PS3 News: NRA Uses Video Games As Scapegoat For Newtown Tragedy - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

NRA Uses Video Games As Scapegoat For Newtown Tragedy

I won't comment because in the bigger scheme of things, from the most general societal and philosophical standpoint, the man definitely has a point.

It seems the National Rifle Association was in need of something to blame in the wake of the Newtown, Connecticut shooting tragedy. And they found it in...well, just about every form of current entertainment, especially video games.

NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre is now on the record saying that violent games are at least partially to blame, and he cites a few of the bloodiest available:

"There exists in this country a callous, corrupt, and corrupting shadow industry that sells, and sows, violence against its own people. Through vicious, violent video games with names like Bulletstorm, Grand Theft Auto, Mortal Kombat, and Splatterhouse. And here's one: it's called Kindergarten Killers. It's been online for 10 years. How come my research department could find it and all of yours either couldn't or didn't want anyone to know you had found it?"

However, he didn't stop there, as he decided to go after both movies and music; both industries have come under fire in the past several decades for supposedly promoting bad behavior:

"Then there's the blood-soaked slasher films like American Psycho and Natural Born Killers that are aired like propaganda loops on Splatterdays and every day, and a thousand music videos that portray life as a joke and murder as a way of life. And then they have the nerve to call it entertainment. But is that what it really is? Isn't fantasizing about killing people as a way to get your kicks really the filthiest form of pornography?"

LaPierre finished by saying that the media, the ones responsible for those games, films, and music, are all caught up in a "race to the bottom" and are only competing to "shock, violate, and offend every standard of civilized society." Well, that's a little harsh but it's hard to see it any other way.

Tags: newtown shooting, connecticut shooting, nra, national rifle association, video games

12/21/2012 10:53:03 PM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (79 posts)

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 11:08:48 PM
Reply

We all knew the NRA would make this about media and mental illness, anything to put the blame elsewhere so that the gun laws don't get tightened up a bit.

I won't argue either way because I have my own ideas and I have ideas that are best for the country but in the end it doesn't matter, Mr. LaPierre and his associates will find themselves on the wrong end of America with this and other rhetoric including but not limited to arming everyone in the nation.

We have these games in the UK too; how much gun violence do they have?

Agree with this comment 13 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Beamboom
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 12:52:26 AM

I heard a program about this on the radio yesterday actually. The numbers of people dying by a firearms (not counting suicide) per year is around 60 in the UK, 48 in Japan, 94 in Canada, 21 in Sweden and more than 12.000 in the USA.

... But, it's the computer games and movies who is to blame, right? American media is global, we enjoy that same entertainment. But yeah, yeah. Whatever.
I'll just leave it at that. I don't have the stomach to enter this discussion, I'm just happy I don't live in your country.

(podcast who goes more into detail can be heard on bbc co uk/moreorless)

Last edited by Beamboom on 12/22/2012 1:02:39 AM

Agree with this comment 12 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 2:56:41 AM

I'm with beam... cause you know... we don't have poor mental health services, movies, and video games in our countries. NRA has 4 million members in a country over over 300 million. Doesn't seem like they speak for most Americans, Beam, so I wouldn't assume that if you thought that.

Agree with this comment 7 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Beamboom
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 7:08:34 AM

I know, Underdog! Like we got such a fantastic mental care system, or no lunatics in our countries. And how about finding a ten year old Flash-based basement-made browser game to prove their point - this whole affair could have been taken straight out of an episode of Monty Python! :D

They may not represent the absolute majority Underdog, but it's scary how many Americans I see on the internet who talk like them.
Comparatively speaking they practically got a civil war going on in their country and defend their "freedom" and "rights" like the American dream was some sort of anarchy.

I just... I'm biting my tongue to avoid tangling myself into a discussion these days. This is for the Americans themselves to try to figure out and solve and the rest of us to study from a social anthropological perspective, and maybe - hopefully - learn something from it.


Last edited by Beamboom on 12/22/2012 7:41:06 AM

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 9:27:20 AM

I should bite my tongue too. It's hard to not involve yourself when tragedies like this so easily occur. I don't know about you, but I cried a number of times over the news. And each time I hear people more passionate about rights to bear arms than these kids (how many know a single name of a single victim?), it makes me so unbelievably angry.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PSN French
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:28:44 PM

Typical that so many are controlled by mass media and government propaganda. You guys talk about "crying over the tragedy", yet bring up the issue of banning guns. The same idiotic argument as the other side who are supporting guns. This has nothing to do with guns, if someone wants to get a gun, they absolutely will no matter what the laws. The only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun, is a good guy with a gun. Houston, Texas arms their teachers and the has never been, and never will be a mass homicide at the schools there. I am so sick of people pointing fingers at OBJECTS to blame instead of criminals themselves. It makes sense though, American propaganda has admitted to not allowing a good tragedy "go to waste"... they are dumbing you all down to become slaves.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

sawao_yamanaka
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:45:44 PM

Yet it would be harder for them to acquire a gun if there was gun control. Tell me, where exactly can you acquire a gun illegally if there was gun control? Where would you purchase it? Who do you know that could acquire it without being stopped by cops? It is because guns are so easily accessible in put country that such things happen. Do you see massacres happen in other countries with strict gun laws? No you don't.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PSN French
Sunday, December 23, 2012 @ 3:10:44 AM

I'm sick of arguing with idiots, so if you're smart enough to get the following statement then maybe you'll wake up... "A gun has NEVER, EVER in the history of the world, EVER caused harm to a living being."
Maybe we should ban everything that can be used as a weapon, and bubble wrap the entire world so nobody gets a boo-boo. Go back to candyland where you can be kept in your little artificially happy world. As for my household, we prefer dangerous liberty to safe slavery. Nobody directs my life or my safety, and if my guns are taken away, I have the ability to get illegal weapons to protect my family, both from criminals and an oppressive government. Sorry, some of us prefer to think for ourselves as opposed to "following the sheep".

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

JoebooSauce
Sunday, December 23, 2012 @ 1:14:19 PM

@PSN French,
Let's ban all the video games before we even think of banning guns. Or make it more RIGOROUS buying a gun and bullets. You wouldn't sound like an idiot if you didn't parrot the NRA line like that. If you're gonna parrot quotes, parrot this one that I just made up for you.

"Guns make it easier to kill people on a whim than if people didn't have them."

Person gets in a rage... hmmmm... no guns, let me use a kitchen knife, of baseball bat to kill 26 people in a minute... Guns make it easy to kill someone with a flicker of a thought.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

dlte
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 11:18:22 PM
Reply

Fictional guns haven't killed anyone.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Killa Tequilla
Friday, December 21, 2012 @ 11:44:43 PM
Reply

So everything else is to blame, except the killer? Right.

What about the lack of gun control?

Last edited by Killa Tequilla on 12/21/2012 11:45:22 PM

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:41:46 AM

That oughta burn them.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Kratoskillall09
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 12:00:46 AM
Reply

Gun control is moot. Especially for people like the psycho that performed that atrocity. If a criminal wants guns, they'll find a way to get them. With all that said I do agree we need to do much better screening when it comes to who can and can't get guns. But the NRA is nothing but a bunch gun nuts who believe that anyone, no matter what should be able to own a gun. If anything the guys running the NRA need ton get their heads checked. Like Adam Lanza needed to.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Clamedeus
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 12:03:27 AM

I wouldn't put all of the NRA's into one basket, there is exceptions of course.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:00:58 AM

I love this argument. If a killer wants a gun, he'll get a gun. lol... so don't make laws about it, right? Come to think of it, don't make laws about drunk driving, either, because a drunk driver will drink and drive anyways. Right? Lets take it further... screw laws in general! Criminals will just do what they want anyways.

You know... Columbine had an armed deputy on site the day of their shooting... just saying... it sounds like the NRA forgot about that fact in their suggestion to arm elementary schools with an armed guard. Now, maybe that armed guard prevented further murders than what happened, but we can't prove it. And it's not like we don't have guns here in Canada, either. My uncle has a nice little collection. But no civilian could have a hope in hell of heavily arming themselves like these mass murderers can. Can't that at least be limited?

The two countries with the lowest gun related deaths AND HOMICIDES in the world... are Japan and Iceland. Go wikipedia it.

And if you can't let go of your precious guns (I have kitchen knives in my, well, kitchen... that's enough for me to be perfectly confident in my ability to protect my family) ask yourself... Why in the freaking world is the USA such an incredible outlier in 1st world violence??? Hint: it isn't video games... it isn't poor access to mental health care... and it isn't movies or anything else in the media, because we all have those issues too!!

So before anyone tries arguing why you SHOULD have guns... tell me why the USA is so incredibly violent in both overall numbers and per capita.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 12/22/2012 3:06:13 AM

Agree with this comment 9 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PSN French
Sunday, December 23, 2012 @ 3:18:22 AM

Actually, most numbers are skewed by governments. Japan is the most corrupt in the world as far as true data for crimes. Did you know that if they cannot solve a murder case in Japan, they won't classify it as a murder? It's to keep the masses "happy" by saying "we solved 94% of all homocide crimes and are incredibly safe. People are so willing to just believe what they are told, without thinking logically about an issue. Anywho, if you live in America I'll be thinking about you enjoying your FEMA camp vacation while I fight for freedom with my local militia.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

AcHiLLiA
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 12:37:08 AM
Reply

obviously the killer did not have enough control of himself. I agree it's partial to blame violent games/movies, the rest is past history to this criminals.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

matt99
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:39:16 AM

No there is no partial blame at all, if violent entertainment had any effect on violence in society we would see similar numbers across all societies where these games/movies/music are available but we don't. What we do see is that in countries where there are stricter gun laws there is less gun violence...so people need to stop taking the easy way out and actually discuss the issue using facts.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

AcHiLLiA
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 12:26:38 PM

Certain tragedies did happen involving violent entertainment in the past. There is history for everybody in this society, and every each have control, make bad decisions there is going to be consequences.

Last edited by AcHiLLiA on 12/22/2012 12:39:33 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

sawao_yamanaka
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:20:06 PM

That is bs. Show me any statistics that have actual cause and effect.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

AcHiLLiA
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 8:09:29 PM

In the LA newspapers years ago, LA one of the worst/or thee worst in the US.. and NO I wouldn't make this sh*t up.

Last edited by AcHiLLiA on 12/22/2012 8:14:03 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Geobaldi
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 1:33:39 AM
Reply

The NRA, and media in particular, seem to go after anything that even somewhat compares, violence wise, to whatever event may have happened. The culprit in this instance was a Starcraft player it was revealed, so of course THAT'S the reason he went all psycho according to the media. Again, if games and movies were the reasons people went on killing sprees, then I should've gone on one a long time ago seeing as how I've been gaming, and watching movies, for 30 years now.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 2:08:53 AM
Reply

Should we really blame entertainment media for anything violent that took place?
Hundreds and millions of gamers out there, one or two psychopaths go massacre and entertainment is to be blamed?
What about every other gamers who never go psycho?
Why aren't they, and why aren't WE, the normal one get any consideration?
So if one guy drive a car and run down a group of children crossing the street, does that mean driving will make you go psycho as well?
All these douchebag know is putting the blame on something else when the real issue is being ignored.

If video game really is to be blame for every massacre and that if it really does make a normal teenager go on a killing spree, then massacre would be a weekly event everywhere on earth.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

CH1N00K
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 2:26:02 AM

Unfortunately massacres are a weekly occurrence around the world. Some don't make it into the news, others are government sanctioned so they're okay...

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:07:26 AM

I'm not including country like Israel or any country with high tension going around.
Massacre is those countries doesn't shock anyone.

I'm saying that if video games does make people go psycho, then peaceful places like Australia, UK, Japan, Singapore, Canada etc. will have massacres every week. And worse in the US.

Last edited by Snaaaake on 12/22/2012 3:08:10 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:07:43 AM

I think it's foolish to compare the US to 3rd world countries. Compare them to the first world, and the differences are scary.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:40:08 AM

Agree with ya there.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

CH1N00K
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:03:13 PM

"Massacres in those countries don't shock anyone"

It's sad because it is the general consensus of the world. A school in the U.S gets shot up and the whole world worries about it, a school in another country gets blown up, and it's not even news worthy..I suppose that should probably be blamed on video games as well...

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

CH1N00K
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:12:30 PM

And I think it's foolish to think it's okay for innocent people to die just because of where they were born. Especially since the weapons that are used to destroy that country usually come from a developed country. Usually provided for profit and political gains...

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:41:58 PM

I agree Chinook. But it's especially scary because the world leaders where freedom is a right, where war doesn't touch home soil, and the government protects it's people, these things still happen. THAT'S why it stands out, and it deserves criticism, because we're supposed to be setting the example for the rest of the world.

That's why people pay attention.

But in the third world, of course it isn't ok for innocent to die. But they don't have political power as a democracy to do anything about it. WE do, yet we still can't actually do anything about it... and it's our choice.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 12/22/2012 3:43:16 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SaiyanSempai
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 2:20:54 AM
Reply

It's been my observation that violent people tend to gravitate toward violent games and other forms of media. Not the other way around.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jed
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:21:05 AM
Reply

I understand that people want answers when something horrible like this happens. Lord knows we all never want it to happen again. But it really makes me sick when people start playing the blame game and use the situation as a platform to further their agenda. If someone doesn't like people having guns they will blame the guns. If they don't like or don't understand videogames they will blame the video games. If they think mentally ill people are dangerous they will blame them. It's like they use those poor children's bodies as a podium to spread their own opinions.

We all know that some media, be it violent games or movies are not meant for children, but they get exposed to them anyway. If media were the cause of the horrible events they are blamed for there would be countless atrocious acts of violence occurring all over the country every day.

Is it games that make people violent? Or are violent people attracted to the violent games?

Last edited by Jed on 12/22/2012 3:23:24 AM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:50:04 AM
Reply

This is bound to happen every time people sift through the ashes of a disaster looking for answers, but I wish we could get past that, it's a childish way of handling a problem.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 8:09:02 AM
Reply

I will continue to own firearms, because I won't bow to the wishes of the unstable. If someone finds it impossible to act civilized, I should be penalized, yeah that makes sense. People kill other people because they want to, not because it's convenient to do with firearms.

I don't care what the rest of the world thinks about the gun issues in America, they're not governed by our constitution. If you care to read it, you will see why gun ownership is included. The rest of the world is powerless against a corrupt government. We have a chance to retake ours if and when it ever goes rogue. There is no compromising when it comes to keeping your freedom.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Clamedeus
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 8:21:04 AM

+1

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 9:31:11 AM

But it is convenient to kill when you own a firearm. There's a reason strictness of gun laws are directly correlated to homicide numbers in first world countries. In the cases of gun specific deaths, there's direct causation. I'm not even saying they should be outright banned totally no exceptions (although Japan and Iceland would indicate that might not be such a bad thing), but there needs to be better laws about gun control in the states. Some of the laws there are just asinine. That mass killing in Arizona that hurt that senator or whatever? That guy was 100% within his rights until he opened fire... how do you "protect" yourself against that legally? Columbine had an armed deputy on site the day of that massacre... Lot of luck he had against heavily armed crazies...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 9:37:20 AM

Tes, maybe you should read your constitution. Keeping a 250 year old constitution for the sake of the fact it's a constitution is stupid. If it makes sense, then fine. But keeping tradition simply because it's a time honored tradition is so incredibly stupid. And last I checked, most of you are no longer in any sort of militia, and you definitely aren't wracked by civil war at this time. It's ancient, outdated by a few centuries as weapons technology has improved exponentially, and well... it's a hillbilly mentality. It simply doesn't keep up with the times over the course of a few centuries! Your president gets that something should be done. No one is even asking you to give up all your guns!! But the first world is literally sobbing and begging you guys to have at least a few REAL guidelines. How about those children's right to free speech or safety or freedom to live life and pursue their dreams as they see fit? The amendment needs an amendment.

I betcha your founding fathers wouldn't have made such a loose-ended constitution if they had any idea "household" weapons could cause the damage they clearly can cause. I'm sorry, but there's nothing semi-automatic about a bayonet and musket.

I love my American friends and relatives. But if your argument is an actual real and respected argument there that holds more water than any real argument, then I'm sorry, but your country is backwards, slow, hypocritical, violent, and governed by tradition. TRADITION is what you are governed by. An IDEAL. A thought... a notion. Not by laws that identify reality... Honestly, wake up and jump ahead by 50 years and catch up already... As if your personal rights to a hobby are more important than realizing that yeah... easy access to guns is NOT a good idea!!!

So tell me... why SHOULD you own guns? REALLY... a good reason. "Because I want to" doesn't count. And protection doesn't count either. Protection is a shotgun that everyone can see so they don't mess with you. The best protection is prevention, not the element of surprise. And since it's unlikely a small army will assault your house, assault rifles don't count either.

So lets hear it... a good reason that means mass murderers should also be able to get a hold of them. Or maybe some changes are necessary afterall.... And while you're at it... tell me why it doesn't happen to the same degree as other first world countries to justify your answer.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 12/22/2012 9:51:07 AM

Agree with this comment 6 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 10:24:33 AM

Like I said, the rest of the world's opinion is irrelevant on gun issues in our country. Our founding fathers deserve more respect and they get it from those who understand our constitution.

History repeats itself, but we never learn from it. America will go bad eventually, and Americans will be the only ones willing to fight to stop it. Our constitution says our rights are granted to us by God, not man. Peoples rights around the world are granted to them by the state and our government is trying to the same here.

Convincing people to throw out the constitution as being outdated and irrelevant would be a horrible mistake and only evil will come of it. I refuse to live under a government that thinks they own me and I'm willing to die to keep it from happening. Live or die, I still get it my way. I guess the world doesn't have anything worth dying for.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

CH1N00K
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:42:25 PM

Bad example....how other governments chose to run their countries should be irreverent as well, yet how many times has the US gone to war with another country because of it? How many countries has the US army occupied and westernized? If the rest of the world has no say in how you should run your country, then the US should have no say in how other countries are run, but we know that isn't going to happen...

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:43:54 PM

Still waiting for a legitimate argument besides "because the founding fathers said so".

My grandfather, my best man and all his brothers, all fought for freedoms in our military. And that freedom on home soil is worth dying for. So don't feed me that bullsh!t. You just don't have a good argument and your only way of combating it is "mind your own business".

Please. I don't have a gun, and i could still kick your a$$. Don't be so self-righteous and ignorant. Use your damn head, tes. You're a smart guy. Try thinking critically about this. My good lord... because you own a gun and I don't, you therefore have more to die for than me? Please... get off your high horse.

I'm still waiting an actual rebuttal... "Because they said so 200 years ago"... Please. THAT'S your argument???

And please... please... tell me... why couldn't the armed deputy at Columbine stop those murderous bastards? The answer to stop gun violence is to arm the populace? Are you serious? How do you not see the problems with that?!

Last edited by Underdog15 on 12/22/2012 3:49:13 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:52:47 PM

I don't owe you sh!t Underdog, so get off your high horse. I'll give you my address if you promise to carry out your threats. A year's salary says your girly *ss will go running back to Canada.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:52:56 PM

And tes... if you believe in science... and statistical evidence that actually ends up equating to correlation and CAUSATION... you'd realize the world doesn't have an opinion on guns in the US... they have the answers. I believe MANY US citizens realize this and will fight for it. And guess what... according to you, their opinions do count.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:54:04 PM

lol seriously? If you want a fight, come here. lol I'm not wasting my time. I have a full time job. (But go ahead. PSN is Underdog15. You can give your address if you like. ;p I'll swing by if I ever have a reason to come to the states. We can talk about it like adults if you like. I have a book that explains what that means so you can prepare.) The point of me saying that is because I bet "self defense" use of guns is FAR less than tragedy. Gun related homicides makes up 85% of gun related deaths. Most of the others are suicide. And a tiny itty bitty fraction is "self defense". Besides, it was purely hypothetical. Because I could. It'd be easy too. Just not worth my time. ;) So aggressive.

Seriously... give me a REAL argument.

Go on. I dare you.

Typical gun-toting american. In the face of an intellectual argument, I'm met with "come say it to my face and my concealed weapon I'll surprise you with."

Oh what's that? You don't HAVE an argument? Oh? Your natural response is to say, "No! I don't wanna! And I don't have to!"

Why don't you just add "neiner neiner" to the end of your argument.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 12/22/2012 4:03:01 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:06:22 PM

Please. I don't have a gun, and i could still kick your a$$.

You brought it up, but if you don't have the time don't make idle threats to me. I never have threatened anyone on this site ever and you should do the same. There's you an American example that should be easy to follow.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

CH1N00K
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:16:06 PM

Well that escalated quickly....

I do have some thoughts for you though Tes, although, I don't think I can change you're mind on it.

First off not all americans feel they need to own guns, in fact only about 20% of Americans actually do, which means that 80% of the country feels that the government, military and police are enough to protect them. Now of the 20% of the people that do have guns, they own 65% of the guns in America...Really? That means that when, as you put it, America goes bad, the chances that it coming from the 20% is higher then the rest of the country. What are you protecting from? Invasion from other countries? You don't think that you're multi billion dollar military isn't going to be enough to protect you? You afraid you're government will become corrupt? In a lot of countries most of them already are, but even so, is a gun really going to protect you from a government that you're own country voted into office? Terrorism? I don't know if you noticed but the last few attacks didn't involve a gun, and anyone who had one on them couldn't have done anything about them...

Now I do understand that there are some areas in the US, just as there are in other countries that you do feel a need to 'protect' yourself, but guess what? Those areas existed in civilization before the gun. When Cain killed Abel by bashing his brains in with a rock, the answer was not to get a bigger rock and retaliate..

I guess it all comes down to how much you value a life. When you buy a gun to protect yourself or your family, you may see that as a small investment. But as soon as you thumb a bullet into the chamber, that means that whoever you aim that gun at, their life is only worth the price of a bullet, roughly 25 cents...And what if someone else gets a hold of that gun and uses it on your family? Suddenly you're families life all boils down to the price of a bullet you paid for, but hey, at least you did everything you could do to protect them..





Last edited by CH1N00K on 12/22/2012 4:51:45 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:20:32 PM

Settle down chum. I never threatened you. I said I don't buy the guns for protection argument. I never said I would get you. I said I could. And it's true. I'm big, fast, agile, and trained in hand to hand combat. But that want my point. I was basically saying need for firearms for protection is a farce of an argument.

I'm still waiting for a real argument. Until you do, I'll just take the double-u on thisone.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 12/22/2012 4:21:27 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:27:20 PM

There is no argument from me. Just a point that murdering children will not get me to give up my firearms.

You called all Americans stupid and backwards and you think I care to have a conversation with you. To hell with Canada and your low budget combat skills.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 5:02:42 PM

On the contrary. I've gone out if my way a few times to state it isn't fair to paint Americans with the same brush. And while our military isn't as large a the us, we aren't low budget. We have one of the strongest militaries in the works...

But you hate facts.

I do not think Americans are backwards. I think some international policy, gun laws, and equal rights laws are backwards, yes. But not Americans. In fast I'm encouraged lately to see so many positive changes in many different areas.

Please don't hear what you want to hear.

Last edited by Underdog15 on 12/22/2012 5:05:13 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 5:47:27 PM

When I said low budget combat skills, I was referring to you and not Canada, but I really don't have anything against you or Canadians. I apologize for being harsh, but you said some very insulting things about a lot of good people.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 6:24:52 PM

No worries. I am a good people, too, but I can be overly vocal on issues that makes me sad or angry. My frustration isn't really with any one person. I just wish there was an explanation for those numbers Beamboom gave earlier. It also doesn't help anyone that there's no closure to this last incident. Like, it just happened. End of story. Nowhere to go from here. My wife's a gentle soul and putthe badness of the victims on our fridge because she wants to pray for them. Lol. But me, I have no answers. I find that remarkably frustrating to not know "why". So I vent, apparently. :( maybe it's cause I'm a parent now, I dunno. But I do feel heartache over this. I'm usually desensitized to news. Bah, anyways...

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 6:59:39 PM

I think it's too late to remove them from our society. Any type of weapon, even military grade, can be bought on the black market in this country. If we ban guns, the criminal element will still have access to them and law abiding citizens will not. If it weren't for that, I would agree to a ban.

I have a child too and I love her with all my heart. I do care about the children who were murdered, but we're kinda stuck between a rock and a hard place as to finding an adequate solution. An outright ban, I believe, will further escalate the problem and render us all helpless.

The police in our country investigate crimes after they happen and in no way provide any form of protection. They may serve as a slight deterrent, but cannot prevent crimes from taking place. I know I should have posted this earlier instead of getting a little upset over nothing. My apologies again, to you and any Canadians I may have offended.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ulsterscot
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 8:52:45 AM
Reply

I do think they should enforce video game ratings and not sell violent games to kids / educate parents etc.

Not because I think video games create psychos - its just the with likes of COD they have far more time to play than us working folks so are generally better than me

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Excelsior1
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 10:57:12 AM
Reply

Guns don't kill people. People do. The NRA just wants to make sure that when people do decide to kill other people they can do it as effeciently as possible.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 11:25:59 AM


The NRA is just a clever way to watch some of the people who believe in gun ownership. Hats off to the intelligence community for creating that one.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:50:51 PM

It's a freaking joke. The world would be laughing at the US over it if they weren't so busy sobbing and mourning.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Stormyhog
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 1:39:31 PM
Reply

NRA are hypocrites they do realize that they had a PS2 game out in 06 called NRA Gun Club.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

CH1N00K
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:35:17 PM

Yeah I saw that too, but you can't go after them for it. The gun was all about target practicing. They stuck to their guns and ideals when they made it and the game didn't get very good sales or ratings because it was dull..

Last edited by CH1N00K on 12/22/2012 3:35:54 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 3:49:45 PM
Reply

Guns in all schools? Maybe the NRA should consider putting a teacher in all gun stores?

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

sawao_yamanaka
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:13:26 PM

They are very uneducated. The states are so backwards in there beliefs, it's a joke.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

CH1N00K
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:17:16 PM

ee, careful, now you're generalizing...and insulting a core group of the PSX community....

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:23:24 PM

I don't have a single American friend or relative that thinks that way. Just see it on the internet and TV. So I agree about not generalizing. Besides, even the president believes something should be done one way or another.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

sawao_yamanaka
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 4:25:57 PM

I was referring to the NRA and the states do have backwards beliefs when it comes to gun control. So no I am not generalizing anything. If I said that everyone in the south are rednecks who are gun ho that is generalizing.

Last edited by sawao_yamanaka on 12/22/2012 4:26:37 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

PharaohJR
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 5:08:48 PM
Reply

i had this discussion bout this recent incident with some folks in my circle..... they believe guns should be removed from society..... i believe they should remain but it should be stricter to get 1..... with that said wheter you remove guns or keep them around if somebody wants to harm another..... believe me they will find & have options. thats the truth & im just being real.

if "violent video games & entertainment" is the motive behind massacre & murders explain to me how 1 man that practiced the bible managed to get his followers to do suicide with no tool involved.....

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 5:35:59 PM

I just wish someone could give me an honest to God reason fit why the usa us so much more violent than the first world. Whether you keep them or not. Why the stark difference?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

bigrailer19
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 8:03:33 PM

Underdog-

Ive bwoukdeadin your posts and I feel that now some tension is gone and I can respond. ;)

Theres no clear answer to that, but guns are not the reason. Any criminal can use any means necessary. If its not a gun its a knife, if it isnt a knife it could be an explosive. This may not be that answer you seek but I honestly dont have one. Its sad this goes on, and we are asking the same question.

I dont think guns should be banned and our gun laws do not allow anyone to get a gun. But there should be tighter restrictions. Not on the types of guns you can own but obtaining one legally. Problem is criminals can still get access somehow and if not they find another means.

The statistic I would be interested in is seeing how many guns involved in a crime also involve the registered owner.

I dont jnow if yiu heard about the shooting in Oregon not long ago. But what isnt being told so much in the media is the shooter wasnt the inly person with a gun in the mall that day. There was another man, a legal concealed weapon holder. Amidst the ongoing tragedy the man drew his gun on the shooter, as the shooter was trying tk fix the jammed weapon. I d

Last edited by bigrailer19 on 12/22/2012 8:23:40 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

AcHiLLiA
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 8:19:44 PM

That's one answer we wish we could know. The US is a pretty lazy country if u ask me.

Last edited by AcHiLLiA on 12/22/2012 8:25:34 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

bigrailer19
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 9:25:51 PM

Underdog (and everyone else) - my apologies but ignore my post above. I got a new phone and im still getting used to it.

here is my full post.

Underdog-

Ive been reading your posts and I feel that now some tension is gone and I can respond. ;)

Theres no clear answer to that, but guns are not the reason. Any criminal can use any means necessary. If its not a gun its a knife, if it isnt a knife it could be an explosive. This may not be that answer you seek but I honestly dont have one. Its sad this goes on, and we are asking the same question.

I dont think guns should be banned and our gun laws do not allow anyone to get a gun. But there should be tighter restrictions. Not on the types of guns you can own but obtaining one legally. Problem is criminals can still get access somehow and if not they find another means.

The statistic I would be interested in is seeing how many guns involved in a crime also involve the registered owner.

I dont know if you heard about the shooting in Oregon not long ago. But what isnt being told so much in the media is the shooter wasnt the only person with a gun in the mall that day. There was another man, a legal concealed weapon holder. Amidst the ongoing tragedy the man drew his gun on the shooter, as the shooter was trying to fix the jammed weapon. The shooter seen the man draw on him and the shooter took his own life. I dont know about you but that other man and his *gun* appears to have saved a lot more lives in this tragic incident.

Another local thing that happened was a man trying to get into someones house forcefully was killed by means of self defense. Had there been no protection that man could have caused any form of harm. You'd probably just say grab a knife but its still a form of protection and the people in the house as I understand it was a woman, child and the woman's father (age unknown to me).

Not in every case can a person protect himself with a knife, especially against a gun. So we truly do need and rely on law enforcement, who we call in emergencies who coincidentally would protect us with, what do you know, a gun. But they cant always be there on time. Thats just a realization that we have to accept, which makes a form of protection all the more necessary.

We dont want to hold on to our rights because its been written for so many years. But because thats just what it is, our right. Not that its just protection but because guns are a passed time whether used for sport, hunting or recreation. We wernt just given the right to own guns because they are not harmful, they can be in the wrong hands. But because as people we should be protected by any means necessary. The right was given to citizens so there was balance of power, so there is no unevenness and that sense of security is strongly possessed.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PharaohJR
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 9:32:19 PM

@ underdog bigrail said it best...... the answer to your question its not hard its simple.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Underdog15
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 11:08:05 PM

Thanks for taking the time bigrailer. Obviously I'm still not satisfied. I still don't know why this happens in the us, but not other first world countries. I don't own a gun, but my uncle and cousin both do. So I get the recreational side of it. That makes sense. And I'm not suggesting an all out ban. Just more control. Afterall, Canada is a bit hypocritical as we've just loosened our laws. Lol.

I get all that and I see where you are coming from. My inner struggle has to do with trying to make sense of tragedy and why the us is such an outliestatistically to everyone else.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bigrailer19
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 11:52:12 PM

Underdog-

I sincerely wish I had a better answer for you, because even I get so frustrated and upset at the violence. Why is it so high? I just dont know.

I share your sympathy, thats for sure!



Last edited by bigrailer19 on 12/22/2012 11:58:07 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

firesoul453
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 7:33:23 PM
Reply

In all honesty, if it was between getting guns banned or volent video games banned; I'd pick the 2nd one.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Amnesiac
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 7:51:01 PM
Reply

I find contradictory that us americans are bombarded with ad slogans daily about "drinking responsibly" and "cigarettes are cancer spreaders" and "don't live with unhealthy lifestyle choices" but never about responsibly owning a gun or safe gun ownership.
Why is the NRA excluded from the same responsibility as the drug companies, the tobacco industry and every alcohol company?

(I think this is where a much needed gun debate in America should start....)




Last edited by Amnesiac on 12/22/2012 7:51:44 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JackDillinger89
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 8:51:59 PM
Reply

im an american law adbiding citizen and a gun[s] owner. while i think nra is wrong for blaming games for violence i dont think anyone has a right to tell law adbiding gun owners you shouldnt own a gun. There are millions of canadians with firearms yet understandably no body tells em to disarm cuz they dont off each other. There is a considerable amount of gun violence in america statistically it has dropped within the last few years till these mass shooting sprees occured.

Funny before columbine the last mass killing of school children occured in the 1920s and guess what weapons were used during that time? Dynamite. Not guns and guns were less restricted during that time when it was easy to get real fully automatic assault weapons. How can there be justice on stolen land? America was taken from the indians with not slingshots and bow and arrows but with guns. Guns are apart of american heritage wether the international community likes it or not. A century ago it was ok for the average american to be armed for hunting or defense of your home without a license and even carry it openly. But time have changed population has grown denser and multicultral. countries started hating each other add the world wars.
Japan wasnt the peaceful country it is today a half a century ago it was a blood thirsty suicidal bully that though it was superior to the rest of the world till it climbed up the wrong tree and our guns and bomb dropping made them the peacful and vibrant beautiful country it is today. Had we not succeed japan might be much different today.

Africa is killing children everyday with guns and machetes for decades more than guns kill americans yet internationally everyone till this day still turns a blind eye.

But as far as this new desease of school shootings that has has sweeped rural america blame not games. Nor movies. Nor guns [even though it makes it easier to kill faster] before columbine there wasnt mass school shootings. Blame the real death machine the news media. Without looking online now as your reading this off the top of your head how many of the sandy hook victims or the aurora colorado, ft hood, columbine, virginia tech shooting victims names can you remember? Probably none cept gabriel giffords cuz shes a government official. But we all know newtowns school shooting killers name right his name is all over the news headlines all over the world. Just like the columbine shooters micheal moore a anti gun guy helps make them famous by making a documantary about there monsterous spree. Copy cat basement dwelling nobodys take notice. CNN will make you famous.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

JackDillinger89
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 9:04:12 PM
Reply

What about the norway mass shooting more kids died there the guy had FULL body armor wait did he kill them with americans guns? He only got 21 f**king years in prison he will be free eventually. In america he would be executed if he dodged the death penalty he would be killed in prison by inmates regardless he will NEVER be free again in the states.

Scoff at americans owning guns but if it happens in your country he gets a decade or two so in jail and tea and buiscuts with the guards. And eventually earns his freedom again.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, December 22, 2012 @ 10:25:51 PM

Just one note- Life in prison for mass murder in this country generally means you'll never see another inmate. 23-hour lockdown in a special part of the prison, usually. Of course, that just means the taxpayers get to pay for them for the rest of their lives. Yay.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

sirbob6
Sunday, December 23, 2012 @ 4:18:07 AM
Reply

Well, nice to see that the comment section is going well...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Alexeon
Sunday, December 23, 2012 @ 1:32:16 PM
Reply

This coming from the guy who runs the organization that promotes the ownership of tools specifically created for killing. Yeah, okay. Whatever you say, hotshot.


...not that he doesn't have a point.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JROD0823
Monday, December 24, 2012 @ 3:55:24 AM
Reply

@Underdog,

It is a matter of numbers that you are so desperately looking for for your answer. I can guarantee you that by numbers, the U.S. has more guns than every other 1st world country combined.

I know it sounds like a cold-hearted way to look at it, but going solely off of statistics, with tens of millions of guns being kept in one country, 11,000 deaths by gunshot wounds isn't really that high in comparison. Even if you guessed a VERY lowball estimate of 11 million guns legally owned, if every death by gun in the U.S. was caused by one of these legally obtained weapons, it would still only account for one one-tenth of one percent of all of the guns I mentioned above, AND it is a fact that the majority of these killings are by caused by illegally obtained firearms.

I agree with tes37 and bigrailer19, guns do NOT need to be banned, the processes by which you are required to obtain one legally need to be strengthened. Like tes said also, it doesn't matter what country you live in, if you want to get a gun to use it on somebody, then you will obtain it by whatever means possible. Also, people that buy guns should be mandated to have in their possession a gun safe before owning a gun. The safe should be inspected randomly twice a year by a regulating body of local law enforcement to ensure that these TOOLS are being kept in a safe manner away from people other than the legal owners. All legal gun owners should be kept in a database to enable law enforcement to keep tabs on those that don't own guns legally.

Last edited by JROD0823 on 12/24/2012 4:23:18 AM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

ima420r
Tuesday, December 25, 2012 @ 4:47:27 AM
Reply

There is no reason for the current gun laws in America. Because I want to own one, because I have a right to have one, because the government might corrupt and need someone to fight them off, for defense against other people with guns... none of these are good.

I know that making something illegal doesn't make it magically disappear, how many pot smokers are there in the US? They get the illegal drug somewhere. Guns are no different.

Things do need to change in the US, and just making gun laws more strict is a start. But business practices, drug use, mental illness care, education... these things are just a few others issues that should be worked on as well.

I read the numbers on gun deaths and the various countries where they are banned or hard to obtain and I would like to know what the education rates are? So many people in America seem just plain stupid, not everyone of course, but I know a few too many idiots (and see them on TV all the time too!). I wonder if some of these other countries have better educational systems than the US? America uses outdated and skewed text books and underfund schools like it's going out of style!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

Did Destiny live up to your expectations?
Yes it did and then some!
Not quite but it's still great.
No, it's only okay.
Not at all; it's a huge disappointment.

Previous Poll Results