New Medal Of Honor Confirmed, Will Not Be Set In WWII
It's one of those franchises that has flagged in recent years, despite featuring fantastic early installments several generations ago. But EA remains firmly focused on revitalizing the Medal of Honor series.
EA has announced that MoH will be returning but for the first time ever, it will not bet set in World War II. Perhaps taking a cue from the Call of Duty franchise, the new Medal of Honor will be set in war-torn Afghanistan, and we will be introduced to the Tier 1 Operator, which is "a relatively unknown entity directly under the National Command Authority who takes on missions no one else can handle." In order to insure a high level of authenticity, developers have been working with actual Tier 1 Operators from the US Special Operations Community, and apparently, this adventure is actually based on "real events." Furthermore - and this part we really appreciate - EA has one internal team dedicated to making the single-player campaign fantastic, while they've enlisted the help of their talented DICE team (Battlefield: Bad Company, Mirror's Edge, etc.) to handle the multiplayer aspects. Said Greg Goodrich, Medal of Honor Executive Producer:
"When we first set out to reinvent Medal of Honor, we wanted to stay true to its roots of authenticity and respect for the soldier but bring it into today’s war. The Tier 1 Operator is the most disciplined, deliberate and prepared warrior on the battlefield. He is a living, breathing, precision instrument of war. We are honored to have the rare opportunity to work closely with these men to create a game that shares their experience."
The game will enjoy a full unveiling at this year's Spike TV Video Game Awards, which will air at 8 p.m. PST on December 12. Being a fan of this franchise from the time the original captivated me back in the PS1 days, I've been disappointed to see the series flop this generation. But it seems EA is taking all the right steps to give us a truly great Medal of Honor effort. Awesome.
12/2/2009 9:16:45 PM John Shepard
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Subscribe to John Shepard on Twitter
Comments
Charger7302
Wednesday, December 02, 2009 @ 10:13:53 PM
Reply
On related FPS news, the public MAG beta just started, but the bad news is that the entire beta will end by Saturday :)
Last edited by Charger7302 on 12/2/2009 10:19:41 PM
johnld
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 12:07:10 AM
www
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 5:10:17 AM
BTNwarrior
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 11:01:45 AM
Banky A
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 3:53:19 PM
BTNwarrior
Wednesday, December 02, 2009 @ 10:19:41 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, December 02, 2009 @ 10:28:20 PM
Reply
Doosharm
Wednesday, December 02, 2009 @ 10:56:46 PM
Reply
Both are recreating an authentic, modern, real-world war with the aid of actual soldiers, aren't they?
Why, then, did 6 Days get totally bagged while this game is not only being developed but being heavily promoted. Why is one ok but not the other?
___________
Wednesday, December 02, 2009 @ 11:04:47 PM
2 that was based on true battles, making a video game of it to some people is insulting.
i agree there kinda being Hypocrites but meh what can you do?
OFLC a perfect example.
sawing zombies in half in a episode of south park is ok for a M rating which has no age restrictions, a 8 year old could legally watch it.
sawing limbs off in GoW is a MA rating, so you have to be 15 unless a adult buys it for you.
but than L4D2 gets banned.
L4D2 basically has what that south park episode had, in TV form its M anyone can watch it, in game form its RC so no one can play it.
WTF?
i swear to god this country has its priorities all fu***d up!
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 12:05:02 AM
BTNwarrior
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 1:50:03 AM
Imagi
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 7:35:04 AM
___________
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 8:17:00 AM
the stupid thing is games keep getting banned because we have no R rating, so there re released as MA which is 15+.
whatevers MA here is normally M in the US like KZ2 GOW and so on.
the whole reason why we dont have a 18+ is because one d*ck does not want kids getting their hands on said games.
so he re classes them as MA instead of R.
so hes effectively doing, what hes setting out to avoid, but hes to arrogant to notice that.
i think the reason why hes doing this is because hes a old cook catholic, his electorate is 99.9999% full of old cook catholics.
he lets a R18+ in he looses his seat there for his job.
thats why i think hes doing it, because, seriously he cant be that stupid to not notice hes doing what hes setting out to avoid.
fear 2 for example, got banned, than passed as MA.
if we had a R rating kids would not be able to play it, but we dont so kids can go in with mummy and buy it.
because most parents either dont care, dont know how bad the game is or just want to shut their kid up.
___________
Wednesday, December 02, 2009 @ 10:58:34 PM
Reply
wont hold my breath though.
1 thing ill ask for, add a cover system.
thats 1 thing that drives me insane with MW2.
your forced to take cover, especially on higher difficultys like veteran but you cant.
your friends, your enemies can snap their back to cover, pop out fire a shot than pop back in.
SO WHY THE FU** CANT YOU!
i hate it when games do that, force you to do something but than make it as difficult as humanly possible.
johnld
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 12:12:23 AM
___________
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 8:10:21 AM
but cover systems for shooters are a must, the bit i found really hard in MW2 on veteran was the oil silo, just where they through the smoke bombs.
because they can get you from left right center behind or any other direction you can think of.
if there was a cover system, would of made it easier and more tolerable.
Streets_74
Wednesday, December 02, 2009 @ 11:06:26 PM
Reply
556pineapple
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 12:33:07 AM
Reply
Beamboom
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 5:16:07 AM
BlackBriar
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 1:10:02 AM
Reply
just2skillf00l
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 2:57:45 AM
Reply
P.S- Medal of Honor: European Assault sucked @&*.
BikerSaint
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 4:16:22 AM
Reply
You should have just bought the "6 Days In Fallujah" story, I see it as a perfect match to what you just said.
And don't worry about any controversy that may arise from it, you just gotta think of it as being worth millions of dollars in a free publicity campaign.
elander
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 5:44:55 AM
Reply
Battlefield 1942 - ww2
Battlefield 2 - mw
Battlefield 2142 - flop, sucks - Future warfare
Call of Duty 1,2,3 ww2
COD:4 Mw1,2 - mw
Plans: Futuristic warfare - Will suck!
Medal of Honor 1,2,3,4,5...ect - ww2
Medal of Disshonor - Mw
Future medal of Disshonor = Final death for the series
Sad
Godslim
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 5:53:24 AM
Geobaldi
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 11:12:57 AM
bigrailer19
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 10:14:55 AM
Reply
maxpontiac
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 10:17:27 AM
Reply
The prospect of playing out real events is intriguing as well.
I hope they stay with and evolve the open world feel that they begun in Airborne. I am tired of linear FPS.
I have always supported the MOH series, and actually liked the campaign in Airborne, so this is probably a day one purchase for me.
photo K
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 3:40:37 PM
Oxvial
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 8:02:24 PM
Oxvial
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 8:02:28 PM
Alienange
Thursday, December 03, 2009 @ 8:30:18 PM
Fane1024
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 4:34:49 PM
If developers feel the need to shoehorn every cool concept they have into a FPS in order to make money (e.g., BioShock, Mass Effect, Fallout 3, Borderlands--even lesser games like TimeShift, Jericho, and Legendary), then the games suffer.
And if every AAA-budget project becomes a FPS (which thankfully hasn't happened YET), then what good games are there left for us to buy?
startazz
Monday, December 07, 2009 @ 3:46:47 PM
Reply

Medal of Honor: Airborne










convergecrew
Reply
Wednesday, December 02, 2009 @ 9:51:06 PM