SCEA: PlayStation 3 Price Drop Rumors Are False
As everyone waits with bated breath to see what Sony might announce tomorrow, they have issued a statement that will put one bit of speculation to rest...and you can probably guess the rumor they have shot down.
Not surprisingly, when the information hit that Sony would drop a mini-bombshell on Tuesday, the majority of the gaming populace immediately settled on a price drop for the PlayStation 3. Supposed visual evidence has also been found across the Internet in the form of retail pics, but none of that was ever confirmed. And if you'd like to know the reason why, let Al De Leon, PR Manager for Sony Computer Entertainment America, explain it:
"As we have stated previously, we do not have plans for a PS3 price drop, and any rumors to that effect are false and are the result of speculation. SCEA remains focused on the long-term momentum of PS3. With the industry's best software lineup this year, combined with our most aggressive marketing campaign to date, we remain confident in our approach and the value we're delivering with PS3."
We're not surprised to see this, despite the excitement and anticipation flooding across the Internet. Sony has remained firm in this stance since the start of 2009 when the price drop rumors began, and they haven't wavered an inch. No amount of speculation is going to change this, and we would like to remind you that PSXE's prediction is a price drop towards the end of the year to coincide with the release of Uncharted 2: Among Thieves. Also, this rumor debunk lends more weight to the possibility of a PS2 price cut, so perhaps that's in store for us tomorrow.
3/30/2009 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (105 posts)
WolfCrimson
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 1:03:08 PM
coverton341
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 2:36:55 PM
xnonsuchx
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 10:13:31 PM
Orvisman
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 9:54:44 AM
When Sony adds PS2 compatability back in, it will definitely be through emulation. It has to do it via emulation because there are too many PS3 owners out there with PS3s that don't offer PS2 backward compatability, and they would be pissed that Sony added PS2 support in-hardware again.
xnonsuchx
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 10:03:33 PM
It's not IMPOSSIBLE to do, but it's very unreasonable to assume they really COULD do it well if they wanted.
I always thought they shoulda offered backward-compatibility via hardware in a $40-60 expansion card.
LividFiction
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 1:13:08 PM
Reply
JasperLoons
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 2:22:43 PM
Geobaldi
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 6:30:10 PM
*wipes sweat from brow* Whew, they're not retiring the PS3 just yet. :)
Qubex
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 9:27:29 PM
xnonsuchx
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 2:01:12 AM
Sony just needs to do a better job of convincing people of its worth. Here's an idea..."PlayStation 3 starting @ $399.99...because IT'S not a cheap piece of crap!"
slugga_status
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 1:16:06 PM
Reply
coverton341
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 2:38:47 PM
CH1N00K
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:43:09 PM
That would be kind of funny though..
Sony Spokesperson: "Umm, we called you all here today to inform you that we are going to give the gamers what they've been asking from us for years...Yes that's right, we are going to advertise! Thank you everyone, and have a nice day."
Daedusian
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 5:45:41 PM
slugga_status
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 1:17:25 PM
Reply
HOODGE
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 1:25:37 PM
Reply
Qubex
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 9:28:47 PM
Gone
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 1:26:06 PM
Reply
Last edited by Gone on 3/30/2009 1:30:23 PM
karneli lll
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 1:33:38 PM
Reply
Alienange
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:08:44 PM
CH1N00K
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:45:37 PM
NoSmokingBandit
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 1:51:18 PM
Reply
slugga_status
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 2:08:05 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 2:15:56 PM
Reply
LyleCapua
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 2:31:45 PM
OR, because the entire world is in a recession, the target demographics for the PS3 currently have no money, and at current time, a 400 dollar Blu-Ray player isn't that great of an investment, saving that 100 dollars that Sony should have cut would have been really nice to potential buyers.
Of course, since Sony didn't do jackshit this past holiday season, maybe they're saving it for this coming holiday season -- 50% off Home outfits, anyone?!
LimitedVertigo
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 2:46:35 PM
Um...when the economy spoiled, jobs were lost, and people had less money. You know, the very thing that happened over a year ago and continues today.
Sony is in a tough spot, they chose to make an expensive console. While the capabilities of the PS3 may justify its hefty price the current economic climate leaves most unwilling to justify it with their wallets.
Alienange
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:13:59 PM
LyleCapua
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:28:19 PM
100 dollars makes a HUGE difference in the eye of the consumer, and 300 dollars is a much more reasonable number than 400 dollars.
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:38:01 PM
All I'm saying is it's still worth the money no matter what your situation.
Last edited by WorldEndsWithMe on 3/30/2009 3:38:30 PM
Alienange
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:51:16 PM
www
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 4:47:22 PM
migabyte
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 8:39:47 PM
Cheroqui
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 2:54:16 PM
Reply
I ask because I mean, how long do you have to wait before they let the darn program go? Honestly. PS3 came out what?... Later part of '06 going into '07? It was mentioned as a title before the system released. You have waited so long for it, that you actually have become okay with it not being released and say things like "probably Dec 09 but I doubt it". 3-4 years and not yet? Is 5-6 yrs better?
Well for me I could care less about a price drop on PS2 or PSP.
They swear up and down there is no price drop coming on PS3.(Possible with holidays coming, but if you say so)
As for breaking news on PS4; why even think of mentioning PS4 when you haven't even released GT5 yet?
Gregory Freeman
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:31:07 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:41:27 PM
slugga_status
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 2:56:19 PM
Reply
brandonctl
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 8:42:24 PM
Jordahn
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:24:21 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:50:46 PM
www
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 4:48:56 PM
MyWorstNightmar
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:44:20 PM
Reply
shaydey77
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 5:25:21 PM
tankerkevo
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:49:49 PM
Reply
$400 keeps the kids off of my online games. If you lower that price point quite frankly you lower my investment yields as now I would have to deal with squeeky voices; which is why XBOX Live doesn't get visits from me.
All that said, I hope the news is about an update which provides access to the GPU under Other OS. That would be KILLER. More likely is that NetFlix is coming to PS3. We will see...
Last edited by tankerkevo on 3/30/2009 3:51:33 PM
Alienange
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:58:02 PM
wano
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 6:40:25 PM
Gpu access is bound to lead to emulating some ps3 games under linux, and theres no way they are gona let that happen. At least not till they start making money on the console it self....
nice thought though :)
Last edited by wano on 3/30/2009 6:45:25 PM
Qubex
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 9:33:43 PM
wano
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 6:10:46 AM
I thought if gpu ram was used as swap, it doesnt give a massive performance boost. isnt it just a bit faster than using swap on the hardrive (but not as good as having an extra 256 of system ram)
I havent managed to get ps3vram working on ubuntu yet (cant burn yellow dog at the moment as my dvd burner is knackared ;(.. so i cant see the difference for my self.
maybe I dont understand enough about swap, but what i was meaning was...the other os having access to 512 mb of system ram right out of the box, not 256 of system ram and 256 of swap partition.
If im wrong, I need to be put right, so tell me ;-)
Last edited by wano on 3/31/2009 6:19:36 AM
rell
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 3:58:15 PM
Reply
Highlander
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 4:17:42 PM
Reply
If it's a Playstation announcement, perhaps it's a drop in price for PS2 and PSP, along with putting PS2 compatibility back into the PS3 via firmware. After all if you're cutting the PS2 to it's final price before it exits the market it makes some sense to pave the upgrade path to the new system by restoring PS2 game compatibility on PS3. So that would be Firmware on PS3, with BC, and price drops for PS2 down to $99 or $79, and a drop for the PSP down to $149 or $129.
I don't see PS2 ever going as low as $49 simply because DVD players are at rock bottom now with prices in the region of $30. Considering the fact that the PS2 comes with ethernet, can do progressive scan, plays games and comes with a controller, I just don't see it hitting $49. $79 maybe, but more probably $99. The PSP could take another cut down to $149 or even $129 which would pitch it directly against the cheaper of the two Nintendo DS models, making the PSP something of a no-brainer. Certainly a PSP drop in price like this could feed some more value into the equation of owning a PS3 and PSP since the PSP would now be less costly.
If this is specifically a PS3 announcement, then I don't see them making a song and dance about firmware unless it includes backwards compatibility.
One thing that they could do which would truly rock would be to open up the PS Stores around the world to international purchase. PS3 is supposed to be region free, so there should be no issue buying games from Japan or Europe, especially via PSN. If Sony were to lift that little regional control it would be a significant announcement, both for PS3 and PSP considering the number of PSP games there are with digital delivery in Europe and Japan.
All useless speculation until tomorrow though.
Last edited by Highlander on 3/30/2009 4:19:35 PM
rell
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 4:42:46 PM
Reply
Xbox_Killer
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 5:13:59 PM
Reply
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 5:52:20 PM
Alienange
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 6:24:26 PM
Xbox_Killer
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 7:23:55 PM
King James
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 8:30:17 PM
Xbox_Killer
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 11:42:39 PM
Banky A
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 2:31:16 AM
Robochic
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 5:38:54 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 6:02:39 PM
Reply
Geobaldi
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 6:30:50 PM
LimitedVertigo
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 7:00:59 PM
LimitedVertigo
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 7:01:54 PM
RadioHeader
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 7:02:06 PM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 7:56:36 PM
LightShow
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 9:21:42 PM
I'm aware people go solid on this stuff and crank out a 100% file in 50 hours, but for someone who likes to take his time in a game, burnout was a great investment.
according to my (personally devised) scale of entertainment value, calculated by hours of enjoyment divided by price, adding in the DLC i've gotten, that works out to a LS rating of 2.00, which is fantastic. Thats 50 cents an hour.
King James
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 8:36:19 PM
Reply
cadpig
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 9:35:35 PM
Reply
March 16 (Bloomberg) -- Sony Corp. is under pressure from video-game publishers to cut the price of the PlayStation 3 console or risk seeing more development funds shift to Nintendo Co.’s Wii.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601101&sid=aiHCQM2xNCmU
King James
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 10:28:20 AM
gumbi
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 9:37:09 PM
Reply
I need a cheaper PS3 so I can get a new one and start playing games again. I had just gotten into Valkyria Chronicles when mine went kaputz... and i just can't afford a new one with it's current price tag.
LegendaryWolfeh
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 12:22:28 AM
Jordahn
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 2:47:59 AM
gumbi
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 9:21:50 AM
crawdaddy
Tuesday, March 31, 2009 @ 9:53:00 AM
Reply

See Full Image









crapreviews
Reply
Monday, March 30, 2009 @ 12:51:18 PM