New Studies: Violent Games Cause Violent Behavior In Children
This shouldn't come as a surprise to many, but once again, the anti-game activists should be able to distinguish between children and adults. ...it's doubtful, but we can always hope.
According to FOX News, new studies suggest there is a definite correlation between violent video games and violent behavior in children. The studies have tried to find a way around the previous, and very common, obstacle: how do we know if the games actually made kids violent, or if already-violent kids were the ones who played those games? But thanks to three long-term studies in the U.S. and Japan, we now have evidence that "otherwise peaceable kids" can become more aggressive in school after playing violent games. The results were published in the Pediatrics medical journal, and the results were clear across the board: there was a positive correlation in all three samples, and the difference in American and Japanese culture didn't seem to have any effect.
Again, not surprisingly, the younger kids turned out to be more affected, as children between the ages of 9 and 12 exhibited more aggressive changes than the kids between the ages of 13 and 18. The study concludes very simply: "Playing violent video games is a significant risk factor for later physically aggressive behavior. The research strongly suggests reducing the exposure of youth to this risk factor." Yes, well...most well-adjusted and intelligent individuals have known this for a while; violent games can have long-term negative effects on children in the same way that violent movies and explicit music can. This is why these entertainment products carry ratings. ...I'm sorry, but isn't all of this just "common sense?" We really need studies to learn that a 10-year-old who plays GTAIV might get into more fights in school and resist authority more? Really?
11/3/2008 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (47 posts)
DeadReaper
Monday, November 03, 2008 @ 10:27:55 PM
Reply
Last edited by DeadReaper on 11/3/2008 10:32:41 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, November 03, 2008 @ 10:50:40 PM
Reply
FLYING_APE
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 8:29:32 AM
Bugzbunny109
Monday, November 03, 2008 @ 11:15:58 PM
Reply
bUnNy FTW!
Last edited by Bugzbunny109 on 11/3/2008 11:16:58 PM
Buckeyestar
Monday, November 03, 2008 @ 11:18:25 PM
Reply
MetalHead09
Monday, November 03, 2008 @ 11:19:03 PM
Reply
xnonsuchx
Monday, November 03, 2008 @ 11:59:12 PM
Reply
There are SO many different studies that end up with SO many different results. MOST tend to conclude that violent video games only feed already violent behaviors, not turn people violent. If VERY young children are playing some of the more violent games, that's the fault of bad parenting, not the games.
jerocarson
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 12:40:00 AM
Reply
Joe_III
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 1:02:06 AM
Reply
Everyone has violence inside them. But like with every other negative emotion, its best to vent it in a measured fashion.
On the other hand, I do remember this one time. I had played GTA3 20 hrs str8 and was heading home. There was a cop car parked next to the on-ramp. As I left the stop sign I jammed the gas and headed str8 for it. After a sec I realized I wasn't in the game and braked. I had some fancy explaining to do.
My friend was playing basketball one time, and as he was playing, he saw a blue hoodie on the side of the court. He started running towards it. Apparently, he thought it was the body armore from Goldeneye and he just automatically ran to pick it up.
This kinda crap has been happening forever. I remember the slew of accidents from the dumb stuff kids did trying to imitate the beavis and butthead movie.
If people would actually enforce game ratings, that would easily fix the problems the study suggests, but it would easily help children grow up the way they should.
But on the other hand, half the users on this site wouldn't be able to say they've played CoD4.
Last edited by Joe_III on 11/4/2008 1:02:35 AM
Zapix
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 4:55:02 AM
Personally, I'm going to start going with the belief... If you think kids aren't influenced by video games, then you must think these Middle East suicide bombers are completely sane blowing themselves up killing innocent women and children so the bomber can go to the promise land. The world is full of f'ed up people, and it doesn't take much to influence them.
ThePoetRazel
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 1:43:45 AM
Reply
Some researchers have an obvious bias. The questions is, why did they bother putting so much effort into researching something we already knew? And then, why did it get to Fox News? Sounds like fuel for the anti-game types.
Enforce existing laws and everything is fine. Simple really isn't it?
akiris
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 1:59:37 AM
Reply
Zorigo
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 2:16:49 AM
Reply
@shak44, we get the point.
Last edited by Zorigo on 11/4/2008 2:17:37 AM
Ultimadesires
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 3:47:43 AM
Reply
Maybe the problem is due to many companies trying to interest an adult audience. games with violence tend to get better ratings, looking at my games only 1 doesn’t have violence which would be offensive to a child, Star Wars Lego, Little Big Planet also succeeds on being acceptable for children and actually being a good game.
Joe_III
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 12:55:50 PM
Entire generations were raised on Looney Toons and the like. The exacerbating problem that violent vgs are twofold:
1. There is an interactive portion that allows the player to do violence rather than just watch.
2. Violent games strive way too hard for realism.
Giving a kid a game like rayman's rabbits (or wtf ever its called) is a lot different than a game like CoD4.
And probably everyone is going to disagree with this last part, but Manhunt 1/2 should never have been made. Games like that don't just desensitize people to violence, but it aggressively promotes violence for violence's sake.
Snuff films are illegal (here in the states) for a good reason, and games about creating/participating in snuff films should be too.
Last edited by Joe_III on 11/4/2008 12:56:48 PM
Wage SLAVES
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 3:59:28 AM
Reply
Geobaldi
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 5:00:14 AM
Reply
TheRaPtuRe
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 6:25:53 AM
Reply
crapreviews
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 6:36:30 AM
Reply
cegmp
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 8:17:55 AM
Reply
P.S.
What Jizmack said is true. They can't prove it. But that is why it is a correlational study. Example: There is 85% correlation that smokers will smoke after eating.This either means (depending on the study) there is an 85% chance that smokers will smoke after eating or 85% of the smokers smokes after eating. Obviously, there maybe other factors which may contribute to a person smoking after eating. And thats why correlational studies could be seen as probability. Anyway, read more if you're interested. Its more complicated than what i mentioned above.
Last edited by cegmp on 11/4/2008 8:26:28 AM
CH1N00K
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 8:48:20 AM
Reply
GamerKid123
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 9:48:23 AM
Reply
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 10:28:29 AM
Reply
And we all have to understand that none of these studies are saying, beyond any shadow of a doubt, that children who play GTA will grow up to be criminals. That's not what they say at all. It simply says it prompts a significant and document-able behavioral change, and that much is most certainly true. And as Joe said, we really need to enforce the ratings on games; I've always been a big supporter of that.
coverton341
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 10:51:03 AM
Parents have to play a bigger role in this instead of getting junior baby son-of-a-b%tch GTAIV just because he cries for it for 10 minutes because "all my friends play it, its not bad."
Joe_III
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 10:58:56 AM
The fact that kids are getting dumber, more agressive, and more apathetic to the plight of the world lies solely on their parents shoulders. I swear we need a parenting license or something.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 11:14:31 AM
Reply
Scarecrow
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 12:12:23 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 11:51:57 AM
Reply
TheRaPtuRe
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 12:13:22 PM
Reply
There not even for children, they just need to enforce the age restrictions much more.
This is the reason mh2 was banned, they feared children would play it and that it would corrupt them somehow.
Leave adult games to the adults, i don't care if it effects the children, thats there parents problem, deal with it!
Ultimadesires
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 1:55:55 PM
Reply
I blame the old stereotype "Games are for children", yes it's sort of dying down now but it's still left its mark. As it’s seen as a typical thing for children to play video games, allot will gain interest. So when we get games like Dead Space, Fallout 3 and GTAIV, which are all getting fantastic reviews and seen as good games they'll naturally be interested.
Maybe the problem is due to many companies trying to interest an adult audience. games with violence tend to get better ratings, looking at my games only 1 does'nt have violence which would be offensive to a child, Star Wars Lego, Little Big Planet also succeeds on being acceptable for children and actually being a good game.
robinhood2010
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 6:31:51 PM
Reply
jonny_bolton
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 7:21:17 PM
Reply
Joe_III
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 7:34:55 PM
LightShow
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 8:07:09 PM
Reply
faulty logic from someone who doesn't want to think about the situation.
I only hope society doesn't decline farther...
Last edited by LightShow on 11/4/2008 8:07:54 PM
Joe_III
Tuesday, November 04, 2008 @ 9:53:45 PM
Wage SLAVES
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 @ 1:14:32 PM
Reply
It is an overall deterioration of morals not only expressed in video games.
My cousin was watching Disney channel and a girl was cheating on some boy with his friend. My cousin (a girl) thought it was hilarious but what they were really teaching her was that was acceptable behavior of young women. Its small tidbits of info that kids pick up which conveys the wrong messages.
My kids are not watching tv until a certain age!
Arvis
Wednesday, November 05, 2008 @ 1:22:09 PM

See Full Image









NuCl3aR32
Reply
Monday, November 03, 2008 @ 10:23:06 PM