EGM Subscribers Now Getting Maxim, Parental Fallout Ensues
You know, it won't matter if the average age of a gamer ends up being 45 years of age...the mainstream public will still view it as a child's hobby. It's the one stereotype that may never die.
If you didn't know, Electronic Gaming Monthly is no more; the magazine has been defunct for a little while now. But in order to appease subscribers who paid for their year, it seems the company has been shipping them new copies of Maxim. In looking at the targeted demographic for both magazines in question, and considering the average age of a gamer is well over 30 these days, most rational humans wouldn't think much of this transition. But in an age where sex is viewed as being more damaging than violence, the story just had to break about 12-year-old Jake O'Donnell from Boston receiving the vulgar magazine and running into the house to show his mommy. Now, of course, there will be exceptions to the rule; a boy that age probably shouldn't be leafing through Maxim. But at the same time, we have this suspicion that the vast majority of all former EGM subscribers are old enough to be Maxim subscribers.
We still don't like t he fact that the mother couldn't cancel this subscription, though. After trying to contact the publisher, the August issue of Maxim still arrived at their front doorstep, addressed to little Jake. But has anyone even briefly considered that some of the imagery in EGM for "M"-rated games might be pretty damn adult-oriented? Well, of course not. That's not the way the mainstream public thinks; they think we're still bouncing around with Mario, and that's vastly preferable to any "bouncing" going on in Maxim. In the end, we don't condone the selling of any questionable material to minors and we don't think Jake's mother overreacted, but the entire story promotes the stereotype that all gaming is still for kids, and we hate that.
...the fact that we used a Maxim photo of Eliza Dushku, the lovely girl who just recently had good things to say about gamers and gaming, doesn't mean anything. Really.
8/10/2009 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (37 posts)
Thrill Kill
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 11:20:07 AM
Reply
Wage SLAVES
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 4:20:31 PM
Byakko2009
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 11:42:03 AM
Reply
ThePearlJamer
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 2:06:08 PM
Highlander
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 11:57:35 AM
Reply
It is kind of odd to replace a magazine about gaming, with a "lads mag" as they'd say in the UK. Maxim is a lads mag, it's not a 'mens magazine' nor is it top-shelf stuff with a plain brown wrapper, but then neither is it for 12 year olds, though I can think of worse options for a 12 year old boy. But really, why choose that as a replacement for EGM, it's a completely different genre. Despite the older demographics that gamin now serves, gaming covers all age ranges, and EGM covered that span. Maxim is far more targeted at the 18-30 single male market. It's just an odd choice as a substitute.
Highlander
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 3:12:05 PM
TEG3SH
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 @ 2:50:03 AM
Highlander
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 @ 9:55:28 AM
somethingrandom
Wednesday, August 12, 2009 @ 12:56:44 AM
camaro300zx
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 12:07:10 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 12:16:53 PM
Reply
Highlander
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 12:39:35 PM
As for TV and a comparison thre, once again in the UK when I was 12, bare breasts were hardly rare on TV, they just didn't happen until after 9pm when it was suggested that kids should be in bed. Parents were responsible back then. Besides, Maxim is really no worse than Benny Hill, or Baywatch (Babewatch?). I don't remember seeing actual nudity in the US edition of Maxim, ever. I may be wrong, as I haven't looked at an issue recently, but I don't remember seeing anything any more dangerous than the stereotypical Baywatch slow motion sequences of life guard babes running along a beach.
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 4:55:57 PM
Highlander
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 11:19:18 PM
BeezleDrop
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 12:17:49 PM
Reply
ThePearlJamer
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 2:08:14 PM
BTNwarrior
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 2:36:46 PM
Reply
Grown_Gamer
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 3:13:22 PM
Reply
ThePearlJamer
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 3:17:58 PM
Reply
tes37
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 5:45:18 PM
ThePearlJamer
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 9:14:35 PM
ThePearlJamer
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 3:17:59 PM
Reply
kreate
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 3:30:20 PM
Reply
but when i play ps home, most of everyone are between the age of
16-29. at least, thats what they tell me.
does older males not play ps home? or do they congregate themselves into groups and not socialize with the younger ones?
Last edited by kreate on 8/10/2009 3:30:45 PM
oldmike
Tuesday, August 11, 2009 @ 10:21:21 PM
MadKatBebop
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 9:51:48 PM
Reply
Last edited by MadKatBebop on 8/10/2009 9:52:56 PM

See Full Image









Deleted User []
Reply
Monday, August 10, 2009 @ 11:18:48 AM