Sony Sues Bridgestone For Use Of The Kevin Butler Character
PlayStation fans fell in love with the big KB. He seemed to have a really good thing going with Sony, and we all enjoyed his hilarious commercials.
But unfortunately, things have gone awry. As reported by GamesBeat, Sony is suing Bridgestone Tires and Wildcat Creek, Inc. advertising firm for a variety of reasons. The short version is that Sony just doesn't like the actor, Jerry Lambert, going over to Bridgestone when he sorta became the face of PlayStation.
They got an official statement from SCEA senior director of corporate communications Dan Race, which reads:
"Sony Computer Entertainment America filed a lawsuit against Bridgestone and Wildcat Creek, Inc. on September 11. The claims are based on violations of the Lanham Act, misappropriation, breach of contract and tortious interference with a contractual relationship. We invested significant resources in bringing the Kevin Butler character to life and he’s become an iconic personality directly associated with PlayStation products over the years. Use of the Kevin Butler character to sell products other than those from PlayStation misappropriates Sony’s intellectual property, creates confusion in the market, and causes damage to Sony."
You hate to see stuff like this. You have to believe Lambert never believed he was doing anything wrong; at the same time, it's usually the job of agents and managers to clear new gigs before offering them to the talent. Me, I'm putting the blame squarely on Lambert's handlers but hey, who knows? Maybe he was well aware and just didn't care.
Tags: kevin butler, sony, bridgestone, playstation, kevin butler playstation
10/7/2012 9:35:18 PM John Shepard
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (42 posts)
Bonampak
Tuesday, October 09, 2012 @ 1:22:40 AM
This is what Kaz Hirai said:
"It's difficult to talk about Nintendo, because we don't look at their console as being a competitor"
So if the Wii is not a competitor of Sony, then it does absolutely no harm to help promote it. Right? It would be like promoting any other product that is not competing against Sony's products. Like those Bridgetone tires that Lambert was also advertising.
Lambert maybe could use that as his defense.
I would hate to lose KB over all this.
tes37
Tuesday, October 09, 2012 @ 3:36:32 PM
ZettaiSeigi
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 10:16:08 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:04:47 PM
shadowpal2
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:49:52 PM
And let's be honest here folks - those KB ads certainly helped to ship PS3s. Sure PS3s are selling right now...but they aren't selling at the rate they used to with KB's punch.
With all these games coming up this holiday, why the hell can't he make the appearance. Seriously Sony's marketing is just...ugh...
And according to an IGN article...Sony's also suing Lambert as well. Ughh...Why do good things have to have such bad endings...
Last edited by shadowpal2 on 10/7/2012 11:55:14 PM
AcHiLLiA
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 12:20:20 PM
556pineapple
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 10:26:33 PM
Reply
Edit: I guess that Intellectual Property class I'm taking has some practical applications after all!
Last edited by 556pineapple on 10/7/2012 10:27:30 PM
tes37
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 10:50:40 PM
556pineapple
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 10:58:43 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:05:57 PM
bigrailer19
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 10:56:01 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:07:03 PM
FatherSun
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:21:13 PM
If his contract was up I wonder why it was not renewed. He gave the PlayStation Brand the breath of fresh air it needed. He was considered a mascot by some.
Maybe Sony decided it was time for a change. Someday we will know. Lambert seems like the type to open his mouth so let's see where this goes.
bigrailer19
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 12:51:43 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:08:30 PM
Reply
FatherSun
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:10:26 PM
Reply
This debate is simple. If the agreement was breached then Sony is right. If not then Sony is wasting its time and looks foolish in the process. Either way this is a mess.
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:19:53 PM
FatherSun
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:23:37 PM
Cesar_ser_4
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 11:58:28 PM
FatherSun
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 12:52:48 AM
www.corporationwiki.com/California/Sherman-Oaks/wildcat-creek-inc/44931717.aspx
If SONY and Lambert were to settle this could be turned around into an epic advertising campaign. Kevin Butler: Triple agent of Sony Corporate Espionage Division.
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 1:55:14 AM
Killa Tequilla
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 12:30:00 AM
Reply
Pandacastro
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 12:46:16 AM
Reply
jugheadjones
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 3:26:57 AM
Reply
Highlander
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 10:39:35 AM
FatherSun
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 12:53:20 PM
daus26
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 10:03:43 AM
Reply
I don't know the 100% true story behind this, but it doesn't seem like a big deal to me. Then again, a lot of lawsuits aren't that much of a big deal as well. It's all about the opportunity for that $$$.
Highlander
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 10:37:07 AM
Reply
No further comment was forthcoming, although as we left the interview, I could swear I heard someone saying "Pew Pew Pew!"...
BikerSaint
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 12:48:09 PM
Reply
Kevin Butler/Lambert should've been on TV anywhere near another competitor's gaming system, Bridgestone commercial or not.
It's a shame for everyone involved, because I liked almost all of his VP of Sony commercials.
HMMMM, something else to ponder...
Did Lambert do it as payback to spite Sony for not using him in any more current Playstation commercials, or not????
Highlander
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 1:19:13 PM
BikerSaint
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 4:04:55 PM
Not sure if you mis-read my comment wrong, or that I'm now reading yours right.
I did say..
Did Lambert do it as payback to spite Sony for "not" using him in any more "current" PS commercials.
But re-reading my prior post, I see that I did make a mistake at the top of my post, as I meant to say...
Kevin Butler/Lambert should've "not" been on TV(instead of should've been).
As for any current commercials(at least on regular TV), I have no idea because I did away with my cable, so all I get to watch anymore is the Sony's Crackle which has free movies, and does have current commercials of Battlefield 3, & and Madden football.
Last edited by BikerSaint on 10/8/2012 4:06:38 PM
Highlander
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 5:04:04 PM
BikerSaint
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 10:10:36 PM
I wasn't aware of that due to having no regular TV programs to watch any more, but I thought I did read here over the last 3-4 months that there were at least some games were being aired, maybe it was just on sports channels???
Anyway, I've always said that Sony needs to buck up & keep the commercials rolling, even if they are in the red.
I mean, how else are they gonna get back to being in the black if they don't even work on getting them aired.
Hell, Sony's even allowed a few M$ advertisements on it's own Crackle lately.
Dealnightfire
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 1:20:51 PM
Reply
Its the same thing as Flo from Progressive, she can never act in anything that might promote other insurance at all.
xnonsuchx
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 2:22:31 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Monday, October 08, 2012 @ 10:21:00 PM
Reply
And if I remember right, his last ad was about hanging with his new fake family. & I even went over to the PSN store just to see for sure, but Sony's deleted all of the KB commercials that were residing inside the "Media & Apps" menu.

See Full Image









tes37
Reply
Sunday, October 07, 2012 @ 10:03:34 PM
All parties involved knew better than to do this, especially an advertising firm. It seems as if they were thumbing their noses at Sony whom I'm assuming will have the last laugh.