Treyarch On CoD Engine: "What Is There To Be Upset About?"
It seems like just about everyone, even the most ardent Call of Duty followers, are calling for a new engine.
But Treyarch has only one question: Why?
In speaking to the Official Xbox Magazine, Treyarch design director David Vonderhaar sought to remind everyone that the engine they're utilizing for the upcoming Call of Duty: Black Ops II is hardly the same engine that debuted six long years ago.
"People like to talk about the engine, but the truth of the matter is that this isn't like something that was invented six years ago. At this point that engine doesn't resemble anything like any engine. We've ripped out the UI system; the rendering and the lighting are all new, the core gameplay systems are all new."
Vonderhaar added that he "never really understood" the complaints, as the engine runs at 60 frames per second and "it's gorgeous." Earlier this year, Treyarch boss Mark Lamia said he knew fans were clamoring for a new engine but he explained it really wasn't necessary, as they've tweaked the existing engine to do some pretty amazing things.
Well, I'm not sure if everyone is going to buy this, but there it is.
Related Game(s): Call of Duty: Black Ops II
Tags: call of duty, black ops ii, call of duty engine, cod engine, black ops 2 engine
10/10/2012 11:21:26 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (34 posts)
firesoul453
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 5:46:35 PM
Qubex
Thursday, October 11, 2012 @ 12:23:28 PM
manofchao5
Thursday, October 11, 2012 @ 7:05:26 PM
That's like an engineer of a 4 cyclinder engine asking why they need to make a 6 cylinder, the rpm's are the same ;P
doesn't matter if its 60fps, if your textures have no real quality or value to them then you are getting 60fps of bullshit, honestly 30fps is better if you can get that extra quality
Qubex
Saturday, October 13, 2012 @ 3:32:13 AM
GuardianMode
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 12:18:54 PM
Reply
Underdog15
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 12:25:01 PM
Reply
Highlander
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 3:51:06 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 12:26:05 PM
Reply
Highlander
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 3:40:19 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 1:12:28 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 3:47:54 PM
Qubex
Thursday, October 11, 2012 @ 12:24:01 PM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 1:55:36 PM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 3:26:08 PM
Reply
AcHiLLiA
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 8:11:46 PM
H8WL3R
Thursday, October 11, 2012 @ 12:27:21 AM
:-(
What extension does that pic have? I was trying to upload .jpg/.jpeg, with the max pixel count and file size.
No luck I am having. A little frustrated I am.
Last edited by H8WL3R on 10/11/2012 12:28:15 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 3:46:56 PM
Reply
That said, if you only replace like with like, it doesn't matter is the current iteration is 90% new code. If all that 'new' engine can do is replicate what the one before did in a more efficient manner than the old engine, that's all nice and good. However it won't look any different. The physics processing might be new, but if the physics model is the same, it will feel identical to what went before.
In other words, yes you could have rewritten the entire engine to be more efficient doing the same thing it's done for 6 years; but, did you improve the visuals, the physics, the controls, the sound, etc... That's the question and from the comments in this topic it sounds like there is precious little improvement.
Killa Tequilla
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 4:17:09 PM
xenris
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 4:07:48 PM
Reply
But back to the engine, this guy is just talking nonsense. MW2 to 3 is completely the same looking, they did the same thing before it released and said all the changes they did to the engine etc. But the weapons all sound the same, the gun models are reused, and the most obvious part is in multiplayer the voices are all reused.
MW3 to Black Ops 2 is a decent change though. At least there is some sort of artistic style being put into BO2. But BO2 is by no means gorgeous no, The last of us is gorgeous, God of War ascension is gorgeous, Beyond 2 souls is freaking gorgeous...this man needs his eyes checked.
Killa Tequilla
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 4:18:33 PM
Reply
ulsterscot
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 8:29:01 PM
Reply
___________
Thursday, October 11, 2012 @ 4:10:33 AM
Reply
well how about the fact that the console versions are STILL NOT IN HD!
yea there 60FPS but big whoop!
this is 2012 bub, we expect our games to be god dam HD even ninty has caught onto that!
not to mention every time a COD game comes out you have the devils own job telling the difference.
both graphically and artistically BO and BO2 look IDENTICAL!
especially from the MP matches shown at the expo over the weekend, look exactly the same as matches from the older black ops.
so that is what there is to be upset about.
in short its 2012, and your releasing a game similar to what we were seeing 6 freaking years ago, thats what is to be upset about.
NaughtyDog
Thursday, October 11, 2012 @ 3:01:49 PM
Reply
Rogueagent01
Sunday, October 14, 2012 @ 6:09:01 PM
Reply

Call of Duty: Black Ops II









daus26
Reply
Wednesday, October 10, 2012 @ 12:07:59 PM