Bayonetta PS3 Enjoys Mysterious Price Drop At GameStop
Bayonetta has been the talk of the town recently, what with its perfect 40/40 score from Famitsu and the fact that Sega had to handle the port for the PlayStation 3. The PS3 version only received a 38/40 from Famitsu and early reports of frame rate issues definitely caused some widespread concern.
However, as most will tell you, the demo on the Japanese PSN flows quite well and even though the game is a port - Platinum Games first developed the title for the Xbox 360 - all indications are that PS3 owners won't be disappointed. And hey, if they can save five bucks off the price of admission, it's a little easier to withstand a few minor drawbacks, right? As noted by Siliconera, the PS3 version is mysteriously priced at $54.99 at GameStop, while the 360 version has the normal $59.99 retail tag. ...what's this about? Is the publisher and/or developer acknowledging that the PS3 version might just be slightly inferior, and hence, cost a little less? It seems almost impossible just because Sega would be making an outright admission; an admission that doesn't exactly reflect well on their efforts. But we're struggling to come up with another explanation; multiplatform games are almost always identically priced and when this trend is interrupted, the reason why is usually unknown.
Anybody have any bright ideas? And if everyone's assumption is correct, would that cheaper price tag convince you to buy the PS3 version, even if it's not 100% perfect...?
Related Game(s): Bayonetta
11/1/2009 9:17:03 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (57 posts)
LowKey
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:41:27 PM
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 1:31:00 AM
LowKey
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 10:39:31 AM
bigrailer19
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 12:44:42 PM
xnonsuchx
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 3:55:38 PM
therabbitkinge
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 10:53:43 PM
Reply
I noticed that the colors in the PS3 version are a tad washed and blurry while the 360's are lush but rather on the sharp side and a tad pixelated when it cam to the lighting but that being the only hitch for me.
Im really gonna pick this title up and 5 bucks off is defenitely welcome.
Maybe sony is doing is doing it because of all the bad hype surrounding the PS3 version and this will just make it look a tad sweeter to those who don't know about the small issues the port suffers and instead they'll just think the PS3 version is cheaper ^_^ makes sense I guess.
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:28:52 PM
Reply
johnld
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:39:29 PM
johnld
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:38:50 PM
Reply
on a side note, why the hell sell it for 59.99? why not just say 60 bucks.
Jawknee
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:41:39 PM
LowKey
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:44:21 PM
Jawknee
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:55:11 PM
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 1:28:57 AM
Jawknee
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 3:07:04 AM
coverton341
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 12:24:09 PM
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 2:16:04 PM
LegendaryWolfeh
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:41:34 PM
Reply
LegendaryWolfeh
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:42:34 PM
Jawknee
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:53:43 PM
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 1:29:43 AM
LegendaryWolfeh
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 7:11:36 AM
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 2:19:34 PM
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 1:32:51 AM
___________
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 11:50:15 PM
Reply
in the US both ps3 and 360 games are the same price.
but here 360 games are always a maximum of 100 bucks, ps3 games are a maximum of 120 bucks.
so why am i paying 10 sometimes 20 bucks more for the game on ps3, when the US is paying the exact same price?
price gouging at its finest!
therabbitkinge
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 12:04:37 AM
Reply
I've seen everything from incorrect release dates to game titles being marked as PS3 exclusive and it always leads to late corrections and wasted money!
Here's hoping its neither ^_^
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 1:34:29 AM
MyWorstNightmar
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 12:39:04 AM
Reply
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 1:43:13 AM
"well.. were pretty disappointed that we didnt get ourselves on as much ps3s as we wanted".
My answer, what did you expect? If you're not going to put the work in to make a multiplatform game equal, then just shut up and go exclusive. You cant call a game multiplatform or aim for a multiplatform game if you're only going to work on one system.
I see this as sega saying that platinum games are a bunch of douchebags and they'll port it to the ps3 as best as they can because we deserve equal treatment. Great try sega but sadly i wont be buying it full price. And now valve has platinum games to keep them company on the list of developers with a bad reputation amongs the sony crowd.
___________
Tuesday, November 03, 2009 @ 5:30:29 AM
RustEDalex
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 4:53:31 AM
Reply
Snaaaake
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 5:38:26 AM
camaro300zx
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 12:11:36 PM
Reply
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 2:23:28 PM
coverton341
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 12:34:17 PM
I distinctly remember seeing those side-by-sides of Resident Evil 5 and how horrible the PS3 version looked only to find that they were not all that different in the end.
coverton341
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 12:31:56 PM
Reply
Hell, maybe Sony themselves worked out a deal with the publisher to lower the price and get more people on board on the PS3 version. The simple fact of the matter is we as the general public just don't know why the price is different and all the speculating that it is because the PS3 version is worse is just silly until the actual game is released.
It very well could be worse than the 360 version but we don't know.
bigrailer19
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 12:49:13 PM
if this bayonetta does end up worse on the ps3 i highly doubt that dictates this price drop. get over it please!
Last edited by bigrailer19 on 11/2/2009 12:49:30 PM
johnld
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 2:27:22 PM
bearbobby
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 3:40:21 PM
I wasn't expecting much, but if anything I had more fun with it than I thought I would have. Though, honestly, I feel it would be a better 2 hour anime movie than a game I want to sit through.
As I don't own a 360 I can't comment on the quality of that version, but there's nothing wrong with our demo that's a deal breaker if you're willing to play this kind of game. If you like the Devil May Cry series, this is it's twin, one chromosome removed.
Ricochet
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 5:46:11 PM
Reply
Alone, yes it is a very SOLID game for the PS3. It's like going to high-class restaurant and having a decent meal. All seems so well and good until another customer comes in having ALL the best service with a complimentary "champagne" on top at the very SAME price you payed for your "decent" meal; suddenly your meal doesn't seem so "decent" anymore to the point that you feel "ripped-off".
This is the exact same scenario for Bayonetta, you can can tout how solid the game is but a crappy port overshadows it's positive aspects -- clearly this is a case of consumer's remorse.
Last edited by Ricochet on 11/2/2009 5:47:24 PM
telly
Monday, November 02, 2009 @ 10:13:52 PM
Reply
And for the record, I'm still not sold on this game at all. I love a great action game, but the main character may be too over the top even for me (and that's REALLY saying something ;)
Advent Child
Tuesday, November 03, 2009 @ 2:01:57 AM
Reply

Bayonetta









HeXeN
Reply
Sunday, November 01, 2009 @ 9:55:23 PM