Dear Joe Baca: You Are Really Embarrassing Yourself
The fact that these people have any power whatsoever is confusing and depressing.
For the record, I was one of the few gamers who supported the idea of ratings for video games and therefore, I have no issue with the ESRB. I think those ratings are necessary and make perfect sense; we've got ratings for movies, don't we? And I believe it's absolutely true that certain forms of media and entertainment should be kept away from our developing children.
But of course, the lawmakers are never happy with such a victory. Of course not. It's too reasonable. It's not radical enough. So now, we need to single out video games by putting warning labels on the packages, alongside the ratings we already have. The only games that would be exempt from this law would be the ones rated EC (Early Childhood). Every other game would have to carry a warning label of some kind, so parents can fully understand the potential ramifications.
The press release at Congressman Joe Baca's website should tell you everything you need to know. Firstly, it proves even supposedly intelligent people, those we have elected into a position of power, are allowed to let personal bias supersede science and fact. By not citing the numerous studies that prove or at least suggest the positive effects of gaming, your position has an automatic slant. And the "facts" that are stated have been refuted again and again.
The official reply from the Entertainment Software Association can be found at GameSpot:
"Unfortunately, Representative Baca's facially unconstitutional bill--which has been introduced to no avail in each of six successive Congressional sessions, beginning in 2002--needlessly concerns parents with flawed research and junk science. Numerous medical experts, research authorities, and courts across the country, including the United States Supreme Court, exhaustively reviewed the research Representative Baca uses to base his bill and found it lacking and unpersuasive. Independent scientific researchers found no causal connection between video games and real life violence."
I'm waiting for the law that says warning labels should be placed on movies sold in stores. I'm waiting for the warning label on books. We've got one for music albums but obviously, it's not enough. Do all that, and then, perhaps only for the sake of absurd symmetry, I'll go with the warnings on video games. At least then the public will have already started to dismiss such warnings as needless and downright inaccurate. And last but not least is the single most glaring issue that is just downright laughable-
Baca and every last one of his like-minded cronies continue to think that all video games are for kids. That's the shame and irony of it all. They actually believe violent games are made to be sold to kids. They think nobody over the age of 18 plays them, despite any statistics that say the average age of a gamer is at least 35 (and rising with every passing day). The only reason to single out video games for warning labels is due to this outdated, nay, archaic belief. "Natural Born Killers" resulted in quite the backlash; I never saw a proposed law requesting warning labels for movies. Why? Because "Natural Born Killers" wasn't for kids. But obviously, Twisted Metal is.
It really is embarrassing. These people are in power. They're proposing laws to govern an industry that is completely alien to them. I can't decide if that's massive ego running rampant, or some special form of blindness unique to politicians. Whatever it is, one would hope that after decades of lawmakers embarrassing themselves when it comes to video games, the lawmakers themselves would be tired of looking foolish.
Apparently not.
Tags: gaming, video games, game ratings, game warnings, game laws
3/20/2012 8:24:21 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (83 posts)
Metal Head
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 11:35:40 PM
Jawknee
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 11:52:57 PM
As for the debt, the problem is not that taxes aren't high enough. It's the government spending. You could tax every single California resident 100% of their income and it would hardly be a drop in the bucket. I've studied the numbers. The problem is spending.
Last edited by Jawknee on 3/21/2012 12:14:08 AM
Beamboom
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 7:24:20 AM
I'm not getting myself into a political debate here, just curious about what all the money goes to if tax can make no difference.
Here in Norway tax is a major contributor to both social welfare and education.
Last edited by Beamboom on 3/21/2012 7:26:08 AM
TGSA
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:50:52 AM
Not that I believe we need this crap, it's just that I'd love to see hollywoods reaction if there was such a bill. Oh wait, they'd probably lose all their monetary support if they did that. Damn politicians...
Doppel
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:13:00 AM
Jawknee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:16:42 AM
TGSA, I agree they should too but they won't because most of their campaign cash comes from Hollyweird.
wackazoa
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:17:26 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:05:34 PM
Jawknee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 5:06:44 PM
PC_Max
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 9:45:44 PM
Reply
And I have seen studies that make remarks to the affects of games on kids or adults a like, studies that go one way or the other. Problem is depending on what side of the fence you sit on... depends on what study you believe and hold up in the others face to prove your point. Bias on both sides.
My thought is games have good and bad affects on humans in general. This is most likely dependent on the genre of games they play.Point is there will always be this debate and there are many factors involved.
Yep, an unpopular stance.
Jawknee
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 9:54:19 PM
Also remember that anytime the government imposes new regulations on business', their costs go up and those cost inevitably get passed onto the consumer.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 9:59:16 PM
wackazoa
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:21:08 AM
Last edited by wackazoa on 3/21/2012 11:21:43 AM
Underdog15
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:39:46 AM
At least that's what I always assumed.
@Wackazoa
I feel you about the AO games, but most devs just aim for M. I believe there might actually be a policy by Sony and other console companies to not release AO rated games? Could be wrong though. I remember reading something like that along those lines somewhere.
Last edited by Underdog15 on 3/21/2012 11:41:36 AM
wackazoa
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:40:33 PM
And Im not talking smut either. Producers like Quantum Dynamics and Rockstar really have to walk thin lines to get the M ratings when if they just made the games for stories sake they would probably be AO rated and possibly more telling.
In books there is a big difference in stories between Harry Potter and anything written by Eric Lustbader. So should the story telling between Little Big Planet and adult aimed games.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:07:13 PM
And music albums don't have ratings. They have warnings, and they're certainly not health warnings.
If such a law as Baca proposes passed, video games would be the only entertainment medium on earth that has an official rating and a health warning attached to it. ...yeah, that's called "singling out."
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 9:49:12 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 9:51:43 PM
Underdog15
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 8:46:51 AM
Jawknee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:47:01 AM
Underdog15
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 6:31:54 PM
;)
But seriously though... what's the difference... You guys vote your politicians into power very democratically just like us. You have states just as we have provinces and territories. And you have a constitution just like we have a constitution.
I know the way the politicking is done with vito's and what not is different, but that's about it. That's actually the only difference I see. All our politicians have equal power, more or less, and for something to pass it's typically just 50%+1.
So aside from that, I don't see any difference. It's all very democratic, if you ask me.
-Theoretically- (lol) all our politicians would merely do what is best for their constituents. That is all.
Last edited by Underdog15 on 3/21/2012 6:35:41 PM
Jawknee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 7:49:58 PM
We are governed by our Constitution and the limits on the Federal Government within that Constitution. A majority in Congress can rule that we must buy an electric car but it wouldn't pass Constitutional muster. Thus it's is not a true Democracy where majority rules as it would be stuck down by the courts. As they are there to keep the executive and legislator in check with the Constitution.
There is a difference, that is the reason there is are separate words for Democracy and Constitutional Republic.
Underdog15
Thursday, March 22, 2012 @ 11:40:29 AM
I'm not sure I like the idea of so much power going to one to five representatives. Too much opportunity for cuckolding.
It's funny, I remember learning all that in an intro to political science class in university in my first year. I remember talking about and learning about the pros and cons of our system and the pros and cons of the American system... but for the life of me, I can't remember much of anything. lol. Of course, that was nearly a decade ago, now, and I didn't study poly-sci beyond the introduction course. So of course I've forgotten by now.
Which one is better, I remember, being completely situational.
Neo_Aeon666
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 9:58:29 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 9:59:59 PM
Reply
And it seems there's hardly any more of those "lesser of the evils" to even vote for these nowadays.
Jawknee
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 10:07:01 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 11:03:15 PM
matt99
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:41:05 PM
Also aren't the ratings already warnings? They even state why the game is rated that way, seems redundant to me.
556pineapple
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 10:06:47 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 10:16:22 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 10:59:26 PM
matt99
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:43:04 PM
Jawknee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 5:10:51 PM
ZenChichiri
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 10:45:30 PM
Reply
"Video games may cause cancer. That's right. A cancer to society! Save the children! Do it for the children! They are so innocent...wait a sec, pan the camera back to those innocent looking kids...DO IT FOR THE CHILDREN! I TOLD YOU TO FUCKING SMILE! Oops, did you get that on the video? We'll cut that later..."
Last edited by ZenChichiri on 3/20/2012 10:47:49 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 11:05:07 PM
Reply
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 11:12:39 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 11:26:19 PM
THEVERDIN
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 6:02:19 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 11:29:27 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:59:02 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:08:42 AM
wackazoa
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:24:15 AM
Underdog15
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 6:36:26 PM
Gabriel013
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:06:05 AM
Reply
That might only be for the R2 releases though as I can't recall what it says on R1.
Last edited by Gabriel013 on 3/21/2012 2:08:31 AM
Lawless SXE
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:53:21 AM
This is separate from them, warning of the link between the playing of video games and the increased likelihood of violent behaviour, a link, mind you, that has never been definitively proven.
Gabriel013
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 7:45:50 AM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:00:32 AM
wackazoa
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:27:51 AM
Lawless SXE
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:34:59 AM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:12:32 AM
Reply
___________
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 4:58:45 AM
Reply
what does it matter if games need to have a extra sticker on them warning people?
it actually could be a good thing reminding people to locate small amounts of time onto them so the rest of the world does not end like south korea!
its become so bad there they have had to enforce curfews!
you dont have to do it with moves or books or any other form of entertainment because they rarely take 10+ hours to finish!
matt99
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:49:13 PM
Jawknee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 5:09:04 PM
BikerSaint
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 5:27:10 PM
Especially when it should be the responsibility of our own mothers & fathers to parent us...and nobody else!!!
But.....if there is some bad/irresponsible/ or clueless parenting shite going on which causes a serious need for someone to step in, then by all means do so.
But do it only by using a individual case-by-case scenario.
Beamboom
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 7:19:41 AM
wackazoa
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:29:35 AM
BikerSaint
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 5:31:25 PM
Sir Dan
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 6:48:43 AM
Reply
Oh, and I love the comment above by Metal Head saying the debt of California is due to taxes not being high enough. LOL!! They really have you brainwashed out there huh? Too funny.
VampDeLeon
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 8:38:42 AM
Reply
JLB1
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 8:38:57 AM
Reply
Underdog15
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 8:54:19 AM
Reply
At any rate, I fail to see how a warning label will give us any extra info the ESRB ratings don't already tell us.
"Gore, Violence, Sexuality, Partial Nudity"
It says that stuff on them if they are in the game... what parent lacks the ability to read that and know what to do with the info?
I mean, honestly... if they don't already read the freakin' box, then they aren't going to read a less aesthetic warning.
wackazoa
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:30:57 AM
matt99
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:49:59 PM
wackazoa
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:32:24 AM
Underdog15
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:38:44 AM
Jawknee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:49:00 AM
wackazoa
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:43:05 PM
Rogueagent01
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:10:15 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 7:10:32 PM
Reply
Tell Congress That There's No Link Between Video Games and Real Life Violence
Rep. Joe Baca (D CA-43), along with Rep. Frank Wolf (R VA-10) as co-sponsor, thinks its 2009 again and have introduced H.R. 4204, “The Video Game Health Labeling Act of 2012.” This bill, if passed, would require a warning label be affixed to all games rated E (for Everyone) or up by the ESRB, regardless of the content descriptors. The warning would read: `WARNING: Exposure to violent video games has been linked to aggressive behavior.' The ECA needs your help to make sure this bill does not become law.
Congress is simply misinformed on this issue. While Congressman Baca has cited “scientific studies,” the vast majority of studies show that there is no proven causal link between violent video games and negatively aggressive behavior. In fact, several studies suggest that playing video games can be helpful to young people, such as this study by the Pew Internet and American Life Project. Further, the bill requires the label on games that are not rated E or above for violence, which could confuse parents and undermine the ESRB, which according to the FTC is the most enforced media retail system.
“The Video Game Health Labeling Act of 2012” is an unconstitutional restraint on speech that would harm consumers and parents alike. Please join with the ECA. Let your Representatives know that you want them to let the industry and parents continue to use a system that works, and have Congress stay focused on the real problems facing our nation.
You can take the few seconds it takes to sign this, right here:
http://action.theeca.com/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=5716
poisonedsodapop
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 11:50:44 AM
Reply
I remember one time I got carded for wanting to buy BloodRayne. I was just about to turn 17 but of course I was still 16. The funny thing about it was my mom was standing right next to me so I just gave the money and the game. She later saw the game and laughed about the idea of the possibility of me strapping blades to my arms and being influenced by the game.
I understand the media has an effect on people but like you said Ben, what about books, movies, music. Yes people invest more time in video games but I still find it hard to blame video games solely violent behavior.
Underdog15
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 1:38:17 PM
I do agree in having a ratings system though. Even though many youth are well adjusted youth, scientifically, brains don't stop development until after 18 years of age. So it's more than possible that there could be an effect of SOME kind, no matter how small from an M rated game.
16-ish is pretty darn close to adult though. But I definitely hate seeing parents buy M rated games for their 6 year olds.

See Full Image









Jawknee
Reply
Tuesday, March 20, 2012 @ 9:43:10 PM
God help us. So sick of these politicians inserting themselves into our personal lives.
"They're proposing laws to govern an industry that is completely alien to them."
Just like many of the other things they try and control. Mark my words, if the pols get their fingers in the video game industries cookie jar in the form of over regulations, video game prices will go up even more.
"I can't decide if that's massive ego running rampant, or some special form of blindness unique to politicians."
They think we're too stupid to govern ourselves. They are the elite and the few who know better, so we must yield to their undying wisdom.
Last edited by Jawknee on 3/20/2012 9:47:49 PM