Best Buy: We'll Match Used Prices On Our New Games
GameStop has already conducted a study to examine the possible impact of the emergence of the digital game format; now, they may want to do another one to counter a big move by Best Buy.
This isn't official but the evidence is plain, and when we can contact a few stores in the area (they're all closed now), we might be able to clarify and confirm the situation. According to Kotaku, Best Buy is looking to take a chunk out of GameStop and Game Crazy's pre-owned games business. As most of you know, a huge amount of GameStop's revenue is generated by those millions of pre-owned titles that change hands every single day. After all, the publisher and developer don't see a dime of a pre-owned purchase; it's 100% profit for the retailer, and furthermore, a used game often costs only $5 less than a new one. But hey, people love to save money so it's a tough situation, despite the fact that game creators everywhere really despise the whole "pre-owned" game idea. And no wonder...
Well, they may have found a new best friend in Best Buy. The picture you see here comes from a store in West Jordan, Utah, and clearly states that they will "price match NEW video games at USED prices from GameStop or Game Crazy." Now, we imagine there are rules and restrictions in this matching deal, but although we aren't aware of them just yet, it seems fairly self-explanatory. And if this is a nationwide thing - which it should turn out to be - GameStop and Game Crazy may have to rethink their used game policy. There is one downside to this, though: Best Buy still won't take games in trade, and as the other two retailers in question won't give you cash for your trade-in, you can't very well go to Best Buy for all your needs. Then again, if you don't wish to trade in anything and you simply want a cheaper price for a game, this could be awesome.
We'll see what we can find out.
8/7/2009 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (101 posts)
Hezzron
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 11:41:02 AM
Reccaman18
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 9:42:42 PM
Reply
coldbore
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 9:53:26 PM
ThePearlJamer
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 10:18:30 PM
Reccaman18
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 11:13:45 PM
And coldbore, what if a used game is around 50 bucks? The edge card takes 10% off any used game or accessory. Thats what I was going on about. But you said it yourself in a later post: people go for the cheapest. Sometimes a few bucks can make all the difference.
ThePearlJamer
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 11:26:18 PM
Jed
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:05:53 AM
Kevadu
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:27:11 AM
Highlander
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 2:02:35 AM
Orvisman
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 4:45:40 PM
ThePearlJamer
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 5:52:00 PM
Last edited by ThePearlJamer on 8/8/2009 5:52:56 PM
Orvisman
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 8:05:21 PM
coldbore
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 9:49:09 PM
Scarecrow
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 9:57:36 PM
Can't people stop and think, these devs poured their hearts and countless months/years into this game.
And then you go ahead and instead of rewardinng them, you go ahead and just buy the game for cheaper. Not supporting these devs at all.
Gamestop is garbage by the way
It's just sad that Best Buy is going through the same thing. Now more stores are sure to follow.
PS: That's why you see less experimenting in gaming. Compared to all the rpgs and amazing experimentation that went on during the 1990s, this generation is lacking. Yes there have been some amazing games.
But there's been a lot of gun gun gun
FPS FPS FPS
Guns guns guns
FPS FPS FPS
PS: Devs are scared of losing money these days. These practices of selling pre-owned games don't help one bit. V-gaming could dull out right before our eyes
NoSmokingBandit
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 10:45:47 PM
I'm all for supporting the developers, but when times get tough my wallet is a bit more important than theirs.
Highlander
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 10:45:51 PM
fluffer nutter
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:08:35 AM
___________
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 3:26:49 AM
Highlander
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 4:26:02 AM
The thing is, as someone else mentioned, although we'd all like games to be cheaper - of course - the game makers have to make money on games or they go out of business. Devs must make money or they stop developing. Devs and publishers don't see any money from used game sales, so if I save $5 by purchasing a used game, I'm only hurting the possibility of the developer and publisher making another game.
I'm not directing this at anyone in particular, but...<rant mode> Sorry if it's not popular, but I come from an age when if you couldn't afford something you didn't whine and moan, you shut up, started saving and counted the days until you had the money. Too many people believe that they are entitled to free everything, an want impossibly cheap prices. That's not realistic. Everything we buy is made by someone else. People won't work for nothing, so products can't become ever cheaper. People need to grow up and lose the sense of entitlement. People have to learn that life is not fair, some people have more than others, and there are a lot of things that we cannot afford to buy.
</rant>
Last edited by Highlander on 8/8/2009 4:26:50 AM
chucknasty
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 4:48:29 AM
I am in complete agreement with you about rewarding devs for making good games. People seemed to think I was an idiot for saying I try to buy CE disks to throw extra money at good developers in the AC2 thread but I was being dead serious.
@NoSmokingBandit:
You should never buy a Ford new or used.
kevyd09
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 2:17:22 PM
end rant
ed_winchester
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 9:50:36 PM
Reply
Fane1024
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 4:05:23 AM
Fane1024
Sunday, August 09, 2009 @ 5:36:44 AM
ThePearlJamer
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 10:03:27 PM
Reply
Alienange
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 10:46:06 PM
Highlander
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 10:47:04 PM
Swavey
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 10:57:29 AM
tes37
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 9:50:36 AM
a1_
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:10:42 AM
Reply
Jed
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:18:39 AM
Highlander
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 4:35:19 AM
Get a new game --> pay money --> retailer margin --> publisher get's royalties --> Developer get's royalties
OR
Get a used game --> pay money --> retailer runs to bank, smiling. Developers and publishers get nothing.
Since the developers actually make the game and the publisher promotes the game and often works as the producer of the game as well, it seems only fair that they should get something from a game sale. But used game sales solely benefit the retailer. Even the poor sap that traded the game got shafted since GameStop pays a pretty poor value for most games, even though they turn around and sell them for $5 off the retail price. Since PS3 discs so rarely scratch, it's not like they do much of anything before putting the game on the shelf with a sticker price.
Lot's of people here seem oblivious to the fact that purchasing used games is effectively biting the hand that feeds us.
Alienange
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:50:00 PM
LividFiction
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 4:08:39 PM
Wage SLAVES
Sunday, August 09, 2009 @ 4:05:11 AM
So, you are completely against supporting the creators of our beloved passtime?
@livid
Movies have more means of making revenue. They begin in theater, go for purchase/rental and end up on t.v.
Musicians are getting raped by pirates but they still have live performances to supplement their loses.
Games only have the first month or so before they start getting recycled at $5 less and tagged USED, to enjoy NONE of the earnings.
Last edited by Wage SLAVES on 8/9/2009 4:07:22 AM
Fane1024
Sunday, August 09, 2009 @ 5:57:26 AM
The prospect of re-selling games no doubt causes people to choose to buy a game at full price rather than, say, renting it. It's a poor assumption that every used game sale would be a new game sale if no one sold used games.
While I prefer to buy new games (at reduced prices), when I do buy used games, I keep them. So, someone bought the game new and someone kept it. The fact that we split the bill doesn't affect how much the publisher made. I wouldn't have bought that game at full price, so the publisher would have had to reduce the price to get my sale. The other customer probably also wouldn't have bought that game at full price if he had to keep it, so the publisher might have sold NO copies to us except at a discount price (and profit on two copies at $30 each is less than for one copy at $60). Plus, both of us are more likely to buy any sequels.
Gamestop/EB does reap the most benefit, though.
p.s. I see jaybiv made some of the same points below.
Last edited by Fane1024 on 8/9/2009 6:11:48 AM
fluffer nutter
Sunday, August 09, 2009 @ 8:13:32 PM
Last edited by fluffer nutter on 8/9/2009 8:14:19 PM
Wage SLAVES
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 4:32:17 PM
Wow, I wish I could sroke my ego as much as you. It wasn't the actual numbers (notice I didn't include any in my post that you responded to) but the principal that I was addressing. In the days of Indie labels and bands like NOFX who own ALL the rights YOU are the one not giving the entire picture here. But I agree that the musicians are getting attacked from all sides.
B'sides my post wasn't about music it was about games.
Last edited by Wage SLAVES on 8/10/2009 4:36:10 PM
fluffer nutter
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 @ 9:51:32 AM
Jed
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:16:43 AM
Reply
Gamestop may not be the best thing for developers, but it is good for the industry. They do get TONS of pre-orders that sell new games, and they also have lots of promotions that give you more for your used games if you buy new ones.
If gamestop was really such a bad thing for game devs, then they wouldnt give them exclusive content, like DLCs and special editions.
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:06:26 AM
Jed
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 11:47:16 AM
Last edited by Jed on 8/8/2009 11:49:36 AM
Alienange
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:57:15 PM
Wage SLAVES
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 4:37:57 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:09:01 AM
Reply
fluffer nutter
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:25:52 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:07:47 PM
fluffer nutter
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:23:03 PM
Ultimadream
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:59:45 AM
Reply
Also i dont see a problem with used games either, i bought Unreal Tournament III and Kane & Lynch for £5 each the other day on there original release they were £45. I'm a student so i dont have the money to waste on brand new games/DVDS/Blu-ray.
Highlander
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 2:06:59 AM
Looking at the bang for the buck, games are one of the most cost effective forms of entertainment out there. Considering the amount of in-game time I put into Burnout Paradise it's cost me less than a dime an hour to play it.
Fane1024
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 3:51:43 AM
I rarely disagree with anything you write, but I will here. The reasons $60 seems good value compared to the examples you gave are:
$10 is a total rip-off for a movie ticket (since you can rent it for half as much and have a ton of people watch it)
one would (should) only pay $25 for a DVD / Blu-ray if you will watch that movie again and again (and view all the special features)
Nonetheless, a long game IS a good value; Oblivion has cost me about a dime an hour and I haven't finished all the side quests.
p.s. Burnout Paradise is awesome.
Last edited by Fane1024 on 8/8/2009 4:00:12 AM
Highlander
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 4:36:49 AM
fluffer nutter
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 10:49:00 AM
The fact is that people want to save money so I don't see the problem here. I agree with what people are saying as far as the retailers are the main benefactors of used games but I have to ask this. When a new game is sold, isn't there a set amount, agreed upon by the retailer and manufacturer, that gets paid to the manufacturer? Isn't this why many stores do not sell games immediately at a largely reduced price? I know this applies to many products out there but don't know if games are set to the same standard.
Last edited by fluffer nutter on 8/8/2009 10:51:19 AM
Ultimadream
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:21:34 PM
Though i find that pre-owned dvds go for literaly 1-3 pounds and any new release i can get after 1 month for 6 pounds, I feel no neeed for Blu-ray as DVDs look better than i could hope for upscaled on my TV, Though i have bought Stanleys films on BR purely to see whats its like & becuase hes my favourite director, I personally dont feel the price of Bluray is worth it, though i shall be getting Disneys Fantasia, that while be a specticale. as for games i think they should be lowwered 1/4 of the price.
One thing that does bug me is seeign a game on the 360 for cheaper, nearly always happens.
SHADOW [Moderator]
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 2:45:55 AM
Reply
fluffer nutter
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 10:53:30 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:08:59 PM
LowKey
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 3:57:42 AM
Reply
BigBoss4ever
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:21:33 PM
I carefully select games to buy therefore I dont have tons of games, but every game I buy I play them through out and never sell back.
Last edited by BigBoss4ever on 8/8/2009 1:23:53 PM
bkjohns1
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 @ 3:47:13 PM
BigBoss4ever
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 5:18:13 AM
Reply
Deleted User
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 6:30:04 AM
Reply
fluffer nutter
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 10:57:32 AM
BigBoss4ever
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:19:23 PM
tes37
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 12:11:44 PM
Alienange
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:01:15 PM
Jed
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 4:07:11 AM
iliimaster
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 1:53:07 PM
Reply
jaybiv
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 4:26:06 PM
Reply
What buying used does is allow a customer to get acquainted with a dev in hopes that the consumer may want to buy the next game new.
One of the biggest movers of the U.S. economy is the second-hand market. Not everyone can afford to buy used, and the used seller now has cash to put down on a new product.
My second point is this is a dumb move by Best Buy. Game Stop is making 100% profit on used games so they can drop the price another $10 to $15 dollars and still make money. Is Best Buy willing to sell new PS3 games for $45? Don't think so.
Robochic
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 5:37:40 PM
Reply
See when a company buys a bunch of movies from the company that owns the rights to the movie the company that owns the rights says we are will sell you the licence and adding also an additional royality fee with that for you to buy the licenses to the movie so if you sell new or used we get a cut of the new and used .
Video game companies basically said we will sell you the licences to the games with a royality to new video games but nothing about used video games a few years back they never thought the used game thing would catch on Oopps it did. I did a project believe it or not on this a few years back for Marketing in College and researched heavily on it now thats a few years back, if they are still complaining why don't they switch to like the movie and music industry when they say Hey Gamestop u sell a used or new i get a cut as well then they pay the devs makes sense to me but it seems they would rather complain about it instead of just changing the royality clause.
Whatever anyones reason to buy new or used thats their choice, me I buy new when I can due to I just like having a new game but if it's like Eternal sonata where the only way i could get it was to preorder and i didn't then i have to buy used, so to me everyone has to meet 50/50 including the companies making the video games cause some games depending the country you live in u'll be lucky to get it new IE valkyria chronicals and Eternal Sonata.
Done :)
a1_
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 8:26:58 PM
Reply
Alienange
Saturday, August 08, 2009 @ 11:33:13 PM
fluffer nutter
Sunday, August 09, 2009 @ 12:51:02 AM
Wage SLAVES
Sunday, August 09, 2009 @ 4:13:34 AM
xStatiCa
Sunday, August 09, 2009 @ 7:44:24 AM
Reply
- Buy 2 get one free deals
- 15 - 20% off coupons that get sent to members
- If you buy a used game and don't like it you can trade it in for another used game within a certain amount of time(don' remember the amount of days but I think it is at least 3 or so days). Some people take advantage of that to play a game for a few days... complete it and then get another game.
- Trade in specials where you get additional percent off the more you trade in.
- Special trade in offers on new games that are coming out.
I think most people know that the price advertised at gamestop for used games is rarely the price people pay. If the difference were really only $5 for new vs used people would buy new a lot more often.
Because of this I doubt Best Buy's plan will work.
Last edited by xStatiCa on 8/9/2009 7:46:29 AM
SwollenThumbs
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 8:47:04 AM
Reply
1- a lot of these so called new purchases that gamestop is "stealing" from the developers by selling used games, would not be new purchases at all. In my case the used games that I do buy, would never be bought if I had to buy them new. The fact is if i'm really into a game, it is a day one purchase or new purchase and I plan out my budget to afford it. Games bought used are usually games I'm on the fence about. and I think that may be the case for a lot of buyers.
2- Without these used trade ins, alot of people would not have money to buy new games and support developers. I think a lot of these trade ins come when it's time to get the new game that's out but you are short on cash.
3- If gamestop stopped selling used games at those prices, it wouldn't matter with Ebay and craigslist being around cause the same used game buyers would go to those outlets.
4- it's called game"stop" lol... not game"help the industry...
sorry for the childish number 4, but it's always good to laugh
Subtracterall
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 @ 8:56:08 AM
Reply
KoldStrejke
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 @ 11:40:00 AM
Reply

See Full Image









CONTRABAND
Reply
Friday, August 07, 2009 @ 9:39:37 PM