Obsidian On Sex In Games: Simply "Part Of Human Interaction"
Earlier, we learned that Obsidian Entertainment wasn't going to offend anyone with the "tasteful yet satisfying" sexual content in their upcoming RPG, Alpha Protocol. But some say it's still unnecessary.
Not true, says lead creative designer Chris Avellone. He was asked if sex is only in video games to titillate the teenagers, and Avellone responded:
"I think it's an important step, and it's not sex for sex's sake, but it's part of human interaction that makes you more involved in the game world and your characters. Just like in the real world, sex runs the range from entertainment to a symbol of the depth of feeling between two people, and not having that reflected in a role-playing experience feels does RPGs an injustice."
And while gamers everywhere just roll their eyes when sex in games becomes heavily controversial in the mass media, we all know that much of the mainstream media hasn't realized that gaming moved beyond the realm of "toys" about a quarter-century ago. After all, sex in movies is hardly anything new, and it has been known to be essential to the plot and not merely for the sake of extra viewers. So why is it a subject at all? Well, Avellone equates video games more to TV than to film, saying sex will need to be more acceptable on mainstream TV and when that happens, "games won't be far behind."
Well, that's one way to look at it. But we'll just take the logical route: games have ratings, and some are designed for adults. Games have stories, and if that story benefits and/or needs sexual content for authenticity or realism purposes, than so be it. If it's just gratuitous, forget it. ...there, that wasn't so hard.
Related Game(s): Alpha Protocol
8/5/2009 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (37 posts)
Highlander
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:13:16 AM
Jawknee
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:30:02 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:36:04 AM
It offends me no end that you jump on your moral high horse talking about promiscuity and yet seem to be willing to excuse death and violence in the same breath.
Jawknee
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:44:01 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 12:00:27 PM
I'm done discussing this topic with you in this or any thread, your stubborn refusal to see the simple contradiction in your position makes productive discussion impossible.
Last edited by Highlander on 8/5/2009 12:01:57 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 12:25:53 PM
I hold a Psychology degree and trust me when I say, there are NUMEROUS studies that prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that viewing violence in any form of media during the young, developmental stages of human development can and DOES increase aggressive behavior, resistance to authority figures, and choosing to resort to violence before trying peaceable actions.
On the flip side, while the positive correlation between sexual situations and dysfunctional behavior is also evident, it's actually not anywhere near as cut and dry. I've studied this a great deal. Anybody who says sex has more of a negative impact than violence is WRONG, regardless of personal experience.
Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 8/5/2009 12:26:51 PM
Jawknee
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 12:29:16 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 12:40:32 PM
Maybe if you actually do some research on a subject before making claims, you won't look so foolish in the words you DO use.
Last edited by Ben Dutka PSXE on 8/5/2009 12:41:26 PM
Jawknee
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 12:49:40 PM
CH1N00K
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 1:09:47 PM
One of the main reasons you don't go out and kill people after watching a violent movie? Umm..it's illegal and the consequences are much more severe if you get caught doing it then if you get caught having sex.
Now I am going to say that there are very few movies out there where sex has actually advanced the plot any. For bad movies, they use those scenes to make sales. For good movies they help give the audience a feel for the deepness of the relationship between characters.
In the end it's going to depend on the director, and with games it will be the same thing.
Is it necessary? Not really, they can always do "James Bond" style of love scenes if need be. Not much nudity but portrays character development and attachments. But if I see a Ratchet and Clank's: Quest for Booty: Adult Version? No thanks.
Highlander
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:06:04 AM
Reply
One thing about saying that games, like movies, have ratings and some are designed for adults. The only trouble I have there is that proponents of 'adult entertainment' will use precisely that argument to push games in the world of adult entertainment. I just hope that by the time that starts to happen, the game market and media are mature enough to realize that such games are like top shelf magazines and movies that carry NC-17 or X ratings. I don't advocate their creation, but I am sure that it will happen.
englishgolfer
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:06:58 AM
Reply
Phoelix
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:13:36 AM
Reply
And 99.9% of unrated movies are as such so they can show, ahem, breasts.
They've got something bigger on their hands than video games.
Jawknee
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:32:57 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:39:21 AM
Not all wall-Mart locations are as good at enforcement as yours, and not all retailers are as concerned about it. However the biggest issue is parents who don't give a damn, buying M rated games and R rated movies for the home and not controlling their use. Stores failing to enforce ratings is a small part of the problem, parents failing to enforce ratings at home is a monster by comparison.
Jawknee
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:47:56 AM
Last edited by Jawknee on 8/5/2009 11:49:24 AM
vicious54
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 12:10:02 PM
Phoelix
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 8:28:55 PM
556pineapple
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 11:50:36 AM
Reply
Jordahn
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 12:12:25 PM
Reply
Ultimadesires
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 12:32:36 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 3:19:28 PM
chucknasty
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 1:59:02 PM
Reply
BTNwarrior
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 2:51:41 PM
Reply
I mean this wouldn't be the first RPG to do it, anyone remember how sex was in Fallout 2? If you played that game you probably don't remember it just as the game that had sex in it, you just remember it as a great game that had a lot of depth and character development.
Last edited by BTNwarrior on 8/5/2009 2:52:01 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 3:24:10 PM
Reply
<insert righteous personal opinion here>
Anyone remember Quantic Dream's first game Omikron? You had sex in the first 10 minutes.
Last edited by WorldEndsWithMe on 8/5/2009 3:24:22 PM
Crabba
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 5:24:28 PM
Reply
What's funny is like 90% of popular games are about killing people, and somehow that's almost never a problem at all. Games like Gears of war, Resident evil, Resistance, killzone are basically all about killing people as brutally and with as much blood coming out as possible, with little to no story behind them at all, yet that never stirs any controvery.
BTW I've played violent games since I was a kid, and even (the horrors) played promiscuous games like Leisure suit Larry (call the Governator immediately Hawknee!!) and I wouldn't hurt a fly (ok actually I do but I don't think that's from watching The Fly back in the day...)
___________
Thursday, August 06, 2009 @ 4:15:05 AM
Reply
i was watching R rated movies when i was bloody 10, my firs was blade love that movie an old time classic.
hell i remember playing doom and duke nukem when i was like 8.
theres allot of lebs at my tafe now there aggressive even look at them and they will bite your head off.
im sick of the media using games as a scapegoat, im surprised they havent found a way to blame 911 on video games yet...... give them time.
its BS like this is why i have to put up with games constantly getting banned.
fallout 3 got banned for having the word morphine in it.
but than i saw a epp of south park today where the 6th graders are smoking weed.
drug use in a cartoon show is ok for a M rating.
drug use in a game is not ok for a MA rating.
M has no age restrictions.
MA has a 15+ restriction.
im lost.
same with violence in underworld she slices the guys head in half and you can see his brain.
thats fine for a MA movie, but dark sector got banned because it has head removing.
im lost shouldent games and movies be treated the same?
whats MA for a movie should be MA for a game, not MA for a movie and R for a game its just stupid.
whats the difference of watching something and watching yourself do something.
i can imagine whats going to happen to saw the game, i just watched a trailer where you open a door than your head explodes. classic!
looks like another game im getting of ebay.
Highlander
Thursday, August 06, 2009 @ 12:07:41 PM
___________
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 10:03:48 AM
Reply
dazy
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 9:45:35 PM
Reply
That's crap. "a lot of these parents" with kids of an age that this matters, would probably be about my age(40-ish or thereabouts) and they damn well know better. They're parents, not morons who exist in oblivion. They watch TV, they read the news, they speak and interact with other humans, so I'm fairly certain that they are aware of the issues.
And come on people. Assuming we are the intelligent beings we claim to, don't we know the difference between TV/movie/book/game violence and sex, and actual reality? Just because I see it/hear it/read about it/play it doesn't mean I'm inclined to do it. Anyone that's that swayed by a fantasy world has bigger issues than we can fix here.

Alpha Protocol









robinhood2010
Reply
Wednesday, August 05, 2009 @ 10:53:05 AM
Simply, if it offends you or you do not like it, do not buy it.