Someone "Will Probably Do" A Final Fantasy VII Remake
Why do we do this to ourselves? Why do we do this to you? Because some sick little deranged monkey keeps clanging his dented cymbals in our heads, always to the hypnotizing beat, "FFVII remake...FFVII remake..." We want to kill him but he's kind of cute in a depraved sort of way.
The idea of remaking Final Fantasy VII has been around for a very long time. In fact, it may be the longest-running rumor in video game history. The reason it always endures is because of news like this, from Square-Enix employees who never categorically deny the possibility of such a project, but instead instill false hopes in the hardcore followers. During a Final Fantasy Ring interview with Akitoshi Kawazu and Toshiyuki Rahans (producer and director for Final Fantasy Crystal Chronicles: The Crystal Bearers), the idea of a remake popped up. In fact, they were asked if "episodes VII-IX" would be remade and whether or not that would be Kawazu's next project. His response:
"No, no, no, no ... (laughs) Someone in the company will probably carry the remake of FFVII, but not me. But if someone tries to do [it], it will be a huge project. With the current technical specifications, it would be very difficult."
I assume you're all looking at the same part of that response, where he says "someone in the company will probably carry the remake of FFVII." This is especially significant because the question provided him with three possibilities for a remake - FFVII, FFVIII, and FFIX - and he specifically mentioned Cloud's adventure. On the other hand, the translation could be off just a touch, thereby producing significance where none really exists in the first place. 'sigh' Who knows? But any news like this is always big, so we must abide...the dude abides...
12/5/2009 10:27:10 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (68 posts)
Lotusflow3r
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 10:53:48 AM
Reply
Leave. it. alone.
Look at the disastrous Advant Children and Crisis Core and that shiddy DMC clone one with Vincent. Absolutely sickening.
It upset a lot of hardcore fans and to pick up the entire original and mutate it? Final nail in the coffin.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 11:33:42 AM
Dante399
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 12:01:43 PM
Kr3sn1k
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 12:02:48 PM
Jawknee
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 12:04:50 PM
Lotusflow3r
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 12:54:31 PM
Crisis Core was a laughing stock because it had Final Fantasy Vll in its title.
Mad cheesy US dialog, horrible soundtrack, a storyline not many really cared about and OTT fighting that was none stop.
Unlike most sheep, i can avoid hype and just see things for what it is. MANY FFVll fans were annoyed at Enix for making such a game, never mind being mad at the fact of them cashing in on FFVlls fame all the time.
It would be disastrous to remake it based on those awful spin offs. It would be mega cheesy, OTT action scenes, fly fighting, one liners, techno soundtrack and whatever else.
The name Final Fantasy does not mean automatic good.
And im not the one misguided, if anyone, it would be the people trapped in the hype machine.
Now, instead of attacking the person writing this, how about providing opposing points on the money motivated products instead hm?
Last edited by Lotusflow3r on 12/5/2009 12:55:57 PM
Jawknee
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 1:09:17 PM
this make absolutly no sense. It was a laughing stock because it had FFVII in the title? Riiight.
Well, just about everyone disagrees with you(exceptions of course). I won't defend the dialog, but the sound track was fine, th story was fine and the gameplay was fun.
Last edited by Jawknee on 12/5/2009 1:15:18 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 1:55:09 PM
Lotusflow3r
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 2:21:36 PM
Jawknee, it is not my fault you didn't understand a sentence. It meant, with such a big name in the title and with the game insulting that title...it was a laughing stock.
"Everyone disagrees with you" well, as you pointed out, that's not the case and 2ndly, is that supposed to make me go, "oh yeah, so they do. Well, i shall follow this sheep example".
I'm just not like that Jawknee.
I'm a very artistic person and love creativity and ideas. An important thing in this game is to ALWAYS stay true to the vision and idea. By putting Final Fantasy Vll in the title, you are implying that idea, yet these money creations have hardly anything in common with the Final Fantasy Vll idea, therefore discrediting and contradicting it. Why would they do that and why would these said games and "movies" all cater to the in fad and go commercial? Easy, money off of people blinded by hype and don't necessarily think beyond whats on the box.
What it is my people.
My arguments come out of love of the original idea and the protection of it, it's just a shame others who claim fandom of it don't also not want it to become dumbed down....on here at least.
Last edited by Lotusflow3r on 12/5/2009 2:25:11 PM
Kevadu
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 2:35:56 PM
I'll agree with you that CC has some pretty cheesy dialogue (though it has been massively surpassed in the cheesiness department by Dissidia...holy crap), but the game itself was great.
By the way, I think you're looking at the original FFVII with some pretty rose-colored glasses if you don't think it had some cheesy dialogue...
Last edited by Kevadu on 12/5/2009 2:37:10 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 3:02:15 PM
Last edited by WorldEndsWithMe on 12/5/2009 3:05:07 PM
Lotusflow3r
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 3:10:35 PM
Dont know what you mean, i never started an argument like that.
But, that's true about CoD.
Kevadu,
It ain't just me my friend.
and no, i don't look at it with rose-coloured glasses. AT ALL. Maybe it's difficult to understand me because im speaking about ideas and art etc
Its not necessarily my fave game nor my fave Rpg. I'm just talking how these extensions are an insult to the original idea.
I'd just be repeating myself from here on out i believe so, what's said is there.
P.S. no one is angry. My Fantasy fandom, believe it or not, died off when Enix came about. I'm just protecting the way it was...but, lay off the insults please, it's just a couple of games, not me offending a person.
Last edited by Lotusflow3r on 12/5/2009 3:18:14 PM
I_defenestrate
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 3:52:19 PM
Back on the talk of the remake, I find it hard to believe they would change the core game all that much. They'll clean up the mistranslations, make it prettier and maybe add some details here and there. I see no reason why we shouldn't have faith in a remake of the pivotal rpg of that generation.
That said, my vote is still for a remake of VI instead.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 4:43:16 PM
Lotus, all I'll say is that it seems you think you can speak for all the hardcore FF fans. I'm one of them, I still think FFVII is the best RPG ever, and I don't agree with what you're saying. So just don't make it sound like everyone who who really cares about the franchise is going to agree on all those "disastrous" claims.
SnipeySnake
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 5:15:33 PM
Oxvial
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 6:20:39 PM
but nobody says nothing about the other remakes ! I'm sure they never played FF 1-4 because they didn't stand the 8-16 bit graphs ...yeah nobody cares about graphs xD.
Last edited by Oxvial on 12/5/2009 6:21:59 PM
johnld
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 11:22:15 PM
Thrill Kill
Tuesday, December 08, 2009 @ 9:13:39 AM
piratedrunk
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 10:58:27 AM
Reply
Dante399
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 12:08:40 PM
I_defenestrate
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 4:00:25 PM
Jawknee
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 12:10:12 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 1:16:15 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 1:57:10 PM
TGG
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 12:39:52 PM
Reply
The thing about VII is that how you went about exploring is sort of anachronistic compared to now, I'm personally having a hard time reconciling that top-down view and glitzy next-gen graphics. How it played and how you explored was just very different compared to how it is done today.
I never really liked the new "extensions" to VII lately, I always thought that the stories were crap and the music was mediocre. Seriously, the stories made no friggin sense whatsoever. Plus, the huge fights where people chop buildings in half would seriously contradict what you could do in game. I mean sure Cloud can chop a building in half in the cutscenes but WHY CAN'T HE OPEN UP THIS FLIMSY DOOR? Giving the actual game the Advent treatment would be a really bad idea.
So a PSP remake which is an "enhanced" VII rather than a full-blown reimagining seems like a good idea to me.
Lotusflow3r
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 1:07:36 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 1:59:13 PM
Lotusflow3r
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 2:22:55 PM
Dante399
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 2:47:48 PM
Lotusflow3r
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 3:06:17 PM
See, whilst i agree with you, you allow me to make my points clearer.
The director of Fantasy X wanted a feel of a straight journey ala pilgrimage, which is what Final Fantasy X was about so, this involved the removal of the world map. This is fine because it's them staying true to the original idea of Final Fantasy X.
This is what i'm trying to say about the extensions. They have Final Fantasy Vll in the title but, insult the original idea, hence mine and many others frustration.
I'm only defending what we are actually talking about here, not attacking it.
Last edited by Lotusflow3r on 12/5/2009 3:07:18 PM
Jawknee
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 5:59:43 PM
Fane1024
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 6:56:33 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 4:43:37 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 2:03:20 PM
Reply
Like Arnold said in that killer editorial "Your system sucks" Why in hell would they just ignore the biggest ready made cash cow in gaming history?
Jawknee
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 6:05:20 PM
Or am I kidding myself?
shadowscorpio
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 2:10:36 PM
Reply
All the devs have to do is listen to what gamers want and they will be successful...cough...namco..cough..bandai..tales..cough..Vesperia...PS3..cough..Localiz...
Kr3sn1k
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 5:44:38 PM
Dancemachine55
Monday, December 07, 2009 @ 3:48:47 AM
It was the most open-world FF I had played til then. Although I do miss the open-world "World" of FF VII, XII had an excellent combat system and story (but I agree with many of you the whole "licenses" thing to use your weapons wasn't a good element)
The only thing I'm disappointed about with XIII is that MS paid big money to gimp the PS3 version. I'm not so angry at MS because what they are doing is smart business (even if it is evil) but SE SHOULDN'T have taken MS's money in the first place. They should have realised that PS3 sales would sky-rocket with their console exclusivity, and STILL make an incredible looking game that took advantage of the PS3.
I blame all of video games' problems on MS. Is it just me, or did these problems and fanwars never exist before MS entered the home console market? (SNES and Genesis don't really count cos it was much friendlier competition, like Sony and Nintendo are now)
Charger7302
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 2:39:15 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 5:29:39 PM
MysteriousMagus
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 6:18:47 PM
Reply
Mysterio Spyder
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 6:29:58 PM
Reply
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 7:17:50 PM
And there will always be a semblance of strategy in turn-based that will never exist in real-time, for a variety of reasons. What I find boring is hacking 'n slashing six million times in a game and never really seeing anything new. So we all have our own preferences.
Mysterio Spyder
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 7:53:11 PM
Ben, you're correct about Ocarina, and I worded my question wrong earlier. I should have said "why can't we have more ACTION RPG'S" as that is the category Ocarina and Magic Knight Rayearth fall under. I believe there are 3 categories for RPG's- RPG, Action RPG and Strategy RPG. I'm not saying this is 100% true because i don't know, I'm not a hardcore RPG player, but it's what I've heard. I have Dragon Force for my Saturn (can't stand the game but kept it cause it's value is rediculas on Ebay and because I had a goal of owning all 255 US Saturn games which I achieved 3 years ago) that's concidered Strategy RPG where the game plays itself, so boring.
But, like you said, we all have our preferences, I just prefer to be in control of a game I'm playing.
Last edited by Mysterio Spyder on 12/5/2009 7:54:54 PM
Jawknee
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 8:01:31 PM
SnipeySnake
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 8:09:28 PM
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 9:02:49 PM
Obviously, the entire point of such games lies in the positioning of those units. And further "control" would change the entire nature of the game and would certainly detract from the depth; i.e., if you were good at the action part, even a poorly executed strategic maneuver could turn out well.
So when I play FFVII or any other turn-based RPG, actually controlling the sword slash is the last thing on my mind, while there are a dozen other factors I'd be considering that aren't always part of action/RPGs. That's just how I see things, anyway.
Mysterio Spyder
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 9:23:03 PM
@snipeysnake
yes, Bayonetta demo was friggin' awesome. It was like playing a female version of Kratos, except without all the awesome gore, and.... it had all that cheesy annoying japanese effect to it with the way the character acted, and the title song, oh god lol but this is DEF a game I'm getting.
Geobaldi
Sunday, December 06, 2009 @ 4:04:37 AM
And there's various categories of RPG.
Tactical
Action
Massive Multiplayer
Roguelikes
Shooter
and probably another here or there that I can't remember offhand.
Last edited by Geobaldi on 12/6/2009 4:05:32 AM
Sol
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 8:06:08 PM
Reply
I mean it would be all great and everything if the game had beautiful 1080p HD graphics rivaling some of the best, but I admit that would be a lot of work and would take years, and every game designer probably has their own ideas that they want to work on... Who knows whether it will happen or not? You never know, when I get my degree I may work for Square Enix and work on the remake if it happens (which could take years). If enough people want it, it'll happen (Like the Okami sequel which people said would never happen... even if it is going to the DS).
just2skillf00l
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 11:01:25 PM
Reply
On to FF7. Remake and not remastered...Thank God. I'd love to see differences as opposed to the exact same game with different graphics. That way comparisons aren't made and people aren't disappointed by it. There's just something about the original thing that makes it awesome...memories maybe.
___________
Sunday, December 06, 2009 @ 3:58:11 AM
Reply
im sure some one will pick up what they have done and finish it off, its a much to popular series to leave hanging.
but than one could say the same thing about BLACK, or syphon filter or the getaway or driver.
such popular games.
BLACK renowned to be the best FPS ever to be made still, after several years after release.
syphon filter, well i dont need to say anything about that except its my favorite PS1 game and favorite PSP game.
that one is a no brainer, its sonys halo WTF? 3 years after release and STILL! no announcement.
the getaway and driver, again immensely popular titles back in the day.
the only true competitors to GTA, saints row gets to roll with GTA but these dont?
WTF?
the sh*t is in, and the gold plated diamonds are out?
WTF?
has this industry gone mad!
MRSUCCESS
Sunday, December 06, 2009 @ 6:23:36 PM
Reply
I know I'm not alone when I say that I found Shin Megami Tensei: Nocturne a lot more enjoyable than Final Fantasy 7.
camaro300zx
Monday, December 07, 2009 @ 10:15:55 AM
Reply

Final Fantasy VII: Advent Children









helgso
Reply
Saturday, December 05, 2009 @ 10:51:52 AM