Levine: Nobody Will Be Happy If BioWare Does A New ME3 Ending
The Mass Effect 3 ending snafu has reached epic proportions. It's so huge, in fact, that Irrational Games founder and Bioshock creator Ken Levine addressed the issue at the Smithsonian's "Art of Video Games" exhibit.
Levine first called the uprising an "important moment for the industry," but if BioWare bows to the pressure, nobody is going to end up satisfied.
"I think if those people got what they wanted and (BioWare) wrote their ending they would be very disappointed in the emotional feeling they got because…they didn't really create it. I think this whole thing is making me a little bit sad because I don't think anyone would get what they wanted if that happened."
Furthermore, BioWare-Mythic senior creative director Paul Barnett told the audience that he believes authors should have "total control over their creations," and he cited J.K Rowling and the controversial conclusion to the "Harry Potter" series. Said Barnett:
"If computer games are art than I fully endorse the author of the artwork to have a statement about what they believe should happen. Just as J.K. Rowling can end her books and say that is the end of Harry Potter. I don't think she should be forced to make another one."
I believe - let me check now - yes, I believe I just recently said something similar. Now gamers have to make a choice: if you call video games art, than you have absolutely no right to tell the artist to change something about a finished product. You can certainly have an opinion, and maybe the artist will take that feedback into account in the future, but that's it. However, if you only want to call them "entertainment products" and it's the job of the developer to simply cater to you, regardless of internal vision, than by all means, make them change it.
But nobody is ever going to win this one. It's just a bad situation.
Related Game(s): Mass Effect 3
Tags: mass effect 3, me3, mass effect 3 endings, ken levine, irrational games
3/21/2012 10:02:10 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (76 posts)
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:24:06 AM
Underdog15
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:26:32 AM
In that sense, yeah, everyone loses. Gamers are basically standing up saying that games are not artistic and are pure entertainment... which means they cannot be respected to the same extent that movies are.
That is actually pretty sad.
DjEezzy
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:23:47 AM
Reply
H0TSHELLZ
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:50:54 PM
bigrailer19
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:25:04 AM
Reply
The thing is There are people who are fine with the ending and if they change it those people may be upset with the new one, so here we go round and round. I havnt finished it but regardless I know from past experiences and how I feel about original product, I don't want them to create a different ending.
And about art. Yea we can't ask the artist to change his or her vision. Just like for those wanting a new ending, obviously your opinion won't change.
Last edited by bigrailer19 on 3/21/2012 10:29:14 AM
Nerull
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 1:20:23 PM
I'm not saying Bioware has to change it, but sometimes hindsight is 20/20 and games are all always have 1000 aspects struggling to mesh in time for release.
cthulhu_spawn
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:27:45 AM
Reply
I think most peoples main gripe is that in this dlc heavy enviroment, no-one actually believes that the product playing on their HDTV is in fact the designers finished, complete and heart-felt vision of what they wanted to show and share with people, but more a springboard for a raft of over-priced dlc.
If, as in this case, mass effect 3 was released as a full and standalone ending to a much loved game franchise, with no dlc to follow then people would be acting alot differently. The fact that the company itself have told us 'that this is not the end of shepard' leads me to believe that the idea of entitled fans bitching falls flat as they obviously haven't finished with, or entirely represented their vision so they are playing a canny marketing campaign.
I intend to buy and enjoy the game whatever the endings are like or whether more are to follow.
Comic Shaman
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:41:56 AM
So they've set up their games as "incomplete" upon release. That's why this falls into a grey area, making it different from (for example) a complete novel where people didn't like the ending.
Not saying that I disagree with Levine here... I think a complete ending rewrite won't make anyone happy in the long run.
bigrailer19
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:50:14 AM
But DLC is different. It doesn't change the main story in most all cases I've experienced. It adds to the story that's already told in some ways, exploring different areas. Which I'll admit sometimes disagree with, if it at all touches on the main stories plot. For example, the Uncharted games clearly are done at each games ending. I would hate if ND spent the time and resources adding to that game in the way of DLC, because they already told that story, its concluded in my eyes. If you're going to spend that time adding on, why not just create a whole new adventure and story? But for a game like Skyrim that ha a main story but also a ton of sub stories, DLC is perfect. Yes there is a main story but it's the adventure and open world that keeps a game like that engaging, not a linear, story arch.
cthulhu_spawn
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:53:56 AM
The main problem is as Levine alludes to. No matter what new endings, dlc etc are now released, it will be seen as the developer giving in to public demand and a loss of their integrity as a result. This will give rise to the 'entitled moaning and whining' that ben has made reference to before, as the average internet idiot will believe that it was their vocal admonition, rather than the developers intent that gave rise to the new stuff which will open the door to loads more of this nonsense in the future of people believing they can shape the world to their view rather the ideas of talented developers who don't want the hassle of defending the stories they want to tell in the way they want to tell them
cthulhu_spawn
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:07:57 AM
bigrailer19
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:12:32 AM
xenris
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:31:32 AM
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QT4IUepvrU1pfv_B95oQj0H84DlCTUmzQ_uQh1voTUs/preview?pli=1&sle=true
In fact ME3 assumes you have played all of the ME2 DLC. Not to mention the Arrival DLC makes the whole collector story arc in ME2 irrelevant. All that aside it REALLY feels like this is a planned DLC move.
This doc shows how the ending makes no sense. My problem is when you pay attention to the ending, you see that it is either the worst writing in the history of gaming or a set up dream sequence. Its a sad day when fans hope that it is a dream sequence :P
I actually believe it is a dream sequence, and we will get DLC to show what actually happens to shepard after the lazer blast. If you get the good ending and see the extra cutscene the dream sequence starts making more sense.
Anyway THAT is the problem with this. It is just enough complete for people to get the illusion of a finished product, but if you take some time and look at it more critically, you can kind of tell that it doesn't feel finished.
I dont think they should rewrite the ending and I wish they didn't make any DLC but I have a strong feeling they will, and its going to complete the story. Although they might be wary of doing that seeing as how much backlash this whole thing has caused.
Temjin001
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 1:14:23 PM
PoopsMcGee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:46:38 AM
Reply
Art (or entertainment) is watered-down for mass consumption all the time (as expected when huge corporations are the primary source for 'art' as in our society), so this doesn't set some 'dangerous precedent'.
cthulhu_spawn
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:04:12 AM
Though you only have to look at how many directors cuts, extended editions, special editions, anniversary editions etc will be released at some point in the future to realize that you are 100% right. This is not limited to the gaming industry and most people understand the way the world works.
Since the prevalence of the net every moron with a keyboard and a connection can go online wrongly believing that just because lots can hear their view it somehow carries more weight, doesn't make their view right or valid
PoopsMcGee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:05:09 AM
bigrailer19
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:15:47 AM
telly
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:16:27 AM
Underdog15
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:17:46 AM
The best thing Bioware should do, imo, is to defend what they've done. Provide further insight to their endings that help further elaborate on the characters that the audience may have overlooked.
Lots of the best pieces of art actually -require- some further knowledge on the topic at hand to full understand the literature. Why not support what they've already done? That would be the best direction.
Last edited by Underdog15 on 3/21/2012 11:19:30 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:17:17 PM
Underdog15
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 6:24:27 PM
telly
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:13:44 AM
Reply
Oxvial
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:15:45 AM
Reply
So much hype for the supposed franchise that destroys all the PS3 ones.
Last edited by Oxvial on 3/21/2012 11:18:46 AM
Jawknee
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:16:35 PM
Oxvial
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:30:38 PM
JDC80
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:26:39 AM
Reply
Last edited by JDC80 on 3/21/2012 11:27:58 AM
xenris
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 11:58:26 AM
I wont spoil it but once your done with it you can look up some blogs people have with the "problems" with it.
Teddie9
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 4:34:18 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:20:04 PM
Reply
I'm sorry, but there's no way out of this. Levine is absolutely 100% correct, because he knows there's no way of appeasing the fans now. They think they're entitled to their indignation and hatred and BioWare will never be able to fix it. So I say, just let it go. BOTH sides...let it...GO.
telly
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:31:36 PM
daus26
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 1:00:39 PM
Knowing Bioware's past, don't they release DLC for the series anyway, that's actually an important part to the story? It's another thing I wonder about because I thought the fans possibly could've waited till some kind of DLC annoucement before taking it hard to the developers. Then again, that's a practice many people don't have a fond of either.
Best way now is certainly for both sides to move on.
daus26
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:22:09 PM
Reply
I thought it was just a matter of filling in plot holes, not so much as to "changing" the ending. To me it sounds like gamers wants answers more so than a different ending, if that makes sense. Perhaps I need to see it myself.
xenris
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 1:25:12 PM
*********Potential Spoilers*****************
So yeah gamers just want questions answered because it literally didn't actually end Shepards journey. This is blatantly obvious when you get the secret "best" ending.
No matter how you look at the ending, it wasn't the best way to end the series. UNLESS they planned to expand on the ending, which after piecing together the ending and the secret ending, its pretty obvious that the ending is so nonsensical to serve as an easy place to retcon a more proper ending. IE the ending might have been a dream or something similar that fits with the ME universe *hint hint*.
I don't want to spoil the story if you haven't played it though. I hope that hasn't ruined anything for you.
karneli lll
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:22:36 PM
Reply
daus26
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:47:15 PM
daus26
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 12:44:07 PM
Reply
Bottom line, in this DLC heavy era and Bioware's past actions, can you blame the gamers for suspecting a foul play on a game's ending? By foul play, I meant about the ending being intentionally incomplete for the sole purpose of future DLC content for some extra $$$.
Other than that, I definitely agree that an artist's vision should never be forced to change by its peers, but only inspired at best. The only thing I don't agree is developer's putting half-arse on their retail release game, so they could rake in some extra bucks along the way with DLC. An artist certainly shouldn't have to change his/her vision by the demands of its fans, but they should give it everything they have on a product. I'm not saying that's what they did with ME3, but I'm just speaking about DLC practices in general this generation.
xenris
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 1:32:33 PM
Reply
I saw this coming, and to people who think its terrible that they "caved" they really didn't. This was most likely planned, and pretty obvious if you pieced together the ending and best hidden ending thing. Its obvious that ME3 didn't end when the credits rolled, and even more obvious that Shepards tale wasn't over. However this only works if you get the BEST ending, which is most likely the canon ending.
Annnnd if it wasn't all planned than bioware is an amazing developer for listening to their fans, and actually acknowledging that the ending was poorly written and explained.
You have to be very humble to admit you messed up and this shows that Bioware cares and doesn't want to lose its fans.
However I still maintain that this was part of the planned DLC anyway. At least thats what I want to believe, because I can't believe that bioware would intentionally write some a FACTUALLY bad ending full of plot holes and nonsensical sequences.
Pandacastro
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:00:22 PM
JLB1
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 1:57:49 PM
Reply
Temjin001
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:18:37 PM
JLB1
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:58:07 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:16:54 PM
Reply
Temjin001
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:39:22 PM
...anyway, if I do play this and see that the execution of the ending was fine, bizarre as it may be, I'll support Bioware in telling fans, "that's how it is, like it or suck it"
but if this ends up being ..uhh, well, we ran out of disc space for the 360 version, and we didn't want to add another disc... hmm, well.. I could actually go on and on.
...hehe I like how we're these PSXe wannabe philopshers
I wanna be Temjim'ocrates
You can be Aristot-endswithme
Ben can be Bento
okay ran out of nicknames =p
Excelsior can be .. Thrasymachus =p
Highlander can be Mencius (or Nietzche.. he's hardcore like that)
Jawkney is John Locke.. being all conservative and all
okay, I'm having too much fun with this ;)
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:24:54 PM
jimmyhandsome
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 2:38:27 PM
Reply
And just as a disclaimer, I have never played the Mass Effect games (more than a couple of demos) so I don't know the story well or how bad the ending was.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 3:04:36 PM
jimmyhandsome
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 4:18:39 PM
Comic Shaman
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 5:09:20 PM
None of those new chapters changed what had gone before, and that's a significant line to cross. So I think that the fans who are asking for changed endings for Mass Effect 3 are not going to get what they want.
But what about additional material that provides more clarity? I think that's the direction they're heading with the new "content initiatives" they announced today.
Laguna
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 4:31:42 PM
Reply
I personally think its hard to top the awful ending that was Final Fantasy XIII.
But i never asked for a different ending. Instead we got a sequel with an crappier ending.
Personally, I think gamers shouldn't have to worry about endings because there is always another game planned more or less.
If you hate ME3 ending, just hope ME4 ending is better.
Dotaownz
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 4:48:42 PM
Reply
I have heard both Fallout 3 and one of the Prince of Persia games have had their endings changed/extended through DLC but those did not blow up like this. I guess this just has way more people behind it?
I do not see anything wrong with asking for a new ending because it would be their (the artists) choice if they want to change it but I will feel pretty bad for them if EA forces them to change it. If they don't change it sure they will lose costumers but the ending in many opinions was so bad they would have lost many customers anyways.
The ending of Mass Effect 3 is so disappointing because not only is it just a bad ending in general but because it was a bad ending to an amazing trilogy which made it harder to swallow. But as I said before whether or not they decide to change it I will still be looking forward to buying future Bioware games as everything besides the last 20 minutes of Mass Effect was amazing and I am willing to give a second chance. However, if their next series also concludes with a horrible ending I will possible passing on future Bioware games as I already have a backlog and no time to be playing games that have endings that ruin the series.
Last edited by Dotaownz on 3/21/2012 4:49:28 PM
sha4dowknight05
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 5:20:37 PM
Reply
xenris
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 5:27:17 PM
Reply
"We wouldnt do it any other way. How could you go through all three campaigns as your shepard and then be forced into a bespoke ending that everyone gets? I can't say more than that..." Mike Gamble
"its not even in any was like the traditional game endings, where you can say how many endings there are and say you got A B or C." Casey Hudson
That last one is a laugh in a half, as the ending literally is an A B C choice deus ex rip off.
Bioware went on record saying they wouldn't pull a lost and create more questions with their ending than answers.
They also said everything will be given answers too. This was not achieved, there are countless questions that were not even close to addressed.
There was almost no closure, yes things were answered in the game, but things that got brought up in ME3 didn't all get closure. What happens to your squad, did the krogans begin to thrive again, how about the quarians? Those are just two of many examples.
THIS is why people are doing what they are doing and demanded satisfaction.
JackDillinger89
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 6:14:26 PM
Reply
ZettaiSeigi
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 7:44:09 PM
Reply
But like what others said, it just feels incomplete and there are few bits that doesn't make sense. Sure, we know whether Shepard lives or dies, but how about the other characters we cared about in the games? Why is the Normandy in a Mass Relay?
Personally, I'd like a bit more closure to the series. Bioware made a universe that feels alive and it would be great if we know what happens to everyone after the events in ME3. That said, I still love the game and I would continue playing it.
Just my two cents worth.
JackDillinger89
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 8:17:30 PM
Reply
Gamer46
Thursday, March 22, 2012 @ 3:55:59 AM
Reply
___________
Thursday, March 22, 2012 @ 3:59:53 AM
Reply
what needs to be done is people forget about ME3, bioware moves onto ME4 and it rights the wrongs set in this.
i really want to see a prequel series starting from the beginning the creators who created the crucible and handed it down to the protheans.
start at the beginning where it was created, and end where the protheans got wiped out.
sad thing is that bioware has created such a beautiful beloved fantasy.
something people have been waiting years to see it conclude.
and now its finally concluded and they have taken a massive dump on it!
its like growing the finest grapes possible, aging them possible spending 20 years aging it in the purest oak barrel.
then its ready, fit for a king, they serve it and just for that extra something mix it with donkey piss.
way to go destroy what was such a fantastic series bioware!
JackC8
Thursday, March 22, 2012 @ 8:37:39 AM
Reply
This whole thing is silly. It's the most common thing in the world for the story of a game to be criticized (or praised). It happens ALL the time. Yet when it comes to Bioware, it's an assault against their artistic integrity? What incredible hubris.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Thursday, March 22, 2012 @ 6:14:16 PM
Gamer46
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 10:49:15 PM
Lathon
Thursday, March 22, 2012 @ 10:29:50 PM
Reply
I have played through ME1 to ME3 and I was quite happy with the ending. In my opinion they did not ruin the ME-series. It is not cut and paste from a Hollywood template, and I think that is, sadly, what is bother people the most.
The scale and context of the game would make a traditional ending more or less absurd. Yes, there are a few things in the final minutes that are a bit weird, and I know most people want more closure on a few issues. But you know what? I can live with that. I was in awe after completing this series. It is a grand work, and felt the ending in context of the game, the conflict and the stakes at hand.
I believe Levine is correct. No good will come out if Bioware caves in and changes the ending.
And a note for all the players that haven't played the game, or haven't finished it. Do you really believe that Bioware would create an ending that all of a sudden totally destroyed what they built up until that moment? These are skilled people fullfilling a vision. From a lot of comments, not on this site though, I get the feeling that a lot of the critisism comes from people that likes to skip the dialogue and skip to the action.
I have seen tons of hate from people that have looked at the endings on Youtube and "won't buy the game with a crappy ending like that". I have seen a lot of hate posts that starts with "I haven't played the game but..." or "I haven't finished the game..." or "I was playing ME2, but now...". I don't understand how these people think.
The game is Shepards journey, and ours. I don't want to spoil things, but there are a pieces of closure both on a "personal" level, and on a more grand scale out there that you encounter in more or less obvious ways as the game progresses. People are angry because they did not include these in the cutscenes, and spell out exactly what happened to this and that. Well, that is Biowares call.
/L
unnavigated
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 5:09:16 AM
Reply
I hope they don't pull something similar with the AC franchise...!
voltron2010
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 11:48:28 AM
pillz81
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 12:21:10 PM
starwolf1001
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 12:39:35 PM
Reply
My teacher thought it would be a good idea to have the other students in class act it out.
He thought it would be a good idea to film it.
He thought it would be a good idea for me to direct it.
I wrote it, I directed it, but with everyone's input in it it DID NOT turn out the way I wanted it.
We may create but that does not mean everyone else sees it the same as we do.
btw I didn't like the way ME3 ended
Jacius Ceed
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 5:56:39 PM
Reply
He is making assumptions just like everyone else about the ending.
Remember it's not just one ending, depending on the choice you make, although Bioware leaves it up to your imagination, you change the galaxy. Heck you may not even save earth if you didn't get enough support.(war assets)
So anyone who plays the game more than once and does things differently is getting a different ending anyway. It changes the experience and you will only keep one ending in your mind as being the "canon" ending.
Also it should be changed by Bioware, as their decision, IF the message they were trying to convey failed to understood. They would still have their artistic integrity. As it would still be their creation, just like in a book it would be a change to the structure of a paragraph with a word change or two. Same story just a tweak to how it is told/delivered.
OR
Change it on the grounds that the ending was the same a Deus Ex. They don't really show you the consequence of your decision. It's an illusion of choice.
The ending can be summed up thusly, you pick a color then walk down a path, explosion of chosen color, everyone on earth lives or dies, ships escaping crash lands with crew suddenly appearing when they should be dead or injured on earth, don't explain anything, fade to black, unknown just forward in time, dialogue that tells you nothing, fade to black, go buy dlc message, end.
If that really is the ending and they were not planning on doing something like the indoctrination theory or hallucination or something else, then they really dropped the ball on quality. It felt rushed and lacking.
If it is one of the previously mentioned theories then Bioware could make a masterpiece of an ending preceded with a "we got you guys so good" moment in our society.
Which if it is, then they would be considered master artists and this whole art integrity vs whiney entitled paying customers that were hyped up thing could end and everyone will either be left embarrassed and shut up or will make another scene.
Jacius Ceed
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 6:12:52 PM
The problem that everyone that I talked with and I had with the last Harry Potter book was not the ending. It was the epilogue, that short bit after a 19 year jump felt too short. All we knew was that they all had kids and were older. We knew they were happy and that's about it.
I believe that if we had gotten a little bit more there would have been a lot less people demanding another book. Another book in the world of HP would be nice but is not needed.
Last edited by Jacius Ceed on 3/23/2012 6:14:24 PM
sinisterurge
Friday, March 23, 2012 @ 7:43:32 PM
Reply
thatpumpingguy
Saturday, March 24, 2012 @ 1:46:11 AM
Reply
It isn't logical what he is saying if you really know the issue. Then you have read the BBB complaint in which an upper at bioware says things about the ending that aren't true (including featuring the Rachni). That is deliberately lying and misleading people. An artist can do that and you know what? I have seen people protesting outside Barnes and Noble because the "art books" contained pornography. I am not saying he is stupid just maybe stupid on that day.

Mass Effect 3









Underdog15
Reply
Wednesday, March 21, 2012 @ 10:22:01 AM
You win this one.
YOU win.