PS3 Version Of The Last Remnant Remains In Doubt
You know, while we never like to hear that an anticipated title might not make it to the PlayStation 3, we may have reached a point where many people simply respond with, "who cares?"
According to Andriasang, the latest issue of the "Square-Enix Magazine" doesn't list The Last Remnant amongst their upcoming releases. Issue No. 13 puts Final Fantasy XIII on the cover (big surprise there) but there doesn't seem to be any mention of the long-awaited PS3 version of the strat/RPG that received a lukewarm reception from critics and gamers. However, the title in question does still appear on the PS3 release calendar over at Square-Enix's official website, and the Weekly Famitsu publication also hasn't dropped the game from its pages. Even so, the release remains in doubt and as mentioned in the intro, PS3 owners are likely beyond the point of caring. There was a time when we really wanted - and even needed - just about every major release possible but these days, we're getting a little spoiled. Really, in my eyes, I only care about FFXIII, which isn't too far off as far as I'm concerned. And I never wanted The Last Remnant in the first place.
But perhaps saying that is unfair to those who played it and enjoyed in on the Xbox 360, and to those PS3 owners who like the concept and have been waiting for an announcement. Personal preferences are wonderful things and I'm not about to step on them. But I believe it's worth pointing out the drastic differences between now and when we first heard about The Last Remnant a couple years back...
Related Game(s): The Last Remnant
11/30/2009 10:35:49 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (38 posts)
coverton341
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 11:24:51 AM
Reply
Highlander
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 11:27:33 AM
Reply
I have a feeling that TLR will remain lost...
Jawknee
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 12:35:19 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 1:27:32 PM
___________
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 11:34:49 PM
when done properly the UE3 runs better on ps3.
unreal tournament came out on PS3 like 8 months before the 360 AND it runs better on ps3.
not to mention batman AA runs better on ps3 and thats also running on UE 3.5
reason why people keep saying it runs worse on ps3 is because its a easy engine to get a hold of and work with.
so 99.999999% of the time when a games being ported from the 360 to the ps3, when the developers dont give a 2 hoots about quality they use that engine as its easy and put no work into optimizing it.
if developers sit down and run through their code and optimize it through UE3 on ps3, the engine works fine if not better than on the 360.
99.9999999999% of budget titles run of UE3 thats why it looks like it runs worse on ps3, perfect example of this roge warrior is THE WORST! game i have ever played.
what engine is it running?
you guessed it UE3.
Highlander
Tuesday, December 01, 2009 @ 12:19:20 PM
Still The Last Remnant was an exercise in suckitude.
Douchebaguette
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 11:36:45 AM
Oxvial
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 12:55:29 PM
NightHawk17
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 12:49:20 PM
Reply
Lotusflow3r
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 1:12:32 PM
NightHawk17
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 1:12:47 PM
Alienange
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 2:10:51 PM
LowKey
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 3:52:27 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 1:29:14 PM
Reply
Alienange
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 2:14:55 PM
Reply
BigBoss4ever
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 2:20:07 PM
Reply
p.s. i really look forward to the Star Ocean Last hope PS3 version tho.
Last edited by BigBoss4ever on 11/30/2009 2:21:29 PM
HUSO
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 3:29:08 PM
Reply
Highlander
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 3:45:56 PM
Fane1024
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 6:25:05 PM
I wouldn't even have believed it about the 360, much less the PS3.
Is there a game I'm overlooking? I can't think of any besides Crystal Defenders.
@ HUSO
A 66 rating on metacritic suggests it's not sour grapes.
Last edited by Fane1024 on 11/30/2009 6:29:05 PM
Jawknee
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 7:40:37 PM
But I do agree it is pretty pathetic that we are only now getting games the Xbox has had. Highlander is right. They did it to them selves.
Last edited by Jawknee on 11/30/2009 7:45:13 PM
oldmike
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 11:04:12 PM
ace_boon_coon
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 3:31:10 PM
Reply
therabbitkinge
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 5:23:26 PM
Reply
Thanks for the update I was wondering what was going to happen.
just2skillf00l
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 7:00:01 PM
Reply
Ragnarok00_CODE
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 8:27:17 PM
Reply
i actually tried it on the Pc and i got to admit it was pretty much the worst hours of my life i mean the game just sucks
it was the first square enix rpg that felt so wrong
i have to agree with some ppl in here i would pay 60$ for a ffVI,... or even ffI over this
Ps3 release pls No! it would just bring bad reputation to the console
just seeing that screenshot reminds me a lot of hours of Odd gameplay with no individual level up i still dont understand that battle system "it was all about pressing ENTER" and voila random attacks till the enemy drops (dont even get me started on how he runs, thats just silly)
so much nice rpgs coming soon it would be more then a miracle if The last remnant were to sell more than 250 copies
___________
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 11:38:52 PM
Reply
im sick of their BS, im never ever buying another one of their games again.
except just cause 2,why eidos why did you have to sell your soul to the devil?
publishers have to much power over developers these days.
perfect example of publishers holding back developers would be IW with activision, DICE with EA, visceral games with EA, Avalanche studios with Eidos.
50 bucks says these developers would be turning out better games faster if these grubbing publishers did not have their grubby hands on them.

The Last Remnant









Mr Bitey
Reply
Monday, November 30, 2009 @ 11:11:23 AM