New Ad Boasts 160GB PS3 Price Cut
All this talk of a PS3 Slim isn't necessarily what most consumers want to hear; they want to hear about a price cut. What the machine looks like has no bearing on their wallets.
Therefore, whether the PS3 Slim is real or not, it's good to see more evidence pouring in that supports an inevitable price drop. According to a new Hastings advertisement located by Joystiq, it seems that long-awaited $100 cut for the default PS3 is just around the corner. In the ad you see here, Hastings - a Texas-based retailer with 153 stores in 21 states - is promoting the 160GB PS3 with a price tag of $399. Amazon recently dropped the price of the 160GB PS3 bundled with Uncharted: Drake's Fortune down to $450, and all of this could hint at a nationwide price cut. Hastings will begin to sell the 160GB PS3 at the new lower price on September 8, which is three weeks after Sony's press conference at GamesCom. As an update, Engadget is further reporting that European retailer Fnac has dropped the price of the PS3 by €100. So it's happening everywhere: retail information makes it appear as if a permanent cut is just around the corner.
Now, if the 160GB PS3 is $399 and it's true that Sony has stopped shipping the 80GB PS3 to retailers (the current default model), might it be safe to assume that if the PS3 Slim does exist, that will become the default machine, and it'll be priced at $299...?
8/14/2009 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (44 posts)
sticklife
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 12:39:16 PM
Highlander
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 8:47:11 PM
yak4life85
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 11:25:26 AM
Reply
Last edited by yak4life85 on 8/14/2009 11:27:19 AM
convergecrew
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 12:49:30 PM
photo K
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 3:35:17 PM
Fane1024
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 5:51:03 PM
2. The 160 Gb doesn't have all the features.
3. Now that Uncharted is a Greatest Hit, it makes sense to drop the price.
4. The Uncharted bundle is probably also passing into oblivion (though it might be replaced).
5. Hopefully, Sony will eliminate the high-priced SKU and just go with one PS3 at $299, making it seem like the price cut was even bigger than it actually was.
@ photo K
If Sony really is manufacturing them for c.$250 (30% of the initial cost, as reported), then it really isn't robbery. Also, the 360 will drop in price as well, so you needn't worry. And since when is a good value a bad thing?
Last edited by Fane1024 on 8/14/2009 5:59:09 PM
ThePearlJamer
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 8:02:16 PM
vicious54
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 11:36:29 AM
Kevadu
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 11:41:59 AM
Zemus101
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 11:48:48 AM
Alienange
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 3:49:44 PM
Jed
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 11:26:07 PM
I would love to see the slim start out at $299, but I don't know.
DIsmael85
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 11:56:09 AM
Reply
Hezzron
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 2:29:00 PM
Highlander
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 8:56:13 PM
yak4life85
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 12:26:10 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 12:48:37 PM
Reply
BlinkBoy
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 1:41:24 PM
BlinkBoy
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 1:45:57 PM
Reply
They might just drop the price to phase out this model as well.
Like Microsoft got their Arcade and Elite models which works like that.
We will see what they show us on Tuesday.
bOnEs
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 2:57:36 PM
Highlander
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 8:54:02 PM
Bet they don't do that though, it makes too much sense.
Jed
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 11:29:52 PM
www
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 4:02:14 PM
Reply
And this isn't the end. I expect PS3&Xbox 360 250GB SKUs retailing for like $299 in the future. So in the end nobody wins, you can't say
1.'Oh i have the 80GB so its bigger than your 60GB'
2.'Oh but my 60GB has BC'
3.'Oh I gotta Slim with 120GB, beat that!'
4. 'Oh but my 80GB emits less heat'
blah blah bla bla etc etc...
So in the end, we're all gonna have different SKUs with their merits and demerits and nobody wins. Now is this cool? I for one don't know.
ThePearlJamer
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 8:08:14 PM
Highlander
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 8:52:14 PM
With the removal of the BC all PS3 models have been the same. The new slim model will have a new motherboard, but will use the same 2.5-inch SATA HDDs, so other than being a new revision, there is really no difference.
pyrobomber70
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 6:27:42 PM
Reply
Highlander
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 8:49:11 PM
convergecrew
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 7:36:02 PM
Reply
___________
Saturday, August 15, 2009 @ 3:09:41 AM
Reply
1 it would rise the costs, the whole point of the slim is to lower production costs not increase them.
2 they would not want to alienate current PS3 owners.
i dont know about you but i would be pretty cheesed if sony added BC to the slim model and gave the current ps3 owners the finger.
unless its a hardware thing, if they cant implement it with software thats fair enough.
but if they can they have to.
even if they sold at a small loss they should lower the price by minimum of 100 bucks, even if there making a loss that should be made up in the number of consoles purchased.
at the right price they would fly off the shelf just for U2 GOW3 and GT5.
but it has to be the right price.
Mornelithe
Saturday, August 15, 2009 @ 3:59:14 AM
xnonsuchx
Saturday, August 15, 2009 @ 7:10:57 PM
___________
Sunday, August 16, 2009 @ 8:31:25 AM
Reply
selling 5 million consoles at say 300 bucks compare to 2 million consoles at 350?
if its cheap enough the sales should come flooding in.
the functionality is there.
the reliability is there (sort of)
the games are coming.
so theres only 1 thing stopping people from buying a ps3 and thats price.
if they drop the price 100 bucks they should see consoles flying off the shelf.

See Full Image









DIsmael85
Reply
Friday, August 14, 2009 @ 11:23:03 AM