Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2: Less Gore, More Gameplay Content
You can't really say the Ninja Gaiden franchise is exclusive to the Xbox 360; although they had to wait a while, Sony owners finally did get the best version of the first entry in the form of Ninja Gaiden Sigma.
Well, it's happening again with Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2, the PlayStation 3 version of last year's Ninja Gaiden II. However, despite all the additions and extra content, there's one feature that has actually been lessened, and action fans may not like it: according to a recent GamesRadar preview, Sigma 2 will cut back on the blood and gore. They said you will "notice a distinct drop in the amount of blood spilled during fights" and "beheadings now feature a blue magical glow in place of the claret shoulder fountain of before." Why did they do this? Game director Yosuke Hayashi explains:
"Each game has its own concept and with Ninja Gaiden 2, the focus was on extreme violence. But with Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2, we really questioned whether violence is a necessity for a game, so we decided to move away from that trend. So the violence 'approach' is not the way we approached the development of Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2. Being able to unlock higher levels of gore would be out of kilter with the concept of the game."
Okay, we can buy that. And it's all the more acceptable when we realize we're getting a vastly updated version: we'll receive co-op, new playable characters, and all new gameplay courtesy of fresh side missions. This will all add to the longevity of the title, and let's not forget that Tecmo is good at delivering the T&A; they certainly aren't cutting back on the "bounce factor." Rachel is more top-heavy than ever in her tight-fitting leather, and Ayane is a little out of control in her flimsy ninja costume. So perhaps the question is, do you want the blood or the "bounce?"
Well, anyway, we say a bunch of extra content supersedes any cosmetic alterations.
Related Game(s): Ninja Gaiden Sigma 2
7/1/2009 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Subscribe to Ben Dutka on Twitter
Comments (Beta)
ADAM WEST
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 11:17:23 AM
Reply
Last edited by ADAM WEST on 7/1/2009 11:18:01 AM
TheHighlander
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 4:53:33 PM
TheRiceman
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 11:27:24 AM
Reply
godsman
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 11:27:34 AM
Reply
HeXeN
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 12:31:06 PM
Arvis
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:25:04 PM
Arvis
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:07:47 PM
King James
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:47:01 PM
CH1N00K
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:56:19 PM
But I know that some people can't wait to see blood and guts spilling all over the place and some of these games will sell just for that reason. Putting blood and guts in a game is the same as putting in scattered T&A. It's a way to get them off the shelf. If you make a game with both of them? You don't have to worry about a story line, people will still buy it.
Arvis
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 3:17:17 PM
Are the Uncharteds, Metal Gear Solids, and Final Fantasies of this world any less amazing for their lack of gore?
I mean, I'm no saint (former Resident Evil fanatic talking, here) but a step away from the trend of overt brutality in this generation of gaming is both welcome and refreshing. Without the "shock value" crutch to lean on, maybe developers can focus more on simply making a better video game.
-Arvis
HeXeN
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 3:35:36 PM
TheHighlander
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 4:58:51 PM
If the technology allowed, I'd shake your hand. Outstanding comments here. I completely agree.
@Ch1n00k
Regarding extreme gore/blood verses random T&A, which is more objectionable and why? I mean, is it worse to glorify and enjoy depictions of extreme violence and death, or is it worse to enjoy the T&A fluff such as the ladies of Soul Calibur, the DOA girls or Rachel?
Personally I think the violence is the more objectionable. Generally speaking I'll take depictions of things likely to lead to the creation of life over things likely to lead to the destruction of life, but that's just me...
Last edited by TheHighlander on 7/1/2009 5:02:14 PM
Arvis
Thursday, July 02, 2009 @ 11:33:19 AM
HA HA! That was classic! :D
On the subject of sexiness in games: As a man, I admit I like boobies. However, a game like Soul Calibur 4... sometimes the sexiness is just too distracting. Not only that, but I don't like it when all the women's proportions are all a little too perfect. Perfect breasts, perfect flat tummies, perfect hips, perfect faces... I don't know, it's all so unrealistic to me.
I hate "women's television" because the men in it are all objectified and unrealistic. So... if I had no problem with video games that did the same thing to women, wouldn't that be a double standard?
-Arvis
bearbobby
Thursday, July 02, 2009 @ 11:02:36 AM
Button Masher
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 1:04:42 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 1:50:56 PM
Reply
King James
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:47:46 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 3:20:23 PM
King James
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 2:50:08 PM
Reply
RustEDalex
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 3:32:27 PM
Reply
TheHighlander
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 4:57:43 PM
As usual I'm left wondering why people have such a high tolerance for violence, gore, death and horror and such a low tolerance for sex and/or sexy. There seems to be an inordinate amount of upset over a reduction in gore and an equally odd amount of upset over Rachel's enhanced bounce. It seems that some would rather see less cleavage and more cleaving. What an odd set of priorities.
Xbox_Killer
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 4:15:21 PM
Reply
Soultaker
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 4:18:22 PM
Xbox_Killer
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 4:50:33 PM
TheHighlander
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 4:54:59 PM
Xbox_Killer
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 7:20:40 PM
Qwarktast1c
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 6:23:29 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 6:39:37 PM
Reply
G-WiZ199
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 8:23:53 PM
Reply
Soultaker
Thursday, July 02, 2009 @ 1:26:15 AM
bearbobby
Thursday, July 02, 2009 @ 11:19:46 AM
Reply
As to the amount of "bounce" in Rachel and other characters in gaming *cough* (DOA series I'm laughing in your direction), is that neccessary? How about for those of us who don't find that anything but mildly amusing?
Would most of you be ok if the developers started making male characters to attract the female and gay men population? Would you be amused if Kratos had a huge package that bounced from side to side as he beheaded hydras? Would you marvel at the physics, or would you rather not see it?
___________
Friday, July 03, 2009 @ 10:01:58 AM
Reply
why do you think people said holy sh** to GOW3?
because its completly over the top gore and violence.
its the best i cant get enough of it, devs are trying to make games more realistic.
well if i slice some ones head off i expect some red sauce to come out.
im dissapointed in sigma 2 i was hopeing for offline co-op.
is there ever going to be a game like Resistance fall of mans co-op?
some of us do see our friends you know, we dont only talk to them online.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Friday, July 03, 2009 @ 10:17:44 AM
___________
Saturday, July 04, 2009 @ 4:46:21 AM
Reply
somethingrandom
Tuesday, July 07, 2009 @ 5:23:45 PM
Reply

See Full Image

G-WiZ199
Reply
Wednesday, July 01, 2009 @ 11:11:06 AM