PS3 News: Activision: Charging Money For Stuff Doesn't Make Us Greedy - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Activision: Charging Money For Stuff Doesn't Make Us Greedy

When you create a Call of Duty update on a PlayStation-oriented website, you have to assume there's going to be some rampant hate flying around. It's inevitable.

So after Activision Social Media Manager Dan Amrich posted about the MW3 Content Collection 1 on the PlayStation Blog, he had to deal with quite a few harsh outpourings from those who just don't like the blockbuster franchise.

Interestingly enough, Amrich was keen on replying to the hate. To the simple "Call of Duty sucks," he replied, "Play whatever makes you happy." For someone who said the collection is "a little pricey for a few maps," Amrich responded with- "Six maps for $15 equals $2.50 a map. Ultimately that’s up to you as to whether it’s worth it, of course, but I’ve seen other games charge $3 or more per map." To the more direct, "...a crappy add-on for a crappy $60 add-on...CALL OF DUTY BLOWS!!!!!", he bravely said-"

"So…play something you like more. You could be championing a game you like more instead of slagging this one and the people who have fun with it. Why waste your time complaining about a game you don’t enjoy, you know?"

Awfully diplomatic, yes? But the comment that got the biggest rise out of Amrich was the one that advised him to "do like FOURZEROTWO" (reference to Infinity Ward boss Robert Bowling's recent departure) "and look for a new company to work for. 'GREEDVISION' is really getting bad." Here's Amrich's rebuttal:

"This is an interesting take, because every single game publisher in the entire industry is a business and looking to make a profit. What’s more, CoD is very popular and a lot of fans look forward to new maps and DLC releases. So…well, I just don’t buy into the “greed” thing when it’s really just giving people what they want, and charging money for products and services — which is what every business does, from car companies to grocery stores to restaurants and movie theaters.

Charging money for something does not make anybody greedy. But you always have the absolute power to choose how you spend your money, no matter what. So support whatever things you feel are worth the money and are likely to make you the happiest. That’s all — and that’s normal!"

While we're not about to say their DLC is among the best deals out there, we do have to admit, sometimes gamers are in need of a bite from a reality sandwich. Yes, you do have to charge money in business. Yes, consumers have to spend money. With all the recent hysteria, it really seems as if nobody wants to pay anything. Of course, as far as the CoD hate goes...well, we're not about to build on that. It has a life of its own.

By the way, Amrich responded to people saying that if one military game is great, the other has to suck:

"I never really understood the attitude that if you like Military Game A, then Military Game B must suck and then be wiped off the face of the earth. A and B might both be of interest, you know?

Like, thank goodness nobody says 'no more sci-fi movies, they already made one.' Different approaches work for different people."

Tags: cod, call of duty, modern warfare 3, mw3, activision

4/20/2012 10:13:23 AM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (67 posts)

Xombito
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:33:38 AM
Reply

Fire Kotick and promote this guy to CEO.

Agree with this comment 21 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

H0TSHELLZ
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:11:51 AM

He feels like i do with the Comments posted on every COD thread here ! Go play somthing you like and comment on stuff you like instead of wasting your time with hateful comments. lol he's the man !

Agree with this comment 6 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Temjin001
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:35:39 AM
Reply

mmmh reality sandwich is good =p

I bought both of the NG3 DLC's. But I'm a bit bummed out because there appears to be no one online anymore with the game. Woe is me =/

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

wackazoa
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:36:21 AM

" reality sandwich is good "



I prefer mine with mustard and no lettuce..... I hate lettuce.

Last edited by wackazoa on 4/20/2012 11:36:55 AM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:55:30 PM

Sorry to hear that Temjin, now that it's clear very few people like NG3 it has qualified for The Cult Gamer. Maybe I'll pick it up one day :)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bebestorm
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:40:44 AM
Reply

I love the way he responded. I don't play because Im not into military shooters anyway I've never understood the COD hate.

Agree with this comment 7 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lord carlos
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:42:33 AM
Reply

Whiners
Their all the same,i'm sure somewhere on the net theres a tread where plumbers are nerd raging over which pipe is better to fix your sink in the kitchen with.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:47:21 AM

PEX for flow and ABS for blow, fool!!!!

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

TheAgingHipster
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:31:34 AM

That's totally off-base. Everyone knows the appropriate application in modern plumbing is PVC in the kitchen and bathroom, with galvanized piping leading the main in, and the waste out.

:)

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

wackazoa
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:38:25 AM

Yeah but galvanized clogs to easy... and is a pain in the ass to repair.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 12:53:21 PM

PEX with Sharkbite. The lazy man's ally.

-MY- ally.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:46:17 AM
Reply

Gotta admit.

I like how he didn't tear anyone down. Was very civil, direct, and to the point.

This guy is a champ, even if Activision is a little suspect. Not often Activision scores points in my book, but today they got one.

Agree with this comment 15 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

jimmyhandsome
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:46:25 AM
Reply

Brilliant. I'm glad he responded to some of the whining instead of ignoring the comments like some developers/publishers do on the PS Blog.

I'm not the biggest CoD fan, but I see the appeal it has on the "competitive" gamer types that love online gaming. Activision is and was very successful at putting out products that people enjoy and buy annually. They also find new ways to generate revenue with services like CoD Elite that a select few of hardcore types are willing to pay for. Thats called running a good business, not "being greedy".

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:48:33 AM

I thought the same thing about the response. Beachhead has been terrible about responding re: elite. Even if I hate the answer, I would 100% favor a response over nothing. Even if the response isn't what I want to hear.

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

wackazoa
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:39:43 AM

If you at least make the gamer feel as if he has a voice and is heard then said gamer will support your company till the end.

Last edited by wackazoa on 4/20/2012 11:40:13 AM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PS360
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:58:43 AM
Reply

Millions of people enjoy Call of Duty, the reason I think it gets hate is because people expect a big jump in quality every year, as they should IMO. Instead their games progress very little or even take a step backwards ( Mw3 compared to Black ops ). This is just my opinion of course.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:11:31 AM

For me, the quality issue isn't so much the problem as it is the support. It just feels like there's no follow through on their end once they get your money.

Compare that to Uncharted 3, for example, and you see there are improvements made all the time at no cost.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

wackazoa
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:40:47 AM

COD is the New York Yankees of games.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

xenris
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:13:38 AM
Reply

My only question about the map packs is why so much? People are dropping almost 70 bucks annually on these games and they hardly support them post release. Even patches for CoD are few and far between.

My other big question is why can Valve, charge 20 bucks for Counter-Strike and they added free maps to it for years after it was released. Not only that they let fans make there own maps and would make them official if they were high enough quality. TF2 before going F2P was also insanely updated with huge content updates patches and maps added, all for free.

I think most of the people who think activision is greedy look at Valve and CDprojekt and all the stuff they give you post release for free and then wonder why activision says they have to charge for it.

This guy was very civil though. Its true if you don't like something just don't play it :)

Agree with this comment 8 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

jimmyhandsome
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:25:37 AM

Why so much? Because people are willing to pay for it. And if they give enough content with these packs, they can justify the cost (see: his response to the $2.50/map). Activision as a business knows what they're doing. Personally, I don't think DLC is worth that much.

Comparing Activision business model to Valve's Steam service is like apples to oranges

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:27:20 AM

"Why so much? Because people are willing to pay for it."

Bingo. It's called capitalism. We live in it.

Agree with this comment 9 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:29:44 AM

Yeah. They'll charge as much as they can for max profit. You have something brand new, the cheaper it is, the more people will buy, but to a limit. The more expensive, the fewer people will buy. So, what price point gives you the most return in the middle?

For example, you make more money selling it for $2.50 to 1 million people than you would selling it for $1.00 to 2 million people. The price isn't even about trying to get it to as many people as possible, ya know? All about the most money made.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 12:05:05 PM

Yea, they can charge whatever they like. Activision overcharges but I have to given them credit for being honest about it. They make it clear and allow you to make the choice. Which is how it should be. No one forces people to buy these overpriced maps. Unlike Crapcom who just hides crap from the consumer on the disc they already bought then pretends it's new content.

Agree with this comment 7 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Rogueagent01
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:27:53 PM

Xenris I am with you on that one, they could easily give a DLC away for free from time to time, or even show the masses that have supported them by buying all of their games with free map packs but they don't(as far as I am aware). He was civil I'll give him that, but nothing more.

And Jimmy then lets use Epics Unreal III for the PS3. When they released it, it didn't sell to well and luckily they also made a boat load of cash off of Gears of War. So rather then charging for the Titan Pack which is still one of the largest DLCs to date they gave it away for free. It contained access to all the MODS, new game modes, and new skins/avatars for your character.

And the $2.50 a map is essentially BS as normally 2 of the maps are from previous games, so it should be more like $4 or $5 a map instead of the $2.50. I wouldn't mind the $2.50 comment from him if they were on a new engine and had to completely redo the maps, but that is not the case.

I am sorry but there is a difference bewteen being a capitalitst and being a capitalist pig, and Activision is from the latter. If small no name companies can release cheap or free DLC, maintain their games post release, and give back to their fans from time to time, then so can this cash cow.

If anyone can't tell, yeah I hate Activision and I don't care.

Agree with this comment 9 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:39:32 PM

"I am sorry but there is a difference bewteen being a capitalitst and being a capitalist pig"

The only difference is moral opinion, though.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:42:56 PM

"I am sorry but there is a difference bewteen being a capitalitst and being a capitalist pig"

Oh nonsense. If you think Activision is greedy don't buy their products or content. The choice is yours. No one owes you anything except honesty and Activsion is honest in their delivery of their content no matter how overpriced it may be.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 5 down Disagree with this comment

Rogueagent01
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:49:51 PM

Jawknee I don't need to be told the obvious and go ahead and look up my PSN name I don't have a single one of the games and I never will. Your right that I have a choice and I have chose to ignore there awful business practices. The only reason I know anything about the games is I have one friend and a cousin who plays them, otherwise I wouldn't know anything about those games.

Unfortunately Underdog your absolutely right.

Agree with this comment 7 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:58:29 PM

He's right, this is capitalism, fools and their money are soon parted.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:00:42 PM

@rogue, Okay so why spend time hating Activation? It's wasted energy. I know because I've done it. But I have come to learn that it's not worth it. Just like this executive said. Play what makes you happy, and stop whining about how greedy they are. At least their honest with the consumer.

Last edited by Jawknee on 4/20/2012 2:01:34 PM

Agree with this comment 5 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

jimmyhandsome
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:02:52 PM

"And Jimmy then lets use Epics Unreal III for the PS3. When they released it, it didn't sell to well and luckily they also made a boat load of cash off of Gears of War. So rather then charging for the Titan Pack which is still one of the largest DLCs to date they gave it away for free. It contained access to all the MODS, new game modes, and new skins/avatars for your character."

Well you said it right there. It didn't sell well. It comes down to what I said earlier, a company will charge what people are willing to pay. If the game didn't sell well, their DLC probably wouldn't either. Call of Duty sells extremely well, and I'm sure Activision prices their DLC at prices that people will pay for it.



Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Rogueagent01
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:27:11 PM

To Jawknee, If no one decides to hate on them then that could become the norm. And I absolutely will not stand for it, don't get me wrong I normally stear clear of articles involving Activision but from time to time I have to say something. To me your never wasting energy/time when you stand up for something you believe in, whether your right or wrong.

And Jimmy sorry that doesn't fit the model of capitalism, you don't give things away for free just because sales were low, usually its the opposite. And the sales were only low in comparison to previous Unreals and God of War, many companies would have killed to get those sales.

Agree with this comment 6 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:35:17 PM

Then maybe you should stop wasting time playing video games and form a picket line outside Activation's HQ with the rest of your self entitled buddies to "make a statement". Afterall, if you hate them so and believe it's a worthy cause to spend important energy on, turn into action instead of incessant whining.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

jimmyhandsome
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:42:52 PM

I have no idea what the sales were for Unreal, I'm just going by what you're saying. But my point is that if people aren't willing to pay for it, then why do you think they didn't charge for DLC? It doesn't make sense for them to charge $10 for DLC for a game that no one bought. Its a nice gesture to give it out for free, but that should have nothing to do with Activision being "greedy" for charging for their DLC. Call of Duty sells 10 million+ units every year, why would they just give away DLC? Does that sound like a good profitable business?

You should listen to Jawknee and learn to accept that they're not being "evil"...at the end of the day, Activision is a business trying to make money and put products out that their customers want. If you don't want their product, don't be their customer. They do have plenty of people that are willing to buy their $15 DLC which is why they charge that much.

Last edited by jimmyhandsome on 4/20/2012 2:45:24 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Rogueagent01
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 3:25:54 PM

To Jimmy from a quick look around the net I kept seein 1.2 to 1.3 million copies, however I couldn't tell if those were for just the PS3 or for all 3 platforms combined. And I don't recall anyone saying they wouldn't pay for it, I would have bought it for as high as $20 with the amount of content it brought to the table. I figured they would have at least charge something for it and then if sales of the DLC were bad release it for free through a patch.

And sorry I put God of War I meant Gears of War for anyone that feels the need to correct me.

And both of use have put words in my mouth. I never not once used the term "evil" I don't consider a capitalist pig "evil" necessarily. Voicing my opinion on the internet is a form of protest. You don't need to physically sit outside the companies doors anymore to make yourself heard.And I am sorry Jawknee if you think I have an entitled mentality because I think a companiy should show some fan appreciation from time to time. I said give away a DLC from time to time not give them all away, even though I'll give you that the second part of my statement could be interpreted that way as I forgot to put the "from time to time" in with it, sorry if that is what you are referring to. Sorry but thinking a company should show/give loyal fans some incentive for being loyal is not entitled, especially when said company is raking in over a billion dollars a year from just that one product.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

xenris
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 4:27:20 PM

I didn't nearly expect this much back and forth wow! Very interesting points by everyone.

I know we live in a capitalist world, more what I meant was I don't understand why they do it. Sure they can make more money and profit but as a whole wouldn't it be nice to be known as a company that is there for the fans instead of being known for selling practically the same game annually and charging more than the competition for their map packs, which I might add usually have maps from old games in them anyway. Also he is false call of duty map packs are the most expensive maps I have seen.

Imagine how much loyalty and respect they would get if they released the top maps from the previous modern warfare games for free? It would show that they cared about the consumer.

I don't think its acting entitled, as we're not really demanding. We are just kind of asking questions about why smaller companies reward their fans while the big guys essentially just want you there as their piggy bank.

I agree with rogue, it would be nice if they gave stuff away for free from time to time. The problem is they have a super capitalist mentality and if there is even a possibility of them making any money they go that route instead. Doesn't make them evil, it would just be nice.

I run my own business, and I give people free consultations for fitness training, free sessions if they stick with me for a while. Heck sometimes I even go grocery shopping with my clients and help them make healthy choices. I know I could be making money off of those things but one it feels great to help people out, and it builds loyalty and my reputation spreads by word of mouth.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 4:58:40 PM

"Voicing my opinion on the internet is a form of protest."

LOL! Where's the petition? Or is your "Internet protest" limited to complaining on video game blogs?

Btw, I never said you said they were "evil". I'm just trying to understand how complaining about it on a blog is supposed to make them lower their prices. Capitalism is pretty simple. A business provides a product, sets a price, and if you find value in it then everyone wins. But if you don't, then save your money and move along. They haven't lied, or tried to withhold stuff you already paid for like other companies. At least not to my knowledge. As jimmy said, they know there ARE people who will happily pay the price they ask so there is no need for your business if you're not willing to pay it. It's called demand. There is a demand for it so they can charge what they want. You're not being ripped off because you aren't willing to pay their price. They will lower their prices when the demand decreases. Besides, you said yourself you don't buy their games. What loyalty do they owe you? That's why this sounds like a case of entitlement.

@Xenris
"I run my own business, and I give people free consultations for fitness training, free sessions if they stick with me for a while. Heck sometimes I even go grocery shopping with my clients and help them make healthy choices. I know I could be making money off of those things but one it feels great to help people out, and it builds loyalty and my reputation spreads by word of mouth."

If that works for you that's awesome. I too run my own business with my wife and we too give out free perks. But Activision doesn't feel the need to and they don't have to just because we do. Besides it sounds like you do a lot of what you do to help people. Activsion wants to make a profit. Which they are perfectly free to do.

Last edited by Jawknee on 4/20/2012 5:06:34 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:21:56 AM
Reply

$15 for 6 maps while other devs charge $5 or give them away for free. Haha

Also, aren't 2 of those 6 maps usually rehashed from previous games?

Agree with this comment 9 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

CaptRon
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 11:49:36 AM
Reply

Is this a joke?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 5 down Disagree with this comment

Excelsior1
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 12:12:53 PM
Reply

hehe. No, it just makes them a little evil kind of like EA but not quite as bad. I am joking...kind of. Wasn't EA recently voted as the most evil corporation in NA? I'm certain something like that happened.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 12:49:53 PM

This "corporations are evil" argument is getting old. They're a business who's job it is to make money so they can pay their employees and provide a well being for their families. Unless EA is dumping sewage onto our oceans or killing people, I fail to see how they're "evil".

Agree with this comment 3 up, 7 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 12:55:41 PM

With that said, Jawk, Shell and Coka-Cola is evil. :p Activision? They just found a gold mine in CoD.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Excelsior1
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:22:43 PM

hehe. Coca Cola is evil,..look what they did to that poor Pepsi can. Anyways, Jawk's response reminds me of EA's reply when voted "most evil". I said I was joking(kind of). I did check and it is true EA was voted the most evil company. Backlash from online passes and Mass Effect 3's ending? Perceived threat to used game sales? Without getting into politics I will just say corporations are like anything else controlled by human beings. Some are good, and some can be bad...most somewhere between.

I do believe in a free market system. I do not have to pay for $15 map packs and I don't. If a company sets that price and some consumers pay for it that's fine by me. Companies do have to be profitable or they cease to exist. There is nothing wrong with a company wanting to make a profit. That alone does not make them evil. I will also add that one thing I do dislike about paid for maps is that it segments the online community into two groups.

Back to a free market system... That's one of the reasons I hate to hear whining about used game sales. It has come from the biggest and most profitable of software companies like EA and Ubisoft during the most successful gen of gaming in terms of sales. Isn't a second market just a natural extension of a free market system? I'm pretty sure it is but that's just my humble opinion. I'm also pretty sure some of EA's tactics this gen has helped grant them their recent award. Whether it is fair or not they can sometimes come accross as greedy which helps grant them the most evil title. Too harsh to label them evil? Probably. Who knows where it's coming from...Maybe there is some backlash against EA for all there smack talking during BF3. I know that turned off some including myself.

I sometimes forget that before Mr. Kotick helped put Activision on top in terms of most disliked software company that EA used to hold this title. Looks like EA has reclaimed their top spot again. It's not quite the top spot they wanted. I'm pretty sure they want the top spot in terms of sales instead.

Last edited by Excelsior1 on 4/20/2012 2:28:54 PM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

jimmyhandsome
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:29:34 PM

Excelsior- I read about how EA won that "award", too. But I'm pretty sure that the outcry and whining from gamers (see: Mass Effect 3 debacle) is A LOT louder than for other corporations in different industries.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BikerSaint
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 12:21:25 PM
Reply

Maybe if they got rid of Kotex, since he was the one that once said that he hated video games & didn't play them, & would also charge $100 for them if he could.

Yo Dicky boy, don't you ever forget that gamers have good memory's as to what you've said, and the disdain you've shown toward us in the past.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

supercrazyggk1
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 12:21:52 PM
Reply

Well sad but true, he is right. Every game publisher wants money and cod is damn popular.If u don't want it don't buy it,but there are a ton load of gamers that play cod only. They don't care about quality, story or dedication poured by some fine game companies in their games, they just want to shoot someone in multiplayer.This is the target demographic of activision and they sure know how to milk them.They don't give a sh*t about u or me, the gamers that wants something special in their games.So i don't care about them either, the last cod i bought was cod waw, no mw2 or mw3 for me.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

AcHiLLiA
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:16:22 PM

The last COD I bought was W@W too, didn't want to be in this hyped up COD craze anymore. I know this gen is more on the multiplayer side, especially when it comes to specific people like most kids.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

inkme101
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:30:10 PM
Reply

the only comment that he made that i really didnt care for was when one guy said "cod needs an updated engine" and the guy basically said y should we do that when we already know the next game will sell regardless. thats true! but i would think that the company would want to make advancements rather than just milk a 6 yr old engine to death. bf3's frostbite engine proves that a shooter can look far greater than what activision is throwing our way!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:44:49 PM

Frostbite provides much better sound too. All the guns in CoD sound the same. Like toys.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

inkme101
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:50:17 PM

INDEED SIR!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:04:19 PM

I agree, but there's one thing about your argument, Jawk, that -SHOULD- make me roll my eyes at cod, but doesn't...

It's the fact that I like playing with toys! :D

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:08:16 PM

LOL! The game itself is the toy. The least they can do is provide decent audio.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 1:56:45 PM
Reply

SMOOTH! That is exactly how I would have responded as well. I agree with that man who works for the evil empire trying to bring gaming down to a lower standard.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Justover6
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:18:02 PM
Reply

I only wish Dan would have been a bit more funny with it. Something like;

If you don't like it, take lessons from Merlin

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxiLUEgN6vQ

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kraygen
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 2:32:20 PM
Reply

I'm not a cod fan, not a big fps fan at all really. I think the prices for cod and it's additional content are quite high, but I just don't buy it.

If you have to be mad or hate on someone for the games quality, pricing, or add-ons, hate on the buyers, not the sellers.

It's the same as release date/disc locked dlc, if no one bought it, companies wouldn't sell it.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bigrailer19
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 4:53:36 PM
Reply

It's overpriced no matter how you look at it. Although this pack in particular is one of the better and more content available, packs they have released. But considering most Sony exclusive games, and I'll use ND and Guerrilla as examples, sell packs for under $10 and ussually contain more than this.

But I will say that no matter what people will buy it, even if it was $20, because it's CoD. It doesn't matter anymore at that point. And especially if it's all you play. Activision know this, and even though they are priced high, they are smart about it.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Pandacastro
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 5:53:23 PM
Reply

Am I the only one that thinks EA is more greedy?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 6:27:34 PM

They both have their quarks.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JackDillinger89
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 7:08:06 PM
Reply

If mw3 is the ONLY game you play then $50 for elite is worth it. Rather than buy the dlc content for $15 a pop will cost you more in the long run with more individual packs incoming. This guy was very professional on dealing with the cod haters, he didnt stoop down to there level. And he's right. I happen to like both military games A and B (mw3/bf3)

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ulsterscot
Friday, April 20, 2012 @ 10:21:34 PM
Reply

Compare to EA - I bought both Crysis 2 map packs - could rarely get a game because no one else had them. MOH map pack "hotzone" never got a game because no one was playing it. Back to Karkland - old maps rehashed - which is fine because they are good maps - glad they came free for those who pre ordered so you are garunteed others will play it.

COD maps - i love them because everybody buys them. I personally get tired of the same maps after a while so im happy when new ones come out.

I totally agree with his response to people who don't like COD - stop being such a bunch of sniveling whiners - nobody is forcing anyone to buy COD - don't try to ram it down the throats of those who like COD that just because you hate it they therefore they should stop making it and because you don't like it, those who do are all 'sheep' (or whatever other pathetic insult you prefer).

You just don't get COD players infesting every article about rpg games or whatever to insult those who like a different genre.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Saturday, April 21, 2012 @ 6:03:09 AM
Reply

of course it doesnt!
publishers are in the industry to make money, not to make friends!
charging for content does not make you greedy, charging a ridiculous amount of money for content does!
like releasing a feature like elite something so many games offer for FREE, and you charge for it.
THAT makes you greedy!
releasing the same crap year in and year out and charging full price for it, THAT makes you greedy!

sigh, antivision still dont get the point!
people hate COD because they have done so well every company has said oh we have to be COD too because if we are COD then we will sell like COD!
so now instead of having a multitude of different shooters we have nothing but COD clones!
there stagnating the innovation and evolution of the industry!

as stan march said to john edwards in that south park episode biggest douche of the universe.
“your not just lying your slowing down the progress of the human race you douche!”
thats antivision, there slowing down the evolution of the shooter genre, and the industry, by instead of saying hey were the biggest influence in the industry so lets do something fresh and new.
there saying hey were the biggest influence in the industry so lets release the same crap year in year out!
there slowing down the progress of the shooter genre, thus they are biggest douche of the game industry!

problem is though as cliffy b once said haters will hate right to the cash register!
in other words how many of the people complaining about this are at the midnight launch for the game?
99.9%?
in other words put your money where your mouth is, if you dont like how antivision are handling the series instead of whining till your face is blue get of your fat a$$ and do something about it!
as the saying goes vote with your wallet!
companies only do these things because they get away with it!
stop buying their games and watch them change quickity split!


Last edited by ___________ on 4/21/2012 6:06:08 AM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bigimpactpooch
Saturday, April 21, 2012 @ 1:01:38 PM
Reply

Wasn't CoD hate built by CoD lovers, they always seemed to trash anything that wasn't CoD so the other shooter lovers retaliated.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Squirrelicus
Saturday, April 21, 2012 @ 4:12:42 PM
Reply

Guitar Hero anyone?

I'm very curious to how many people bought the new map pack. Because from my experience not many considering it has only 640+ reviews. Last I heard Black Ops still has more people playing it.

I'm willing to bet the next CoD doesn't break any records.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

EagerGamer
Sunday, April 22, 2012 @ 10:56:00 AM
Reply

It clearly is greed. Designing maps should be one of the easiest parts of this kind of game which costs apparently $60 (in the US I'm guessing). Thanks to the recession or whatever you want to call it many people are jobless and can't find work for love nor money. So $60 is enough in itself to be spending on a game. Yes 2.50 is cheap enough for 1 thing alone but $15 to pay for content needed to enjoy the full potential of a game or otherwise miss out on what your friends or whoever else are playing is greed. Simple as. Especially when these maps could have been made before release and don't tell me they couldn't - the amount of money COD makes it would be easily done. If more designers were needed it'd still be fine and cost buttons compared to what the game makes. I program myself so I know what I'm talking about and level design is a doddle compared to the other aspects of making a game. It's probably fun! They make more than enough money without having to release DLC or enough maps for a substantial figure derived from $2.50s x numberOfMaps. It's not necessary for them to release dlc to make a profit. It's not necessary. Therefore it IS greed. Yes all businesses make as much profit as they can - doesn't mean it's not greed. It means all of those businesses are greedy and Activision is clearly no different. You can dislike my comment if you want but I suspect that's from either being a fan boy or from my words hitting a nerve - the truth hurts. I like COD and have bought every came from COD 3 onwards - apart from MW3 or should I say MW2.1 + DLC? Interested to see how good Black Ops 2 looks and whether it's worth paying good money for compared to a weak and lame effort shown in the likes of MW2.1/3...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bariikade
Sunday, April 22, 2012 @ 2:59:08 PM
Reply

Dan Amrich is common sense embodied.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bariikade
Sunday, April 22, 2012 @ 3:09:15 PM
Reply

Thought I'd add another comment. I don't mind when DLC is released for games, but I hate it when you go online with a game and they remind you that you don't have the extra DLC's and ask you to buy it. Halo Reach does that, everytime you go to matchmaking it reminds you that you don't have the DLC and comes up with a page asking you to buy it. I frakin' bought the other DLC I was missing just to get rid of that annoying message. I know I'm a fool...

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LazyVigilante
Sunday, April 22, 2012 @ 7:17:45 PM
Reply

Activision makes good games once in a while but IS greedy!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Gamer46
Monday, April 23, 2012 @ 12:03:58 AM
Reply

Surprised Amrich didn't just ignore the comments. Every publisher gets hated on, in most cases rightly so, for the greed that has been on display this gen. Activision, EA and Capcom are the worst offenders when it comes to exploiting DLC. They know what they're doing is crap and then still get all bent out of shape when people call them on it. Seems a bit childish to me to get involved in a war of words with consumers who are justified in being sick of the nickel and diming. Just post the update of what's available and move on.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

So, how's Far Cry 4?
Terrific, one of the best in 2014!
Good game but not amazing.
Okay; nothing special.
Eh, I'm disappointed.

Previous Poll Results