PS3 News: Call Of Duty Confirmed For 2010, NOT Set In World War II - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Call Of Duty Confirmed For 2010, NOT Set In World War II

We all know the Call of Duty franchise isn't going anywhere and at this point, we can expect a new entry every year, what with Infinity Ward and Treyarch trading off.

So it's no surprise to learn that Activision has confirmed another CoD title for 2010; the announcement came during a conference call with analysts, and of course, other major franchises will return as well. Said Activision president Mike Griffith:

"In [calendar year] 2010, Activision Publishing is expected to release strong, innovative new titles. The diversified lineup will include titles based on the best selling franchises including Call of Duty, Guitar Hero, Shrek, [and] Spider-Man."

Details are few and far between concerning the Guitar Hero and Spider-Man titles but we've heard pieces of information concerning the next Call of Duty. Earlier this year, Treyarch was reportedly seeking new music for the game, and such tracks included "Vietnam War-era tunes, as well as Cuban, African, and Soviet Union music," which got people thinking. Could it be based around Vietnam or the Cold War? We also heard from Treyarch's senior producer that World at War would be the last CoD title to be set in World War II, which will undoubtedly be a major topic of debate amongst loyal followers. Lastly, we do know that wherever the setting, the new Call of Duty has already been in development for quite some time so perhaps we'll start seeing some info and media before the year is out.

At this time, Activision is clearly focusing on the gigantic launch of Modern Warfare 2, which launches next week and is predicted to be one of the single biggest entertainment-related launches in history. Could it sell 14 million copies before the year is out...?  We'll stay on the lookout for any details concerning the next Call of Duty but in the meantime, let's hear from you: what setting would you prefer?

11/6/2009 12:20:56 PM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (92 posts)

laxpro2001
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 12:39:37 PM
Reply

Only looked at title and all I can say is that's good to hear... I was spoiled with Modern Warfare and going back to the older weapons just sucked too much, though I used to go crazy over WWII shooters.

***Random Thought*** how cool do you think it would be if they did some sort of futuristic war game like WWIII and speculate possible weapons


Might be a stupid idea but I wonder where else they'll go with it because I'd rather see a shooter with more recent technology.
Last edited by laxpro2001 on 11/6/2009 12:41:41 PM

Agree with this comment 3 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Killsignal
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 7:58:00 PM

they need to move to NAM... the only good game set in that era was snake eater and it's got little to do with the actual conflict...

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

556pineapple
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 12:45:11 PM
Reply

CoD: Civil War... nah.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

laxpro2001
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:01:44 PM

haha i was thinking the same thing... but like I said I can't regress in weaponry

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ThePearlJamer
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 5:40:12 PM

Take a page from Ratchet & Clank...

Cod: Civil War Future lol

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SvenMD
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 12:59:10 PM
Reply

I love the high tech themes. I want gadgets, red dot sites and really detailed automatic machine guns and sniper rifles.

I'm also just played out of WWII - I even like the idea of Vietnam (even though its not too high tech), but think of all the GREAT music you could put in there.

I'm really looking forward to MW2 - it should be incredible.

But I don't know how long they can keep it interesting with a new one EVERY YEAR...

Agree with this comment 3 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

ThePearlJamer
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 5:42:40 PM

If they based it off of Vietnam...how badass would it be if Forrest Gump was an unlockable character?

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Random_Steve
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:03:48 PM
Reply

could we allow this one to come out before talking of the next one please activision?

Agree with this comment 9 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JcBball717
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:15:20 PM

yea seriously jeeeez

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

chucknasty
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:59:34 PM

thank everyone who preordered MW2. When you buy a reskinned version of a game you already own six reskinned versions of you are directly responsible for this sort of thing.

Agree with this comment 6 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Zorigo
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 7:22:30 AM

chucknasty, when people are sick of COD, they'll stop buying it. just because it exists doesn't mean you need to have it. im gonna get Mw2 then cod can go eff itself unless it make something im interested in.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Alienange
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:05:23 PM
Reply

I want to see other 'fantasy' settings for CoD. Like a Cod set in the Bioshock/Fallout3 futuristic 50s or 60s. Or heck, CoD Future Warfare or some such.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

laxpro2001
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:28:35 PM

yea or something like a post apocalyptic future, Allies vs. Mutated enemy nations with futuristic weapons

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

www
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:22:58 PM

laxpro we dont want no more halos

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

laxpro2001
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:59:14 PM

i didn't exactly mean halo, but I guess you can get that from the post... I just wanna see futuristic weaponry (kind of like Modern Warfare weaponry only what one would assume to be more advanced) and halo doesn't really have that

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

www
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 4:04:09 PM

Yea I know, just wanted an excuse to bash Halo lol :D

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Naga
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:07:49 PM
Reply

Call of duty heroes World Tour?

Agree with this comment 5 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

laxpro2001
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:27:19 PM

lol

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Random_Steve
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 5:17:14 PM

that could actually work in a way...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

NoMoreWar
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:15:35 PM
Reply

must be Vietnam. it would be kinda hard to make it based on the Cold War considering it was "cold" aka no battles occurred... i suppose they could have you cruise around the USSR in a submarine trying to avoid detection. then you get to be Kennedy negotiating with russia, and then a sailor on board a navy cruiser helping in the blockade of Cuba. then you are Neil Armstrong stepping on the moon to "win" the space race... AWESOME!!! LOL

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SvenMD
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:30:13 PM

Your name is NoMoreWar - but you're commenting on a game that is all about WAR...

I dont get it.

And what do you expect our kids to play 30 years from now if there are no more wars today? HAHA
I would hate to continue to see WWII games in 30 years!

just messin' around.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Axe99
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:22:13 PM

No shortage of wars today unfortunately, so you don't need to worry about what your kids will end up playing. But in the cold war there were plenty of things going on besides Vietnam - insurgencies all throughout Africa, with the Soviets on one side and the US on the other, and some stuff going on in South America as well.

As for CoD and WWII, a good game is a good game - I play plenty enough other games that one good WWII shooter for me every couple of years isn't over-saturation, and there are _heaps_ of topics and themes that gaming hasn't gone close to, but Vietnam is ripe, as is Korea, or even Afghanistan (a game playing as the Mujahideen fighting the Russkies has the potential to be a lot of fun).

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

NoMoreWar
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:56:56 PM

@ SvenMD: lol, i keep getting this more and more. its a game, and i thoroughly enjoy virtually killing virtual people.

@ Axe99: well i dont know what you are talking about regarding the Cold War unless you mean the era in general, but i'm talking specifically about the conflict between the US and USSR named the Cold War because it was "cold," referencing the fact that there was no actual warfare going on... just an arms race, space race, economic race, nuclear missiles being sent to Cuba, resulting blockade, etc.
Last edited by NoMoreWar on 11/6/2009 3:57:50 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Raiden08
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:32:32 PM
Reply

What about Vietnam? Compared to WW II and modern settings, Vietnam has had next to nothing come out.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

photo K
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:14:07 PM

Vietnam war? Does that mean you can't beat the game?

Agree with this comment 6 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

leatherface
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:50:40 PM

@photo K, you win by getting out of vietnam alive. if you were in my squad with that attitude and went KIA , in the words of AnimalMother- Better you than me.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Miggy
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:42:33 PM
Reply

Call Of Duty: Kotick's Office

Agree with this comment 6 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Kangasfwa
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 5:41:00 PM

Great multiplayer map idea... weaving in and out of piles of gold coins and stacks of money...

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Naga
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 5:57:13 PM

Yep and a screw games billboard too

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

HeXeN
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:44:10 PM
Reply

They could have had the decency to wait till MW2 came out.While their at it they might as well confirm the one set of 2011.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:45:17 PM
Reply

Every bloody year...

How are "Call of Duty, Guitar Hero, Shrek, [and] Spider-Man." stong, innovative new titles?
Last edited by WorldEndsWithMe on 11/6/2009 1:46:21 PM

Agree with this comment 4 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Oxvial
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:10:48 PM

New CoD it's not WWII... that must be the innovative feat.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Douchebaguette
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 5:14:11 PM

Was thinking the same thing, especially when he said "innovative" and "based on" in the same answer. So he's practically admitted it's all copies of old innovations.

In the name of business, he's only selling himself.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bagmup
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 1:51:18 PM
Reply

Well, they're not, thats why i only buy every second CoD... sorry Treyarch.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

maxpontiac
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:11:43 PM
Reply

I see the series heading to the future.

One world governments fighting terrorism.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

photo K
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:15:16 PM
Reply

i prefer a completely fabricated COD:WWIII, using real proto-type weapons, but nothing fake and so futuristic like Halo.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Cavan
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:26:37 PM
Reply

do they have to do a new one every single year?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

frylock25
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:47:46 PM

actually yes they do. are you unfamiliar with activision? lets be happy they only do 1 a year. hell with activision we are lucky they arent tryin to do it twice or more a year like the hero games.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

MyWorstNightmar
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 2:47:59 PM

They are just setting up that stool next to the cow, and milking those udders for all they are worth. Until everyone is lactose intolerant, you will continue to see them roll out more of the same year after year.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

frylock25
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:27:19 PM
Reply

yep callin it right now. CoD in 2011.
might as well call the next one also, CoD in 2012. oh dont forget CoD set for 2013 and the one set for 2014 and....

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:35:12 PM

The only thing that'll stop this is if the world really does end in 2012.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Banky A
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:06:15 PM

Yeah. But the world better not end with you in 2012.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 4:02:39 PM

There will be no 2013, it's like the 13th floor in the USA, it doesn't exist, you go from the 12th to the 14th floor, so we'll just skip straight from 2012 to 2014. ABC will have to run a new TV show about how the entire human race lost a year of their lives and no one remembers a thing....

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Random_Steve
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 4:15:55 PM

it'll be like those 3 doctor who episodes like 2 years ago

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 9:31:10 PM

Lol World, no, the WorldEndsWIthYou :)

Q!

"i am home"

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

redman479
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:36:33 PM
Reply

I hope this is true, that's why I didn't buy WOW. I'm tired of that WW2 crap.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Naga
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 6:00:08 PM

NOOOO!! not World of Warcraft Athene needs to pwn the newbs

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

DIsmael85
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 2:47:48 PM
Reply

After Tuesday I am officially done with the COD franchise, I just wanted the sequal to my favorite one. Now it's dead, and done. Activision sucks.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Oxvial
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:11:35 PM

and what you gonna do when they release the third one?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

LegendaryWolfeh
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:31:50 PM

What it there's a MW3?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

DIsmael85
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 7:52:15 PM

@ Oxvial, I will not buy it, did you not get what I said in my post. How many Guitar Hero's did they make? They are crap. This is my last Call of Duty. No more, nothing, this is it.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

MyWorstNightmar
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 2:54:36 PM

Dismael, we got what you said in your post. Just doesn't make sense. You want MW2, but you won't buy MW3? Oh, ok, makes a lot of sense. You will buy the sequel to your favorite game, but when asked if you will buy the next sequel to your favorite game you scoff him?
Last edited by MyWorstNightmar on 11/7/2009 2:57:07 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Banky A
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:09:04 PM
Reply

Cool. I did get a good vibe when I had Treyarch's COD: WaW.

I really liked that game. Looking forward to this ;) since it's not WWII anymore. No idea what theme they could cover. Nearly everything's been used.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

IrreducibleSUN
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:12:23 PM
Reply

Well that sound about right, I mean it's okay to milk the cow this much this fast..right?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

www
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:27:16 PM
Reply

Well its gonna be set in the 90s or something based on some war that never happened am sure.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 3:38:25 PM
Reply

Gasp!

Oh my! Shock and awe, another COD and Guitar Hero game! How very unexpected. I hope everyone takes note of the fact that these are being announced for 2010 when the 2009 versions are only just out of the incubator.

New Shrek and Spiderman games eh? I guess that means new Shrek and Spider-man movies coming in 2010 as well then.

Yay...I think.

Gotta love Activision, the paint's not yet dry on one end of the bridge before they're starting to repaint at the other end again.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Random_Steve
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 4:17:42 PM

more of the the paints not been painted on one side of the bridge and they start painting the other again

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

laxpro2001
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 4:01:58 PM
Reply

I see a lot of people are getting angry with Activision, and I'm definitely not a big fan of them, but lets face the fact that they are a company who's purpose is to maximize profits.

Furthermore why don't I remember seeing this when EA releases a new sports game every year. In essence isn't it the same situation?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 4:03:31 PM

Indeed, have you seen the displeasure of people complaining that Madden is a yearly refresh with little difference except fresh paint and new rosters?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

www
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 4:06:10 PM

Yea Laxpro I see what your saying, actually I don't have no problem seeing COD every year, heck I even wanted GTA every other year.

I've been buying FIFA yearly and I don't see nothing wrong. Even with COD its got new storylines for each iteration, how about these sports games that seem just updated every now and then, yet we still buy them.
Last edited by www on 11/6/2009 4:11:19 PM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

FlyingKickPunch
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 4:45:45 PM
Reply

call of duty : revolutionary war

i think it would be really interesting to play a game where you use muskets, bayonets, or your gun as a club, cannons, cavalry, infantry formations.
it would be very intense to reload after every shot and wait for your captain to yell fire! then rush at them with your bayonet as cannon fire explodes around you, wiping out soldiers left and right. if done right, it would be as exciting as any omaha beach landing.
i dunno maybe i'm crazy

that or civil war...gettysburg would be epic!
just a thought...

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

randomname
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 5:21:31 PM
Reply

WWI

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

TI_2589
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 5:45:51 PM
Reply

Can I please soak in MW2 before I half to worry about playing a different COD?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Mornelithe
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 6:05:32 PM
Reply

Might be interested if it were a Vietnam era thing. Seriously doubtful if it doesn't have dedicated servers tho.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Mysterio Spyder
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 6:30:12 PM
Reply

"At this time, Activision is clearly focusing on the gigantic launch of Modern Warfare 2, which launches next week" I had to laugh at this because a local store in my town already started selling COD;MW2 yesterday in which I got my copy. I really hope a new COD isnt WW2 settings or any setting with the old school weaponry, after COD;MW I can't seem to use the old weapons at all, I'm horrible.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

cadpig
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 7:19:16 PM
Reply

Good, as long as it's not world war 2. They should set it in Vietnam.

No civil war...That time period had lousy weapons.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

mykjessnjr
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 7:20:36 PM
Reply

I think a Call of Duty: Nonlethal Warfare should come out sometime down the road- before ending the franchise. That would be a day 1 purchase for me. Think about it: taser and stun guns, rubber bullets, pepper spray, sticky foam... you could play forever and never die... unless your soldier had a heart condition and died from the taser...long live CoD!!!! muawahaha

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 7:25:01 PM
Reply

Saw Warfare 2 on a modded 360

Looks average at best
boring (imo)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Mysterio Spyder
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 7:32:56 PM

it looks pretty good, not as good as killzone or uncharted 2 cause of it being multiplat and bogged down by 360. The campaign like all COD's is just awesome. I don't care for COD multiplayer, just the campaigns and Modern Warfare 2 campaign impressed me ALOT. All I know is I can't wait for Modern Warfare 3, yes there will be one according to MW2's ending.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Oxvial
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 7:49:03 PM
Reply

you are a weird kind Mysterio.. a MW player that don't care about the multiplayer.

I'm gonna give you a thumb up.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Mysterio Spyder
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 8:01:39 PM

I'm not a fan of the multiplayer for numerous reasons but mainly the community (i know that doesnt seem fair to the game). from my experiences it seems like the HALO community is also the Call Of Duty community, or as alot of people I know call it, Call Of Douchebags. If I play with no mic or mute everybody it's alright but then how can u make more friends to add to your list? I like the Campaigns in COD games because to me they're intense. I've enjoyed every COD campaign to date starting from COD 2 on 360. I have Killzone for multiplayer :)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 8:22:35 PM
Reply

Wow, amazing, I guess from CoD4 onwards there's gonna be a CoD EVERY year.
What can I say? LET THE MILKING BEGIN!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Hezzron
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 8:44:55 PM
Reply

It's funny seeing everyone rag about a yearly COD game. It's a quality franchise people. That's why there's actually 2 COD games each year, counting the Game Of The Year Edition!

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

NonProphet
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 9:05:01 PM
Reply

I was underwhelmed by COD: WaW after coming off Modern Warfare. As far as I'm concerned, they're two different franchises.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qubex
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 9:32:37 PM
Reply

For me it is Killzone 2 and Killzone 3 all the way. MW2 I will get second hand!

Q!

"i am home"

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

frostface
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 9:54:58 PM
Reply

A bit premature with the promotion of next years game. Although I like the idea of them using Vietnam as a setting. But as much as I like the CoD games, I found myself getting too involved in them and having to remind myself when I'm playing that they're basing them off real events that have happened. What I mean to say is that I wasn't too impressed with myself when I'd blast the head off some Japanese dude and be happy about it. Not trying to read too much into the games and this didn't stop me from finishing the last one, but just saying, sh** got me thinking.
The Modern Warfare games don't have that effect since they're not based on any historical events.
I seem to of gone off topic now I think. 4am will do that to ya I guess.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LittleBigMidget
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 10:23:53 PM
Reply

Gee another COD. Tsk Tsk. These CODs are gonna make me but a bullet through my head.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Perry Katy
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 11:18:35 PM
Reply

How about Vietnam?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Friday, November 06, 2009 @ 11:52:12 PM
Reply

oooo another spider man game.
that could be interesting.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

laharl
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 3:50:26 AM
Reply

I'm obviously in the minority here but i think they should stick with ww2.There are hundreds of modern and futuristic shooters out there but for those of us who like the ww2 setting there is medal of honor(which has sucked for a long time) and call of duty.How about a cod from a german point of view?Nazi's are much more interesting than generic terrorists and bloody weapons of mass destruction.(yawn)

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

laharl
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 3:50:27 AM
Reply

I'm obviously in the minority here but i think they should stick with ww2.There are hundreds of modern and futuristic shooters out there but for those of us who like the ww2 setting there is medal of honor(which has sucked for a long time) and call of duty.How about a cod from a german point of view?Nazi's are much more interesting than generic terrorists and bloody weapons of mass destruction.(yawn)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Zorigo
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 7:23:20 AM

how many GOOD futuristic shooters are out there.
KZ2 and Unreal Tournament 3 is all i can thnk of.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

laharl
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 3:50:28 AM
Reply


Last edited by laharl on 11/7/2009 3:53:31 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

laharl
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 3:50:30 AM
Reply

Sorry for the multiple post i'm using my PS3 and the cursor wasn't responding.
Last edited by laharl on 11/7/2009 3:52:50 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Banky A
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 2:25:47 PM

Excuses.. ;)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

laharl
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 3:50:30 AM
Reply


Last edited by laharl on 11/7/2009 3:51:15 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

sha4dowknight05
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 7:44:30 AM
Reply

well we can almost determine that this might not be on the ps3.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

sha4dowknight05
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 7:44:34 AM
Reply

well we can almost determine that this might not be on the ps3.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

tlpn99
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 10:28:57 AM
Reply

At last im all for basing it in the modern world. WW2 has been done to death. Vietnam would be good as it has no been done as much as WW2 has.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

sha4dowknight05
Saturday, November 07, 2009 @ 3:49:38 PM
Reply

definatlly vietnam would be great only battlefield and a few other spinoffs have done nam.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

LowKey
Monday, November 09, 2009 @ 2:52:34 PM
Reply

A NAM game would put me over the edge not only has EVERY NAM game that has ever come out with NAM sucked big hairy moose baww.... u know, but a NAM game where u play as a US soldier is pure propaganda for a false flag operation. This is one of those times that I would'nt tell stupid nay sayers to shut up.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

willdigital
Sunday, November 15, 2009 @ 2:16:46 PM
Reply

I know COD has been a FSP but like they did with MW and how about trying it in both FSP/3rd person. One of the big reason i like the R2:vegas series.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Popular Cheats

Recent Reviews

Recent Previews

Sponsor

Our Poll

Do you plan to buy a PlayStation Vita this year?
Yes, I'll definitely get one in 2013.
No, but I'll get one eventually.
No, I have no intention of buying the Vita.
No, I've already got one.

Previous Poll Results