Jaffe Slams CNN Anchor Erin Burnett
The most annoying part about this is that Burnett's ignorant, presumptuous diatribe will be seen by millions, while Jaffe's defense will probably only be seen by gamers and a few mainstream journalists who summarily dismiss the video game industry as childish and potentially damaging.
Legendary designer/developer David Jaffe felt the need to defend our industry against the legions of politicians and journalists lining up to bash it in the wake of another terrible shooting tragedy. He really rips into CNN anchor Erin Burnett and if you had seen her piece, you would know his words are plenty justified.
My favorite part is the opening paragraph:
"Dear @ErinBurnett : you, ma'am, are at best an idiot that @cnn should be ashamed to have as an anchor. At worst, you are the worst kind of American: one who has allowed the healthy desire for success to morph into a capitalistic cancer that makes it ok to ignore the facts in order to make your product more appealing, regardless of the consequences. To make matters worse, your own views about video games- which you seem to have no problem sharing with your hundreds of thousands of viewers- clearly have not been formed by any actual research or real life experience with the medium."
Jaffe goes on to accuse Burnett of doing no research on the matter and hence, forming baseless conclusions. He also attacked her choice of words; she said the man who killed all those children in Norway "trained" on violent games before committing the act. Jaffe's response:
"The fact that you think a guy who 'trains'* on a shooting video game would be granted the skill to horrifically, tragically kill those CHILDREN in Norway only serves to show how little research you do before you open your mouth in front of your world wide audience under the guise of delivering news. I'm not sure what makes your argument look more ignorant: the fact that you don't back up your idiotic statement by showing a correlation to the current health of America's agriculture sector with the popularity of Farmville OR the fact that the sick, deranged evil loser who killed those poor kids in Norway had picked such a poor 'training' tool that after 700 hours of play, he was only capable of hitting little kids with his bullets versus the well armed pretend terrorists and highly skilled virtual soldiers that he was battling in the game."
We're posting this up simply to expand the reach of Jaffe's comeback, if only by a little. It's incredibly frustrating that the only people who are heard in this debate are also the most ill-informed individuals on the subject. That's completely backwards and downright absurd.
Tags: david jaffe, erin burnett, cnn, violent games, violent video games
2/2/2013 11:10:03 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (63 posts)
PSN French
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 1:58:52 PM
PSN French
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 2:10:56 PM
Killa Tequilla
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 3:05:45 PM
However, a videogame wasn't the cause of killing. It was a weapon used to kill children at an elementary school, wich by the way, the weapon was easily obtainable. My argument here is that videogames have nothing to do about it.
And yes I think Obama is the only president in this country who is trying to push change.
And how the hell do guns stop dictatorship?
As for unhealthy americans, I have no idea
Last edited by Killa Tequilla on 2/2/2013 3:06:36 PM
PSN French
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 3:54:19 PM
How do guns stop dictatorship? Do they not teach you in history class about revolutions like the one that happened in 1776? That might have been a monarchy that was fought but the type of tyrant is not the point... The only reason we don't have a single global government is BECAUSE Americans and the Swiss have guns, if it wasn't for us AND our guns, there would be a single power controlling everything. The Rothschilds, the Russells, the Van Duyns, the Rockefellers, the Bundys, these are only a few family names that would control every aspect of your life... and since these families have worked tirelessly to take our freedoms since the founding of the United States, they have largely been successful. Also, they won't be showing their true intent until guns are gone and there can be no REAL resistence.
I'm not going to convince anybody with a closed mind to propaganda... just providing information, do as you wish with it.
Geobaldi
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 6:00:07 PM
PSN French
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 6:19:53 PM
Alejandro562
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 6:35:00 PM
Killa Tequilla
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 7:33:56 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 8:02:17 PM
robinhood2010
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 1:41:39 AM
This is the problem. People are too quick to blame someone or something else. Other countries in the world have similar gun laws, yet the majority of school shootings happen in the US. That says leagues. We need to ask why. So instead of pointing the finger, lead with an open palm and try and help each other.
Excelsior1
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 3:04:45 AM
As for videogames and violent media. Countries like Canada and Great Britian have the same violent influences we have. What they don't have is sheer amount of guns we have here on the streets and a population armed to the teeth.
PSN French
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 5:31:57 AM
Last edited by PSN French on 2/3/2013 5:32:45 AM
SayWord
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 11:46:18 AM
Caanimal
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 12:50:11 PM
You want gun control? Put EVERYONE(Baring those who have mental issues such as unchecked anger and such) through a gun handling course and give them the choice to then own a gun or not. That way there would be someone w/ a gun close at had that could stop a violent crime early on and not let it turn into a massacre. Taking guns away only takes away from those honest people who follow the law, it doesn't effect criminals in the least and that can be seen in EVERY country that has very restrictive gun laws. A criminal isn't going to stop and go "Oh man I shouldn't be doing this w/ this gun, it's against the law!" and to think they are is really asinine to believe.
@Say... What scares me are those sheople out there that mindlessly gobble up what ever dribble is spouted from their perfered source like the mindless drones the source knows they are...
I'm getting really tired of people not taking the blame for their own stupidity, it's always something or someone else, it's NEVER their own screwed in the head thoughts causing it... I'm sick and tired of hearing "Guns killed" or "Mother Nature destoryed" or the rest of the asinine comments about such things that would never have happened if HUMANS weren't involved... Gawds this world makes me sick of being a human sometimes.
Excelsior1
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 3:11:48 PM
PSN French
Monday, February 04, 2013 @ 10:33:24 AM
richfiles
Thursday, February 07, 2013 @ 12:58:44 AM
You are a hating, uninformed, moron if you actually think "gun loving Americans" are the problem. My gun loving buddy, with a LEGAL conceal and carry permit (issued by the local Chief of Police, after a background check, and a full gun safety course) was the only reason he and I didn't get MUGGED last night. One flash of steel, and they ran.
Now tell me guns are bad?
Screw off with your anti-american drivel!
@PSN French
You know... There are a lot of points, especially on gun rights, that I agree with you on. I'm glad some people have not forgotten that the ONLY reason The United States of America even EXISTS, is because we pointed our rifles at the government that oppressed us, and we said NO! We will not take it anymore!
To all the people dismissing your comments, if they want to see gun control in action... Look to EVERY dictatorship that has ever existed, and they can study up on the subject all they like. It's good to see people like you standing up for our rights, and more importantly... Understanding WHY they are so critically important!
Last edited by richfiles on 2/7/2013 1:10:02 AM
Borderline
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 12:01:34 PM
Reply
gumbi
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 12:03:36 PM
Reply
How is this even happening? The only people who seem to have any sensibility on the topic are the ones supposedly being contaminated by it.
Is that their angle? To dismiss the defense of everyone who has an interest in gaming because we're so polluted by it's evil that they need to save us from it? This is ignorance of mass proportions, and it makes me sad...
Cesar_ser_4
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 12:09:48 PM
Reply
Wrote
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 6:25:13 PM
Underdog15
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 12:16:51 PM
Reply
But what I'm missing is not only causation of video games to these tragedies, but any proven correlation. There is speculation about these mass murderers playing video games, but never any proof. True, the guy in Norway tried to say he trained on... um... World of Warcraft.... yeah.... but that's it.
I'm sorry, but you just can't dictate causation due to circumstance. You need to measure these things in controlled scientific studies. Which -HAS- happened. And what did we see? Children who indulge in overly violent (usually to the extremes of gore) can show very mild increases in aggression. But there has been no study to show them ever becoming physically violent. And in adults who are deemed psychologically fit, there is little change. Some show mild increases in tension, while most typically show no change, and some even being able to relax MORE as it is used as a sort of venting mechanism.
There are many studies available via google search, even. I myself did a paper back in the day, and psychological journals agree.
Here's what's going to happen in the states in respect to video games:
The pres. of the ol' U.S. of A. is ordering up some official studies. They are going to uncover the exact same findings that have already been uncovered and built upon. They will find that violent media, not just games, affects children negatively. They will find insignificant changes in adults to draw finite conclusions. Just as what has been already done. They will decide, based on the research, that they should concoct a way to determine which games are inappropriate for children and that they should limit children's access to such content. Then they will discover the ESRB already exists. They will consult the FCC and discover the FCC believes it to be the most reliable ratings on the market.
And they will say to themselves... oh shnikies... this shit's already in place! hmm.... well, we can't just do nothing after all that, we're going to have to either increase fines for selling to minors, incorporate a tax on M rated games, or both.
Sheesh...
Last edited by Underdog15 on 2/2/2013 12:21:14 PM
touchyourtoes
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 12:22:11 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 4:36:54 PM
Here's the only video I could find anywhere on Erin Burnett discussing the guns & videogame controversy.
But I must say it's pretty tame & it really doesn't come off as a rant as much.
And especially, when some many of our own political & ignorant, despicable, self-agenda, GDB's ("GOVERNMENT DUNG BEETLES" are coming out of their hot steaming piles of manure-based eatery's to spew their foul acting double-chewed phobia-feces all over America.
Anyways, enough of my own rant......here, the video starts off about what the downside will be to both, the manufacturers, & our economy, if semi-automatic guns are banned & how many people will have to be laid off.
And then it switches over to our "video games" at the 2:19 mark.
Erin Burnett: Is Someone That Kills A Prostitute Playing GTA More Likely To Kill People?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blH3Shg3nX8
Last edited by BikerSaint on 2/2/2013 4:38:44 PM
touchyourtoes
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 10:58:20 PM
I'm in Canada and I'm getting pissed off with so many of your political "leaders" pointing the finger at our past time, and only our past time. Why is it so hard for those fools to see that we have the same damn games here in the great white north, but we don't have deranged assholes shooting up schools/offices/malls/etc. Our deranged assholes shooting up these places are gangsters shooting other gangsters.
Stronger rules to keep the GTA's and COD's out of young children's hands sure, but another tax and attacking the rest of us isn't going to stop the fruitcakes from going postal.
Last edited by touchyourtoes on 2/2/2013 10:59:27 PM
Caanimal
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 1:02:07 PM
It amazes me that people here in the USA have forgotten what happened when a government body had too much control over our day to day lives.... 1776...
Hand_of_Sorrow
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 1:25:28 PM
Reply
Snaaaake
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 2:06:45 PM
Reply
"VIDEO GAMES ARE TO BLAME"
"VIDEO GAMES ARE BAD INFLUENCE TO CHILDREN"
"VIDEO GAMES ARE RESPONSIBLE"
Ok, prove it or your statement doesn't count, it's that easy.
And I wish there were more developers like Jaffe coming out to defend the industry.
I can't believe with all the jabs and insults, Jaffe is the only out to stand up.
Killa Tequilla
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 3:08:28 PM
Knightzane
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 3:50:05 PM
Reply
Geobaldi
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 6:02:01 PM
clockwyzebkny
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 3:51:08 PM
Reply
clockwyzebkny
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 3:55:04 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 3:59:34 PM
Reply
PC_Max
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 4:14:17 PM
Reply
3 years ago there were a number of researches done to find out if video games influence games in anyway. I remember one report that was conducted by a skeptic who was surprised to discover that certain genres of video game do affect gamers physiologically as well as psychologically. Simply, video games get aggressive. specifically with violent games such as the CoD's games. They also found it starts with players getting frustrated leading to anger and aggression. The social aspect of the game where players communicate online during play and antagonized each other compounding it if not actually the catalyst in some cases.
Now even then they said that the affect levels are dependent on the individual but the affect is there.
I wish I had the report BUT like I said this was years ago. AND both side of the issue disagreed with it. One that it did not go far enough and the other just refusing to accept it. You can guess which said is which.
The rationals in the world KNOW that games are one one of the many mediums who influence how people think and react. Such as television, movie, music, advertising and even books.
Point is when the gaming community is being "attacked" as some have put it the response is verbal abuse and totally denial. The verbal abuse unfortunately make the gaming community looked bad and supports the opposition stance. Wrongly or not.
Games do influence us, I have seen friends get angry during games, mostly the online FPS games. One reason the CoD's games of the world do not interest me. Those games are not meant to be all flowers and faeries. Its combat, its suppose to frustrating and aggressive.
The main point is Video Games are not the sole cause of violent influence. Just one or many. As adults we need to recognize that in ourselves and parents need to recognize that letting your kids play these games at early ages along with all the other mediums out there for entertainment...may not be a good idea... at least unsupervised.
Keep playing!
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 4:26:45 PM
I'm betting the effect of hours of hardcore porn on children isn't good either, hence the laws surrounding it. A certain amount of discretion has to be left to parents though or we are not free.
Highlander
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 2:03:01 AM
The thing about games influencing us is that all media influences us. Ads influence us to buy things, movies can make us excited, angry, happy or incredibly sad, so can TV and anime. So for that matter can games. The ability to change a person's mood 100% indicates that whatever is changing the mood is by definition influencing that person. So, there is no question as to whether a game could influence someone, the question is about the depth and persistence of the influence.
For a vulnerable mind looking for answers on how to behave, a constant diet of violent entertainment and/or violent environment, may teach that vulnerable mind to be more aggressive and violent, and that would become a permanent behavioral change. But that would be an exception and not representative of the general situation.
Perhaps the correlation that people see is not that the video games cause the shooters to shoot, but perhaps the shooters are interested in action games because they satisfy the urges inside them - preventing them from acting in the real world. In other words, perhaps violent people seek out games to self medicate themselves and prevent abhorrent behavior from occurring. In which case, withdrawing games from such individuals might result in more attacks, not fewer.
BikerSaint
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 4:41:38 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 5:58:35 PM
Reply
Shams
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 3:00:03 AM
JDC80
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 6:23:11 PM
Reply
To PSN French here's a quick history lesson on Obama care, its roots belongs with the conservative think tank Heritage foundation and later in 1994 Republican Bob Dole used it as a counter healthcare plan to Hillary Clinton's plan. So yeah I notice a difference when there was a president that actually went against the constitution I didn't hear much of anything from the folks that hold the constitution so dear.
Back to Jaffe, he has to put folks like Burnett on blast with force because stuff like that gets repeated by other talking heads. Because a lot of these jokers have a negative stereotype about gamers and our community is easily disregard nevermind the video game industry ranks in billions of dollars in a year and a majority of us live very productive lives outside the console or keyboard.
Cesar_ser_4
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 8:39:37 PM
olicapone
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 7:12:54 PM
Reply
Last edited by olicapone on 2/2/2013 7:13:52 PM
jugheadjones
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 7:19:51 PM
Reply
tes37
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 8:14:36 PM
Geobaldi
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 8:18:52 PM
Shams
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 10:21:44 PM
Highlander
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 1:54:25 AM
Banning video games because someone uses a gun to shoot people? Doesn't that kind of miss the mark? We always look at the interests of shooters to look for the reasons they shoot people. What if Lanza liked watching the NFL? Should we ban American Football? Or perhaps all contact sports? What if Lanza liked collecting Barbie dolls and beheaded them? Do we blame Mattel and end the sale of Barbie? What if Lanza regularly went to a practice arena for improving your skill with lethal weapons? Oh, wait he did. The very same lethal weapons he had available to him because they were in his home, owned by his Mom.
Seems to me that if he'd really been into games, he'd have been too busy playing online to go find his Mom's guns ans shoot people...maybe he was more of a gun aficionado than a video game aficionado...
Highlander
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 1:50:03 AM
Reply
In the CT school shooting case, the shooter may well have played video games, he was also an honors student. So I guess we should proactively lock up all honors students because they are clearly predisposed to shoot people. But the thing is, the shooter in CT was trained to use guns, his Mom took him to the gun range, the weapons used were not illegally held, they were hers. Had she not had the guns, had she not ensured he was proficient in their use, it's unlikely that he could have done what he did. Even if he had every first person shooter ever made in his video game collection, the worst he could have done with them is throw the discs at people. Video games are not inherently dangerous.
I loved the way that Burnett called Lanza a "video game aficionado", based on what we know he was very much a gun aficionado as well. So, if we accept her argument about video games, should we also not conclude that like video games, guns are obviously dangerous. And since on an objective comparison between a loaded gun and a shrink wrapped video game I think we can all agree that the gun is infinitely more dangerous as a weapon, should not the guns be getting more debate than the games?
Shams
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 2:57:42 AM
___________
Sunday, February 03, 2013 @ 3:05:41 AM
Reply

See Full Image









Killa Tequilla
Reply
Saturday, February 02, 2013 @ 11:57:47 AM