Sony And Microsoft Team Up To Bring You The "PlayBox"
Well, obviously.
It's April 1. It's Sunday (and we don't normally update on Sunday). Sony and Microsoft teaming up on a console is probably the most absurd thing we could think of. Well, I would've added- "And FFVII Remake Is A Launch Title" but it wouldn't fit in the headline.
So it's not about trying to convince you that this is real news. Rather, it's a chance for the community to discuss what the gaming landscape might be like without the petty console wars. Personally, I wouldn't mind having one universal console, just because I've never really cared about the name on a machine; I've always just wanted to play the games I want to play, which are typically the best ones available. And when multiple consoles have games I want, I have to own them...and that not only gets cumbersome and awkward, it gets expensive as generations roll on.
On the other hand, they say that competition begets quality and I'm willing to bet that console manufacturers don't mind having competing systems out there. It may drive first-party developers to do something extra special. At the same time, I think all game designers are gamers themselves, and they all want to create the best experience they can, so maybe the hardware competition is unnecessary. It just might be easier the whole way around; it may solidify the industry as well, because having multiple consoles isn't exactly accessible. I know to outsiders it might be confusing whereas with one unit, it's just- "Here, buy this and you can play any game made."
I really wouldn't mind. Having to buy a couple new pieces of hardware each generation (and finding room for the ones I already have) is getting ridiculous. However, I'm willing to bet that not all gamers agree...
Tags: ps4, playstation 4, xbox 720, new xbox, new playstation
3/31/2012 8:45:35 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (45 posts)
La_Bete12
Saturday, March 31, 2012 @ 10:29:00 PM
shadowscorpio
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 10:17:45 AM
Jawknee
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 1:56:29 PM
fatelementality
Saturday, March 31, 2012 @ 10:00:28 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Saturday, March 31, 2012 @ 10:20:43 PM
Reply
Am I'm willing to bet over a $200K worth of gaming collections that not only could it never happen, it will never happen either between those two.
hell, just the differences in their business ethics alone, would repel them from each other.
Axe99
Saturday, March 31, 2012 @ 10:21:04 PM
Reply
Metal Head
Saturday, March 31, 2012 @ 11:45:45 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 12:05:02 AM
Reply
AcHiLLiA
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 8:46:08 PM
Helghast
Monday, April 02, 2012 @ 10:26:04 AM
Last edited by Helghast on 4/2/2012 10:28:46 AM
Fox hounder
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 1:06:14 AM
Reply
556pineapple
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 1:47:25 AM
Reply
A universal console could have its advantages, but essentially being a monopoly, they could get away with high charges. Plus there's not really enough Xbox games out there now that would make it worthwhile for me to get an Xbox, so I really don't mind just having one console. However, that could easily change next generation. Nothing wrong with a little healthy competition, especially if it gets the manufacturers, developers, and publishers to try to out-do each other in terms of quality.
___________
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 3:20:29 AM
Reply
but throw ninty in too then you would have the perfect system!
think about it $ony doing the future proofing of it, ninty doing the innovation bringing something new to the table, and M$ supplying a half competent OS and online service.
would be brilliant!
then you can have the best of both worlds with the games too.
the dark gritty exclusives M$ offers, the repetitive old but still fun exclusives ninty offers or the more unique risky offerings $ony brings.
honestly, i cant think of anything better to happen to the industry!
Lawless SXE
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 3:33:25 AM
Reply
Competition between the two would stall, but that would only serve to heighten the innovative attempts of this conglomeration and Nintendo, perhaps sparking something entirely awesome, and the combined bankrolls of MS and Sony could make the current tech specs quiver with the right people on the job dedicated to improving hardware quickly. Might be cheaper too.
Nah, I like things the way they are :)
Beamboom
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 4:48:01 AM
Reply
But the way I see it we are about to get the best of both worlds if the rumours regarding the next Playstation are true.
The consequences of having a slightly more standardized architecture means the developers more easily can deliver good versions of their games also on our console. And that is a win:win:win situation. I can't emphasis strong enough how right I think Sony's move is in these regards. What they do there is simply to adapt to the new reality.
I look more forward to the PS4 now than I've ever done before. If we don't have to wait five years to enjoy the full potential for our console the next generation then good for us. We've had enough of poor ports and the lesser versions now. If we can leave all that behind with the shift to the new console then who are we to complain? After all, it's ALL about the games!
Last edited by Beamboom on 4/1/2012 5:34:59 AM
CrusaderForever
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 3:36:19 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 8:36:16 PM
I'd rather see.....Station X
Anyway, if they ever did co-diddle....Er...I mean co-mingle.....one console together(which I will never foresee happening), the Sony's part in re-branding the name definitely has to come first in my book!!!!!
There's just no way that a company with shady business ethics, and who's semi-gimped their current console with RRODs , plus the fact that compared to the PS3, the 360 is a console with lesser discabilites, so M$ should never, never, ever, have their name first.
BTW, don't get me wrong because I DO like my 360, but I hate the scummy company behind it.
Last edited by BikerSaint on 4/1/2012 8:38:05 PM
Gamer Girl Gemo
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 5:12:24 PM
Reply
Highlander
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 5:38:09 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 8:43:15 PM
xnonsuchx
Sunday, April 01, 2012 @ 9:30:24 PM
One interesting thing about the MSX/MSX2 that TheHighlander mentioned is that Yamaha made one that included an FM synthesizer (from their DX-series synths), which allowed it to differentiate itself from the other MSX/MSX2 machines. Otherwise, they were all about the same (with a Microsoft OS).
Highlander
Monday, April 02, 2012 @ 4:27:54 AM
Fane1024
Tuesday, April 03, 2012 @ 3:30:35 AM

See Full Image









EddPm6
Reply
Saturday, March 31, 2012 @ 9:18:30 PM
Last edited by EddPm6 on 3/31/2012 9:19:10 PM