New Disc Format For PlayStation 4?
Most will agree that Sony used the PlayStation 3 as a Trojan Horse of sorts for their new high-definition format, Blu-Ray. But if they continue to push the envelop with the PS4, might they need yet another optical disc enhancement?
Evidently, Sony has already said they won't be abandoning physical media in regards to their new PlayStation; despite the rise of digital distribution, Sony isn't about to release an all-digital home video game console. Therefore, can we assume the PS4 will feature Blu-Ray...or something else entirely? Perhaps a new wave of HD technology? According to PlayStation LifeStyle citing the current Game Informer issue, we may indeed see something new; something similar to the previously announced Holographic Versatile Disc. Whatever this new format is, it might have a massive capacity of 6TB (terabytes), which translates to 6,000GB. This would mean developers would have no problem loading all the data needed for 1080p high-definition resolution, 3D imagery, uncompressed loseless HD audio, more AV codec, etc, etc, etc. The article also hints at the extra space allowing for enhanced security on each disc, a major step in the ongoing battle against piracy. Now, Sony hasn't said anything official about this physical media phenomenon but we're hoping to hear more before the end of the year. But geez...just as we were getting used to Blu-Ray...
Well, progression is the name of the game, especially in an industry where failure to advance or innovate leaves you out in the cold. The quesetion is, how far off is the PS4? We figure 2012 is the absolute earliest but you never know...
1/12/2010 10:18:05 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Subscribe to Ben Dutka on Twitter
Comments (Beta)
maxpontiac
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 10:48:40 AM
However, if Microsoft goes for the the advanced form of media (which I see happening due to the failures associated with not using Blu-Ray in the 360), Sony would be foolish not to do so.
Plus, it seems Sony has always been right when it comes to the media format after VCR/Beta "war".
godsman
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 11:45:49 AM
We only see the need for a larger disc format (blu-ray) , because we are in the transition of upgrading to HDTV. There aren't any new TVs in the making that require a larger disc. People are complaining they can't tell the difference between 720p and 1080p.
6 terabytes are probably for 100+ inch TVs. The new format won't happen until we can get 60 inch TVs into EVERY house. Do YOU guys think you'll be buying a 60+ inch within the next couple years?
fluffer nutter
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 11:46:34 AM
Superman915
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:36:17 PM
TheHighlander
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:42:50 PM
CD to DVD. CD maximum single layer capacity was about 700MB , DVD single layer capacity was about 4.7GB. So the transition from CD to DVD was about a 7 fold increase in capacity.
DVD to BluRay. DVD singl layer is 4.7 GB and dual layer is 8.5GB. BluRay is 25GB single layer, and 50GB dual layer. That's about a 6 fold increase in both cases from DVD.
The next jump in capacity is likely to be a 6-7 fold increase which would put a future disc format squarely in 300-500GB territory.
Strangely enough Hitachi have demonstrated 4 layer BluRay that can supposedly be read without modified optics. That would be 100GB. Pioneer has claimed a working prototype with 10 layers giving capacities of 250GB - apparently without requiring modified optics.
There is no definitive information on whether these multi-layer disks would be readable on all current BD players with updated firmware or perhaps require some form of modified optics. If it can be accomplished with firmware alone, then I would bet you will see higher capacity BluRay sooner rather than later. If it requires modified optics, then I think the various players will agree a higher capacity BluRay format. But it will be a few more years before that arrives.
Either way, the PS4 will more than likely use BluRay, even if it is an updated BluRay player with advanced optics to read more disc layers. Sony is still trying to get any return on the heavy investments it made into Cell, PS3 and BluRay. I just don't see them walking away from these things so easily.
Canuck Pride
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 4:15:51 PM
could be wrong... haven't read about HVD's since N4G mentioned it as a possible media format for the new Micro-Box.
Last edited by Canuck Pride on 1/12/2010 4:25:59 PM
photo K
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 5:16:47 PM
TheHighlander
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 9:50:39 PM
Microsoft, that company that has spent the best part of the last 5 years telling anyone who will listen that BluRay is not needed DVD is fine, and Digital Distribution is the way forwards, and BluRay will be the death of optical storage...That very same company will use a new, far bigger optical media? Why? Isn't optical storage dead and digital the way of the future?
___________
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 12:19:51 AM
i remember when 64bit OSs came out i was like cool now we can use more than 3GBs of RAM, but everyone even my teachers were saying no whats the point no program needs more than 3GBs.
well how did that turn out?
people are so closed, short minded, just because we dont need it now does not mean we wont.
i mean when films are originally filmed there MASSIVE!
they have to compress the crap out of it to get it onto a DVD, and with compression you loose quality.
yes compression has come a long, long way but no matter how good it gets your always going to be loosing some quality.
the amount may get smaller, and smaller, but it will always be there.
Akuma07
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 6:38:51 AM
TheHighlander
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 9:55:50 AM
Yes, I know all that, I was in IT when we still had full height 5MB winchester drives in PCs. I'm more that aware that we have said that we'll never need XYZMB, and then we said we'll never need XYZGB.
On the other hand, with BluRay and looking forwards we have not only the past to go by - CD to DVD 6-7 fold increase in data density, DVD to BluRay 6-7 fold increase in data density - but we also know exactly how much space HD material takes at 1080p and even 3D in 1080p - with uncompressed audio. So we can project forwards to 2160p to see what would be needed to store a movie on a disk, and you don't need 6TB to do it.
Yes Movie studios will want to store their images in a raw uncompressed format which will ne3ed lots more space, but that's not how a movie will be delivered to consumers. So unless you can come up with a reason for 3D in glorious 2160p60 needing more than about 500GB per disc, there's really no reason to push 6TB holographic storage. Especially considering the ability (as designed) for BluRay to go to many more layers with little if any modification to existing equipment. It also seems that data density per layer can be increased with only modest changes to the optics.
I'm not suggesting that we'll never go to holographic storage, but I am suggesting that that option remains both unnecessary and somewhat pie in the sky due to costs. Besides, as I said, MS has spent half a decade drumming into people that BluRay wasn't needed and DVD was fine, so how do you persuade all the sheeple that suddenly they need a disc with 1000 times the capacity of a DVD to watch a movie or play a game?
DeathOfChaos
Friday, January 15, 2010 @ 9:02:05 AM
Last edited by DeathOfChaos on 1/15/2010 9:04:29 AM
englishgolfer
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 10:39:25 AM
Reply
also, wondering what M$ might do? support what sony gets behind or find something else....
Last edited by englishgolfer on 1/12/2010 10:40:33 AM
b3mike
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:57:35 PM
cochise313
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 2:38:01 PM
DeathOfChaos
Friday, January 15, 2010 @ 9:05:50 AM
BikerSaint
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 11:54:29 AM
Well, actually Sony gives a sh*t, and probably starts thinking about their nex gen machine the very moment they've put out this gen's console(and most probably even before it's out).
That way we can be even more wow'ed with each PS console that comes out.
In my same vein of thinking, what forward thinking has MS really done so far???
To me, MS doesn't really didn't do very much at all..... they tend to steal everyone else's tech, then scramble it all together, and just bum-rush it right out the door in trying to beat it's only real competitor(hence all the RROD's).
So, I for one give a great deal of sh*t about the new gen systems.......
And I want to see it all!!!!!!!
jaybiv
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:45:15 PM
Ultimadream
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 10:46:57 AM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 10:50:42 AM
Reply
www
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 10:58:30 AM
Alienange
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 11:06:13 AM
Qwarktast1c
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 11:21:49 AM
personally i hope they stick to blu-ray, just make it a high capacity multi-layer as you said
indeed blu ray is here to stay for a while and i see no use for HVD other than BAG (Big Ass Games)
but if it actually does come to having a new format like HVD, they just need to make it backwards compatible.
no 100% digital distribution!!! physical media FTW!!!!
www
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:14:07 PM
www
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 10:56:48 AM
Reply
I gotta feeling MS think they can fool Sony by making all that noise about digital media is the future whiles their prepping something like the HVD in their next Xbox. MS don't want to admit, it was a slight blunder on their part sticking with dvds for the 360, they wouldn't want to make that mistake twice.
Qwarktast1c
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 11:28:09 AM
granted theres nothing wrong with making profits in the gaming industry (in business in general for that matter), but it better not result in a shitty half assed product or anything that might have to be scaled back because of multiplatform (yeah i'm lookin at you squenix).
coverton341
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:48:42 PM
Canuck Pride
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 4:30:52 PM
hehe, looks like this tech will be long and distant from consumer popularity... Maybe we'll discover warp drive before then, and will no longer need entertainment because, well, iunno about you, but space travel to me would be more important than Killzone, Uncharted, Heavy rain, or Ratchet & clank.
I <3 the idea of inter stellar travel, call me a nerd, but i actually want to be the 1st man on mars (although thatt'l never happen)
but as I digress, $15,000 is alot to spend on lasers and diodes...
Hezzron
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 11:30:11 AM
Reply
However, to push a new media format on the movie buying crowd so soon (2012 possibly) could cause an uproar and ultimately fail.
The fact that Blu-Ray players were backwards compatible with DVDs, helped the new format to thrive. Any new format would have to do the same if it wants a chance to succeed.
Anyways, as others have said, waaay too soon to even want to think about it.
bigrailer19
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 11:59:31 AM
Reply
BikerSaint
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:05:32 PM
Reply
Hell, some of the developers are just starting to get comfortable with the PS3 as it is now, so it's got plenty more giddy-up & go horsepowerto drive itself far, far into the future.
BTW, even though I want to know everything about all this new tech, I still wish Sony could plug up all it's damned leaks.
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:28:39 PM
FullmetalX10
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:22:07 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:26:57 PM
Reply
So that's how things will end in 2012, everyone who buys a launch PS4 will put in an HVD and the new Qriocity will come to life like skynet, take over our Sony products and destroy us all as it fights Natal2 in an epic battle over console supremacy.
robinhood2010
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:32:02 PM
Reply
coverton341
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:40:41 PM
Reply
ShadowRunner
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:54:57 PM
Reply
CrazyIrishBoy
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 1:01:17 PM
Reply
jaybiv
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 1:01:21 PM
Reply
Just doing a google search and they have been singing the praises of this tech since 2005 and we still haven't seen a consumer oriented product using this technology.
Perhaps Sony is taking an wait and see approach in case some major tech breakthrough occurs with the tec, but I think extra capacity BRD may be at the core of the PS4.
FullmetalX10
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 1:03:09 PM
Reply
gumbi
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 1:20:00 PM
Reply
Blu-rays were designed to be capable of more data layers than DVD. I think we're more likely to see 3-4 layer blu-rays in PS4 than a new format.
Besides, it doesn't get much better than blu-ray. I have a 100" screen and 1080p HD Projector and I can't even conceive of any audio/video being any clearer or crisper than what blu-ray is now.
Unless the average consumer starts building Imax's in their basements, we don't need anything bigger than blu-ray for movies and games.
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 1:46:10 PM
TheHighlander
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 2:07:02 PM
gumbi
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:19:35 PM
And thanks Highlander. I knew BD was capable of more data layers, but hadn't done any extra research to see just how far it could go. 8 layers would give us what? 200Gb! It should be some time before games exceed that.
NonProphet
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 1:22:09 PM
Reply
And I predict a 2013 release for the PS4 (but I might wait for the price cut in 2014*~*)But I guess we'll have to wait and see.
RadioHeader
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 1:27:07 PM
Reply
Qwarktast1c
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 12:11:25 AM
DarkUnHoly
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:00:18 PM
Reply
now back to sony please man I spend 600 bucks on the my 1st addition 80gb ps3, and I thought that hurt my pockets but for the love i bought it. My wife is gonna kill me if You come out with another machine with the same price tag. Now I am no tech genius but Maybe the media drive can still be blue ray but with 6tb of space on them and still be able to be read by all current bluerays they just have to figure out how to format that on the Blue ray media. and you know @ hexen I totally agree with you dude. just like the ps1 a simple kick ass gaming system.
BikerSaint
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 7:46:46 PM
DarkUnHoly
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:13:56 PM
Reply
TheHighlander
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:17:04 PM
Reply
Unless HDTV takes another leap in resolution to 2160p which would be 4 times the amount of data for video compared to 1080p, there really isn't a need (yet) for a new format, especially as BluRay is designed to be expandable up to about half a TB.
Not only that, but BluRay is only now gaining acceptance in the mainstream, and the same is true of HDTV. Except as a media for Business data backup, the 6TB holographic disc is simply not needed - yet.
MyWorstNightmar
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:31:03 PM
Why are developers not making 1080i or 1080p verions of their games for the PS3?
Will we have to wait until the PS4 comes out before developers make games with top notch resolution?
Does the Xbox simply automatically upscale these games, and the PS3 doesn't have the ability?
TheHighlander
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:59:12 PM
The short answer is that most games render to 720p or sometimes a lower resolution and the console then scales the picture to the output resolution needed.
The long answer is...
The scaler on the Xbox360 is under user control so every game on the 360 can be displayed as 720p or 1080i. But, that is a scaled image, the game engine is still rendering to whatever the developer chose - usually 720p or less.
On the PS3 the difference is that the scaler isn't controlled by the user, it's the developer that has to include the 1080i support. Early in the PS3's life including 1080i support was a major pain in the neck because Sony in their infinite wisdom had not yet made that functionality available to developers, forcing extra work on them if they wanted to include 1080i support. Since the PS3 could automatically scale down to 480p and almost every HDTV being nsold could handle 720p, most developers worked on 720p output. The thing is that the 480p image upscaled to 1080i on those older HDTVs that don't actually support 720p, is rubbish. Things are better now and most games include 1080i support because Sony has made 1080i scaling available to developers.
MyWorstNightmar
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 4:57:35 PM
You mention that Sony now makes it available to developers and most games have it now? I am not at home right now, so I can't check, but I thought Uncharted 2 says 720p on the back of the box? I seem to remember looking for that on the back, thinking that if any game would be 1080i, that it would be this game. Maybe I am getting my games mixed up, and perhaps if you are home, and have the box handy, you can check. But back to your comment, if 1080i is now available, why did it not get used on the latest gem Uncharted 2?
TheHighlander
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 10:12:31 PM
1080i and 720p take about the same horsepower to accomplish, and for action games progressive scan produces a superior image to the user.
For users of a 720p/1080i TV (the majority of HDTVs currently owned are 720p), 720p will in general be a superior experience.
That's my opinion on why 720p has become the target resolution of choice.
DarkUnHoly
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:21:15 PM
Reply
FATHASUN
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 3:38:55 PM
Reply
Unless there is some future tech we don't know about that they will be implementing or some alien technology that has been discovered all that space may be a waste. I can understand SONY not wanting the competition to leap over them but this seem 2 be getting out of hand.
Or maybe my dream of having an actual holographic experience in my home is on the horizon. Now that may need 6TBs! If not more.
Bugzbunny109
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 6:53:43 PM
Reply
kiwami_nemesis
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 7:29:26 PM
Reply
amoled is a good technology for smaller pixels but it is far from being in the consumer market in sizes higher than 4" at a competitive price.
1080P 3D blue-Ray only requires 50% more space so 3D being the next move in the near future, i would say if the ps4 is released in the next 2 to 3 years it most like have a Blu-Ray drive.
TheHighlander
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 10:25:23 PM
Even 2160p only quadruples the space needed for video data. So even if a 3D BluRay movie was fully 50GB in size, a 2160p version of the same thing would be more or less 200GB in size, which is actually 50GB less than what Pioneer demonstrated around CES 2008. BluRay has the capability to go to at least 500GB with higher data density per layer, and more layers.
BluRay can cope not only with full HD (1080p), 3D in full HD, and in future 2160p and 3D in 2160p. I just do not see any justification for this really quite expensive (even compared to BluRay) holographic technology at all.
The other aspect of this is something called "good enough". I still hear people arguing that HD isn't necessary and upscaled DVD is as good as BluRay. There's simply no business or other justification to go for 2160p at this point in time. 1080p is very much good enough for 99% of the population, if anything more than half the population still consider 1080p to be something of a waste of time. 1080p is more than good enough.
Last edited by TheHighlander on 1/12/2010 10:27:36 PM
___________
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 12:49:02 AM
___________
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 12:36:45 AM
Reply
anyway i can guarantee 1 thing and that is the ps4 WILL NOT! be download only.
i think ive done enough bitching about that, its just common seance why.
my guess would be holographic disks since its tradition for sony to bring in a new format with each of its consoles and it nets them quite a bit of cash.
putting out a bluray player into the market just as a normal player would of been a massive risk.
it may not of paid off, putting it in a games console is much safer because if it does not take off who cares its only in one medium.
make it as a movie player than you have wasted movies themselves, computer drives, movie players.
so putting a new optical drive in a games console is a much smarter, safer bet.
i wont say there going to do it because they always do thats just a stupid excuse not a reason.
they will bring in a new medium because it nets them quite a bit of cash and ruffles the competition.
i would say the panasonic 300GB bluray disks will be a staple for PS3 games till the PS4 comes out and than we will get our holographic disks.
5 things stopping the PS4 from releasing now.
1 sony has not made their cash back on the ps3.
you dont go and spend millions on R&D not counting production than scrap it 5 years later.
the PS3 has cost sony so much money im not expecting to see a PS4 till 2013 at the earliest, sony will want to milk all the money out of the ps3.
2 holographic TVs.
i really think next generation consoles will go for the "virtual reality" holy grail.
3 TVs picture quality is still not high enough to warrant such a powerful system.
when you think about it TVs have not come very far in the last few years.
Plasmas came out and were slightly better than CRTs, LCDs came out and they were worse than both CRTs and plasmas, than LEDs came out and are STILL! not as good as plasmas.
4 the market.
its so saturated now with so many new TVs due out at the end of this year.
laser TVs are FINALLY! due out, 3D is due out, OLEDs are due out.
were still in a recession and these companies are poring millions into new TV tech, who is going to buy it?
5 cost.
hardware is there, its incredible what has been made but is not out to the public.
Q&D Australias most expensive audio and visual specialists say both sony and panasonic have made 3D laser TVs but they are incredibly expensive.
toshiba has a new TV powered by the cell BE that is suppose to do double 1080P.
the tech is there it has been made its ready to ship.
but its dear as poison to develop.
ill be seriously shocked if sony release a PS4 before 2014, 2013 if M$ beat them to the race they dont want to be late to the party again.
no one likes playing catch up.
TheHighlander
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 10:12:13 AM
2 - holographic TV is at the same stage as regular TV was when John Logie Baird was inventing his version of TV.
3 - LCDs are better than CRTs in most ways, LED baclit LCDs are pretty darned good, the only LED TV is the OLED one from Sony, There are no othe actual LED TVs on the market - yet.
4 - HDTV is only just beginning to enter the mass market, we're 10 years away from complete market penetration by HD, and still many consumers don;t believe it's needed.
5 - LED backlit TVs are hideously expensive, the OLED screens from Sony are hideously expensive. holographic technology is still in the blue sky research stage and is hideously, hideously expensive - even for cutting edge tech.
The PS3 will continue to use the standard dual layer 50GB BluRay, unless BluRay universally adopts a multi-layer format that can be read by existing hardware. I believe that PS4 will most likely use some future version of BluRay which uses more layers and higher density. The reason being that even at 4 times the resolution of existing HDTV (in stereoscopic 3D) we won't need even a full terabyte to store a movie on a single disc.
___________
Thursday, January 14, 2010 @ 6:17:44 AM
the hybrid movie and game on one disk like sony has been talking about for a long time, batman AA was suppose to be the first of those.
maybe developers will start releasing their games together on the one disk thus reducing publishing costs.
maybe 3 games per disk like darksiders, bayonetta and army of two the 40th day on one bluray disk.
that way it would cost less to publish the game and hopefully the savings will be passed onto the consumer.
only problem i can think of would be people saying well what if i dont want bayonetta or darksiders, what if i only want the army of two the 40th day?
well simple, have the 3 games on the one disk and you pay for the codes to unlock the game.
that way if you only want 1 game you can pay for one code specific to that game and the other 2 will be locked out till you buy a code for that game.
o, but than people could post these codes on the net...........
where do you keep getting this idea that LED backlight TVs are expensive?
there not.
as i said yesterday LED backlight TVs are 300-500 bucks more than the equivalent LCD tube model.
if it was the jump from CRT to LCD as in 1K or so i would agree, but its simply not.
i mean samsung series 8 TVs which more or less are the best on the market are costing less than 4K for a 52 inch.
you call that "hideously expensive?"
in that case i would close my eyes if i were you because theres going to be lots of TVs releasing later this year that will cost more than that.
panasonic are due to release their 155 inch TV
toshiba are set to release their TV which has the cell BE in it and does dual 1080P
laser TVs are due out.
OLED TVs are due out, and well if sonys 12 inch is any indication there going to be priced through the roof!
in fact LED backlighting is the only new tech to come to TVs that has not skyrocketed the price, which is kinda expected but still.
the picture quality improvement is more than worth the price, in fact i would say its a bargain!
Last edited by ___________ on 1/14/2010 6:23:39 AM
TheHighlander
Thursday, January 14, 2010 @ 4:41:25 PM
Well, on what scale do you call them cheap? Cheap compared to TVs with LED backlighting and local dimming? Perhaps. Cheap compared to the older CFFL lit TVs? Perhaps not. Edge-lit with white LEDs are 'cheap' compared to truly backlit ones, which makes you wonder why Samsung charge so much for them.
Samsung 40-inch 120Hz CFFL-lit LCD HDTV - $650
Samsung 40-inch 120Hz LED LCD HDTV - $1150
Those are prices from today searched via Google. So, LED lit TVs are cheaper? Looks to me like they are $500 more expensive.
TVs that are truly backlit by LEDs (the ones that feature local dimming) are much more expensive. The tri-color LED backlight with local dimming is even more expensive.
Laser projection is in it's infancy.
I think you just like contradicting and arguing.
Last edited by TheHighlander on 1/14/2010 4:48:04 PM
BigBoss4ever
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 2:00:28 AM
Reply
it is irrelevant to me for now and i am very happy with the blu-ray.
i refuse to embrace such a quick advance of technology, i dont mind even playing those classic ps1 game with this gen technology, i dont care about 6000g or holographic or whatever fancy name the future console will have, just let me enjoy what we have for now, we are just getting into the begining of a new gold era in this gen, let it boom, do not jump the gun. please
Last edited by BigBoss4ever on 1/13/2010 2:05:02 AM
Nerull
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 2:06:00 AM
Reply
To me the most critical mistake to correct is to throw in some more impressive ram. 4 gigs should be cheaper to manufacture by that point so combined with something similar to the cell or better it should stand with whatever pc's have by then.
daizycutter
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 3:19:11 AM
Reply
Imagi
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 6:58:22 AM
Reply
Stand alone Blue-ray players are only just about getting cheap enough for the mass market. The Capacity of Blue-ray disc's can be increased, and should be plenty for the next gen.
When a new format comes in I want it to be a big increase on the current size limitations,to justify the new hardware required.
Imagi
Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 8:23:41 AM
Fane1024
Saturday, January 16, 2010 @ 7:39:10 PM
fooosie
Thursday, January 14, 2010 @ 2:04:21 AM
Reply
Personaly I cant wait for uncharted4: Les Paul's Guitar but I'll settle for the Uncharted Collection until then.
JackC8
Thursday, January 14, 2010 @ 10:13:24 AM
Reply
dzabava
Thursday, January 14, 2010 @ 2:45:36 PM
Reply
Last edited by dzabava on 1/14/2010 2:49:02 PM
JROD0823
Thursday, January 14, 2010 @ 6:36:23 PM
Reply
NetheRealm
Friday, January 15, 2010 @ 4:39:45 AM
Reply
DeathOfChaos
Friday, January 15, 2010 @ 9:07:50 AM
Reply

See Full Image











Superman915
Reply
Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 10:31:23 AM