PS3 Slim Questions Answered, Sony Says "No" To B/C
We've done everything we could to fully reveal the new PS3 Slim, but as always, there were a few lingering questions. Well, Sony has already answered them for you.
ArsTechnica spoke to Sony's John Koller and clarified a few important facts that many gamers have been eager to learn; such topics include the state of the current PS3 model, backwards compatibility for PS2 software and why we'll no longer be able to use different Operating Systems. So here we go:
On model availability and pricing
Retailers will continue to get rid of their current stock of 80GB PS3s and once they're gone, they're gone for good; the PS3 Slim "will be the hardware moving forward." As for the 160GB model, it was always supposed to be a limited-time deal, so if you want to snag it now that it features a more attractive $399 price tag, you had best take advantage. As for pricing, as of now, the 80GB PS3 should be reduced to $299, and to reaffirm, the PS3 Slim will also debut at that price on September 1 in North America and Europe (299 Euros in Europe).
On the new hard drive
The PS3 Slim boasts a larger 120GB hard drive and according to Koller, you can indeed replace it with a bigger one if you wish, and furthermore, this will not void your warranty. In fact, it's actually encouraged; the hard drive is accessible in the front of the system and changing it is merely a "two-screw process."
On the new redesigned interior
The PS3 Slim has a new power cable that uses about 1/3 less power, and with the decreased power consumption, the cooling system has also been redesigned and the Cell processor is down to a 45nm process from the previous 65nm. The new slimmer console will be lighter and quieter and will still have all the same capabilities and features of the older, fatter model. Koller also said the system will have a power brick, but it'll be small; it'll be "nothing like" the one that comes with the Xbox 360.
On disallowing other Operating Systems
The new PS3 won't let you install a new OS and Koller explained it simply- "There are a couple of reasons. We felt we wanted to move forward with the OS we have now. If anyone wants to use previous models and change the OS, they can do so. We wanted to standardize our OS."
On backwards compatibility
In what may be the most disappointing news for long-time PS2 fans, Koller firmly said full b/c for PS2 software won't be coming back. After saying clearly that it won't be returning, he added- "It's not as big as a purchase intent driver as you may be hearing. We've got such a substantial lineup of titles on the PS3; most people are buying the PS3 for PS3 games. They've buying it for PS3 games and Blu-ray movies." We know a lot of you out there still wanted to see b/c return, and rumors had hinted that it might come with a new firmware update in the future, but that rumor has been officially shot down.
'whew' Okay, that should just about do it. There can't be anything else you need to know, can there?
8/18/2009 Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (136 posts)
LegendaryWolfeh
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 12:13:18 AM
N a S a H
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 12:27:42 PM
LegendaryWolfeh
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 4:22:32 PM
bamf
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 5:31:45 PM
What about using your older hdd thats in your fatter PS3 and putting it in the slim? Will it need to be formatted, I'd hate to lose everything, allot of its recorded with the tv play that we have in he UK.
NiteKrawler
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 10:30:17 PM
Reply
Lotusflow3r
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 7:03:47 AM
I missed out on a lot of great games last gen and i continue to catch up to this day.
Right now, as im a Level 5 fanatic, im going through Rogue Galaxy as thats the only Level 5 game i missed and obviously, its on ps2 so, the B/C on the 60 is vital to me.
What if Rogue Galaxy 2 is announced for PS3 (which i see happening)? I would of been half screwed (as i ain't hooking an old ps2 up to a hd tv!).
NiteKrawler
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 2:06:12 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:34:03 AM
The power supply in the PS3 Slim is an internal one. If Koller is this mis-informed about his most recent product, you'll have to excuse me if I doubt anything the man says about Backwards compatibility.
Oh, here's a close-up of the rear end of a PS3 Slim, note the 2 prong power cord socket....the PSU is internal.
http://www.joystiq.com/photos/ps3-slim-unboxing/2217799/
And as you can see from this second image, the box clearly lists only an AC power cord, and no external supply. If you look through the rest of the gallery, you'll see this confirmed in other images.
http://www.joystiq.com/photos/ps3-slim-unboxing/2217812/
Last edited by Highlander on 8/19/2009 1:37:02 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:37:23 AM
www
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 6:41:41 AM
LegendaryWolfeh
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 7:04:01 AM
Gogaku
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 10:41:05 PM
Reply
Lucky me that I have the 60gig machine though :)
CH1N00K
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 11:12:02 PM
Oxvial
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 11:20:06 PM
fluffer nutter
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 11:41:09 PM
NiteKrawler
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 12:09:59 AM
CH1N00K
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 10:03:56 AM
The new PS3 is going to be sold to a majority of people who wanted to get the system but felt that the price was to high to pay for "just a video game console" These are the general masses that don't check websites for gaming details, they don't care whether FFVII ever gets remade. They are the people that bought the Wii. They aren't hardcore gamers, they're casual. Most of them won't even know that the PS3 Slim is coming until they see it in the stores and go "whoa!" it's cheaper and skinnier.
For the 23 million PS3's that are out there now, the % amount of those users who are actually crying for B/C is not that big. Sony knows this. The next group of people that are going to rush out and buy the Slim are going to make that number even smaller. The nintendo and the 360 didn't include B/C in their new systems, and they outsold the PS3. Once the "late adopters" see the graphics of the new PS3, there is going to be a few that want to play b/c, but the majority won't really care.
We may see an update eventually from sony that includes B/C, but Sony is going to be focusing on getting back into the number one spot for consoles. That means looking onwards and upwards, not backwards. Eventually, I'm sure you'll be able to download thousands of popular PS1 and PS2 sales on the PSN, to play on your PS3 or PSP GO. That is the B/C that they are heading for.
If you really want to play them from disc format..well the PS2 is only the cost of 2 new games. Which over a year of what most people spend on a console...it isn't really all that much.
Last edited by CH1N00K on 8/19/2009 10:06:42 AM
MadKatBebop
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 10:58:59 PM
Reply
fluffer nutter
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 11:20:03 PM
Jed
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 11:22:45 PM
MadKatBebop
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 11:27:11 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:47:44 AM
I suspect that it's Koller with the mis-understanding...
Here's the actual quote from the Ars Technica article.
<<
He also told us that there will be a power brick, although we can expect it to be small. He laughs when I ask about the power brick's size in relation to the 360's power supply. "It's nothing like that," he assured Ars.
>>
It's pretty clear that they are referring to an external power supply, not an internal one. This is clearly not the case. Perhaps Koller was simply not well briefed. However if he's not well briefed about that, why should we suppose that everything else he said was accurate?
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:20:06 AM
kokoro
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 6:28:46 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 4:10:32 PM
But I still think it's coming to the PS3 in due course, but we won't hear it from Sony until it's definitely ready to go.
fluffer nutter
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 11:34:26 PM
"Thank you for your email but I am unavailable at this time. We are currently hard at work, raising the prices of our premium game lines, such as Guitar Hero, to help counteract the PS3 price drops. Thank you for your money and your patronage through these times."
Last edited by fluffer nutter on 8/18/2009 11:35:08 PM
HeXeN
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 11:27:22 PM
Reply
fluffer nutter
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 11:35:52 PM
Oxvial
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 12:08:22 AM
CH1N00K
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 10:14:04 AM
Jed
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 11:12:52 PM
LegendaryWolfeh
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 12:12:45 AM
Reply
Fane1024
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 5:15:29 AM
orangpelupa
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 12:25:48 AM
Reply
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:38:14 AM
orangpelupa
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 11:53:01 AM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:22:18 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:39:53 AM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 10:15:07 AM
nath08
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 11:44:38 AM
nath08
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 11:45:56 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 3:56:50 PM
Other than that, the casing hasn't shrunk by enough to mandate an external power unit. In fact it looks about the same size and layout of the original PS2 (fat), and that had the PSU in the left hand edge of the case (bottom of the case when vertical). This is a form factor Sony has a lot of experience with, so I am pretty sure Koller was simply mis-informed or mis-quoted.
Last edited by Highlander on 8/19/2009 3:58:19 PM
LegendaryWolfeh
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:02:06 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:22:33 AM
2) Then I'd have to buy another one? No thanks, I just upgraded to this swanky new $299 thing from Sony, why the hell doesn't it play the games?
3) why should I have to have two Sony systems to play Sony games?
4) PS2 games on an HDTV look like crap without the scaling that the PS3 does.
5) When they announced the PS3, Sony stated categorically that it would be backwards compatible. Removing the capability in the first place was breaking a promise. Not restoring the capability is simply pointlessly pathetic.
Charger7302
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:00:33 AM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:20:52 AM
Fane1024
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 5:26:45 AM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:26:57 AM
Reply
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:42:22 AM
Fane1024
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 5:29:08 AM
Ultimadream
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 3:11:02 AM
Jed
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 11:17:04 PM
Ultimadream
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 3:09:07 AM
Reply
Ultimadream
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 3:18:47 AM
Reply
Byakko2009
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 3:24:08 AM
Reply
Let's look at what was nice about the conference, shall we? Maybe I'm one of the few, but I'm really excited about the 3.0 firmware. The new themes look amazing! I just saw the LBP theme on youtube, and it was awesome. Sure, it's rather mundane for gaming, but it gives the XMB more life when compared to the Xbox dashboard. Also, the software they showed for the new motion controller looks solid.
My advice to anyone who really desires to play their PS2 games upscaled on their PS3s is to just go buy a used one from GameStop. While I admit it was disappointing to hear, I have to say if it was so important to me, I would purchase a used B/C PS3.
xnonsuchx
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 4:24:19 AM
Fane1024
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 5:42:16 AM
Add 7 - 15% to U.S. prices and you'll see what we actually pay. My $599 launch PS3 cost me nearly $750 at the register.
It doesn't cover all the disparity, but the rest is likely tariffs.
If you want one for £200, find an importer who'll smuggle it past customs for free (good luck).
Last edited by Fane1024 on 8/19/2009 5:45:01 AM
Oliver
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 8:09:25 AM
nath08
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 11:41:52 AM
Ultimadream
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 4:10:33 AM
xnonsuchx
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 4:10:11 AM
Reply
SLIM PS3 INTERIOR: Nice!
SLIM PS3 EXTERIOR: Debatable (I might need to handle on in person to decide for sure if I like it or not).
FIRMWARE 3.0: Sounds more like a 2.85 or 2.90 candidate.
NO PS2 COMPATIBILITY: I have a launch 60GB...what do I care? ;-) Seriously, too bad, but about what I expected (since solely software B/C is usually VERY finicky).
NO 'OTHER OS' OPTION ON SLIM PS3: Sucks huge ones considering it's a FIRMWARE option not needing any specific hardware support, even though 95+% of users would never use it. Home users just playing around with it out of their g33kiness is ONE thing, but what about the compan(y/ies) selling PS3 Linux clusters to scientists/researchers??? "Thanks for buying thousands of our machines, but now go F yourself!"???
NO MORE RUMORS OF CONFIRMATIONS (for a while): Nice! ;-)
LegendaryWolfeh
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 7:06:16 AM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 3:48:26 PM
djduke316
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 6:09:19 AM
Ultimadream
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 7:22:49 AM
Deleted User
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 6:24:10 AM
Reply
robinhood2010
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 6:57:01 AM
Reply
jaybiv
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 9:33:04 AM
Reply
Orvisman
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 10:05:43 AM
orangpelupa
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 11:59:11 AM
the downside is, software emulation not as good as the old PS3 that use hardware emulation. so expect to see only popular games and a few not-so-bad games supported by software emulation.
xnonsuchx
Thursday, August 20, 2009 @ 2:33:52 AM
I still think that if PS2 compatibility was a cost issue from the beginning, Sony shoulda designed it as a $30-50 add-on (like a PCMCIA-like card w/ the PS2 chipset that installed in a special slot). That way, also only those who really wanted it would be paying for it.
Button Masher
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 9:40:13 AM
Reply
Robochic
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 10:19:24 AM
Reply
On B/C I have to agree with vicious54 if people wanted B/C for the PS2/PS1 games they would of invested into the Launched PS3's.
We all have to say guess what no B/c I mean we got the price cut and the PS3 slim model why aren't people happy?
I think Sony is listening and doing a damn good job but their are some things that they are going to stop and say sorry no to and lets move on and continue with the PS3 games and console.
anjpikapp3
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 11:38:19 AM
Reply
Does this mean they are going to remove all of the original models (80 and 120 GB)? is the Slim taking over? I know it looks good (I have already pre-ordered mine) but so does the original. Why take that one off the shelves to??
JMO_INDY
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 6:13:45 PM
sunspider13
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 11:41:05 AM
Reply
Sony is doing what it can to make itself profitable again and this a step in the right direction.
TubbyUrchin
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 12:03:48 PM
Reply
Scarecrow
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 12:06:47 PM
Oxvial
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 12:25:18 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 1:10:27 PM
Reply
CH1N00K
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 3:50:25 PM
Highlander
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 3:55:07 PM
The last time a Sony person gave a categorical "no" (I think it was regarding a price cut that materialized less than a month later), it turned out that the truth was in fact the opposite of what had been said. Koller is marketing, not technology. If someone in the engineering side of things builds a workable emulation, the only time that Marketing will be informed is if/when it's ready for prime-time. Until then, as far as marketing is concerned, BC has been removed and isn't coming back.
So in a sense it's like plausible deniability. It can be denied until it's announced.
Tribble
Wednesday, August 19, 2009 @ 4:19:35 PM
Reply
Sony, like may other media companies is always looking for ways to make you buy the same software again (SONY famously said that copying a CD you owned was akin to theft). Strange that they would ignore such a lucrative market almost begging for the oppotunity to buy back catalogue products.
I think the reason for removing the 'Other OS' option is pretty straightforward; SONY were wary of the hacking communuity finding a hole in the hypervisor , and potentially finding a way to run pirated software.
shadowscorpio
Thursday, August 20, 2009 @ 10:59:32 AM
Reply
Is the removal of switching OS a big deal? I have yet to own any PS3 and there are features of the 180gb HD PS3 that attract me but the smaller amount of power comsumption of the slim is appealing to me as well. 120gb HD is bad either.
Another thing that wasn't answered was whether or not the slim actually has card reader slots like the original PS3?
Highlander
Thursday, August 20, 2009 @ 12:19:14 PM
The PS3 Slim, like all of the PS3s since the 40GB system launched (basically any PS3 with only 2 USB ports) does not include a memory card reader. There are 2 USB 2.0 ports, and of course you can plug pretty much any memory card reader into one of those, as well as any other USB device, and a standard USB hub will extend the number of ports you have. It's not ideal, but it is workable.
shadowscorpio
Thursday, August 20, 2009 @ 11:22:51 AM
Reply
If you ask me the concept of B/C is genious. If Sony were to continue B/C they're legacy of games would live forever.
Does anyone know if Sony has a patent for B/C?
One way I see backwards compatibility for PS2 titles coming to PS3 is if they take PS2 out of production. IMO removing it in the first place was one of their biggest mistakes.
Think about it. Would the PS2 have been as successful without B/C?
Last edited by shadowscorpio on 8/20/2009 11:24:57 AM
Bardock617
Thursday, August 20, 2009 @ 11:52:31 AM
Bardock617
Thursday, August 20, 2009 @ 11:55:05 AM
Reply
shadowscorpio
Thursday, August 20, 2009 @ 12:29:13 PM
Mounce
Thursday, August 20, 2009 @ 11:57:15 AM
Reply
They're just hiding the truth and saying what they feel they must, only to announce and confirm it when they feel most comfortable.
shadowscorpio
Thursday, August 20, 2009 @ 12:31:03 PM
Reply
WATSHAPPENIN25
Saturday, August 22, 2009 @ 12:32:45 PM
Reply
racingboy123
Saturday, August 22, 2009 @ 12:39:28 PM
Reply
He says Sony needs to drop the console because they are to worried about the PSP
Also he claims that there's no games out for this system (only plays RPG's) that there all going to the handheld
He also said that if the PS3 didn't have a Blu Ray player he would have turned it back in
He claims that there is no such thing as FF13
he thinks its just a joke that SE is playing to get people to buy the PS3
racingboy123
Saturday, August 22, 2009 @ 2:19:59 PM
Subtracterall
Sunday, August 23, 2009 @ 1:14:21 AM
Reply
redstar
Monday, August 24, 2009 @ 2:22:59 PM
Reply
Will this PS3 Slim Version be able to play old PS1 and PS2 games?
I'm not sure if that is the question already answered when the article is talking about "backwards compatibility".
racingboy123
Monday, August 24, 2009 @ 2:40:03 PM
deadpanda
Monday, August 24, 2009 @ 5:41:40 PM
Reply

See Full Image









Karosso
Reply
Tuesday, August 18, 2009 @ 10:29:15 PM
Last edited by Karosso on 8/18/2009 10:29:35 PM