Pachter: Current Console Life Cycle To Be Longest In History
Wedbush Morgan Securities analyst Michael Pachter is a mainstay in video game journalism, and his recent report is well worth your attention.
As summarized by Joystiq, Pachter's massive 200+ page report talks about the future of the industry; specifically, the longevity of the current console life cycle. In this report of novel proportions, he not only pointed out the very real possibility of a WiiHD, but said this generation of consoles will be the longest in history due to HD displays and console SKUs. Pachter indicates the small adoption rates for HD displays and says that unless this changes, the longevity of the consoles currently on the market will expand. Further, if you consider the fact that it costs developers and publishers more than ever to be a part of the industry, you can expect a very long console cycle. In fact, Pachter believes you won't even see console sales hit their peak until "early next decade" (which is next year, of course). In addition, as costs are high and manufacturers are continually looking for ways to make things easier on consumers, multiple SKUs will come into play, as we've seen already. Pachter does mention the feasibility of the PS3 Slim and the upcoming bundles for the Xbox 360, and we can probably expect even more SKUs to come our way in the coming years.
Essentially, this report flies directly in the face of any rumors you may have heard that new consoles will be on sale within the next few years. It just seems very unlikely, according to this analyst.
6/30/2009 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (41 posts)
www
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 5:24:04 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 @ 10:35:09 PM
Reply
godsman
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 12:45:39 AM
Sony on the other hand, has plenty of design potentials before maxing it out. It will stay for a bit.
Also I want to point out to the people that hate Pachter, he is just an analyst. He base his predictions on the present, assuming Sony and Microsoft makes no new moves. Even Nintendo is surprised on how successful the Wii is. You cannot blame Pachter to make his predictions based on business strategies by the three companies as well.
www
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 5:23:30 AM
Qubex
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 10:43:21 AM
BikerSaint
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:47:52 PM
Gregory Freeman
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 12:04:46 AM
LegionGT
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 7:36:28 AM
And still costs over $600, I purchased mine in a GTAIV bundle approx. one year ago for $720.
It is a disgrace. Our games on release (RRP) are $100+
I welcome anyone to do a currency conversion to AUS $ and still try and tell me we aren't getting ripped off over here. :(
bridgera
Thursday, July 02, 2009 @ 2:31:12 PM
Ricochet
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 12:30:00 AM
Reply
As for the PS3, Uncharted 2 better keep up the pace following Killzone 2 and inFamous respectively. That way, the path for Gran Turismo 5, GOW 3 and Heavy Rain will be smoothed out for even third party developers to be more inspired and put more effort to develop high quality titles for the PS3.
A wii HD would be great, I find it pissingly annoying that the Gamecube has more 480p games than it's successor.
Last edited by Ricochet on 7/1/2009 12:30:38 AM
godsman
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 12:48:57 AM
Ricochet
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 6:15:14 AM
Kangasfwa
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 12:56:40 AM
Reply
The xbox is running on old tech (technically) and eventually MS is going to have to accept that its console is the less powerful one. Developers can still make great games, but they probably won't be pushing as many boundries. "Project Natal" is useless and an embarrassment. Can anyone really see themselves playing an RPG for long periods of time or flailing around with "casual" games using the motion camera?
Sony's machine is essentially future proof with its blu ray drive and CELL technology. The PS3 is more consumer friendly with its built in wifi and easily swappable hard drives, unlike both of MS's overpriced add-ons. And its motion tech is designed for real gamers, whether they are "casual" or "hardcore."
Last edited by Kangasfwa on 7/1/2009 1:00:03 AM
Ricochet
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 6:21:17 AM
I agree on your 360 comments but developers are not really making it easy to see that way, from being the "better" looking ports and great exclusives, even other devs are beginning to think that the PS3 exclusives are too overhyped (Hopefully U2, GOW3, GT5 & Heavy Rain) will really show these guys what the PS3 is truly capable of. It's still 3 - 4 years and we're seeing a great future for the PS3.
From what I heard of Project Natal, it can be integrated with games like Mass Effect and Fallout 3, that would really "revolutionize" the gameplay. People have been saying the exact negative things about the Wii-mote but look where it is now?
And yes, Sony's console has always been "future" proof. Only 4 years and it's already showing the other consoles that it's improving at AN ALARMING rate.
Jawknee
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 9:56:56 AM
Kangasfwa
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 5:28:56 PM
Yes, the Wii has a huge install base, but I'm referring to the people who bought the Wii because it was a trendy gadget. I really can't see these "casuals" buying a WiiHD. I own a Wii and I don't see myself buying a WiiHD. Not unless they figure out how to make the motion controls better without having to buy an add on to make the m/c what it should have been in the first place.
Nintendo is sitting on a big pile of money that will not last forever. And while they're sitting on that big pile of money, we get a Zelda tech-demo-game and wii music. They even broke the Metroid series by turning Samus into some generic super ninja just to save face. And they only announced a new Mario just to maintain faith among its followers.
Nintendo's pursuit of the mythical non-gamer market has alienated the user base that kept them alive during the darkest hours of the Gamecube. Nintendo knows this. It's why they've made one pathetic attempt at redemption after another.
That's why I no longer like Nintendo. They have forgotten what it means to be a game company. Sony was rebuffed becuase of their arrogance. Sony took a kick in the pants and learned from it. Nintendo hasn't.
Jawknee
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 6:23:27 PM
Kangasfwa
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 7:00:49 PM
And I'm saying Nintendo doesn't feel the need to release new Zeldas, Marios, or real Metroid games. Other than to pacify those that built their company anyway.
Jawknee
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 7:49:03 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:12:45 AM
Reply
I mean, unless 2160p or 3D 1080p suddenly makes a strong run at the consumer market, virtually every TV purchased in the next 10-20 years will be a 1080p set with HDMI. My PS3 will continue to provide everything needed of a home entertainment system for the foreseeable future and beyond.
So with no real driver for an upgrade cycle, the life of this generation will stretch.
Last edited by Highlander on 7/1/2009 2:15:09 AM
Ricochet
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 10:23:13 AM
So far the PC has always been the "benchmark" of next-generation gaming. As of yet,it has 3 generations of graphic cards beyond that of the PS3 and the 360 and what does it come out with?
CRYSIS!
Seriously, do we need an upgrade?????? PC just lost. All it's now useful as to be the best and stable of all the "ported" games a bonus of having some 360 exclusives and just your everyday "improved" sequels like the Sims 3.
BikerSaint
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:56:12 AM
Reply
slayerkillemall
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 3:06:34 AM
Reply
if its not for resolution,it will be for a better RSX chip (ps3 needs it)with more ram,etc
maybe a faster blu-ray drive,and/or a new optimized cell,ie smaller,faster,more cores,etc
and some other features,about the ps2 backwards compatability,maybe by then it will make bussiness sense to include it in ps4,and keep ps3 as long as it sells (what sony is doing now with ps2) anyway these are just my thoughts...
slayer...
Last edited by slayerkillemall on 7/1/2009 3:12:06 AM
BikerSaint
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 3:43:02 AM
Reply
BigBoss4ever
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 4:33:22 AM
Reply
Dancemachine55
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 5:52:23 AM
Reply
Highlander
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 9:15:23 AM
I think you may be right for the next Xbox, but I think you're looking at 2014 for the next PlayStation iteration, and in both cases I would say that the new console will be an evolution of the one we have today, rather than an entirely new system. Both MS and Sony will be able to take advantage of advances in design and process to bring new PowerPC and Cell processors to their next console. The result should be binary compatible with today's consoles and an order of magnitude (or two) faster.
Last edited by Highlander on 7/1/2009 9:17:41 AM
Qubex
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 10:44:31 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 5:20:28 PM
Absolutely. If the build cost of the PS3 hadn't already been so incredibly high, I think Sony would have included more system memory.
Personally, I think that if they had been able to put 1GB of XDR and 256MB of GDDR3 inside the PS3, we wouldn't even need this discussion about a future PS4.
That said....I think PS4 will arrive in 2013/2014 and will use the latest Cell design with more Power cores and more SPUs. It will likely use a new GPU, but whatever new GPU they use will be capable of emulating the RSX. I'm guessing that the PS4 will feature 4GB of main memory and 1GB of video memory. Anything more would be overkill for a gaming device that only has to render at 1080p. I'll go on record as saying that any future PS4 will contain better video scaling and anti-aliasing hardware.
Button Masher
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 10:36:28 AM
Reply
Highlander
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 5:21:15 PM
Charger7302
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:51:47 PM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 4:53:01 PM
Reply
bridgera
Thursday, July 02, 2009 @ 2:36:51 PM

See Full Image









Danny007
Reply
Tuesday, June 30, 2009 @ 10:01:06 PM