief that the PlayStation 3 could last me until 2020 and I'd probably be fine with that....." 1000% agree.
like i also said earlier, until the blu-ray phased out and Ultra HD TV comes into consumer market, I do not see a reason for me to get PS4, because every generation console upgrade, that also means significant media and visual upgrade -- ps1, ps2, ps3 = CD to DVD to Blu Ray. so PS4 better get something new or I am not getting it.
Last edited by BigBoss4ever on 1/12/2012 9:54:51 PM
Highlander
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 12:15:03 PM
DemonNeno
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 10:15:09 PM
Reply
Besides, maybe a super console will make S-E consider incorperating legit towns into their RPGs! I kid... I think I saw a town in the XIII-2 demo's gaming previews they incorperated at the end.
Regardless, the PS3 is just the beginning of this generation. FPS began the itch for graphical enhancements, this generation raised the bar in realism and I believe there isn't a single developer capable of utilizing any of this generation's consoles to truly leave us breathless.
Do I believe in any of the above? Meh. Not really. I do believe it IS the trend, but I would much rather have PSone graphics and better RPGs and stories than better graphics.
... And Nintendo is dead in my heart as well. They need to bring back the NES name and create another SNES-type system. I'm not 10 years old and don't care for bobble heads for virtual bowling or whatever. Dud. Dead. Lame. I will always measure up what Nintendo tries to sell me to their glory years and can't help but feel like they're in for one hell of a losing battle.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 12:11:45 AM
Marckon
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 10:21:40 PM
Reply
Image a game like skyrim that when you play in first person view you fight like you would in skyrim, but you can also seamlessly zoom out the camera and control your army of 30,000 soldiers. Your army in divided by platoons and directed by your captains who you communicate with voice recognition. all of this with the graphics of Avatar.
Imagine super AR 3d glass that work together with Haptic sensor gloves covered with LEDs. When you use these glasses with your gloves you see a sword, a rifle, or a bow on your own hands. You aim with your virtual weapon that tracks position of the target in real space; hence real world aiming.
all of these requires insane computing power that only machines specially designed to these kinda of things will be able to do.
sorry Ben I wanted to help you dream again man. I am nearing my 30's and I am more excited about gaming now than when I was in my teens because now I really believe that there is nothing that we can't come close to when we combine are imagination and technology. Its cheesy i know but i really believe it. I am a futuristic, even when I have perfection in my hands I can't stop thinking how it can be better, but not because I think is bad.
Killa Tequilla
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 10:58:41 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 12:14:19 AM
But I'm sorry, I've sort of moved beyond technical refinement and a few extra pixels. All of what you describe does sound wicked cool...but perhaps it's for younger people. I really want advances in story, dialogue, character development, and general immersion. Not so much from a technical standpoint, though.
The future to me is about more than technology. It HAS to be...or I'm gonna be depressed until I die. ;) Again, though, I appreciate the effort.
Beamboom
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 1:26:35 AM
Fane1024
Sunday, January 15, 2012 @ 1:29:35 AM
Processing power will allow better AI, animation, and physics, which are absolutely necessary for greater immersion. Advances like branching story and dialogue paths also require more advanced technology (BD storage space, RAM, etc.). Even better graphics allow for more immersive experiences, since there are fewer reminders that it's a game.
In short, I think there's reason to be excited for the next generation. I know I am.
:D
Cuetes
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 10:37:03 PM
Reply
I'm anxious to see what the future if gaming will be. A lot of things have changed in five years, the PS3 may or may not be ready to hand over the reins to a new console, but I think it's time. Given a choice between my five year old PS3, and a brand new PS4.......give me that PS4.
shadowscorpio
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 11:33:47 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 12:14:57 AM
PharaohJR
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 11:56:57 AM
Jed
Saturday, January 14, 2012 @ 2:41:54 AM
BTNwarrior
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 10:46:29 PM
Reply
Killa Tequilla
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 11:16:46 PM
Reply
There is no doubt in my mind that Sony will not release a new console because they will. I just don't believe that they will release a new on this year or the next, simply because a new handheld of theirs is about to be released to the public. I don't believe Sony willcrelease two new machines in under 2 years. Maybe after the PS Vita has had a healthy life of two years.
It's possible Sony might announce a new console at E3, but is it likely? Their PS Vita will be out 10 months and people think they will announce a new console? It's just not likely. Hearing a new console Sony will release in the near future will re-direct peoples minds in to what they are thinking of purchasing, meaning people will want Sonys new console instead and save money for it.
Only time will tell. I myself am tired of this generation and want a new one soon. I want to be playing a GTA where no matter where I'm in the city, the other side of the city is completely active and alive. Better AI, graphics, etc... Sony is more than capable of achieving such a thing! Im definetely up for the next gen, maybe some people aren't but I am. They can play their last gen consoles, I have no problem but don't ruin it for everyone just because you ain't reazzdy.
Last edited by Killa Tequilla on 1/12/2012 11:18:12 PM
BikerSaint
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 11:26:01 PM
Reply
Sony Shows Off 55-Inch Crystal LED HDTV
By Ian Paul, PCWorld
Jan 10, 2012 6:01 AM
Sony recently announced a new display technology called Crystal LED that promises a picture with higher contrast, richer colors, better response time and a wider viewing angle than existing LCD and plasma high-definition televisions. The electronics maker is showing off the new technology at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas with a prototype 55-inch HDTV. Sony has not announced pricing or availability.
Sony's Crystal LED HDTV uses six million pixels (two million for each of the RGB colors) to display a 1080p high-definition image.
Unlike standard LCD televisions that use LEDs as backlighting, the Crystal LED display has six million tiny LED lights (equivalent to the number of pixels) affixed onto the front of the display.
The company claims Crystal LED displays have 3.5 times higher picture contrast, 1.4 times richer colors, and a 10 times faster response time compared to Sony's current LCD models.
Sony's prototype Crystal LED also has a 180-degree viewing angle and the panel consumes less than 70 watts of power, according to the company.
Sony claims its prototype is the first 55-inch Full HD self-emitting display that uses LEDs as the light source. LEDs are able to produce their own light, while LCDs require a backlight to produce a visible image.
Display technology is shaping up to be a primary new feature for the next-generation of HDTVs. Samsung is also showing a 55-inch display that uses so-called "Super OLED" technology at CES, while LG has debuted a 55-inch OLED. The difference between Super OLED and OLED, according to Samsung, is that Super OLED sets don't use a color filter resulting in pictures with deeper contrasts and finer detail.
http://www.pcworld.com/article/247717/sony_shows_off_55inch_crystal_led_hdtv.html
Buster
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 12:33:08 AM
Killa Tequilla
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 8:32:09 AM
Marckon
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 9:34:54 AM
Geobaldi
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 11:28:39 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 11:54:46 PM
Reply
In the past it was always about "What can Final Fantasy do with THIS generation of consoles?" And that question has quickly become irrelevant.
Ludakriss
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 8:03:52 AM
Temjin001
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 12:17:32 AM
Reply
But one thing I don't like, and it's for certain, is all of the rumor crap flying around. Especially the doom and gloom of the consoles, or even traditional handhelds. The notion of Cloud gaming replacing traditional hardware chipset design etc etc. Then there's the whole Apple thing. I like Apple products. I do. But I don't think I want their universe of product offerings colliding with the gamer market. It just doesn't look appealing to me as of yet.
Anyway, I'm sick of the bullcrap and rumors. I want to see the cards laid out on the table. Nintendo has played most of their hand. I like what they're showing more than the standard Wii, but now I want to see MS play their's.
Last edited by Temjin001 on 1/13/2012 12:19:06 AM
gungrave
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 1:02:41 AM
Reply
Other than that Ben, I believe the reason we all don't want a new console is because we're older now. Back then 5 years felt like a long time but as we get older, a single year takes up less percentage of our life to the point that it now feels that time flies...hence, PS4 already! That's what I think anyways.
berserk
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 5:18:39 AM
Reply
If they can impress me with the AI and character animation then i ll be interested in the next generation .
Something like when you shoot/hit someone he can react in 100 different ways depending on where you hit him ( something that would resemble re4-5 or dead space but with way more possible outcomes ).
Anyway , like gungrave said , the ps3 still got life in it and i m not rdy for the ps4 just yet .
Last edited by berserk on 1/13/2012 5:22:51 AM
SolidFantasy
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 6:05:11 AM
Reply
In a better (imo) world we could all have 6 or so months of no AAA titles and then the release of a new console. That way I can feel complete and content with our current tech and ready for something new.
When we are all still waiting for some big hitters to come out and all we here about is the PS4 and 720 those upcoming PS3 and 360 games really lose there touch.
Dancemachine55
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 7:04:31 AM
Reply
Honestly, I'm happy with my PS3, but I can defintely see some things that both 360 and PS3 could do to make each other better.
First, MS could take a note out of Sony's book and integrate Blu-ray and a bigger and better processor with more SPU's for developers to toy around with. But MS are being stubborn, which I guarentee will eventually be their downfall.
Secondly, Sony could take a note from MS. Party chat and shared CPU and GPU RAM usage. That's really about it. Those are really the only 2 things that the 360 did better than the PS3... wait, triggers, yep.... triggers work better for shooters than the L2 and R2 triggers, but for everything else, PS3 controller rocks.
As for next gen, I'm kind of intrigued and interested in seeing what they show, but I feel like, in terms of graphical presentation, we're about to hit it's peak and I'm not as excited to see the next big leap in graphics.
We've got 1080p HD resolutions, can't really go higher without going bigger, like an $80,000 108" TV with double the res of 1080p (can't be bothered doing the maths now)
Uncharted 3 looks incredible already, and Battlefield 3 still looks great on consoles, even if the PC version looks far far better.
Here's what I want out of the PS4...
- Backwards compatibility with PS3
- 4x or 8x Blu-ray disc reading speed for faster loading times
- quad layered blu-ray discs for 100GB of insane gaming
- 8 core processor with 16 SPU's (although keeping the current 8 SPU's would still be more than enough for next gen while keeping prices down)
- 1 GB of CPU RAM and 1GB of GPU RAM, maybe an extra 512 MB of dedicated system RAM for running multi-tasking actions like party chat, music, video streaming and gaming at the same time.
- Keep the PS3 and Move controllers, but have a new 3D dual-lens camera like Kinect for 3D pictures and video capture, and even Kinect-like motion games. Dance Central and fitness games are far better on Kinect than Move or the Wii-remote.
- Integrate PS Vita and SOny tablet touch screen capabilities to mimic the Wii U controller or another PS3 controller for gaming. The hardware is there, I just hope Sony can find a way to use it in unique and stunning ways.
The PS3 was so far ahead of its time, it really only needs a few minor upgrades, and VOILA!!! PS4!!!
Highlander
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 1:48:40 PM
That's all that is needed - IMHO.
BTW, Sony doesn't need to mimic WiiU since the PSP already does remote play, and Sony demonstrated the PSP as a remote gaming device working with a PS3 game - for example acting as a rear view mirror in demos and dev builds of games like F12009(can't remember the year) and GT5. So, WiiU is doing a nice job of copying that functionality... ;)
Ludakriss
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 7:46:10 AM
Reply
All this space on Blue-Ray and we still need to Install Data and the whole disc isn't even filled...usually, EVER!
All that was hyped in the specs of PS3 and let the imagination of a kid commence - "Oh, wow. We're here. The next gen in technical capability. I can't wait for EVEN MORE vast fields to run around in RPGs and get those monster's loot."
Yeah, well done. No traditional RPGs until what, 5-6 years down the line of PS3's lifetime? Thanks next gen. I'll pass.
PHOENIXZERO
Monday, January 16, 2012 @ 12:38:02 PM
50GB would be waaaay more than enough space next generation too.
maxpontiac
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 10:02:10 AM
Reply
Qubex
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 11:21:59 AM
WYO1016
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 11:58:29 AM
Reply
Graphics have always been the driving force in the past. You'd say things like "how cool would it be to be able to see their eyes move?" or "wouldn't it be awesome if games looked just like a movie?". Games are getting so close to photorealism now that I think we're all pretty satisfied. As processing power grows and we can do more within the game's engine a new console will come along to do innovative things for us. As for now, I'm pretty damned happy with the PS3.
Sidenote: The 360 has peaked. M$ will make something new soon, but Sony won't need to push hardware to keep up.
firesoul453
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 12:14:11 PM
Reply
Highlander
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 12:22:34 PM
Reply
Unless someone can correct me, there are no upcoming shifts in living room technology that will take the market beyond 1080p (especially as broadcasters are only now reaching that standard). So we're looking at a device that will do everything the PS3 does, but in 1080p60. Sounds like evolution, not revolution.
But, as jaded as we have all become it's difficult to get as excited over an evolutionary upgrade as we would over a revolutionary one. PS3 brought online gaming as standard, HD visuals, BluRay, PSN, Home and all the online services we have now. PS3 compared to PS2 is a massive upgrade in every way. You really can't say that about what a PS4 would be.
Highlander
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 1:45:05 PM
SmokeyPSD
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 9:26:52 PM
I think your right Highlander with 1080p60. Aswell as full image effects running too with that image being processed.
For a big new price tag for a system, to be honest I can't just get excited for that. There needs to be more substance behind gaming now for me like with Ben. I would however just like a system completely backwards compatible and regionfree for dvd and bluray. That would be enough of a step forward for me. Giving us a truly open device for our media across the board.
PharaohJR
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 12:38:31 PM
Reply
when i picked up on gaming i loved the fact the object in my hand allowed interaction. now its a gradual shift we going from controlling to being the controller & i dont want that at all.
i upgraded my PS3, put the YLOD 60g out & bought a 320g slim in that came with move & sports champion. i used the move several times & enjoyed but it dont make me say this is amazing. i watched kinect in person & i said to myself naw.... im kool, did this already on eyetoe. maybe im not seeing games yet that utilize these devices strongly & i feel like if im doing all this moving just go outside.
Warrior Poet
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 5:06:25 PM
Reply
Excelsior1
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 7:39:14 PM
Reply
Laguna
Friday, January 13, 2012 @ 7:57:36 PM
Reply
I mean it took a long time for things to really click for the ps3.
Even if there is a ps4 relatively soon, i will not buy it for some time.
Unless of course, it has fully compatible with pS1,ps2 and ps3.
We haven't even gotten FFVS XIII yet! many old devs let us down big time this gen!
Last edited by Laguna on 1/13/2012 7:58:04 PM
BigD0207
Saturday, January 14, 2012 @ 9:32:36 AM
Reply
Darwin1967
Saturday, January 14, 2012 @ 2:41:10 PM
Reply
Warrior Poet
Sunday, January 15, 2012 @ 12:55:29 AM
Reply
I don't see the new consoles offering any new kind of functionality or leaps in gameplay. Nothing like that has been showcased. We haven't even seen any new gameplay that couldn't have been expertly coded on PS2 hardware. World sizes and physics, maybe, but no new mechanics.
Graphics and sound are beautiful right now, but what will tomorrow's games have to offer over today's? So far we haven't heard anything new.
PHOENIXZERO
Monday, January 16, 2012 @ 1:42:54 PM
Reply
1080p at a solid 60fps should be the standard next generation and that alone WILL be a big leap. Not to mention that more system resources also means major improvements in all aspects. The WiiU is supposedly 50% more powerful than the PS3 and that's a console that's basically "next generation" of the next generation started in 2009 or 2010. The next XBox and PS4 will be at the very least, twice as powerful as the XB360 and PS3. Probably more so since Sony and MS are willing to invest in hardware that they'll take a loss with at first. That said, Sony won't be coming close to the price of the PS3 and it'll probably max out at $400 just like the next XBox will. It's also a given that the PS4 will be massively easier for developers to work on.
Spec wise I'd imagine it'd be somewhere along the lines of this.
GPU: If Sony sticks with Nvidia, probably something along the lines of the 600 series as a base if the PS4 launches in 2013, maybe 700 series if in 2014.
CPU: I kind of doubt they'll stick with Cell considering the issues and headaches it caused though then again a refined, multi-core version might be possible if Sony is that concerned with BC. But I think they've shown lately that they're not. So, a new and better CPU it is but I can see them sticking with IBM. The rumors of Sony going with a ARM based CPU (as part of the ARM/NVidia project) is something I can't really see being done with the console. Either way I still think IBM will again be the true winner when it comes to the next generation.
RAM: 2GB-4GB GDDR5 (or 6, if it's there in time but I doubt it), unified much to the joy of developers everywhere. Yeah, that 4GB might be excessive, even with the overhead from the OS. But so would a 600 or 700 series based GPU if the plan is to stick with 1080p at 60FPS. <_<
Storage: Blu-Ray again with a minimum 8x drive, maybe 12x.
Mass Storage: Probably laptop HDDs again, 7200RPM ones this time standard, starting at 500GB. They could go the SSD route but they'll only do it if the cost has dropped enough to make it viable. I kind of doubt it as they're going to want to keep costs low as possible in some areas and they can just as easily just make the option available if people want to take advantage of it later. With the hugely increased BD reading speed, games will less likely need data installs that plagued the PS3 but at the same time still be used for caching.
Yup, all pulled pretty much from my ass.

See Full Image









Qubex
Reply
Thursday, January 12, 2012 @ 9:50:02 PM
The big question is, do high-definition visuals solely determine whether or not a "next generation" is really that, a true "next generation"?
Why do I say this? I say this because we agree that primarily it is about the games one plays; the deep story driven game play elements that make so many games memorable today, the intense music and atmosphere that this current generation of game developers have brought to life. One can't deny, that the current crop of Sony exclusives have done really well in using the PS3 platform to full use; it is not like we are actually missing anything. One just needs good games to drive the platform and keep it relevant.
So what about the "next generation"? Well if we discount the fact that "next generation" does not necessarily mean a better game, if we agree that next generation means a doubling or tripling of power purely for visual and physic advancements then it does beg the question, that maybe yes, new "generation" of hardware is needed to up the fidelity of video games - it doesn't mean though that better games would follow.
Next generation hardware would allow gamers to experience games in a new and different way with higher visual fidelity - enhance the overall experience. One of the benchmarks that is always mentioned is native 1080p gaming at 60fps; and, more recently, 1080p gaming at 60fps in 3D stereoscopic. I guess we all yearn for that true "HD" experience now, however it does not mean we need new hardware and it does not mean we will get better games.
So i would say, for gamers who want the higher visual fidelity with real-time tessellation, the opportunity to use 3D head mounted head tracking equipment, 1080p visuals for both eyes (3D) and uncompressed HD textured models and environments - a new generation of hardware is most definitely required... and I honestly think Sony will not disappoint in this area!
The question must still be answered though, does new hardware necessarily define the "next generation" in gaming?
Q!
"play.experience.enjoy"
Last edited by Qubex on 1/12/2012 9:57:35 PM