PS3 News: Will Exposed PS3 Power Result In Even More Exclusives? - PS3 News

Members Login: Register | Why sign up? | Forgot Password?

Will Exposed PS3 Power Result In Even More Exclusives?

While the idea of third-party exclusive titles is nearly extinct this generation, it has become abundantly clear that games exclusive to the PlayStation 3 hold the edge in terms of overall quality and pushing the envelope; in gaining a new technical foothold in this era.

It has all happened quite recently, although early examples (Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, etc.) have given us glimpses of what developers could do if they focused entirely on the PS3's ultra-competent hardware. However, it's no easy feat to produce a blockbuster exclusive that manages to be lucrative. First of all, you're eliminating...what, about 55-60% of potential sales by cutting out the Xbox 360? Secondly, these projects often suck up a tremendous amount of cash and it can be awfully risky for the designers. Thirdly and lastly, with the competition becoming stiffer and stiffer with every passing month (or so it seems, anyway), you really have to produce something pretty damn spectacular to make a big splash. Despite all these risks, though, the likes of Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, inFamous, Killzone 2, and the spectacular Uncharted 2: Among Thieves have been extremely successful and have proved the PS3's unrivaled - and heretofore untapped - capability.

Furthermore, it's hardly a stretch to believe future exclusives like Gran Turismo 5, God of War III and Heavy Rain will be gigantic hits, and will likely act as more measuring sticks and benchmarks for the generation. Developers for the games I've listed here have often said they simply couldn't make such productions for other platforms (Naughty Dog has said Uncharted 2 would have to be "a very different game" on the 360). If you factor all this in, might developers, even third-party developers, look at this success and realize they can make their mark with the PS3? It's risky, yes, but look at the respect designers like Naughty Dog and Guerrilla get; look at how the critics and gamers everywhere receive their efforts. At the same time, we've seen multiple reports from developers who say the 360 has long since been maxed out, which means we've already seen just about everything that console is capable of. Gears of War 3 is a guaranteed bad-ass game, but I'll say without any reservation whatsoever that four of the five most impressive titles I've played this generation are PS3 exclusives.  I doubt I'm the only one.

Obviously, exclusives seem to be great for every platform, and that's just logical. Give a developer time to focus entirely on any console, and it's more than likely the team will produce something better than if they were forced to make the game for multiple systems. But given the potential of the PS3, much of which has been clearly utilized in the past few years, it seems inevitable that more devs might want to take a shot at a PS3 exclusive. I dunno...just a train of thought followed through to what I'd like to think is a common sense conclusion.

11/26/2009 9:34:00 PM Ben Dutka

Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google Share on MySpace Share on Delicious Share on Digg Share on Google Buzz Share via E-Mail Share via Tumblr Share via Posterous

Comments (76 posts)

jlch777
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 9:59:15 PM
Reply

Hopefully!

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Banky A
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 3:11:49 AM

I was thinking of saying exactly that ;)

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Deleted User
Saturday, November 28, 2009 @ 1:58:16 AM

it didn't work for the Xbox and the Xbox was a complete generation above the PS2 in graphical ability unlike this gen

Agree with this comment 0 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 10:11:06 PM
Reply

It's the take over
Just like when ps2 took over Dreamcast

It just took longer this time around
ps3 is the QUALITY console to own

Never again will you have to sweat your face off worrying 'bout Red Rings of Death

Getting your modded 360 PWNED by Microsoft

Or having to pay for online

Oh, and yes you'll be getting exclusive as diverse as they come.

Anyway, I've said it before, at this point I really don't care who owns a ps3 and who doesn't.

In fact it cracks me or at least makes me smile in a sarcastic way when someone actually doesn't own a ps3 since I know they're getting owned by the lack of quality the 360 has to offer at the moment. No exclusives, 200000 PFSs, horribly controller*, etc.

Agree with this comment 10 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

shadowscorpio
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:23:51 PM

I actually don't "mind" the 360 controller but it isn't an "all round gaming controller" the Ps controller on the other hand is still by far the most practical.

Agree with this comment 7 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:46:51 PM

wait so if someone does not own a ps3 they automatically own a 360?
also dont want to start a argument here but the ps3 is not as reliable as a wooden stove either, dont forget that.
the day you get all cocky waving it around saying it wont happen to me.
is the day youll end up on the phone or at the post office.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 7 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 12:12:33 AM

Mr Negative has entered the ring

Think that "____________" is jut a big minus sign

And instead of taking my points in generality you go ahead and try to find the small negatives/possibilities in them

Agree with this comment 5 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:18:16 AM

1. Agree with the whole 360 controller thing. Sucks something severe. Only works well with FPS's, and even then I feel better with a PS3 controller in my hand. One friend of mine hates the asymmetrical joysticks of the 360 controller, and so do I.

2. The popularity of shooters this generation is what MS has taken advantage of. It just takes a few years for the Halo fans to grow up, grow a little more intelligent and realise the PS3 has more variety.

3. Now that the whole RRoD problem is dying down, along with the YLoD on the PS3, can we finally put that to rest? Both 120 GB PS3 slims and 360 Elites have very few problems with them, especially this year's models.

4. So long as Gears and Halo remain exclusive, and so long as arrogant and loud teenagers play 360's with their loud arrogant friends, PS3 will always have stiff competition. Wii and iPhone fills the casual crowd, 360 owns most teens, Xbots and Halo lovers, while the PS3 fills the gaps with all in between (which is a large audience leftover)

Last edited by Dancemachine55 on 11/27/2009 1:20:08 AM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Wage SLAVES
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 3:44:29 AM

@ff

No bro, the ps2 was released after the Dreamcast and overtook it. Wiki it.

I also agree with the 360 controller being bad. It is a shooter's controller only and still I think the ps3 controller is better. That is completely objective but who was born with crooked thumbs???

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 6:44:27 AM

and your comment was positive as sunshine?
what you said is utter sh*t and to try and cover it up, you put the mr negativity twist onto it.
nice try but its not going to work.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 9 down Disagree with this comment

Solid Fantasy
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 9:36:03 AM

imo realistically speaking the controllers are virtually the same. I might even go as far to say the 360 controller looks cooler. But thankx to that awful D-pad on the 360 the PS3 controller wins in my book.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Kowhoho
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 4:26:16 PM

For what it may be worth, Scarecrow, I don't think you're a shallow little man who's "covering up" your supposed negativity. Mr. negative has his undies in a bunch.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

DeathOfChaos
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 9:11:23 AM

I liked the Dreamcast, it was awesome, but the PS2 was just that much better. Also, if you look at the controller for the XBox 360 and the Dreamcast...see the similarity? Except the XBox 360 one is a bit less comfortable, and that's really not a good thing, lol. The XBox is only an FPS hoarder and it makes me hate FPS games even more than I did before, in fact, back in the N64 days, Goldeneye was great. Thanks XBox. The only XBox exclusive I like is Fable, guess it's because it's not an oversued genre? I dunno. All the other games I would have played that were XBox 360 exclusive are all coming to the PS3 or already here on the PS3 and are new nd improved. Trusy Bell was one, Tales of Vesperia, and my all time favortie XBox 360 to PS3 upgrade: Star Ocean The Last Hope International. lol. For Christ's sake, it's an international version of an XBox 360 exclusive made exclusive for the PS3! I just find it hilarious and look at the XBox 360 as a beta testing system for the better games out there. Use the XBox 360 sales to fund the complete version of their game so they get it made for the PS3 only, lol. Doesn't that sound like a beta testing machine to you?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

kevinater321
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 10:17:36 PM
Reply

I don't know... that means that more work is involved. and a dev like valve.......

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

www
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 5:37:19 AM

Yea their leader likes burgers and until Sony buy him a truck load of Macs....forget it!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Aftab
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 10:19:01 PM
Reply

It's getting harder to get your name out there when hits like MW2 take the spotlight. And therein lies the risk of multiplatform development. If a game fizzles, they've got almost twice the resources invested, and almost twice the losses. But, if they put an exclusive with an acceptable level of quality, they're guaranteed some audience, even if it's not the next Call of Duty. So, naturally, there are plenty of developers looking toward ND, and wondering, can those guys help us make our games shine, too?

Agree with this comment 6 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 10:25:25 PM
Reply

Yeah I was hoping FFXIII would be going this route but well there's always FFXV. And let's not forget how awesome Agent is going to be just by staying exclusive. I really hope there is a return of third party exclusives because so far there have been only a few multiplats this gen that are worth having in your collection, something just gets crappy about those games that have to cater to the lesser system.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Lord carlos
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:52:00 PM

Methinks the best sony can do to entice 3rd party devs is the offer of dev kits 4 free and a cash injection on the QT,to help with development costs,untill such time as ps3 is the majority console in homes.
Quantic dream & heavy rain is a good example of this method.
I read somewhere(can't remember) that even though kojima had said mgs4 would remain ps3 exclusive,sony gave konami the rights to the mgs movie back for free as a sweetener!

its a messy business making good games!!!!

i now return to the dark realm from whenst i came.
'aaaaaa ha ha ha ha ha ha'

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Qwarktast1c
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:07:57 AM

@ world

when you said FF XV i just had a thought of how the amount of numbered guitar hero titles will most likely surpass the number of numbered FFs at the current rate of activision's milking machine

cause you figure that XV wont come out for at least a year and a half after XIV

damn....

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 10:48:14 PM
Reply

I think that the times have changed. Games like MW2 from Activision make it very hard to see games from third party publishers going exclusive. A publisher like Activision has a primary goal of maximizing profit and revenue, not maximizing the platform or producing a title of unparalleled artistic quality.

A first (or second) party developer/publisher like Naughty Dog is in the perhaps enviable position of being effectively commissioned by a patron to produce a work, rather like the old masters of the oil painting world were commissioned to produce works. They therefore have more freedom to take risks and do not have to worry about maximizing revenue so long as they make a game that meets their target/goal whatever it is.

I think the tremendous success of a game like Uncharted 2 might encourage Sony and it's first parties to continue doing what they are doing. It is these games that are defining the generation and leading the platform in quality. Personally I would prefer to see Sony sponsoring and directing their first parties this way, in some ways it removes the commercial pressure on the developers, which must be liberating.

Agree with this comment 19 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:06:46 PM

yeah but what about a 3rd party company that is more interested in producing a quality title (work of art) than making tons of money? I admit they are few and far between but I'd like to see more of them.

Agree with this comment 9 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:29:20 AM

@Worlds

Sony has already shown that if a third party wishes to make an exclusive, Sony will be ready and willing to help any way they can, including getting their first party developers to share custom tools and knowledge.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

mastiffchild
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 2:51:53 AM

Great discussion you two. Something I often think about since the debacle over MW2. IW used to be all about "he gaming experience" be it on or offline. About maximising the pleasure a gamer would get from playing their games-in short making their game the best it could possibly be with their buddget and at that time. They spoke guchingly about dedicated servers and put them into their PCversion of COD4 with console owners possibly consoling themselves with the gope that the high sales of that ganme would mean they'd get them too next time. But what happened? IW turned intop Acti's monkey butlers and inherited ALL Kotick's greed, started promoting MW2 as the GOTY before release, started hiking the price in the eU and on PC while taking away rather than adding features for gamers, stripped the dedicated servers from PC gamers and offered lies as an excuse, made a video offensive to anyone who isn' homo[phobic themselves and generally behaved like none of them were EVER gamers themselves. Why? Because it's become ALL about the bottom line and way less about the game, the experience or the art.

If IW wanted dedicared servers they could easily affrd them without denting the profits of this game-but they din't want the expense and didn't want the PC crowd making mods a s they want to make all new maps themselves as paid for DLC. They allow us all to play on P2P and limited to 9V9 with a ton of lag for profit and because what we experience as "their" gamers is no longer that important if there's a corner to be cut for a little extra margin. Sleep with the devil(Acti) and you'll starrt growing horns yourself.

Thing is this attitude is VERY commonplace this generation asp when the main aim of a multi plat dev isn't to make the best game they can but the most money WHILE ensuring the two versions achieve parity. How in the world are multiplats ever gona challenge exclusives in this enviroment? When making their game is all about avoiding the controversy of one being better than the other(meaning they kowtow to both sets of weaknesses and neither set of strengths of the two platforms)while making as much cash as possible there's no chance of making the best game they could on either PS3 or 360.

Does this mean a lot of third party devs DON'T care about the quality of their own games anymore? IDK as maybe some will use the multiplat cash to do better things in the future(like Vs from SE maybe?)but, largely, as it would make their multis look REAL bad I doubt theres a big number waiting to go a PS3 exclusive and join the ranks of the great game makers of this generation. Face it too-when Valve can get 360 heads praising them to the hilt for their version of L4D people, gamers might well have stopped caring about quality too as that is without a doubt the worst value package I've bought this gen yet they act like it's a gift from the Gods! Compared to the PC version it looks awful, runs badly, has a jumpy framerate, has less dev support, lss community support and NO mod support while we're expected to pay a LOT more for it to boot(I payed twice as much for the rubbish 360 game as I did on Steam for PC)! Again, is this the kind of circumstance that leads to evs pushing quality over immediate profit? Sadly, I doubt it when devs are being greedy and the gaming community will allow the biggest online game of the year to drag us ass backwards inot the P2P era AGAIN!

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

OPHIDIAN
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 3:12:28 AM

Sorry MSC your post is just too long to read.

But about the argument money vs art: I have to say it is incredibly unlikely that a company would strive - using up all their resources - to make a work of art, not giving a damn as to there revenues. Arguably I would be worried if there was such a company, because I certainly won't be investing in them.

The reason there are third party exclusives, or lack of, is because companies knew during the PS2 period knew that there are potentially 100 million + customers out there. On the other hand, with the likes of PS3 / and xbox360, there would't be that many potential customers even if they were combined!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:47:50 PM

@Ophidian

I don't think that the struggle between the profit motive and artistic quality are mutually exclusive. I am certain that the folks at Naughty Dog are very interested in revenue and profit too, that's the reason they are still in business. However as a first party studio, they may not have the same drive on profit/revenue as a third party. I'm talking about the difference between their primary objective and their secondary objective. For a first party developer they may have the luxury of putting the quality of their game first, and worrying about the money side second. But for a third party developer/publisher without the support of Sony (or MS) the money has to come first.

It's a matter of emphasis. A first party developer is sheltered by their status as a first party studio. Uncharted was a statement game, it made the statement that the PS3 could do 'this much' and more. But the sales of the game were limited - there were fewer PS3s around, and it was a new game IP. To some extent, for Sony, Uncharted : Drake's Fortune was a combination of loss leader, R&D and marketing, as well as a darned good game, and one hopes profitable in the long run thanks to continues sales as a 'greatest hit'. How many third party publishers could afford to have a game that's considered a loss leader, or party R&D? That's where the difference is to me. Sony's focus is on the platform as a whole, not just the sales of an individual game title. A third party publisher/developer will always focus on the individual sales of a game.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

OPHIDIAN
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 2:07:28 PM

Arguable though, Highlander, the success of a game is dependent on the revenue it makes. I know this sounds strange, but whether a game is quality or not is, most of the time, decided on how many buy it. An example may be Valkyria, that game was quality but never had the sales and therefore wasn't classed as an 'art' within the gaming community, despite being quite incredible. Then there is MGS4 and MW2, MGS4 beats MW2 anyday, but if you ask an average gamer which has made more of a mark, they are most likely going to argue the latter.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:03:37 PM
Reply

As more people buy PS3's I think we'll see a lot more exclusives. It may take another year but I believe it will happen.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:29:29 AM

My thoughts exactly.

It's taken 2 years to even the playing field, it might take another 2 for Sony to take over and dominate once again.

Then MS will bring out Natal and claim it to be the greatest thing on earth, before it too dies after Halo fans realise the controller is better and casual gamers go "Microsoft? Pfft... they're not as cool as Nintendo or iPhone"

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

sabitrulz
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:36:23 PM
Reply

''although early examples (Heavenly Sword, Warhawk, Uncharted: Drake's Fortune, etc''
---ben mgs4 aint there???????? omfg!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 3 down Disagree with this comment

Alienange
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:44:51 PM

MGS4 was no "early example."

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:40:14 PM
Reply

doubt it.
if anything it will see the end of high quality games and send us back to the dark ages of mediocrity.
reason being its so bloody dam expensive to crete a high caliber game like uncharted 2 so only first party companys can afford to do so.
decided to pick up rouge assassin yesterday, dont ask why.
and O boy has it made me appreciate how spoiled we have been this year, it is truly a game with so much Potential but is seriously lacking some effort and polish.
it screams rushed, rushed, rushed.
you can really tell they just rushed it out the door, saw the flaws but could not care less.
there just worried about making a quick buck.
thats what i hate about the industry these days, back in the day game developers were game developers because they had a passion for games.
nowadays game developers are game developers because they see it as a massive cash cow.
wow i can sit on my ass all day in a nice air con building playing testing games and get paid very well for it.
thats the new attitude and it stinks, and i fear as the industry gets bigger and bigger were going to get more and more like that.
until the industry is full of nothing besides mediocrity.
funny how people see the future as the peak of games, the more time passes the better games become.
i see it as the destruction of them.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

tes37
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 12:13:33 AM

Somebody is funding this mediocrity you speak of and it's not me. Developers will go under with that attitude. You don't get that many chances when you get it wrong.

Last edited by tes37 on 11/27/2009 12:15:03 AM

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:32:19 AM

@tes

Mediocre games are bought by average people in their millions. These are the people who do not avidly read gaming sites, and do not follow every rumor. They go by the posters, charts and advice found in their local GameStop/Walmart/Target. Many of the purchases are made by parents who are even less informed (why else would Wii have so so very well?).

So mediocre games sell reasonably well because they are neither terrible, nor offensive. They are simply average.

Agree with this comment 4 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Bugzbunny109
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 10:17:12 AM

__________ I couldn't agree more. Most developers are more interested in the amount of cash they are going to make, rather than the quality of the game they are producing. MW2 is an example of this. IW created a mediocre game with "additional features", a piss-poor incoherent storyline and somewhat polished graphics, and expected it to sell like hotcakes because it had the name "Call of Duty" on it. In my perspective, you cannot compare MW2 to MGS4, Assassin’s Creed 2, Killzone 2 or Uncharted 2. The developers of all these games were out to create a piece of artwork that people would enjoy and of course, make money. The most important thing is that money is not their primary goal; aesthetics is their primary goal. As a result, they worked long and hard on their games. When you play their games, you immediately know and understand how much effort they put in them.

Last edited by Bugzbunny109 on 11/27/2009 10:19:52 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Alienange
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:44:08 PM
Reply

You're making perfect sense to me Ben. There must come a point in a developers life where he's thinking to himself that the game he wants to make is only possible on one system. Take Dragon Age. A fantastic game, really and truly. But as I play through it, I sense that old DVD gimp effect just about everywhere. Look at Borderlands. Gimped again. These devs can make fantastic games, they must realize that their game is not as good as it could have been because of the multi-platform mess going on.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:52:17 PM

damn straight, I see dvd gimpage all over the place that needn't be.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:35:49 AM

Final Fantasy XIII.

Square lost so much respect over that game, and now they're trying to make it up with Versus XIII and XIV online.

Is it just me, or has Microsoft completely held back the games industry altogether, completely stagnating it by relying on old formats, old formulas and old technology? How long can they truly milk the FPS genre?

Agree with this comment 9 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Highlander
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 2:33:14 AM

@DanceMachine

It's not just you.

MS has acted like a brake on the entire industry.

Agree with this comment 5 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

jaybiv
Thursday, November 26, 2009 @ 11:48:31 PM
Reply

I've been hearing a lot of Xboxers saying they plan to get a PS3 this holiday season. Cannot be good news for Bill Gates.

You can't expect Sony to get some current multi-plats to go exclusive, but it would be nice to see some of these games use the PS3 as the lead system.

Agree with this comment 3 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:40:54 AM

Not Bill Gates. Remember, he has shares in MS, but no say in it anymore.

I forget who's in charge of the Xbox division, but it looks like they've given up on their console and shifted to Natal as their saviour from mediocrity. It'll be interesting to see how successful it will be.

And it looks like their plan to buy out everything isn't working, so long as PS3 has bluray and cheap dev kits, developers go with 360 for the money at first then use that money to create an amazing PS3 exclusive.

Seriously, I feel like this is whats happening. MS gives shiteloads of money to developers for multiplats or exclusives, then the developer uses that money to create their masterpieces for the PS3.

Anyone else seeing this trend?

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 3:54:32 AM

@Dancemachine55

Studios such as?

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

___________
Saturday, November 28, 2009 @ 6:25:26 AM

steve balmer is the head of things now i think.
and if you ask me hes even worse than bill gates.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

BlackBriar
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 12:10:48 AM
Reply

Heavy Rain, Need I say More...

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

ryu
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:02:36 AM
Reply

actually... it's more like developers setting back to 360's shitty standard to go multiplatform, after all it's only about profit, critics can have their say
at least that's what i sense is happening in the industry

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Dancemachine55
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:45:42 AM
Reply

Anyone else notice the difference between FFXIII on PS3 and 360 when it was still PS3 exclusive?

Google it, check out comparison pics, and it will confirm that 360 is the true inferior console in terms of graphics and raw power.

Sadly, because of MS's and Square Enix's greed for money, the PS3 MUST get the same quality FFXIII title as 360, which means it has once again been cut down to sloppy 360 standards. Square shoulders anyone?

This is what infuriates me. The money is now the spotlight for developers, not the game's quality, and they are willing to sacrifice their games to make a quick buck. I feel as though MS has created the dark ages in video gaming:

1. MS used money over technology to get people on their side.

2. They have created the annoying teen gamer who swears profusely and calls other players hurtful names.

3. I wish I had the knowledge to build a time machine and go back to 1998 so I could silence the people who suggested Microsoft enter the console market. I don't care how successful Xbox Live is, they killed quality gaming!!!

P.S. I spend every waking moment worrying my 360 will red ring any minute as it is a 60GB Pro. No gamer should be put through that.

Last edited by Dancemachine55 on 11/27/2009 1:54:25 AM

Agree with this comment 7 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Scarecrow
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 2:24:05 AM

This is depressing her as much as it's depressing us, check THIS out:

http://thegamesmen.files.wordpress.com/2009/08/ffxiii_changes_02.png?w=460&h=518

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 2:26:16 AM

I've seen what your talking about. I was thinking the same thing and wanted to believe this but I just don't think it's the case. Some of those pics are obviously a change in design choice. Some of what may have been a prerendered cut scenes, my guess, and it's only a guess, is that they changed some of it to the ingame engine. Now I don't know why, maybe because what you say is true, but I believe we will be getting the better version and yet another steller Final Fantasy.

I mean we all know FFXIII could have been loads better on if it had stayed Exclusive but i think well be happy.

Last edited by Jawknee on 11/27/2009 2:30:03 AM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 3:56:07 AM

Scarecrow, I can't really see which one is better but it's obvious they're different.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

www
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 5:45:32 AM

Yea but its sad we'll never know the business deals going on behind closed doors. Whether or not Wada has been fed a fat cheque or receives death threats to keep both versions on par, we will NEVER know, its just real sad and painful. Karma is a bitch, the same way 360 games will always get pirated as a payback for charging online play, believe me if 360 is responsible for all this, they'll definitely pay.

Last edited by www on 11/27/2009 5:46:57 AM

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 9:08:52 AM

Yea, it crows links the top pic looks like a cut scene and the bottom the ingame engine.

Anyone know of there is an oppertunity to save storage space using the ingame engine rather then prerendered cut scenes?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

SirLoin of Beef
Saturday, November 28, 2009 @ 10:58:27 AM

MS kicks puppies and eats babies, too.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 2:29:29 AM
Reply

I certainly hope so. I'm tired of multiplats. Some devs can do them right but most don't. I'm sick of a majority of the games on the market looking like greesy xbox games.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

just2skillf00l
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 2:42:16 AM
Reply

Yeah Jawknee we'll be happy. An exclusive would be of better quality but the game will still be good. As long as it's not a port. Those are truly inferior.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

randomname
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 3:26:37 AM
Reply

Happy late Thanksgiving, guys at PSXExtreme!

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

pyrobomber70
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 4:25:44 AM
Reply

Third party exclusives should be made for the Xbox 360 first, then make the same game even better for the PS3 second. If they did the work this way we wouldn't be seeing anymore inferior games and would all be happy. I rather wait for a well produced game then not have a game finished to it's full potential. Another Topic.......My last PS3 died after finishing Batman Arkham Asylum. I GOT MY SECOND PS3 ON AMAZON TONIGHT! I took advantage of the great bundle(Killzone 2 & Infamous)they were offering and picked it up for $289 with no tax! BLACK FRIDAY IS AWESOME! I have to buy Uncharted Drake's Fortune now!......Happy Late Thanksgiving Everyone!

Agree with this comment 1 up, 2 down Disagree with this comment

Snaaaake
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 6:02:03 AM
Reply

In this gen, multiplats are either superior on the 360 or equal, no multiplat has ever been superior on the PS3.

Weird eh?
Considering that in the 6th gen, there's quite a number of multiplats that's clearly superior on the Xbox, so developers are too shy to even make a superior version of multiplats on the PS3? Even though they clearly can pull it off with the huge difference between DVD and Blu Ray?

Last edited by Snaaaake on 11/27/2009 6:02:39 AM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

tlpn99
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 7:14:07 AM
Reply

I know people that say they dont like the PS3 controller as thier hands are mssive and the 360 one fits it just fine. They say they do like the PS3 and will consider getting one for the exclusives they cant get on the 360. Uncharted 2 was the game my mate said he wanted to play, so he said he would have to put up with the controller. It is just a matter of getting used to the controller.

It is the same on both sides it takes getting used to a controller is all, especially as your more used to one than the other.

As Ben said there are about 4 out of 5 games that are great but they were on the PS3 this year, the 360 had 1 maybe 2 depends on your take on the game(s).

Infamous 2 and 3 anyone ? Uncharted 3 lets hope so. :)

Last edited by tlpn99 on 11/27/2009 7:14:47 AM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

JackC8
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 7:49:42 AM
Reply

With the PS3 selling better because of the price cut and introduction of the slim, I think you might see a couple of Xbox/PC exclusives going multi-plat in the next few years, but that's about it. When it comes to potential profits vs. putting out a superior game, the publishers will go with the profits almost every time. Hell, some of these dev's can't make a smooth running PS3 game in the first place.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

King James
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 8:42:00 AM
Reply

R* is coming around. "Agent" anyone?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Ricochet
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 8:44:48 AM
Reply

I gave up comparing it to 360 exclusives. Sorry, but the PS3 has the "edge" over the 360's games. With exclusives utilizing the blu-ray not to mention the "high" production values and the delays to polish the game as high as they could only to be exceeded with another sequel (hence Uncharted 2).

All of this for the very same price for a 360 exclusive. Sorry, Alan Wake and Splinter Cell: Conviction are the only games on the 360 that truly interests me and even IT may be published on PC.

I believe each "exclusive" the PS3 releases is a stab to the "nay-sayers" heart.

Last edited by Ricochet on 11/27/2009 8:46:08 AM

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 9:10:49 AM

PS3 exclusives do give you more bang for you buck.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

geovanwitdakick
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 9:24:42 AM
Reply

ummm Snaaaake, Batman: Arkam Asylum was\is better on the PS3, w| the ability to play as the Joker in challenge rooms.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Jawknee
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 10:12:11 AM

Were talking better like uncharted better. Or even better in how most multiplats are have an edge on the 360. Additional content is nice but doesn't really apply. I'd rather have a larger and ps3 exclusive quality games then additional add ons. Batman AA was largely the same game without the content.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Hexen
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 11:27:37 AM
Reply

From their stand point I don't see why they would want to limit themselves to one platform; specially the one that exclusives sell less in.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

DeathOfChaos
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 9:21:15 AM

Yeah, God of War III will definatly lose money. Oh, and Final Fantasy Versus XIII...right...

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Snorge
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 11:29:39 AM
Reply

@ Snaaaake:

I agree to a certain extent. Batman AA is the only exception I've come across where the PS3 version was better than the 360 version. I have both copies and played them side by side on the exact same TVs. (32 hd lcd). The Ps3 version does look better than the 360 when it comes to textures. The 360 version looks more plastic and maybe this is just me but the PS3 version responds slightly better. (and the 360 Batman looks more blue and PS3 Batman is more black)Granted it is not a HUGE step up from the 360 version, but it definently is a sign of things to come. PLUS, we get exclusive DLC (on more than one occasion!) PS3 for LIFE! (Here's lookin at you cross game chat *crosses fingers*)

Please insert nail in 360's coffin and lay it next to the Wii so that we may bury them at the same time.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Moochie
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 1:29:23 PM
Reply

PS3 is working with dedicated companies and I think the final products are finally starting to show now that they are understanding the hardware. I was very hesitant to see the future for PS3 last year and now that their are games like Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 out, I am excited to see the games they can come up with. The only thing going for Xbox right now is Mass Effect 2 and after that, the creativity for their games have just been falling ever so slowly downward with the increase of casual gamers. This is definitely going to be the better investment down the road.

Agree with this comment 1 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Deleted User
Saturday, November 28, 2009 @ 2:05:11 AM

yeah every year I hear the same thing... just because you're one sided doesn't mean everyone else is... yeah Mass Effect 2 is it... let's forget about Alan Wake and Splinter Cell Conviction and those are in the first few months and that's not even taking into consideration that the new halo game is using a new engine that uses the newer APIs from Microsoft. Then you have 3rd party games they'll do better like Bioshock 2 and the next CoD. For all the big games and the huge success that the Slim has been it's only made a slight dent in Microsoft's lead and Sony continues to bleed money.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

Fane1024
Saturday, November 28, 2009 @ 4:44:24 PM

Way to troll, Cueil!

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

DeathOfChaos
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 9:18:56 AM

I agree with Moochie, though Mass Effect 2 isn't even appealing to me. Only thing that appeals to me is the Fable series and 'exclusive' titles that are going to the PS3 or already have.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Imagi
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 5:38:27 PM
Reply

Money talks so probably not, not yet anyway.

It must frustrate developers that are being held back by multi-platform requirements when they see how a PS3 exclusive can bring the original creators vision of a game far closer to realisation.

Agree with this comment 2 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Deleted User
Saturday, November 28, 2009 @ 1:59:21 AM

as long as you pump 2 million into your best exclusive and then double that for your biggest 3rd party games it's not going to happen

Agree with this comment 0 up, 4 down Disagree with this comment

fatelementality
Friday, November 27, 2009 @ 7:38:52 PM
Reply

Ya know, I was playing the PS1 version of Soul Reaver that I downloaded of the PSN and remembering that I used to own the Dreamcast version. It looked so much better for Dreamcast (obviously because of the huge hardware gap) and I'm just wondering why developers don't do this today. Just make the best version of the game for the most powerful console and dumb it down for the rest. Can't be that hard......can it?

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Beamboom
Saturday, November 28, 2009 @ 2:32:58 AM
Reply

Seeing how well games like cod:mw2 plays and looks I don't understand why you guys are so concerned about a game being exclusive or not...

Other than the brag rights it's pretty apparent to me that a cross platform game can be just as good, or better than a platform exclusive.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 1 down Disagree with this comment

fatelementality
Sunday, November 29, 2009 @ 2:43:08 PM

Not a PS3 exclusive.....if done right.


Last edited by fatelementality on 11/29/2009 2:43:38 PM

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

DeathOfChaos
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 9:15:20 AM

Modern Warfare 2 looks like a Nintendo 64 game. the damage done by bullets looks like small gif images upsized too much and the bullet holes go away after a while, too. I played that game with 4 people for a while, and I had flashbacks of Goldeneye 007 from the Nintendo 64 come back...because it looked and felt like it. Like a games from 2 generations ago. The best look of that game were the guns, but that's because they were shiny. All FPS games are the same in this aspect, they seem like they're all built upon the same engine. A very outdated engine.

Agree with this comment 0 up, 0 down Disagree with this comment

Leave a Comment

Please login or register to leave a comment.

Our Poll

The PS4 exclusive(s) reveal in December will be...
MEGATON! Biggest thing evah!
Pretty great, but not mind-blowing.
Something decent but that's it.
A waste of hype.

Previous Poll Results