Poll Implies That PS3 Owners Aren't Too Interested In Mobile Gaming
The state of gaming is always a hot topic these days, especially considering the emergence of portable gaming via smartphones and tablets.
And in a recent poll conducted by DealNews.com, we get a few interesting stats: The Wii isn't exactly seen as a hardcore gamer's machine, unsurprisingly the Xbox 360 is the #1 console of choice, and most would agree that someone is a gamer if they exclusively play on the 360, PS3, or PC.
But another interesting result arrived as part of this poll, in which 1,551 readers participated. It comes from the question that asked people how much they'd be willing to spend on a mobile game; 32% of PS3 owners said they'd only buy a mobile game if it was free. We could conclude from this that PS3 fans are thriftier than other gamers, or maybe we could assume that PlayStation followers are the most hardcore of the bunch and kinda scoff at mobile gaming. By the way, for the record, even those who primarily played games on mobile devices didn't consider themselves "gamers."
But perhaps above all else, it definitely implies that 1/3 of PS3 owners simply aren't too interested in mobile interactive entertainment, yes? I mean, if we're only willing to play something if it's free...we really can't care much about it, now can we?
Tags: gaming, gaming industry, gaming culture, gamers, video games
6/4/2012 12:01:45 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (19 posts)
Beamboom
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 1:30:29 PM
Reply
I have no idea how many hours I've spent on games like Wordfeud, Uniwar, Landrule and Draw Something but at a couple of bucks each they sure do offer an insane bang for the bucks.
I think it's about time that us "real" gamers stop being so darn snobbish and acknowledge mobile gaming for being the additional gaming arena that it is. We should also stop comparing them to PC/console games cause they are not supposed to be that. They are mobile games.
556pineapple
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 1:34:19 PM
Reply
Last edited by 556pineapple on 6/4/2012 1:35:29 PM
DazeOfWar
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 1:34:22 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 2:02:49 PM
Reply
Beamboom
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 2:55:18 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 3:23:26 PM
___________
Tuesday, June 05, 2012 @ 6:44:03 AM
Twistedfloyd
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 3:36:01 PM
Reply
Advent Child
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 3:54:06 PM
Reply
Beamboom
Tuesday, June 05, 2012 @ 3:08:51 PM
Jed
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 7:50:54 PM
Reply
I don't understand how so many of the people here hate mobile games so adamantly. There is a big difference between these little time wasters and real console games. I don't know if they feel that their console games are threatened by Angry Birds or what.
___________
Tuesday, June 05, 2012 @ 6:41:42 AM
Reply
in fact mobile games give you a hell of allot more value for money than what console, hell even vita games do!
N.O.V.A 3 for instance, a game that has console quality graphics, a 6+ hour campaign mode, awesome multiplayer, AND it only costs 6 bucks!
youd be paying a hell of allot more than that if it was a PSN game!
hell the PSP mini port of the original nova if i remember right is 10 bucks!
and that was a pretty average game...........
pillz81
Tuesday, June 05, 2012 @ 11:42:16 AM
As a person who has played Dead Space, Battlefield Bad Company, and fighting games for my ipod touch, I can say that I'd rather play games like that on a mobile platform that has a thumbstick and physical buttons. My thumbs can't take using another touchscreen to move a character anymore.
I for one have not based my gaming decisions based on willful ignorance.
___________
Wednesday, June 06, 2012 @ 10:05:06 AM

See Full Image









slugga_status
Reply
Monday, June 04, 2012 @ 12:43:13 PM