PS3 News: Will Sony And Microsoft's Motion Sensing End The Wii's Reign? - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Will Sony And Microsoft's Motion Sensing End The Wii's Reign?

After E3, it seemed like everyone wanted to avoid the obvious question, and while I'm well aware of the number of Wii fankids out there, I can't imagine why the question hasn't at least been addressed in some fashion.

Let's face it: the Wii sells on the gimmick alone. It doesn't sell on the strength of its software as that's essentially non-existent (especially in direct comparison to the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360), and the bottom line is that it appeals to non-gamers everywhere. The gadget hounds love the thing and senior citizens can go bowling. And I will forever have the utmost respect for Nintendo in producing a machine that ingeniously catered to absolutely everyone who wasn't a hardcore gamer, thereby opening themselves up to a gigantic demographic; i.e., everyone who didn't list "gaming" as their primary hobby. However, after sprinting out to a huge lead, Wii sales have slumped worldwide in 2009 and it's entirely because of what I've been saying all along: without software people want to play, no game console can survive, and consumers are immensely fickle. Yeah, they loved the idea of waving that wand around yesterday but today, they desire something more...and Nintendo ain't givin' it to 'em.

Sony and Microsoft, on the other hand, appear poised to do exactly that. The motion sensing technology for both is awfully impressive and I think we can all agree that it's leaps and bounds beyond the Wii, technologically speaking. Now, considering the almost complete lack of "AAA" software on the Wii and looking down the road, it becomes obvious that besides price, the Wii only has motion sensing going for it. But what happens when consumers can't even look at the Wii and say, "that's the only system I can do this with?" What happens when the best motion sensing experiences can be had on other consoles? I guess the big question is, what would the Wii have left? I have always known that unless Nintendo either produced innovative and top-notch software to go along with the gimmick, or they enhanced the gimmick itself, that the Wii would be little more than a fad. Yes, they've basically stomped the competition already, but with sales falling at a ridiculously rapid rate and Nintendo themselves admitting the health of the Wii is poor, we wonder what may happen in the future...

Seriously, what reason could anyone have for buying a Wii once these motion sensing technologies are available for the PS3 and 360? That it's cheaper? I suppose that would be it, and that might be able to keep things going. But you can't use the "oh, it has family-friendly software" excuse because I can absolutely guarantee that both the PS3 and 360 will have such software for these new technologies. In fact, I dare say many of the first games that support the motion sensing will be accessible and safe for all ages. It may blossom, but the bottom line is that Sony and Microsoft seem to be trying to squeeze out the Wii...and as absurd as that sounds, I'm wondering what can actually stop this from happening. Nintendo needs to do something to counter this, wouldn't you think?

7/19/2009 Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (80 posts)

kevinater321
Sunday, July 19, 2009 @ 10:27:53 PM
Reply

I knew the day would come....god damn it came slow enough!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Xra897
Sunday, July 19, 2009 @ 11:36:22 PM

now nintendo can put mario, zelda, and stuff on ps3 and it'll look awesome and be awesome!!

Agree with this comment 8 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Gregory Freeman
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:45:00 AM

maybe nintendo will go out like sega did, and just sell software...

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Swim_Irr
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 1:58:37 AM

Yup... I firmly believe that Nintendo should just lay down their arms and leave Sony and MS to duke it out... We definitely don't need three next-gen consoles on the market.

It might be in their best interest to just do software for the two other consoles from here on out... It would be very sad to see though.

I have a question for the older guys here... I'm 20 years old and my first console was a Genesis. How many multiplatform games were there back then? I was a little too young to acknowledge those sorts of things. Nor do I recall any "fanboyism" between Sony and Nintendo, although I know it existed by reading the comments and stories from the members here on PSXE. Was there just as many multiplats back then as there is now? Or even before my time?

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JohnnyGold
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 6:37:47 AM

im going to see green day tonight.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Orvisman
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 9:47:17 AM

@ JohnnyGold

A bit off topic, don't you think.

Last edited by Orvisman on 7/20/2009 9:47:43 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

kevinater321
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 9:57:04 AM

Yay, you won't be disapointed xD

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kevinater321
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 10:01:13 AM

@Xra897...i don't really think i want nintendo should put mario and zelda on playstation or 360, i don't think it FEEL be right. But then again a sweet zelda could be done right now that playstation is coming out with that superior motion tech. unlike twilight princess.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 11:20:54 AM

Swim, there was Nintendo and Sega fanboyism but it was more playful. My friends little brother the other day told me how the PS3 was for "fags". I asked why he's proceeded to throw out all the talking points. "cost too much, third place, no games, online sucks"etc. Then he started in on me about my iPhone and about how M$ ruled and Apple sucked. iMac sucks blah blah blah. Fanboys have always existed. The nets just given them an amplifier to spew their stupidity and it seems to have gotten worse since MS unleashed the trolls and seem to encourage it by puttng Aaron Greentoad out their. He's the king of trolling.

Last edited by Jawknee on 7/20/2009 11:27:49 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Swim_Irr
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:48:42 PM

Jawknee, I realize that there is and was fanboys. That really wasn't my question though... I was just trying to point out how young I was back when I had a Genesis. I just think that there is a really high percentage of multiplatform games today and I was wondering if that is how it was back with sega and nintendo, as I was too young to remember.

I do appreciate the time you took to write that though, as I am also a Mac and iPhone owner. :) ...And this comment is being written with my iPhone. :D

Was making a multiplatform game as popular back in the Sega-Nintendo days as it is now?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bridgera
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 @ 12:54:38 AM

@Swim

to answer your question about multiplatforming, no, it wasn't anywhere near as common during the NES/Gensis days as it is now. I think a couple of titles such as Mega Man crept onto the Genesis eventually.

Other than that, I can only think of a few titles off the top of my head that hit the SNES & Genesis, Mortal Combat, Street Fighter II, other than that I can't think of much.

Looking at my library of 10 PS3 games, 7/10 are available on the 360. Thinking back to my old NES/SNES, I think I had 1 or 2 titles available on the Genesis.

Multiplatforming is way more common now than back then.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Allelujah00
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:19:27 PM

I completely agree. I do not see Sony advertising this new wand for more than 3 months at the most. Sony's wand is just bound to turn out like the PS eye. Hardly any innovative software is coming for it and it's a real shame. Sony can take Nintendo's reign, IF and only if they support that wand like it's their last hope.

On the other hand, I do see Microsoft advertising their product, I mean it's already been on those late night shows, and it doesn't even have a firm release date yet.Microsoft will support Natal, unlike Sony.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Sunday, July 19, 2009 @ 10:35:03 PM
Reply

It's all 'bout the casual games

The Wii has tons of them. The other two consoles do, but not with motion-sensing.

HOPEFULLY motion-sensing won't "casual-nalize" the ps3................or that other console

But yes as long as those damn casuals are around the Wii we still sell

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Victor321
Sunday, July 19, 2009 @ 10:39:52 PM
Reply

Well, it's been a really long while ever since Nintendo dominated a generation of console gaming, so they're still getting used to it, I guess.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

crump602
Sunday, July 19, 2009 @ 10:45:26 PM
Reply

I think it would be a BIG reality check for NIN because many developers could do, that much more on PS3 or X. So y would they want to save $$$ on development for the Wii, when they can make the TRUE game they wanted to make with out the restraints. Also the online community that Sony & M$ have made would be a major +!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

End of line
Sunday, July 19, 2009 @ 11:38:46 PM
Reply

The Wii's biggest advantage is that it represents fun and not gaming to the casuals. As long as people want to have fun, it will sell. I think this is what Nintendo was capitalising on all along (they've said as much).

I'm not sure if M$/Sony realise this to the extent of what Nin does (it's been their philosophy since day one), and if they do, how will they reposition themselves to appear being as fun. Motion, a slim console? Copying doesnt work when somethings too succesful (well done ipod) so Nin doesnt have much to fear.

@ Scarecrow: I have the same disdain for casuals as you do then I remember the fun factor is what binds us, I'm still to decide if that's good thing lol.

Last edited by End of line on 7/19/2009 11:46:34 PM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

fatelementality
Sunday, July 19, 2009 @ 11:59:14 PM
Reply

Wait....why did I want a Wii before all this?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

piratedrunk
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:12:09 AM
Reply

While I feel that saying Wii sells on gimmick alone is an exaggeration I do agree that Nintendo has been seriously lazy on bringing the software at a pace resembling anything close to acceptable. I bought a Wii for the first party games but even those have been severely lacking this year. Last year I would have comepletely disagreed with you but the way things have been I think you've hit the nail on the head.
Unless Nintendo make some drastic changes the PS3 and 360 will completely void it's place this generation.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Effi
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:20:29 AM
Reply

the thing is there are STILL alot of people out there who do not own a Wii and still thinks that there is only Wii for fun and Xbox for kids.

sony needs to really kick in the advertising machine

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Oyashiro
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:26:12 AM
Reply

I don't think anything can stop the Wii now...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Mornelithe
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:26:54 AM
Reply

Honestly, Nintendo still has their tried and true franchises, that get people foaming at the mouth no matter what they do with the series. Mario, Metroid, Smash Bros., Mario Kart, etc, Nintendo will always have those franchise. Plus, we've no idea what the pricing on these new peripherals from Sony + MS. The Wii will still have that impulse buy appeal...yeah, it's $250, but that's a far cry from the price of a PS3 or 360...unless Sony and MS get to a point where they can afford to bundle the motion sensing stuff, and keep the price of their bundles the same.

Don't get me wrong, I'm with Sony for consoles through and through. But, Nintendo still has a few aces that'll keep people coming back for a long time coming.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:50:19 AM
Reply

I think shock and awe will hit the market once the PS3 price is cut... there maybe many a gamer who own 360's and Wii's and are waiting for an excuse to jump ship... the price cut will be their excuse.

"Motion sensing" will only succeed if the content is made available that really fits that form of entertainment... the problem is I like sitting on my ass playing games... I like being lazy... it feels good, there is no denying it...

I don't think I will purchase the "EYE" just yet, until I see real world games that make full use of the technology sensibly... I don't like the idea of just moving my hands in the air in order to drive a car... your arms would get tired quickly I think...

Sure there will be many applications that this sort of technology could be used for, but would really need to see exactly how far it goes and if it would be so much fun playing in such a way. It could, in all sense and purposes, end up being exhausting and frustrating... try playing in Famous whilst gyrating in front of the "EYE".... aaaggghhh!

Q!

"here's looking at you kid"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 11:49:02 AM

The Eye is cheap and fun. I bought one for Burnout Paradise just to support the smugshots in that game. It doesn't hurt that singstar uses it too.

Actually our 2nd PS3 has one on it as well, then again we bought a second copy of Burnout Paradise so my wife and I could play at the same time, so it makes sense in a twisted sort of a way. She games more than I do now.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Mornelithe
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 11:55:06 AM

Actually, the Eye's greatest achievement imo is the PSN download 'Trials of Topoq'. Not only is it a crazy party game, but it's just plain fun. Control a ball with the movement of your hands through a shitload of track layouts. (The real-time feed of you from the Eye is super-imposed over each 'platform' of the course. Each platform is cut up into 40-50 smaller tiles...the movement of your hand(s) causes the tiles to lift, creating a ramp, moving the ball.)

I've had a ton of fun with it though, it can take a bit to get the right lighting, and making sure you're torso is absolutely still is hard to get used to, but once you do....that game is a blast.

Also use they Eye for long-distance communication, for picture stamps in LittleBigPlanet, and making movies in secrecy, of people who get way to hammered at my house. Most amusing to show a room full of people (the person included), the footage.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dealnightfire
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:59:01 AM
Reply

The Wii will still be fine as long as the 360/PS3 do not come bundled with the motion tech.

Add-ons don't do well in the video game market. The Wii does well because instead of making it an add on to the Gamecube they just bundled it with a beefy gamecube and Wii Sports.

A soon as a person gets a Wii they can play motion games. They didn't have to run out and buy an add on and Wii Sports was ready to go.

For motion tech to take off on both they have to bundle it with systems which guarantees devs that a lot of people will have them.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 1:56:28 AM

I feel honor bound to point this out since so very many people are utterly ignoring it.

The PS3 DOES come with motion sensing built in. It's called Sixaxis and it works bloody well actually.

Try playing High Velocity Bowling for instance, it demonstrates just how good Sixaxis can be. Ratchet and Clank made good use of it, as have other games. Lair made excellent use of the motion sensing features - but alas no one really gave it much of a chance, apparently Dragons should fly like F-16s with flight sticks and the like, instead of a set or reigns.

But the point is, that PS3 comes with motion sensing technology already. I've said before that if Sony ever puts any effort into combining the Sixaxis with the PS Eye capabilities they could far exceed what the Wii has to offer. The new stuff Sony showed at E3 was a development of that, and unlike the tech shown by MS, Sony has been developing their technology for years in real products.

Back to the point though. The PlayStation 3 *already* comes with a motion sensing controller. It has done so since launch day.

Agree with this comment 9 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bridgera
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 @ 12:59:15 AM

I love the PS3, but have only played with the motion controller a bit. I used it in Heavenly Sword and Marvel Ultimate Alliance.

In MUA, it was utter crappily implemented. In Heavenly Sword, well it was cool, but I personally shut it off the second time through and used the stick, and god, did that make life easier.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

bebestorm
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 1:55:56 AM
Reply

I think the Wii will be fine because even though they've done extremely well there are people waiting for the price to drop just like the ps3.. As you said PS3 and Wii crowds are not one in the same. As others have said "how much will Sony's motion controller cost" . Personally Im not interested in Sony or Microsofts motion controls. When I game I want to throw myself into to the game not go through the motions.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 2:26:51 AM
Reply

The Wii is awesome.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 2:34:00 AM

I think you put a 'we' where an 's' was required...




<j/k>

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 3:25:35 AM

Ha!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 3:26:33 AM
Reply

hell no.
because of all the software they have.
zelda is as popular as it ever was.
same with sonic mario all their team players.
i remember reading a article a few weeks ago saying that wii fit has reached and sold more copies than the holy halo 3.
now thats a achievement, i would love to see a ps3 title to do that.
also because of there kid friendly image.
a family friend of mine, hes freaking 15 and his parents wont let him watch star wars movies, or play the games.
hes 15 and hes not allowed to watch or play anything rated over PG, theres tuns of families out their (sadly i feel so sorry for the kid, hes the only one who does not know star wars, at school he talks about shows his friends stoped watching 5 years ago) that are like that and thats why nintendo are not going anywhere but straight to the top.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Alienange
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 9:00:57 PM

Out of all the nonsense you wrote I only understand one thing. That Zelda is as popular as ever. The last console Zelda game to come out was three years ago. To a 15 year old, three years is ancient history. Zelda is not as popular as you think. The franchise has been reduced to DS games with not a whiff of a console Zelda in the wind.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

TEG3SH
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 4:12:09 AM
Reply

nothing can beat the wii now not natal,milo or sony's motion sensing thingy.

the wii is like an infection that had already spread in ur whole body and the doctors cant do nothing about it( double negation i know i kinda feel naughty)lol

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

SkantDragon
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 4:17:08 AM
Reply

I think Sony and Microsoft are jumping onto the motion sensing fad after it's already run its course.

The market ingredients that turned Wii into a runaway seller are unique and not unlike the Tickle Me Elmo or Cabbage Patch Kids fads.

I've always thought that the Wii would end up fading out sharply once the fad was over with and the cool kids were all onto the next gadget. I have to admit it took a lot longer than I thought it would, and the Wii has had a great run in the meantime. But from this point, there's nothing Nintendo or anyone can do to recapture the fad. The Wii is going to fade away fast now.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Gogaku
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 5:28:41 AM
Reply

I really dont believe that the Wii will fall when the other systems get motion sensitive controllers. They have too big of a base already, and they have it with people that never would pick up another type hand control. I dont think people view the Wii as a videogame, and thats where Nin has benefitted. Videogames are for children and nerds, but the Wii is for everyone.

I also think that with all the cash that Nin has gotten from the Wii, they are already close to finishing up the development of their next console, probably something you hook up to your brain.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 5:50:16 AM
Reply

I feel like the Wii is the perfect gateway for non-gamers to get into something thats good, like the PS3 or 360.

When people see how much better the EA Sports lineup is on a next gen console, combined with motion tech and better graphics and online scoreboards and online multiplayer thats much easier to manage than Wii, many people will begin trading for the superior console.

I'm not saying everyone will, but there will be a large majority. Many Wii owners are budding gamers ready to learn about what real games are like. In case no one has noticed, theres very few M and MA rated games on the Wii, so when all these Wii kids grow up, they will hook onto the next Xbox and Playstation which will have all the best mature games for them.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

KevinCairo
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 6:29:22 AM
Reply

Problem is that an accessory will not make one console outsell another, especially considering the hype built up behind the wii and the release of wii sports resort or whatever -- more crack for the addicts.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

cowboy828
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 7:06:42 AM
Reply

they also have to be cheap to defeat the wii.
even though after you buy all the parts it as much as a ps3 but that overall price is cheap.
I hope this move consoles

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ShadowRunner
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 7:16:32 AM
Reply

I have a feeling I am not going to use the motion sensing much, I just want to sit back and enjoy a game. Also there's always the challenge of mastering the button combos that gives you the excitement and satisfaction of doing tricks/moves right.
I'll just wait and see how motion sensing works on PS3.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

A2K78
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 8:15:23 AM
Reply

No and you know why? Well history have taught us that add-ons don't sell and developers(even though some seem passionate aboutt them) don't take advantage of them. So in the end both motion-sensing devices already have failure written them on just like those in the past.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

kevinater321
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 10:32:05 AM

I think that this will work for microsoft because....well they have money to throw around. but this has already happened to sony, the eye toy didn't sell well so they might of learnt from eyetoy and will change there business strategy. And why say add-ons don't sell well, do you remeber a little thing called guitar hero?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

NoSmokingBandit
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 9:52:21 AM
Reply

I always find Ben's stance on the Wii a bit odd. The only reason i own a wii is because of the games, not because of the motion controls. Super Mario Galaxy, LoZ:TP, Mario Kart, Wii Sports, Metroid, SSBB, Super Paper Mario, and de Blob all get regular play on my wii. Sure, almost half of those are Mario titles, but if its a good game i am gong to play it.
Sure, the wiimote is kinda essential to a game like Wii Sports, but it doesnt fell gimmicky in that game, it just fells right.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 10:15:54 AM

What of those games came out recently, and which would you play without the motion sensing?

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 10:24:28 AM

Well it's not that the Wii doesn't have good games.

It has some AMAZING games: Mario Galaxy, Tales of Symphonia 2, Mario Kart Wii, Zelda: Twilight Princess, Super Smash Bros. Brawl, etc.

But most of them came out the first two years....

The Wii's STRONG software died after Super Smash Bros. Brawl.

We took a look at what Nintendo was gonna bring at last year's E3 and that's when we figured out that motion-controller isn't really innovating as Nintendo thought it would.

Where Ben, I, and everyone else agrees is that the Wii has no good games anymore nor is it promising much in the future. Well actually they did show some really strong games at E3. But for the most part the Wii is a casual gamer's console...

We're bashing Nintendo because of how good their software lineups used to be. Nintendo 64? Gamecube?

Look at the gems which came for those consoles. They actually were as good as Sony's. Bringing in innovative games like Pikmin, Animal Crossing, etc.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

NoSmokingBandit
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 10:52:17 AM

Anything but Wii Sports would work well without motion sensing, and i would play them regardless, but thats the point i was making. I bought my wii for its games, not the motion sensing jazz. If those games were available for ps3 without any motion sensing i would have bought them for ps3 instead of buying new hardware.

I do agree that the wii's game release schedule has been pretty terrible, but most nintendo consoles only see one Mario and Zelda title a generation anyway. Im a huge Zelda fan, and SMG is one of the best games i've played this generation, so its worth it *for me* to own a wii just for those games.

I like what nintendo is doing by branching out into something new, but it is still all about the games, and the wii had quite a few good ones early on.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 11:05:42 AM

Well, regardless of what you like, there just isn't enough software. Will ANYTHING come out in 2009 for the Wii that can be considered "AAA"?

Most all of those games are old and there doesn't appear to be anything on the horizon. When I say the Wii has no software, I'm really talking about the current situation...and I'm being literal.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

NoSmokingBandit
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 8:51:27 PM

I agree with you about the wii's games, but anyone expecting more than one Zelda or Mario title a generation doesnt know how nintendo works. The main point i was trying to make is that some people actually did buy the wii for its games, not just the motion sensing stuff.

We need to ask if Nintendo even gives a crap if the wii keeps selling. They've been rolling in money for the past few years between the DS and Wii, so they could kill it off early and start a WiiHD or whatever.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kevinater321
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 10:20:05 AM
Reply

I just had a brain wave...alright hear me out. They should have 2 mothion controllers in a box, that comes with the ps eye and have analog controls on each but also have that ball top. BUT shape each controller as half of the Dualshock 3 but add like stuff so it is easy to hold. so then there could be some sweet fps without motion control. Make it kind of like two nunchuks but with the directional pads and the x o square and triangle and with the ball on the top. and then package it with every ps3 and take out the Dualshock 3 but add this motion control, but name it something catchy like microsoft did with natal. and nintendo did with the wii...."wii":P. But also have the option to have the dual shock 3 aswell. Also be able to change the ball with different weights so if you are playing baseball make it feel different than a butterfly net. And sorry about the typos.

So, this is what i basically said, have the ps3 slim packaged with 2 psmotes and an eyetoy, each one will be a differnt hand and have dif buttons on each, so on the left hand you have the left side you have directional and left anaglog, and right...well you know what i mean...different attachable weights...keep D3 as an option for the hardcore...catchy name....sorry about the typos....ya my venting is done :P

Last edited by kevinater321 on 7/20/2009 10:25:56 AM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

GlavinChris
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 10:34:23 AM
Reply

This may just be me, but personally I do not want to compete with the Wii. I don't want games that are geared to the "casual" consumer, I like all things "hardcore" (every pun intended).

I fear that many of the consoles may be heading in the casual direction.

-The Glavin

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 11:22:36 AM

What if, rather than competing with Wii, Sony offers a grown up motion sensing interface for games that can use it, providing a complementary rather than competing platform. Wouldn't this put Sony in the position of the next logical step for the so called casual gamers who perhaps are looking for something a bit more grown up?

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kevinater321
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 10:44:28 AM
Reply

Oh! i had another brainwaze! what if that ball was atachable to the current D3! or if you could just buy a pack of like 20 for 10 bucks and then stick it all over your body, asuming that it is all that is needed, kind of like motion capture :P but imagine what natal would do to the movie industry, they could sell hardware for it, no actor should ever where those ping pong balls again!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 11:19:08 AM

No. Just, no.

Natal is neither high resolution enough, nor responsive enough for Hollywood (neither movies nor TV) to use.

That's the interesting thing about what Sony brought to the table, it is as accurate and responsive as anything that Hollywood uses. It almost seems as though Sony has brought some of the technology from it's Movie business into the game business.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kevinater321
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:54:09 PM

Well i don't know how responsive either was so i can't really compare but the ps mote does LOOK more useful but knowing microsoft and there money then they will no doubt advertise the hell out of natal. And i was thinking yesterday, it would feel wierd playing tennis or baseball with your hands, but you could put anything inside of your hands. You could play tennis with a real tennis racket in your hand. or baseball with a real baseball bat, and so on. But it would be hard throwing a ball wih out hurting your tv....

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

somethingrandom
Friday, July 24, 2009 @ 12:56:23 AM

just throw a really soft ball. pillowy soft...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

PS3addict
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 11:25:37 AM
Reply

Being a gamer for over 25 years, I want Nintendo to continue wit hthe legacy of thier games .Legend of Zelda, Mario kart, Mario Brothers, Punchout, Contra, Metroid, Kid Ikarious, Donkey kong, Castlevania, Street Fighter, & many many more games made thier appearance on the nintendo system. I have a wii for the Nintendo games that are only available for that system. I hae a emulator for all of my other nes, snes and nes643 roms to play on the wii. It is MY nintendo, and I love it. When I want graphics, I play my PS3, when I want memories (and occasional wierd looks from my kids and complaints of "Crap graphics" I play an old school game.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 12:23:59 PM

If you're only playing the PS3 because of "graphics," I think something's off.

I have a special fondness for Nintendo, too, but the Wii is completely incapable of delivering the immersive experiences I get with the PS3 and 360. As much as I love the old-school Nintendo, I really don't see how any of the new installments in classic franchises are anything worthy of my time.

It's why my SNES is still hooked up in the bedroom. ;)

Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 7/20/2009 12:24:32 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

PS3addict
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 3:23:53 PM

Ben, Never meant to say that the only reason I play my PS3 is for the graphics, I play it because I love to game and love to be sucked into a game. I re-read and could not edit. Lots of spelling errors too...

I have over 30 games for my PS3 beast and play it daily. I was trying to state that the Wii has it's place in my gaming world, most of the games I do play on it or last gen or older, and older and ... yeah they are really old, but they bring back memories.. I used to dust off the NES and SNES every once in a while, but now that I have roms of all of my old school memories, the wii does get used for more than getting pissed off at Twighlight princess. Freakin "Point the remote at the TV" I AM!!!

Another thing about the Wii is Houe of the Dead. Love shooting me some zombies! I do not care for overkill with the volume up due to the always loud "F" bombs. Cussing is OK in moderation, but that game pushes it over the edge. 190 times in a game??? K, that is Overkill!!

Last edited by PS3addict on 7/20/2009 3:28:57 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

tlpn99
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 1:02:35 PM
Reply

I like playing the Wii but I would never get one as I love my PS3 and 360 for the gaming needs in my life. When I was at my friends recently we played on his Wii bowling and a bit of a go on the golf (Wii Sports pack). The Wii is good with someone else or agroup of you.

I am not too sure if I would get the motion controller for either the PS3 or 360. It is ok for a bit of a laugh with your mates but I dont wanna be waving my arms round and jumping all round the place when playing my games on the PS3 and 360.


Last edited by tlpn99 on 7/20/2009 1:03:16 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

556pineapple
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 2:11:36 PM
Reply

I see the Wii as more of a gateway console. Non-gamers try it because they're curious, and that could very well lead to the hardcore consoles. I don't know too many serious gamers that have one, they've all experienced the good stuff, or in the 360's case, the slightly diluted good stuff. Either that or they've gotten too old and want to settle down without giving up gaming.

As far as motion sensing goes, it's cool, but I have a hard time as seeing it as much more than a gimmick. The sixaxis works well with a few PS3 games, but for the most part it doesn't do much. I don't think the Wii will disappear, because it is significantly cheaper than either the PS3 or 360.

Last edited by 556pineapple on 7/20/2009 2:14:46 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 8:56:30 PM

LOL

You stole my comment!!! Scroll up and you will see why.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

556pineapple
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 11:27:16 PM

Haha, didn't even notice that. When there are so many comments, I can't read all of them. Oh well, everyone knows that your was first anyway.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

jerocarson
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 3:59:48 PM
Reply

speechless

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

CH1N00K
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 4:02:39 PM
Reply

I think Nintendo will be fine, they'll be around for a little while still. The Wii may slowly dissapear, but Nintendo's already made enough money off of it to support them for a while. They just need to decide now if they are going to finally take a leap into a more mature audience, or if they are going to be content with being the "casual" gaming company. Or maybe they've already figured out how to be both, they're just waiting to launch the next generation of console to build up the hype all over again..



Last edited by CH1N00K on 7/20/2009 4:03:46 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

BikerSaint
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 4:46:21 PM
Reply

To me, all ideas are gimmicks, only some turn into the thoughts of "wow, what a genius" as they grow into fruition & prosper as now-mainstream useage.

And, Ninty's not going to fade away anytime soon, especially since they've made more profit on their Wii, than Sony & MS combined. There will always be more gimmicks to come up with.
That's what made this generation so good(overall, that is).

But mark my words, the PS3 "will" own this console generation soon, just as it has in the last two console generations. And just as it will in the next gen console wars too.

The other consoles may be the quicker hares off the starting gate, but the Sony tortiouse will always run right over them before the finish line, and all while it takes it's own sweet time, "just strolling along!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JoshBall
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 5:21:40 PM
Reply

I don't think we needed to ask the question haha, we all knew it!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ricochet
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 6:32:11 PM
Reply

Regardless, I think it's a bit too cocky to dismiss the Wii as it has performed were no console has DONE before. And I give good credit where it's due.

Fact:

- Most of the Wii's sales are made by the non-gamer demographic. A target THEY THEMSELVES made. So it's a big victory for them. Why we're criticizing about them not targeting the hardcore gamers is beyond me.....

- The Wii had more demand than it could supply. That shows how unexpectedly popular it is.

- Tries to break they "stereotypes" that video games are bad. And with such demand for non-gamers, I applaud them!

- "Gimmicks" don't sell, REVOLUTIONARY does.

- And now we have more console-savvy players in the gaming market....


The PS3 and 360:

They're now eating at the Wii's entrails. They want to conquer the demographic that the Wii dominated for so long. That's like saying the Wii will GREATLY surpass the XBL online.

360 and PS3 has no experience bringing the non-gamers to the market. What makes you think they can now? Oh, wait... thanks to the Wii, the non-gamers may opt to find something new. Let's face it guys, the Wii won flawlessly, it penetrated the proverbial wall of the non-gamers, now the PS3 and 360 are now to pick up the sloppy seconds.

But let's see what the future Natal and the unnamed PS3 controls would bring......

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

crawdaddy
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 7:38:06 PM
Reply

Ben, you and most ps3, and xbox 360 people still just don't get it, do you! Blinded by the hardcore, and all these serious exclusives ect... you just lose sight that Ninetendo games are just fun, and always have been way before Microsoft, or Sony ever heard of gaming. It is not just about motion sensing, it is about lots of great games by Ninetendo even if all hardcore gamers can't see it. Ninetendo games are just a lot of fun. Ninetendo will be here strong whether Microsoft, and Sony does.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Kangasfwa
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 8:15:49 PM

I own six wii games, only one is third party. Are six games enough to justify a 250 dollar purchase?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Alienange
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 9:04:42 PM

crawdaddy are you freakin' blind? WHAT games? Have you been to Toys R Us in the past three years? There's nothing for the Wii but rehashed Gamecube games with tacked on motion controls! Get real. I played Mario Tennis. Loved it. Now the latest release by Nintendo for the Wii is ... MARIO TENNIS??!!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

crawdaddy
Tuesday, July 21, 2009 @ 8:54:58 AM

@alienange: I have a couple of examples for you. At The Movie Gallery game rental store, it has 1 rack of ps3 games, but has 3 racks of wii games. Also at WalMart, they have 2 racks of ps3 games, but has 3 racks of wii games. The wii does have a lot of fun games. The wii hasn't outsold all other systems for no reason. Lots of other people like Robochic say they have plenty of games for their wii. Quit being in denial!!!

Last edited by crawdaddy on 7/21/2009 8:59:39 AM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Kangasfwa
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 8:13:34 PM
Reply

"Seriously, what reason could anyone have for buying a Wii once these motion sensing technologies are available for the PS3 and 360?"

Hope for another real Metroid game?

Nintendo can't even deliver good hardcore games and I've played the bloody mess that is madworld. I haven't been able to try the conduit yet, though.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Alienange
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 8:50:11 PM
Reply

Woooah ! Slow down there. "they've basically stomped the competition already" ?

Doesn't really match the statement:

"opening themselves up to a gigantic demographic; i.e., everyone who didn't list 'gaming' as their primary hobby"

360 and PS3 were initially both geared towards those who DO list gaming as their primary hobby. Can't say Nintendo stomped the competition. They didn't have any competition for the market they were after. As a matter of fact, if Nintendo was trying to win over those whose primary hobby is gaming by coming out with the Wii, one could say that it is THEY that have been stomped.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 9:06:21 PM
Reply

I think the real competition against Nintendo is the iPhone. Both are catered to the casual demographic.

PS3 and 360 are in competition for the hardcore demographic. By introducing motion controls for both, they are expanding their accessability for both hardcore and casual. If both 360 and PS3 have the fun software to support these motion controls, then they may sell quite well.

Quite frankly, I believe the PS3 may fair better than 360 for its motion controls being much more accurate, having triggers and buttons with the motion controls similar to the Wii, and Sony is pushing for more AAA software to sell the console.

However, I feel Natal will sell more at first simply because of the aggressive marketing and hyping that Microsoft are very well known for.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

dveisalive
Monday, July 20, 2009 @ 11:19:27 PM
Reply

With the revenue that is all out for Wii, it will take Sony and Microsoft a while to be successful, because of the user base. I can't imagine all of the 360 and PS3 users converting to Wii-like controls overnight. I know i would/will but I dont know about the rest of you.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Robochic
Tuesday, July 21, 2009 @ 8:38:29 AM
Reply

I like my Wii i have plenty of games for it. To me I can't see PS3/360 even really competing with the Wii, Sony and M$ take on their motion tech is going to be very different, plus I don't think nintendo gives a flying crap they've been around for a long time, i just wish they wouldn't push the game so quickly then STOP.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Milonakis
Tuesday, July 21, 2009 @ 11:28:41 AM
Reply

Nintendo will not die. They have all sorts of tricks up their sleeves. They probably have some new genius design coming that will blow everyone away and start a new fad.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

jagstatboy
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 @ 12:13:07 PM
Reply

Let's face it: the Wii sells on the gimmick alone” – oh so no one buys a Wii to play games developed by Nintendo like SMG, SSBB, Kart, Zelda, etc. Or for Virtual Console. Oooook.

“However, after sprinting out to a huge lead, Wii sales have slumped worldwide in 2009 and it's entirely because of what I've been saying all along:” – oh so the global economy has nothing to do with it…not to mention the fact that Wii sales would have declined no matter what given the torrid pace at which they have been selling.…but we’re to believe it’s ENTIRELY because of what YOU have been saying. You also ignore the fact that the Wii still outsells the other consoles.

Seriously, what reason could anyone have for buying a Wii once these motion sensing technologies are available for the PS3 and 360? Are you being serious when asking that or is that a joke? Please tell me you’re joking.
You sure do state a lot of your opinions as fact. Look, I absolutely LOVE my PS3. But I have a Wii also and without it, there are a great many games I would not be able to play. I’m not saying it’s as good as the PS3 hardware-wise or graphics, of course it’s not. The Wii is a different experience and a fun one and that is why we play video games – to have fun.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LastHour
Wednesday, July 22, 2009 @ 2:38:27 PM
Reply

As much as I feel the Wii's time in the spotlight is over, I can't deny that it wasn't fun. I'm a hardcore gamer, and I play on Xbox 360 and will be a PlayStation 3 gamer within the next two weeks. I like the games they have to offer, but for fun play with my family, they just don't work. The Wii is simple and easy to play, and that's why it sells so much. It's about being able to pick up and play. I love to play Call of Duty 4, but my parents just don't want to sit and learn all of the controls, which are (to them) extremely complicated.

So, like I said before, it's not dead, or going anywhere. It's still gonna have its AAA Nintendo titles, and it's crappy third party titles. It's just not getting the attention it once had. The 360 and PS3 might succeed with the motion sensing thing, because to me Natal seems really cool, and I like the PlayStation 3 Eye, and I want to play that Eye of the Beholder game on it (that looks so friggin AWESOME). But then as many other posters have said, the motion sensing might go over as another Sega CD, as much as I hate to make that comparison. People might see it as another one of those Wii ripoff things (Did anyone see Ashen's review of the Vii?) and might not buy it. Only time will tell.

And to kevinater321, Guitar Hero wasn't an add on as much as a game with a special peripheral. You can't say it failed, because it's madly popular, and because not many 3rd party devs take advantage of it, where as with Natal and whatever it is that Sony's gonna have, third party devs might try and shove shovelware to the two "hardcore" console.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

uwvark27
Thursday, July 23, 2009 @ 7:26:05 AM
Reply

"Wii sales have slumped worldwide in 2009"

But haven't ALL the systems sales been in a slump and not just Wii? I think so.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

The PS4 exclusive(s) reveal in December will be...
MEGATON! Biggest thing evah!
Pretty great, but not mind-blowing.
Something decent but that's it.
A waste of hype.

Previous Poll Results