CT Senator Chris Murphy: The Latest To Blame Violent Games
Okay, who's next? You, Murphy. Speak up. We haven't heard your BS yet.
The latest politician to speak out against violent video games in the wake of the Newtown school shooting is Democratic Connecticut senator Chris Murphy. Speaking at a recent press conference (as cited by GamePolitics), Murphy said the tragedy might not have happened if games didn't glorify excessive violence:
"I think there's a question as to whether he would have driven in his mother's car in the first place if he didn't have access to a weapon that he saw in video games that gave him a false sense of courage about what he could do that day."
The string continues. President Obama has called for more studies involving the effects violent games can have on children, various politicians have called for a tax against violent games and making the ESRB ratings legally binding, and the NRA has issued a statement on the matter, too. One of these days, I figure a politician will actually have to do some real research before opening his or her mouth but evidently, that's not going to happen any time soon. So all I can do is refer them to my latest article.
It's the best I can do.
Tags: video games, violent games, gamers, gaming culture, newtown shooting
1/25/2013 9:51:41 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (38 posts)
Knightzane
Friday, January 25, 2013 @ 10:48:59 PM
Reply
matt99
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 12:12:16 AM
booze925
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 2:00:31 PM
sawao_yamanaka
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 2:41:29 PM
Highlander
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 12:18:22 AM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 12:26:57 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 12:25:46 AM
Reply
PSN French
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 11:36:38 AM
CH1N00K
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 5:07:36 PM
PSN French
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 9:38:05 PM
CH1N00K
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 11:16:08 PM
I understand the concept that if someone wants to cause mayhem and destruction, they are going to do so, why not limit their availability of things to chose from..and you keep talking about being able to defend yourself against a corrupt government..Is the government that the country voted into office that bad that you have to sleep with a gun under your pillow? They don't need a military to control the people, they are doing it know with fear and scare tactics. As long as everyone is focused on what their neighbor might be doing, then no one is going to focus on the real issue, that the banks of the world have already enslaved you and own your ass and will be selling it to whoever has the money to pay for it..
Last edited by CH1N00K on 1/27/2013 11:18:03 PM
BikerSaint
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 12:48:45 AM
Reply
Let's get focused now, all you political idiots, it's the "MEDS"!!!!!
Just look right here at these hundreds of cases for proof, all of them involving serious violence, and all while taking these mind & life altering medications right here.....
http://ssristories.com/index.php
Last edited by BikerSaint on 1/26/2013 12:50:04 AM
PSN French
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 11:39:10 AM
I've been saying this for a while now... the pharm industry owns far too many politicians so that discussion will never be taken seriously by the idiot masses.
Most people on this site who call for gun control live in the UK, so they should be ignored anyway, they are the idiots that have glorified monarchy. They are still content with being taxed to give a lavish lifestyle to someone who was "born into royalty"... idiots!!
Last edited by PSN French on 1/27/2013 11:42:01 AM
homura
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 7:12:57 PM
PSN French
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 9:50:41 PM
Politicians focus only on GUNS as a weapon so it's easier to demonize America.
Last edited by PSN French on 1/27/2013 9:59:55 PM
CH1N00K
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 11:31:26 PM
You could go crazy trying to figure it all out...
PSN French
Monday, January 28, 2013 @ 9:10:46 PM
Underdog15
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 1:55:44 AM
Reply
homura
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 2:27:59 AM
Reply
Underdog15
Monday, January 28, 2013 @ 12:00:12 AM
xenris
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 9:49:42 AM
Reply
Last edited by xenris on 1/26/2013 9:50:10 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 2:07:23 PM
xenris
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 6:35:45 PM
World I think we're on to something here. QUICK TO THE DETECTIVE CAVE!!!
sawao_yamanaka
Saturday, January 26, 2013 @ 2:43:13 PM
Reply
PSN French
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 11:38:18 AM
Reply
CH1N00K
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 5:19:48 PM
A divided populace is much easier to control if they are fighting amongst themselves, as opposed to a united country with a common goal in mind..
Last edited by CH1N00K on 1/27/2013 5:25:03 PM
PSN French
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 9:41:15 PM
Also, the majority rule has always been the downfall of republics. Your "democratic" view of ONE goal means that 51% of the populace can vote away the rights of the other 49%. How about you decide what is good for your family and I will decide what is good for mine. The world is full of evil and you cannot enact laws to get rid of it.
Last edited by PSN French on 1/27/2013 9:43:22 PM
CH1N00K
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 11:00:21 PM
One thing had become clear, there's people on either side who are making arguments against cases that they know very little about..if you're in favor of gun control, chances are you don't own one and are probably a little scared of them..If you're against video games, I'm guessing you don't play them...it's a case of the blind leading the blind down a dark tunnel of ignorance...
Last edited by CH1N00K on 1/27/2013 11:04:34 PM
CH1N00K
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 5:03:15 PM
Reply
Or forget about the decades of violent movies, or even the nightly news, while we're at it..lets take some books off the shelves because they describe in detail, violent events.. But let's not focus on the fact that parents need to take SOME responsibility for raising their children...
BikerSaint
Sunday, January 27, 2013 @ 11:24:00 PM
Reply
I just can't see his mother leaving those guns lying around, especially since she had just recently told a friend that she was thinking of having him institutionalized due to his worsening behavior.
Also..... all the a-hole cockroaches that have come out of the woodwork to "assault" our gun rights & freedoms were the 1st to biatch about so-called assault weapons used to kill that day.
But guess what, after he killed himself inside the school, the LEO only found 4 "HAND-GUNS" on or with him.
And there's a proven YouTube video taken by news choppers that showed the cops actually taking that so called "assault rifle", which is actually only a semi-automatic rifle taken out of his mother's car trunk by LEO, but only after he was already dead.
And it also clearly showed the cop ejecting the rounds from that AR15.
BTW, there is no such thing as an assault rifle being sold. The so-called AR 15 is actually a semi-automatic, which means 1 pull of the trigger for each individual shot taken(5 pulls to take 5 shots, got it????)
Federal laws way back in the gangster days outlawed any real assault weapons(one pull of the trigger sprays numerous bullets until either the magazine is empty or the finger is taken of the trigger).
FYI, automatic weapons are machine guns, & the feds had abolished them under a law called "The Dick Act" in the early 1900's.
Underdog15
Tuesday, January 29, 2013 @ 9:31:25 AM

See Full Image









matt99
Reply
Friday, January 25, 2013 @ 10:30:41 PM