Sony Report: Despite Overall Losses, PS3 Sales Impressive
See Full ImageIt's all in how you view the numbers. Sony has always operated at a loss early in a generation, so we shouldn't be too shocked when we see the overall numbers to date.
According to the Q2 financial report from Sony, the big news is that the gaming division has lost nearly $4.7 billion thus far this generation. However, if you look at a very interesting and enlightening breakdown provided by VG247, you will find that such losses are actually on par with the losses Microsoft's game division incurred during the introduction of the original Xbox. As you can see, Sony lost more early but Microsoft's losses were more sustained and they end up right in line with one another; in four full years, Microsoft lost about $4.2 billion and in 3.5 years, Sony has lost $4.7 billion. ...gee, that's like, the same and stuff. But anyway, the good news to be taken from the Q2 results is that Sony said they sold 3.2 million PS3 units during the quarter, which brings the total amount to 27 million worldwide to date. The $654 million overall loss is attributed to falling PS2 and Viao sales and the appreciation of the Japanese yen.
Those 3.2 million PS3 units sold means it topped the Xbox 360 in the second quarter, which is exactly what Sony desires at this point. And in looking down the road, it seems very likely that, given the new $299 price point, loaded software lineup, increasing Blu-Ray popularity, and vastly improved marketing campaign, the PS3 will continue to outsell the 360. Like we said at the start, it's all in how you look at it.
10/30/2009 9:56:27 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (34 posts)
Highlander
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 10:34:07 AM
Reply
It sucks to lose money, especially when a lot of the loss is due to factors like currency rates that you have no control over. If Sony keep selling PS3s at a good rate, they should be OK, at some point the cycle becomes virtuous and not vicious.
One question. Although Microsoft lost a bunch on the original Xbox, as far as I know they never made a profit on that system, haven't they also lost a bundle on the Xbox360? As far as I know it's only shown a profit in the most recent business year, and that's only because they took an extraordinary loss in a previous fiscal year to cover the RROD. If you look at the total Xbox losses for Microsoft since day 1, you have to wonder how they can continue to justify the program to investors. At least with PS3 the predecessor made money, and the PS3 itself will likely make a profit over it's lifetime, while also being a good source of long term revenue.
Sony sees things differently...10 year life, long term plan, first party development means first party revenue and profit, quality over quantity, all of these things and more are what Sony sees. Like Arnold said at the start, it's all in how you look at it.
Last edited by Highlander on 10/30/2009 10:36:45 AM
12 up, 1 down
JMO_INDY
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 7:38:20 PM
Last edited by JMO_INDY on 10/30/2009 7:40:57 PM
3 up, 0 down
Highlander
Saturday, October 31, 2009 @ 12:27:15 AM
You're so right, it was Ben. My apologies. Considering how my day went today, it's a wonder I was able to type a reply, so I'm only mildly surprised I didn't comprehend who wrote the article I was replying to.
0 up, 0 down
Cholo Gamer
Saturday, October 31, 2009 @ 12:41:07 AM
0 up, 0 down
AshT
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 10:39:16 AM
Reply
4 up, 1 down
Juanalf
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 10:43:23 AM
Reply
3 up, 5 down
laxpro2001
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 12:15:27 PM
The gap is a result of much lower sales in the United States, but lets be honest here, how many people have extra money to spend right now on a console. I feel once the economy starts getting better (No, I don't think this past quarters increase in GDP means the recession is over) we'll see an even higher spike in sales of the PS3.
Especially with the fact that the PS3 just had a price cut, and with the release of some excellent exclusives this holiday season, despite the economic recession, should be an incredible sales booster.
All in all I think you'll soon start to see this gap narrow, and going off what you said about the PS3 continuing to outsell the 360, you have to take into account how much longer each system is going to be around. The PS3 probably has at least 5 more years in it and if it can't narrow that gap and eventually surpass the 360 in that amount of time, I'll eat my hat.
7 up, 0 down
JackC8
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 1:13:21 PM
7 up, 0 down
Qubex
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 11:10:29 AM
Reply
Just keep thanking your lucky stars PSN is still free...
Q!
"i am home"
3 up, 0 down
Highlander
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 12:05:17 PM
Let's see, PS3 manufacture costs dropping gradually meaning that next year PS3 may start breaking even on the console itself. More PS3s sold means more games and accessories and therefore more licensing fees from game publishers and accessory makers. More superb exclusives from in house (first party) studios means more revenue and profit. More PS3s = more PS3 users = more PSN users = more PSN revnue and profit. PSPGo has opened up the flood gates in terms of bring paid PSP content to PSN. Whether you own a PSPGo or an older PSP, the ability to download games to a memory stick is very nice, especially with large 8GB or 16GB capacity memory sticks being reasonably priced now. All that means more revenue and profit. Sony knows that the PS3 has a long life left, so they do not need to invest heavily in the next console, and re-using technology like the Cell in the next console will reduce the cost of developing a future Playstation as well.
All in all, profit next year, and climbing rapidly too. I should think that PS3 will eventually overcome the losses of the first three years.
Imagine if the PS3 had sold twice as well as it has in years 1 and 2, Sony's losses would be double what they are. Would Sony have a chance of overcoming that? When people complain about the price of the PS3, They're not really being fair, Sony sold the PS3 at a considerable loss per unit. Those who bought the 60GB system got a $300+ gift from Sony the day they purchased their system - they paid $599 for a system that cost more than $899, so Sony gifted each purchaser $300+ on purchase to make up the difference. If Sony had dropped their prices more rapidly or come to market at a lower price they'd have lost billions more, and may even have decided to leave the market by now. So, in the end the price they used was right, not dropping prices rapidly was right - for Sony and gamers - because in the end, the losses are manageable and can be overcome in time, and Sony did not leave the market.
14 up, 0 down
mexgeo86
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 4:26:32 PM
Given the worldwide economic state and the fact that the ps3 was the constant pricier system, you have to give Sony credit for being able to move their product as well as they have.
I believe that as of this year they've been able to get a good momentum going with exclusives, more comparable multiplats and the PSN which gets better and better (for free).
3 up, 0 down
NoMoreWar
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 11:37:19 AM
Reply
0 up, 0 down
Kevadu
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 11:45:41 AM
0 up, 0 down
NoMoreWar
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 11:52:57 AM
guess thats why a dualshock3 is still at least $50
0 up, 0 down
Highlander
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 12:06:45 PM
Don't expect the PS3 to drop from the $299 mark for at least 12 months though.
2 up, 0 down
NoMoreWar
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 12:18:39 PM
1 up, 0 down
Fane1024
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 5:56:53 PM
2 up, 0 down
Sir Shak
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 11:45:28 AM
Reply
0 up, 2 down
Highlander
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 12:08:18 PM
10 up, 0 down
Sir Shak
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 12:43:35 PM
4 up, 0 down
chucknasty
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 2:09:58 PM
Reply
4 up, 1 down
maxpontiac
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 3:15:31 PM
Reply
2 up, 0 down
SILVERAMMO
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 3:15:57 PM
Reply
2 up, 0 down
A2K78
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 4:11:54 PM
Reply
2 up, 0 down
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 5:16:44 PM
Reply
2 up, 0 down
Scarecrow
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 6:13:09 PM
Reply
But I've said before, those who pass up on the ps3 are missing some of the best games this gen.
Just look at the exclusives this year, and even more one sided next year.
That's ALL you need to do
1 up, 0 down
Alienange
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 6:13:31 PM
Reply
3 up, 0 down
Highlander
Saturday, October 31, 2009 @ 12:41:36 AM
Now with Sony, the true reliability is probably not as good as their published claims of 1-2%, so let's assume it's double that (2-4%), split the difference and it's 3%. Three percent (3%) of the 27 million consoles sold by Sony is about 800,000 consoles - not even a million. Of course some of those have been repaired, but it's fair to say that there could be around a half a million dead PS3s around by now (sounds like a lot, but it's less than 3% of all PS3s ever sold). Leaving Sony at around 26.5 million working consoles.
Oddly enough, if you remember the numbers of Xbox Live users (both Gold and Silver) compared to the number of PSN users it's pretty much a wash between the two. Strange, I wonder where all the extra Xbox users are, since there are supposedly so very many more of them. Hmm....
I also consider the sales of a few very prominent multi-platform titles. With the exception of the titles with a clearly inferior PS3 port, sales have been surprisingly even, with PS3 sometimes selling more, and Xbox360 sometimes selling more. If there were really 6 million more Xbox360s out there wouldn't games automatically sell better on the xbox360? Yet EA and others have confirmed within the last year than they make more money from Sony console game sales than Xbox360. Hmmmm.....
All in all, I think you can make a very strong argument that Sony's PS3 has more or less caught up the Xbox360, and may soon overtake it.
Sometimes I love a good train of thought, especially when it's crashing through someone else's living room.
7 up, 0 down
Dridion
Saturday, October 31, 2009 @ 3:24:54 AM
I love you, lol, and your way of thinking. Keep talking, it never gets old!
4 up, 0 down
___________
Saturday, October 31, 2009 @ 12:34:17 AM
Reply
though i think they should be able to make it back in a few years if there 3D tech comes out and is not to expensive.
if it does go as planned ill be first inline for a 3D TV.
who does not want to play killzone 2 in 3D, with all the bullets, grenades and such flying towards ya.
or imagine the train scene in uncharted 2 chapter 15 where drakes actually running towards the camera, they could make it so it looks like hes leaping at you.
O and imagine horror games like deadspace and the such in 3D, than i would really be sh*tting my pants!
ooooo this has got me all giddily like a school girl.
1 up, 0 down
Snaaaake
Saturday, October 31, 2009 @ 3:55:40 AM
Reply
0 up, 0 down
Highlander
Saturday, October 31, 2009 @ 3:43:19 PM
3 up, 0 down
newchef
Reply
Friday, October 30, 2009 @ 10:27:18 AM