What Game Maker Needs A "Reboot?"
Reboots have become quite popular this generation. We'll see two in the first quarter of next year; Devil May Cry ("DMC") and Tomb Raider.
But what game producer needs a "reboot?" Which video game company needs to reinvent itself most? Which is in dire need of a makeover? Which needs a return to former glory with the help of either a complete overhaul, or a reminder of what initially made their products great? Which needs a big ol' wake-up call?
For me, it's a no-brainer. Square Enix lost its way long ago and to date, there isn't a glimmer of the company that used to be Squaresoft (or Enix, for that matter). Granted, the Square Enix name is on the box of quite a few great titles this generation, but as far as games they make internally and the vaunted Final Fantasy franchise, things have gone terribly awry. In fact, now that I'm thinking about it, Final Fantasy is in dire need of a reboot as well. There may be no fixing it now, as Square Enix seems hell-bent on utterly destroying what that award-winning franchise once was but hey, one can hope. Hope against hope, I'm sure, but whatever.
I'm sure others have different answers, though. Which game company would you most like to see get "rebooted?"
Tags: reboots, game reboot, game maker, game publisher, video game developer
12/9/2012 10:25:45 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (28 posts)
firesoul453
Sunday, December 09, 2012 @ 11:49:25 PM
Lord carlos
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 8:54:59 AM
Rare ruined rare actually methinks as half their staff left after goldeneye and became free radical games which gave us timespiltters and second sight and are now known as Crytek uk. I dont think rare ever really recovered or else they just liked making banjo games.
Last edited by Lord carlos on 12/10/2012 8:55:58 AM
karneli lll
Sunday, December 09, 2012 @ 11:32:10 PM
Reply
GuyverLT
Tuesday, December 11, 2012 @ 12:04:20 PM
maxpontiac
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 12:44:07 AM
Reply
Ace Combat is not Call of Duty, therefore it shouldn't feel like one.
Don't force me to play a certain way or shift the focus off the airplanes and if that mean getting rid of the helicopter missions, so be it.
Above all, return the series to "Strangeworld", for it is so much better that way.
LowKey
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 1:04:24 AM
maxpontiac
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 11:40:54 AM
And while Ace Combat AH disappointed me to an extent, I still purchased it because I want Project Aces to make another one.
The music is great in this one, and once you set the controls to original settings, it plays the way we know and love. My problem with the game is the forced DFM that is required in order to achieve the "Ace" rating. Let me fly around and shoot everything down, thank you very much!
Beamboom
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 1:43:27 AM
Reply
As correctly stated in the article, as a *publisher* Square Enix stands behind a lot of great games these years, everything from fun little digital downloads to flagships like Deus Ex:HR and Hitman Absolution. So is it fair to say the *entire* company needs a reboot just cause of one franchise?
For me Square Enix is a publisher whom releases I've found to be of good quality, spanning over a good range of varied experiences. With the exception, of course, of that dead horse you all call Final Fantasy. But how many times do we need to state that?
Last edited by Beamboom on 12/10/2012 7:46:28 AM
frostface
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 8:24:03 AM
I missed the Final Fantasy boat but it's just one franchise, I've been more than happy with SE this gen and I don't think because they've neglected that one IP that they need a re-boot. That's just silly imo. Then again, if From Software messed with the 'Souls' franchise, maybe I'd be acting silly too.
Last edited by frostface on 12/10/2012 8:25:01 AM
Rogueagent01
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 9:57:15 AM
Beamboom
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 10:36:06 AM
So instead of a series of fanatic attempts to resurrect/reboot/time-travel/callitwhatyouwant Final Fantasy or the entire company behind it - why not just let it lay down to rest while there still is some dignity left in the name. Nothing is meant to last forever, not even Final Fantasy. Or Front Mission, for that matter. Everything has their era.
Cause from my perspective, without the relation to FF as many of you guys have I gotta say that the list of good games this gen they've been responsible of bringing to the market is really quite impressive!
Last edited by Beamboom on 12/10/2012 10:48:18 AM
Temjin001
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 1:23:15 PM
Games like Just Cause, Deus Ex, Tomb Raider etc., are all strong titles, but they're not developed by Square-Enix.
Beamboom
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 2:35:35 PM
If SE took over the companies, moved their employees to Japan and placed them inside their offices, would all then cheer and say "yay SE has resurrected! They now have the developers as employees!"?
Temjin001
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 3:13:05 PM
These days, S-E's published works largely don't resemble that identity from years past, like most eastern franchises. Tomb Raider, Just Cause, or Deus Ex could just as well be published by EA, Activision or Ubisoft. There is nothing about them that feel belonging to one fold. I guess another way to think about this would be to look at Nintendo's in-house development studios. Most of what they produce share an identity and intended audience, despite being different titles, or genre offerings. Back then, whether it was Brave Fencer Musashi or Secret of Mana there seemed to be at least some cohesion, as if Squaresoft could've launched their own console.
Anyway, times have changed and much of what was then, just isn't the way things are now. Gaming is huge and massive in breadth and largely driven by online connectivity. I like being nostalgic about the good o' days but those days are long sense past. So yea, I don't think S-E necessarily NEEDS to change. I say, only those who lived the era in context of this discussion really care. The newer youth who know no different probably don't give a crap and are interested mostly with what's hot and new today. They'll define the future of this entertainment, I say.
Last edited by Temjin001 on 12/10/2012 3:13:36 PM
___________
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 3:55:12 AM
Reply
they have brought the most amount of new IPs, and most of my favorite games are from them.
i have to choose them though because they brought all these awesome new IPs into the industry, and now am hell bent on turning them into something there not suppose to be!
dead space, army of two, new IPs, and 2 of my favorite games this gen!
dead space 3, army of two the cartel 2 games that look NOTHING like their predecessors!
i also have to mention BF3 and NFS as well, not a IPs but like the above, so, so, SOOOOOOOOOO different from their predecessors!
and BF4 is looking even worse!
as for NFS, well, its pretty much dead.
i wish EA would bring black box back and get them to work on NFS undercover 2, by far THE best NFS game to date!
real cars, based in a open world just like most wanted, but this time the gameplay, cop chases, customization, and features of a NFS game!
shock of horrors for a NFS game to play like a NFS game!
god forbid!!!!!
besides them though, the obvious choice is crapcom.
same as EA, they created some of my favorite series of all time!
devil may cry, mega man, resident evil, and even lost planet.
3 awesome franchises, and 3 awesome franchises they have destroyed this gen!
Last edited by ___________ on 12/10/2012 3:56:33 AM
Lord carlos
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 8:58:16 AM
Reply
godsman
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 9:01:55 AM
Reply
Rogueagent01
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 10:04:08 AM
Reply
And no please don't try and lump Civilization Revolution into those types of games, as that game was horrible in all respects(at least for the console).
Beamboom
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 10:52:18 AM
Rogueagent01
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 5:56:15 PM
telly
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 10:46:54 AM
Reply
Temjin001
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 1:31:46 PM
Reply
Temjin001
Monday, December 10, 2012 @ 1:35:59 PM

See Full Image









MartyRules
Reply
Sunday, December 09, 2012 @ 10:49:01 PM