Square Enix: "This Generation Has Lasted Way Too Long"
Many gamers are fine with an extended console life cycle for this generation, as are several outspoken developers.
But not everyone thinks a console cycle lasting 7-10 years is a good idea. Take Square Enix Worldwide Technology Director Julien Merceron, for example, who told GamesIndustry.biz that Sony and Microsoft's decision to elongate this generation was the "biggest mistake they've ever made."
Merceron weighed the pros and cons of releasing a new machine with simple architecture versus a console with a complex makeup. He also said he'd like to see Sony ditch the Cell and proprietary tech in the next generation. Added Merceron:
"Now you don't need to manage longevity by complexity of programming, because your longevity is ensured by your online model. And I would suggest that maybe we don't want long generations. We have Sony and Microsoft talking about this generation lasting 7,8,9 or even 10 years and it's the biggest mistake they've ever made.
This generation has been way too long, and I say this because you have a lot of developers that work on a new platform, and perhaps will not succeed, so they will wait for the next generation, and will jump on that platform. You could not do that with this generation though. So these developers went elsewhere to see if the grass was greener. They found web browsers, they found iOS, they found other things and a lot of them won't come back to the hardware platforms. So you could look at it that thanks to Microsoft and Sony and the length of this generation, it helped the emergence of other platforms and helped them get strong before the next hardware comes out."
Do you believe that the added years in this generation have opened the door for other platforms? Or do you think that would've happened, anyway? Personally, I don't think launching the PS4 or Xbox 720 earlier would've had the slightest impact on the casual/mobile gaming explosion, which was inevitable given the extreme popularity of smartphones and tablets. But that's just me.
Tags: current generation, next-gen, next generation, ps3, xbox 360
7/10/2012 9:18:47 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (91 posts)
Deathb4Dishonor
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 11:21:54 AM
Qubex
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 1:40:12 AM
richfiles
Sunday, July 15, 2012 @ 10:28:41 PM
I'll start listening to what Square has to say when they are relevant in the game industry again. The only thing they are good for these days, is re-releases of old titles.
Square needs to be less concerned with the processing power of their pretty graphics makers and learn to do good games again...
Shut up Square, you're making people laugh!
Drake_RB3
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 9:50:28 AM
Reply
Personally, I don't see the need. I'd much rather play a story-driven game.
I also find it funny that this statement comes from a company who needs to outsource to other developers to work on new (or finish current) games. They should be happy the current generation is longer. Instead of spending the first year of the new console figuring out how to make the best game possible.
Last edited by Drake_RB3 on 7/10/2012 9:51:37 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:25:32 AM
Lemon_Saint
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 2:25:04 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 3:44:46 PM
Drake_RB3
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 3:51:24 PM
Yea, teachers are in a rough spot now, and tenure isn't doing some great teachers any favors.
Lots of politics and budgeting sadly get priority, when students passing Algebra and other subjects should come first.
I feel like doing a Limit Break on Governor Christie sometimes.
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 6:35:37 PM
BikerSaint
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 7:45:54 PM
Another one I see from our state that doesn't like Christie or his bullying ways to get things done.
And that fat ba$tard pork-belly's so big around, that he could snout-snort an entire Dunking Donuts shop in only one inhale.
(BTW, I live right outside of Ocean City)
Last edited by BikerSaint on 7/10/2012 7:48:59 PM
DjEezzy
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:13:09 AM
Reply
shadowscorpio
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 4:03:51 PM
Akuma07
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 6:16:50 PM
Beamboom
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:16:00 AM
Reply
Also that part about those who gave up on this platform (I assume he think of the Japanese here) are just waiting for the next were really, really weird. Does he think it will be easier with the next gen? That it will be a kind of a "reset" where everyone are back on square one?
Last edited by Beamboom on 7/10/2012 10:19:47 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:24:37 AM
Comic Shaman
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:18:24 AM
Reply
And the company that's responsible Final Fantasy Versus XIII and Kingdom Hearts 3 is not in any position to throw stones about taking "way too long" with anything.
Nas Is Like
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:20:36 AM
Reply
You know I never thought about that, but he does have a good point.
bigrailer19
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 4:25:47 PM
Akuma07
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 6:21:06 PM
It kind of proves to the world how much Japanese devs have slipped. If there are developers over in Japan that REALLY think this way, then gee, it's no wonder jap games suck now.
Because in all honesty, western devs don't do this. A LOT of game devs fail due to sucking at the hardware, they usually either A) Close down, or B) Practise more, and prepare better for the next game they make, which almost always is an improvement. So much so, that in a few years, all games on the console start to really shine.
When was the last time you seen a western game that sucked so hard from bugs?
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:23:05 AM
Reply
Sony and MS need to make a profit on their investment so no the long cycle is not their big mistake and mobile iOS and Android and other platforms were going to come out and draw devs no matter what. If they weren't good enough and had to go to a lesser plat then that was going to happen anyway.
xenris
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:28:07 AM
Reply
Maybe they should release versus already before everyone gives up on them...if they already haven't.
ZettaiSeigi
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 4:54:38 PM
Rogueagent01
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:33:42 AM
Reply
Nice try, but there seems to be quite a few companies making money off of this generation the way it is, and I am sure they will be happy to move to the next generation so long as it doesn't double or triple their development costs.
A good portion of companies are always gonna fail, it is the world we live in. It doesn't matter if a new generation came out tomorrow you will still have companies that fail. And if SE doesn't get their s**t together by the end of this generation the next will be their last, you can quote me on that.
Deathb4Dishonor
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 11:24:07 AM
BikerSaint
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:34:16 AM
Reply
Deathb4Dishonor
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 11:25:03 AM
DrRockso87
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 11:49:16 AM
shadowscorpio
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 4:11:58 PM
FxTales
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 9:33:25 PM
duomaxwell007
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 11:48:24 AM
Reply
monkeypunch
Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 2:21:46 PM
If a new system came out then would all the publishers target that system and not the current? I don't know. It would suck if they did and upgrading wasn't an option. But in the past the publishers have stayed with the current system for 2 or 3 years *AFTER* a new system came out.
The other issue when new consoles come out is backwards compatibility. Do you have to buy all new games? If yes then yeah it sucks. I don't remember how long PS2 compatibility lasted. Not sure how well XBox either. I remember a few games I couldn't play on the new system. That sucked. Of course you could get a input switcher.
What if phones releases were like consoles? That would suck. Phones are still underpowered.
Have you seen what happens to companies when they don't have competition or stop pushing the limit?
Underdog15
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 11:51:29 AM
Reply
Just sayin'... I completely understand why they feel like this generation has gone on for so long.
jjlive168
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 12:24:35 PM
Reply
Ignitus
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 12:40:17 PM
Reply
In the console world a development kit goes in the 1000's of dollars, normally between 20,000 and 50,000. While in the smartphone world is like a $100. The barrier of entry is very low and with lots, millions of users, what's not to like?
Besides, why are they complaining? They still need another 7 years to finish Versus.
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 12:41:50 PM
Reply
Temjin001
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 12:46:55 PM
Reply
I really don't think this ideology serves to the benefit of SOny or MS because they put out millions upon millions of dollars to market new consoles with the hope to make back everything and more a few years down the road. The new hardware is only their to re-imagine what's possible given more power.
Personally, I don't think that's why Sony or MS are in this business. They're not in here to release new consoles every 5-6 years. They're in this business to grow an ecosystem of entertainment and services that continuously provide a means for profitability. I believe as real time computer generated graphics move closer and closer to realism we can forget having to repurchase new hardware in order to deliver diverse and exciting new entertainment as the pallete devs have to work from will largely be limited only by their imaginations.
Right now, if the next-gen does deliver performance at or around The Samaritan and the Agnus Prophecy demo, I'd like to see that gen carry on for at least twice the length of our current one.
Last edited by Temjin001 on 7/10/2012 12:47:22 PM
Highlander
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 2:43:17 PM
Temjin001
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 3:13:55 PM
I pretty much think it was a mistake for eastern devs to have considered the Xbox market as something worth jumping ship for right on the onset. I agree that they should've put in place a frame work for designing and producing quality experiences for their flagship PS base before venturing to "greener pastures" with MS. Konami seemed to have done perfectly fine keeping MGS4 where people would identify with and receive it best.
Last edited by Temjin001 on 7/10/2012 3:15:59 PM
Highlander
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 3:35:14 PM
BikerSaint
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 7:59:57 PM
I'm not sure what the basis is for Mistwalker's boss's hatred towards Sony, but he's said quite a few times already that they will never develop for Playstation.
But "hopefully" their future of never doing a Playstation game could be wrong, I mean just look at the complete turn-around from Dave Newell & Valve now loving the Playstation brand.
Highlander
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 10:40:55 AM
Ignitus
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 9:08:02 PM
homura
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 12:51:49 PM
Reply
xenris
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 3:41:23 PM
homura
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 8:15:30 PM
homura
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 8:37:09 PM
Lemon_Saint
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 2:27:55 PM
Reply
Highlander
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 2:41:50 PM
Reply
Come on SE, you can do better than that, what's wrong? Are you feeling heat over your ridiculous development cycle and need to try to push the attention of criticism elsewhere?
If it's been such a very long generation, why are there so few SE games in my collection?
Whatever.
Last edited by Highlander on 7/10/2012 2:44:13 PM
Qubex
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 1:41:05 AM
Knightzane
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 2:47:21 PM
Reply
Qubex
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 6:48:31 AM
CanadianGuy420
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 1:52:20 PM
gumbi
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 3:14:17 PM
Reply
Besides, I highly doubt that many console gamers have abandoned their consoles for tablets and smart phones. The casual gaming market has exploded in the last few years because the technology for it has exploded in the last few years. Not because it was our only alternative over these ancient, ailing consoles... give me a break.
Highlander
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 10:43:10 AM
homura
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 3:16:52 PM
Reply
As for the casual games in phones, the most popular ones are free to download. And if android or ios phones want to upgrade to accommodate developers to make a kick ass games it still never gonna be as good as in the PS Vita.
So prolonging this gen consoles is not a very very big mistake.
Last edited by homura on 7/10/2012 3:21:18 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 3:48:35 PM
Reply
Akuma07
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 6:11:38 PM
Akuma07
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 6:16:00 PM
Akuma07
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 6:10:58 PM
Reply
Has anyone noticed how Squeenix are always blaming everybody else for their poor performance this generation?
Now they are blaming the console makers? Don't bite the hand that feeds you Squeenix..... Oh wait, what am I talking about? You have been doing that since day 1 of this gen.
100% agree with everyone else, they should not criticise Sony and MS for taking too long, when they have spent the majority of this gen 'developing' vsXIII, and they haven't even officially shown it off yet!!!!!
Makes me wonder if they are saving it for a day1 release on the next gen consoles?
Veitsknight
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 10:16:30 PM
Reply
ProfPlayStation
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 2:33:33 AM
Reply
Impulsive developers will follow these trends, but I don't doubt that the mobile market will bust before very long, in much the same way that the Wii busted. There are a few mobile apps that make lots of money, and the rest of them aren't so lucky.
Personally, I want this gen to last as long as possible, because I doubt I'll be coming back for the next one. Publishers like >SquareEnix<, Ubisoft, EA, and the rest, have sucked all the life and fun out of console gaming, and introduced all kinds of problems that used to be what drove me away from PC gaming. We're inputting user keys now? Really? Wasn't that out of fashion back in the 90s? Now, PC gaming is easier and more convenient than ever before, with a huge majority of the same titles that appear on consoles, ready for a gamepad and HDTV. I'm becoming a PC gamer, only due to the horrible practices of publishers, like SquareEnix, on consoles. They're sinking their own ship; it's not the console makers fault.
BigBoss4ever
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 5:41:22 AM
Reply
___________
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 6:04:29 AM
Reply
$ony and M$ whoring the crap out of current systems has helped everyone but themselves!
it has allowed the gap between mobile games and console games to be closed in oh so much!
it has also allowed the gap between PC and console games to widen oh so much!
so yea it was the biggest mistake $ony and M$ have ever made!
your suppose to help yourselves, not your competitors!
do you really think ouya would be releasing, and in such a good position now, if next gen systems had already been released?
or at least announced?
hell no!
Squirrelicus
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 8:04:55 AM
This is apples and oranges. The market that mobile games target doesn't effect the consoles. No one is saying "hmmm, PS3 or iPhone 4? I'll go with the iPhone, better graphics."
As for developers, making mobile games are minor leagues. The cost is low, it's easy to get into and quick to produce product. But the profit is also low. Not everyone can make Angrybirds. They are to console games what commercials are to movies.
I think you're expecting a huge leap in graphics like we've seen in previous jumps to new consoles. It won't happen.
___________
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 9:36:45 AM
you do know infinity blade and infinity blade 2 has made epic more money than the WHOLE gears of war series right?
mark reign has been saying that, and singing IOS praise for years!
im so sick of this BS notion that only angry birds sells well, it is so untrue!
im not even going to bother with the mobile games not being as good as even psp games BS.
all ill say is come back when you have actually played a mobile game!
as for next gen systems not being a big leap forward, right.
so epic, $E, all these companies are spending millions creating new engines so they can just make PC exclusives are they?
all the next gen tech demos shown, hell even starwars 1313 and watch dogs were running off nvidia 680s!
much, much, much more powerful than what systems today provide!
yea there designed to be scalable, but not THAT scalable!
next gen systems HAVE to be a big leap forward from what we have now, otherwise there going to be overtaken by the mobile market, and get their a$$ whooped by PC!
Highlander
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 10:47:26 AM
Squirrelicus
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 2:50:40 PM
I use Angrybirds as an example because that is the likely route a mobile game will be marketed. Granted I never heard of Infinity Blade, and while it may be better then Gears (which I was never impressed with. I doubt it is graphically as beautiful as GT5 or Uncharted3. Nor is it as popular as CoD or Batman:AC
There is nothing even remotely close in any iOs or Android apps in development that can touch a game with the scope of GTA3 much less GTAV.
So explain to me how mobile games are in anyway a justification for a PS4?
___________
Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 9:50:53 AM
sorry dude, im done.
as for high what does that have to do with this?
as you said resolution is not the only place where games need improvement!
and im not so sure about console games being capped at 1080P next gen.
4K TVs are going to be out within 3 years or so, next gen consoles probably will last 6 years at least so within that timeline you would like to think somewhere we will see some crosses.
maybe not 4K, but definitely higher than 1080.
its disappointing PC games have not adopted a higher res by standard, i mean higher than FHD displays are not exactly new!
they have been out for ages!
cant remember what it was called, but a few weeks ago a doccumentary released which is the worlds first production shot in 4K, its already happening and it wont be long till 4K becomes the new 1080.
its taken the industry FAR too long to adopt 1080P, so they really need to ditch it and step up to the new standards.
its ridiculous that HD TVs have been out for what 7 years?
and 99% of games are still not up scaling to 1080P, let alone rendering in it!
releasing a next gen console that cant render 4K resolutions just seems a big mistake!
its like releasing a new PC that does not have USB 3.0 support.
or a new car stereo which does not have a AUX port.
Squirrelicus
Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 11:50:44 AM
I never played Angrybirds, but it is the standard mold that app games try to follow. Not it actual gameplay but in marketing. They make a gimmick fad game and sell Tshirts and stuffed animals.
Mobile games are not much different the flash games from 6-7 years ago. Yeah one or two might be good for what try are, but that's not closing the gap.
I just don't buy your argument that mobile game quality is somehow a threat or prod for Sony to make a new console. You want Sony to release a new console now for technology that's 3 years away? When that new tech will be available or in widespread use It will be at the end of the PS3's life cycle. So how why a new console now?
What hurt the PS3 more then anything are the thirdparty games. BF3 a prime example, Xbox version is practically the same. Mostly due to development costs and profit margin(it would be an insult if Xbox users somehow got a "watered down" version) So the game was limited not by the PS3's capabilities but by the Xbox's.
I don't understand what this next gen console obsession is.
___________
Friday, July 13, 2012 @ 11:01:26 AM
NOTHING pisses me off than when people shit on things simply out of sheer arrogance and refusal to try it!
im sorry, but to say that mobile games are the same as simple flash games from several years ago is just ridiculous!
might as well say console games are the same as what they were several years ago!
stuff it, im done arguing to your arrogant a$$!
oONewcloudOo
Wednesday, July 11, 2012 @ 9:26:25 AM
Reply
jagstatboy
Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 11:27:15 AM
Reply
monkeypunch
Thursday, July 12, 2012 @ 1:51:07 PM
Reply
What he means by developers not staying with a system is probably the high cost of entry. As a developer myself some target devices have been harder to program to than others. It takes away the creative momentum when you're fighting with the system.
For example, why does Unreal and Crysis engines exist?
You can keep your PS3, and I'll keep mine of course, but I like seeing new and faster technology come out (see smart phones) because of what it means... more possibilities.
Why are people against it?
Last edited by monkeypunch on 7/12/2012 1:56:55 PM

See Full Image









cLoudou
Reply
Tuesday, July 10, 2012 @ 9:46:05 AM