Will The Next PlayStation Console Feature An Optical Disc Drive?
With all this talk about physical video game media disappearing in the future in favor of digital downloads, PS4 Talk has wondered: will the next PlayStation feature the seemingly essential optical disc drive?
Although we're not the biggest fans of removing the disc format entirely, we have to agree that without the disc drive, Sony would have more design freedom with the PS4. First of all, it wouldn't even have to lie flat or stand erect; it could look however you wanted it to look, and to top it all off, we wouldn't have size limits for games, anymore. Currently, a game has to be made to fit on a Blu-Ray disc, but without the disc, there's no restriction. Of course, this could lead to a spiraling issue that results in 100GB games quickly maxing out HDD space. Then again, perhaps by that time, HDD space won't even be a hindrance (what with all the technological advancements and all). The machine would also be quieter, smaller, and could also be less expensive thanks to major savings on manufacturing costs. Oh, and if you wanted to buy a game, it would merely be a matter of turning on your PS4, putting in the relevant information, and hitting the "Download Now" button. No braving the elements and the crowds trying to get to the stores.
However, it appears to be a race more than anything else. If - if - digital downloads start to become the preferable mode of delivering video games, will it take hold fast enough for the release of the PS4? Or perhaps the better question is this: shouldn't Sony be working on initial designs of the PS4 already? If so, are they really considering a machine that doesn't boast an optical disc drive due to the digital download expectation...?
12/8/2008 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (71 posts)
moose88
Monday, December 08, 2008 @ 10:16:01 PM
ec0li
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 12:06:47 AM
somethingrandom
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 12:58:30 AM
djjake
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 1:48:17 AM
downloading everything is realistically going to happen in the next ten years with the expansion of games being bigger and the internet being slow
even if there was a huge improvement in internet service it wouldn't be fair to use it as people may not be able to make the move to this new internet service, it's only been in the last 2years that everyone's finally made the move to broadband
with the new blu ray disk coming in at a massive 400gb, i don't think they will be turning they're back on the disk format just yet
gamebuster24
Thursday, December 11, 2008 @ 6:05:30 PM
asianinvasian
Sunday, December 14, 2008 @ 10:05:04 AM
crapreviews
Monday, December 08, 2008 @ 10:17:12 PM
Reply
the other side of me just wonders what happens if there was like a big file loss in the servers and all you purchase history was gone and you no longer could use the stuff you bought or download it again.
LightShow
Monday, December 08, 2008 @ 10:17:30 PM
Reply
You also cut out a huge social aspect of gaming, i.e. "hey man, you played Gears yet?" "Na man, haven't gotten around to it" "Hey, I finished it, you wanna borrow it?" "ya man, thanks"
the whole scenario is gone with downloads.
It's bad for me, the customer, and you cut out a huge chunk of market share when you go completely digital. I don't see it happening.
AntDC
Monday, December 08, 2008 @ 11:08:31 PM
Joe_III
Monday, December 08, 2008 @ 11:32:36 PM
LightShow
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 6:37:07 AM
dveisalive
Monday, December 08, 2008 @ 10:20:05 PM
Reply
xnonsuchx
Monday, December 08, 2008 @ 10:20:49 PM
Reply
Bring this topic up again in 5 more years and we'll see where things stand.
Joe_III
Monday, December 08, 2008 @ 11:31:37 PM
Reply
DRM, Net Neutrality, as well as bandwidth caps all conspire against direct downloads at this point in time. Gimme some 100Mbps connection speeds and at least 1000GB a month and I might consider it as long as I don't have to redownload and reinstall things with a huge hassle each time.
somethingrandom
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 1:05:53 AM
slayerkillemall
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 12:09:42 AM
Reply
i believe for sometime now that microsoft would do this because they are not about to use Sony's
technology.it would be funny if they started using some kind "flash" card or similar,kind of ironic since company's stopped using cartidges for cd's,then dvd's, and now blu-ray
i think sony is just going to keep expanding blu-ray. maybe in 10 years they might make one but not now, then again i could be wrong....
Last edited by slayerkillemall on 12/9/2008 12:20:47 AM
Aftab
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 12:12:59 AM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 12:49:49 AM
Reply
Saber1989
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 12:52:32 AM
Reply
Fane1024
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 5:24:27 PM
SplendidBlended
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 2:24:26 AM
Reply
Troy Powers
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 5:39:39 AM
Reply
hald
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 5:51:52 AM
Reply
Maybe Sony will make a special console for me without optical drive? Or not. . lol.
snglbck26
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 8:11:13 AM
Reply
CH1N00K
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 8:26:25 AM
Reply
With the whole world being more aware of environmental issues, the idea of less packaging and waste, not to mention emissions needed for shipping, the idea of doing everything online to reduce a carbon footprint will force companies to use less physical media. There are already a few full games for download on the PSN store now. I have a feeling that towards the end of the PS3's life, we will see more and more.
Everyone is worried about their dvd/bluray collection becoming obsolete, but when is the last time you actually went to a CD store to buy a CD? Sure some companies are going to go under with the loss of the optical drive, but it's happening now with CD stores. It happened with record stores before that. Stores like Gamestop and EBgames are either going to enjoy the ride while it lasts and make the most of it, or learn to adapt somehow. The optical drive will dissapear eventually, it's just a matter of when. It's part of the evolution of the industry. You're only going to have 2 options, adapt, or fade away....
Think of how much of distribution costs are involved in buying a game. If we go online, there is no more need for distribution. The gaming manufacturers will have cut out the middle man. This will hopefully mean that we get cheaper better games. More than likely it will mean these companies make more money for themselves. Which should translate into better, faster products and better R&D.
I know we're aren't ready for this technology yet, but when it does come, I'll welcome it.
Last edited by CH1N00K on 12/9/2008 8:32:56 AM
Fane1024
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 5:28:10 PM
somethingrandom
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 9:38:34 PM
Troy Powers
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 9:32:12 AM
Reply
PS3_Wizard
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 9:32:58 AM
Reply
Until Broadband ISP's can provide service ANYWHERE in the USA, then I don't think they should switch to digital media downloads.
Dr_Frodo
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 10:14:27 AM
Reply
If you're not a PC gamer, Steam is the best solution to content delivery I've seen to date, you can even buy the disk version of a game and never actually put it in the drive to play, you type in your key to your game and it adds it to your games list, available for download wherever you are.
Or simply having games in compressed format on USB pens could be a start, take your pen (comes with the console) to the game outlet and copy files directly, needs work but getting away from limitations is a godsend for developers.
CH1N00K
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 10:17:34 AM
Reply
Last edited by CH1N00K on 12/9/2008 10:18:06 AM
Zorigo
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 11:36:39 AM
PS3_Wizard
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 11:50:44 AM
Reply
CH1N00K
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 12:49:46 PM
CH1N00K
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 12:57:15 PM
Reply
They would be shooting themselves in the foot if in 5-10 years time they suddenly told everyone that their Blu-Ray collection is obsolete. That would be a big "Thanks for the money, but you're screwed!" move.
MetalHead09
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 3:18:52 PM
Reply
tlpn99
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 3:35:46 PM
Reply
Your mate calls round can I borrow oh no I cant can I its in your machine, what games you got on there oh yeah its all on your machine.
I myself like having physical game in my hands I love new smell of games and game booklets as you open them specially if they are shrink wrapped. That's all gonna go with digital downloading. If they are going to offer it it should be as a choice not dicatating how we download our games, plus how do you trade in ? Sell them back online to the store or who ever. I wouldnt like to do that its bad enough downloading stuff like updates imagine uploading stuff it would take forever plus the speed, so more and more of us are gonna be up on the net half the night as the nets faster at night etc etc etc.
This news sucks and blows.
Arkhon
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 4:23:13 PM
Reply
Last edited by Arkhon on 12/9/2008 4:36:22 PM
moose88
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 5:08:13 PM
But I still love putting the shiny into the slot. Nothing will ever be able to top that...
Fane1024
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 5:36:36 PM
I think we'll see much the same hardware set-up as current systems (i.e., both relatively small HDD and multi-layer BRD), hopefully with the ability to add larger HDDs (and SSDs) as they become available.
daus26
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 5:33:18 PM
Reply
If space is a problem, why can't they just concentrate on making discs that can support more data. Like everyone said, if the 400gig is coming, then that should be enough for next gen.
I also read about the beneficial on digital media on being more quiet, smaller, less cost, and design.
-I mean is the current system so loud we need to make it quieter?
-Is it so big, we need to make it smaller?
-Isn't the cost of internet service gonna add to the cost loss in production?
-And are they seriously limited to a design of a system with a disc drive?
We should always have a choice like how we have a choice between credit cards and cash.
Dingodial
Wednesday, December 10, 2008 @ 3:19:42 PM
mustang750r
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 6:53:19 PM
Reply
mustang750r
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 7:02:33 PM
Reply
mustang750r
Tuesday, December 09, 2008 @ 7:07:42 PM
Reply
Toxin
Wednesday, December 10, 2008 @ 4:06:26 AM
Reply
To me the PlayStation has been a more than a gaming machine. My PS1 was a nice music player. The PS2 movies and music. I love my PS3 as it keeps me connected to the online world.(PC died :( ) as well as offers loads of other entertainment.
Now if the next system did not offer an optic drive Sony has a way to get content to its users. It can use wireless technology(like Amazon's Kindle) so no mater were your at you are connected.
I am a big fan of innovation but digital property is not the same as holding the game in your hand. Think back as a young child on Christmas or your birthday you unwrapped a game you wanted. How would someone buy a game for you? And what do you do with that Walmart/K-mart gift card grandma got you?
I could think more into this but i better stop now.
Dingodial
Wednesday, December 10, 2008 @ 3:14:24 PM
Reply
Orvisman
Wednesday, December 10, 2008 @ 3:57:05 PM
Reply
GameStop, Wal-Mart, Target, Amazon, Toys R' Us, etc... would all suffer in a download-only environment. This would not be good for the economy because it would cause more people to be laid off in the future, and it would not be good for the consumer.
Furthermore, I guarantee game companies will still charge $50-$60 for their games; and the consumer won't have the benefit of picking up cheaper used copies.
Robertson99
Wednesday, December 10, 2008 @ 4:38:55 PM
Reply
Lordnicon
Wednesday, December 10, 2008 @ 4:56:19 PM
Reply
The PS3 having the ability to play cd's, dvd's, ps1 (for some), ps2(for some), ps3, bd rom, and even read some data cd's, it makes no sense to ditch you're entire library if you got rid of the players required for all of those formats.
The bottom line is that while there are some consumer benefits, there are far more drawbacks.
PaiNT_kinG
Thursday, December 11, 2008 @ 12:40:42 AM
Reply
Lovingit07
Thursday, December 11, 2008 @ 3:39:44 AM
Reply
How am i meant to buy my family PS3 and 360 games and puit under the tree...i wont be able to, i will have to think of something else to get them :( lol.
I think we need to wait untill everyones broadband is better....i can only get 8mbps. The new virgin fibre optic one is 20mbps
SilverLion
Thursday, December 11, 2008 @ 7:34:42 AM
Reply
Uh, no. Two major errors in the article: you sould still have design limitations, and you would still have size limitations. Games wouldn't exist solely in the ether surrounding your star-shaped, wall-hanging console.
On the game size: your limitations are the size of your hard drive and the quality & speed of your internet connection. And remember most hard drives have moving parts, so they die, eventually. Heck even my DVR is starting to grind... So lets assume a couple 1.5 TB drives, that's a good amount of space! But for how many games? You eventually reach the limit, unless you want to DELETE a game you paid for... Maybe you can offload it somehow? Impossible. Sony has gone to some extreme ends (read: root-kit) to prevent people from infringing on their copyrights. In their zeal to protect their interest, they've made it impossible to make my _legal_ backup of software I purchase. Good thing Blu-ray doesn't scratch easily. On top of that, how long do you think it would take to download a 50GB game over your network?
Also in that vein, Sony has always fallen back to using physical copy protection techniques for their games. Digital downloads would be far too easy to pirate & copy.
On the freedom of design: Have you seen the size of the PS3? Its a bit bigger than the combined dimensions of an optical drive and hard drive. There's a lot of hardware in there. There's a reason PCs are still box-like. And the bigger the box, the better the hardware. (I've yet to see a slim or micro-atx case that can handle a raid-5 array with Firewire and a current gen graphics card.) The PS3 is a computing beast! It needs a lot of cooling for the processors if nothing else. Any cutting edge hardware will have that requirement as well.
So while we might have visions of sugarplums dancing in our heads, I'm happy with my PS3. I assume the next gen will be generally box-shaped, have some kind of removable fixed-state media (maybe a new generation of micro-SD carD?), expand on the technical interoperability (new wireless networking, maybe an HD tuner?), and some kind of internal memory for downloadable content, or transient local installs (fixed-state disk drives are getting bigger...).
Last edited by SilverLion on 12/11/2008 7:38:41 AM
Veritas Vincit
Thursday, December 11, 2008 @ 9:47:40 AM
Reply
NetheRealm
Friday, December 12, 2008 @ 7:56:08 AM
Reply
Last edited by NetheRealm on 12/12/2008 8:08:44 AM

See Full Image









kreate
Reply
Monday, December 08, 2008 @ 10:06:11 PM
i do not like the idea of not having a hardcopy of my video games. what if i am in a situation or a location where i can't get internet access?
that idea of 'no hardcopy' is aggressively supported by the evil microsoft corporation.
its a form of control.
the benefits sounds all nice, but later on, we are forced to download games once this happens.
i bought a ps2 as a dvd player. others bought a ps3 as a blu ray player. why can't we keep advancing the technology instead of getting rid of the disks?
pretty soon i would have to download everything in a digital format from games to movies. its inevitable but i want to push it as far as it can be pushed.
with the slow crappy internet of america (good compared to other countries but sucks compared to countries like japan/korea) do u know how long it would take me to download a 100gig worth of digital data? when a game launches, are we going to have network failures and server downs cuz of all the ppl trying to buy the game at the same time?
it may sound nice, but to protect ourselves from all these corporate BS, we need to fight the idea, if not fight, at least not be so supportive.