Might Cross-Game Chat Be A Premium PSN Feature?
Cross-game chat is a major feature for online functionality that hasn't yet been added to the PS3's repertoire. We keep hearing that it's coming, but it may come with a bit of a twist...
According to Games Thirst citing an article in the latest PTOM issue, cross-game chat may be a feature for which you have to pay. In the article, there are a couple of quotes that might indicate a paid subscription will be necessary to access the feature in question, and the first reads:
"Aside from the 3D goodness, cross-game party chat is the obvious 'next big feature,' even though it might be restricted to paid [PSN] subscribers."
The second reads:
"Sony’s current service is one of the PS3’s best features, so we’d begrudgingly welcome a revamped PSN with extra subscriber functionality, like cross-game-chat and exclusive PSN downloads."
We know a paid subscription option is coming to the PSN, but this is the first we're hearing that cross-game chat may be one of the "premium" features. The question is, what do you think about this? For the record, Sony has no intention of charging to play online; the premium subscription service will simply give you access to other things, like early demos, extra add-on content and other bonuses. But shouldn't cross-game chat be free for all because it relates to online gaming? Granted, Xbox Live is a paid service so we can't say 360 owners get this feature for free but even so, we're willing to bet that most PS3 owners believe cross-game chat should come free of charge.
2/16/2010 8:58:30 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (126 posts)
Zorigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 7:47:41 AM
TheCrazyMerc
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:59:04 AM
lMephisto
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:24:06 AM
LimitedVertigo
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 9:41:35 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 9:44:27 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 10:12:41 PM
Got Rag Doll Kung Fu for free, I should probably delete that from my hard drive. Never play it.
Last edited by WorldEndsWithMe on 2/16/2010 10:13:24 PM
OtisFeelgood
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 11:37:34 PM
bridgera
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 5:08:33 PM
animalmother
Sunday, February 21, 2010 @ 9:17:29 PM
geovanwitdakick
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 10:05:18 PM
Reply
Just join his/her party before your match starts (or invite him/her), or find a corner to hide in & send a party invite. Simple. But then again I can see why people wouldn't like this feature.
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 10:16:00 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 11:57:19 PM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 2:01:54 AM
OtisFeelgood
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 2:02:02 AM
Shams
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:28:00 AM
Deleted User
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 7:56:49 AM
As for this being a Premium feature, I understand it. I read somewhere (a loooong time ago, not sure where) that voice communications take up more bandwith. My guess would be that Sony needs to charge for this because of the extra "weight" on their network.
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 10:11:08 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 12:23:00 PM
geovanwitdakick
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 10:17:10 PM
Reply
Dancemachine55
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 10:19:22 PM
Reply
For now, the majority of my friends remain faithful to XBL, seeing as it was about 300 bucks cheaper over a year ago and had a far superior online network.
(In Australia, 360's were 400 bucks while PS3's were $700. And XBL was superior at the time, even if you had to pay to use it. Couldn't blame them at the time. But now, most of em are thinking of jumping ship to PS3, thanks to the price drop and cos of the top-notch games coming out. I just need to give them that gentle nudge over the line.)
Last edited by Dancemachine55 on 2/16/2010 10:21:06 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 10:29:26 PM
Deleted User
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:46:16 AM
geovanwitdakick
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 10:43:37 PM
Reply
I'd welcome a two for the price of one. So I can keep both hands on the controller, as I speak. That's just me though.
Dancemachine, I also need some more people on my friends list before I consider this feature worthy enough for me to subscribe for it. My most wanted feature for the PSN Premium Package is still free PS1 Classics. I'd pay whatever for that.
randomname
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 10:44:01 PM
Reply
jaybiv
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 1:47:02 AM
geovanwitdakick
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 11:07:11 PM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 11:47:12 PM
Alienange
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 9:53:56 AM
I'm all for PS1 classics, but do you honestly think they'll be handing out free classics with a paid premium service? The only reason we even have PS1 classics available now is because Sony wants money. What would be the incentive if they've already got your money? They can release any old lame PS1 game and say "see? wow! Look what we gave you!" Meanwhile you're paying 40-60 a month.
Shams
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 1:15:46 PM
Although getting exactly what you ask and pay for is ideal (just short of getting what you ask for free), the practical problem, which is why packaged service are sold, is that some services aren't feasible unless they are already in place, and being consistently used, which is the major difficulty in introducing a new service or feature.
For example, cross game chat won't be used,
unless the majority of customers have it already, or at least to the extent, that you, or the average gamer who wishes to use CGC, will have enough buddies online who can also use it. So what happens, when a customer has purchased say a subscription service for CGC, but can't use it? Well, at least he should also have access to some other features that he may also want, like a premium news, and games that happens to pay for itself, too, and covers some of the infrastructure for the CGC, while it's not paying for itself. Now what happens when CGC becomes widely used, and the other services are no longer needed to fund it? You reduce the price of the general package, gradually over time.
InBlackestNight
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 11:11:31 PM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 11:45:47 PM
___________
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 12:58:30 AM
seriously if you want to talk to a friend while playing a game there is a great new invention called the telephone.
find their number, punch it in and woof your talking to them.
MAGIC!
or there is a even greater cutting edge feature called MSN.
yes thats right you can download a program which lets you talk to your friends whenever their online.
AMAZING!
come on people, GET OVER IT!
the ps3 is a GAMING SYSTEM, NOT A COMPUTER!
ps3s are made, and should be bought TO PLAY GAMES!
not to watch movies, or talk to friends.
complaining the ps3 does not have cross game chat, is like complaining a 1M dollar car wont cook your dinner.
___________
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 6:30:52 AM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 7:19:39 AM
Roach721
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 7:45:36 AM
God forbid that Sony Corporation goes bankrupt(yeah right sarcasm) I don't want to have to pay a montly or yearly fee.I don't care what they ad to PSN.Keep it freeeee.
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:37:28 AM
Jawknee
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:35:31 AM
If you want them to continue to produce products for us to consume, they need the money.
Jawknee
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 12:24:33 PM
Roach721
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:00:17 PM
I think what Sony is trying to do is copy M$ since they see their making money, but Sony isn't Microsoft which is why I picked Sony to beging with. Well that and their great games, but a big part of why I chose Sony is their buisness motto and the value they give their customers. I say leave as it is thats my opinion. If they want to add stuff great better for us but don't charge us for it.
geovanwitdakick
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 11:16:08 PM
Reply
InBlackestNight
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 11:41:04 PM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 11:47:35 PM
SympoziumPawa
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 5:37:00 AM
Roach721
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 7:52:01 AM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:34:41 AM
You can go ahead and call me an idiot for, as you say, "wanting to pay for something we should get for free" since I NEVER SAID anything close to that. Evidently you and Mr. No Name come from the same gene pool since you're not only off on why I called him an idiot but now attempting to put words in my mouth.
Oh and if you truly believe you deserve to get everything the PSN offers currently and beyond with no extra cost you're very naive and selfish.
Roach721
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 6:34:15 PM
Roach721
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 6:43:07 PM
Thats what mister blank paragraph was about or isnt that what the subject is wether you think cross chat should be free or not, and you called him an idiot for it so screw you .Your the one throwing insults.Your from Mc Comb Illinois forgodsakes talking about genepools you probably sleep with your sister. ;)
Where the hell is McComb anyway come to a real city like Chicago you inbread.
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:53:27 PM
Firstly to clarify a few things. I'm from the Chicago area you fool, I simply live in Macomb currently for school. Not only are you unable to spell the town's name right but admit you know nothing about the area yet imply it must be rampant with incest.
I insult and correct those on here for their comments, never for their personal lives since I know nothing about them. I suggest you do the same unless you want to continue to look foolish and destroy whatever credibility you have on this site.
On subject, the PSN is currently free but did you honestly believe it would ALWAYS be FREE. As I mentioned you're naive and selfish if you honestly think this way. Sony was new to the online community and instead of charging people out the door with what was obviously a weaker offering than MS they offered a free service and have continued to build upon it. I wouldn't be surprised if the PSN we all know stays free and Sony offers a premium service for those that choose to take advantage of the perks. I wonder what you'll be complaining about then. I'm sure whatever it is you'll continue to be narrow minded and throw out lame attempts to insult people.
LimitedVertigo
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 6:33:42 AM
SympoziumPawa
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 5:35:13 AM
___________
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 12:54:43 AM
Reply
ive said it once, twice, three times and ill say it again.
the day sony start charging for PSN is the day my ps3 and my collection goes on ebay.
they only thing i would pay for is if they were actually going to give me access to everything they give the US.
but than they get it for free so why should i have to pay for it?
hope its not that BS chart, if im going to pay 50 bucks a month (which i NEVER! will) i would want access to EVERYTHING! not a little of this and a little of that.
funny how sony changes their principles so quickly.
2 years ago they would fire a nail into your head if you mentioned paid PSN, they would absolutely deny it and make it 100% clear it will never happen.
now all of a sudden yea its coming.
guess what they say is true, money does talk!
rogers71
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 4:39:16 AM
the day sony start charging for PSN is the day my ps3 and my collection goes on ebay."
Will that also be the day you quit posting your mundane opinions because I would be all for PSN Premium service. You have alot of rage you need to see someone about.
This is a double edged sword for Sony. I can see their reasoning for charging for it. CGC is something most people want so why not put it in the premium service to spark subscriptions but at the same time like some of you have said....If your friends aren't buying then why buy it.
Sony should really think about this idea.
Last edited by rogers71 on 2/17/2010 4:42:02 AM
___________
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 6:29:43 AM
sony keep following the other companies like blind sheep.
M$ has achievements so we have to follow.
M$ adds netflix so we have to follow.
M$ adds twitter so we have to do it.
M$ adds facebook so we have to do it.
nintendo has motion controllers so we have to do it.
nintendo is making a shelling of motion controller games so will make our own called eyepet and scrap 2 of our best games, 8 days and the getaway 3.
how about some originality?
just because one company adds something does not mean sony needs to follow suit.
i bought a ps3 to play games, not to win little electronic gizmos with no use to me.
i bought a ps3 to play games, not to stream movies.
i bought my ps3 to play games, not to talk to my friends.
i bought my ps3 to play games the old fashioned way, not waving my arms around for 2 hours, games are suppose to be fun what part of that sounds like fun?
sony have lost a shelling this generation and its because they have been sidetracked with all this useless BS.
thanks to netflix and co sony London studio has lost over 50% of its staff and i can now say goodbye to 8 days and the getaway 3 because the likelihood of them releasing is now 0.
again thanks to sonys wondering unorganized priorities they have had to axe so many good games.
sonic1899
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:10:32 AM
As far as the Cross-Game-Goes, I'm still sitting on the fence on that. It Sony has it, players will start using their mics (PSN is well known to be more silent than XBL (the only real reason people think XBL is better)). but if we get that feature, expect to see the rise in the same racial slurs, insults, sexual harassments, frog-like singing, loud noises, etc,. XBL is known for. Sometimes when you're in a party, it can get crowded because a friend want you to invite two more friends and that can lead to people making those rude comments because there's a disagreement. I don't use Cross-Game-Chat as often on XBL anymore and just send messages (like I do on PSN), but I know a hell of a lot of people would try it on PSN, including those of you who might be against the idea.
Deleted User
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:38:45 AM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:52:47 AM
Cavan
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 9:38:46 AM
you say in one post the day sony charge for psn is the day you sell your ps3, then later in the post u say if it got all the featues that the us store has you'd pay for that?? you moan that the ps3 can do more than just play games, the old fashioned way, well why not stick with a ps2? or psx even if you wanted to do that? you say that sony has scrapped 2 of its best games in the getaway and 8 days?? how do you know these are their best games have you played them? they might just be utter crap, thus why they were canceled in the 1st place.
also they are not charging for the psn, they are charging for extra stuff, as in stuff that we do not currently have now, therefore there is no point in moaning as since you wont pay for it anyway, it will not, shall not affect you.
You moan about everything, did you ever think sony decided to build the ps3 with not you in mind, that you are the minority, that other people like being able stream downloaed movies to watch on their big stream tvs from their laptops, and ppl like to watch dvds and blu rays, not just have it as just a gaming console.
Maybe your not botherd about cross game chat as you would actually need friends to talk to over the psn but no, your too much of a moaning moron to care about that.
Last edited by Cavan on 2/17/2010 9:40:19 AM
rogers71
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:20:52 AM
Roach721
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:04:24 PM
Bugzbunny109
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:21:59 PM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:56:39 PM
rogers71
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:31:49 PM
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:33:58 PM
Roach721
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 4:27:02 AM
Gabriel013
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 1:07:54 AM
Reply
iGraves1
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 1:59:31 AM
Reply
When I play with family or freinds that might say something in Spanish sometimes, we get racist rants from other people in our own team. Not to mention people who play loud music, wich can be heard from their headsets. And it's kinda hard to use a cellphone when you have 6 people in your party. Having our own voice chat room and not having to listen to online jerks is a more than welcome feature for me.
It should be free thou!
Last edited by iGraves1 on 2/17/2010 2:03:50 AM
jaybiv
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 2:01:05 AM
Reply
To make a premium service worthwhile, Sony is going to have to renege on some of its free online claims because bundling content only is a losing proposition. They are going to have to include system features which have always been available to all PS3 owners.
Cloud storage was the only survey item I would pay for, but I'll wait to see what Sony comes up with. However, if the PS4 (I know it's still too early to fathom) has a subscription ala XBL, then I will kiss video gaming goodbye.
spiderboi
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 4:34:32 AM
Reply
Zorigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 7:49:04 AM
Deleted User
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:41:33 AM
SympoziumPawa
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 5:33:01 AM
Reply
JcBball717
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 6:15:25 AM
Reply
JackC8
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 6:43:37 AM
Reply
Anyhow, I couldn't care less about cross game chat. If you're so bored with the game you're playing that you would rather chat with someone than pay attention to it, maybe you should just turn it off and go outside for a while. You know, interact with real-life people 'n' stuff.
Fane1024
Saturday, February 20, 2010 @ 9:27:39 PM
geovanwitdakick
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:07:33 AM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:53:47 AM
gumbi
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:21:10 AM
Reply
Besides, I'd never even heard of cross game chat until people started complaining. If I want to talk to someone I'll open up a dedicated chat or use this nifty doodad I carry around in my pocked that lets me talk to people from all over the place.
LimitedVertigo
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 8:56:30 AM
buckoboy1
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 12:36:50 PM
G8GTdriver
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 9:05:22 AM
Reply
If I see one of my friends online and I have the game they are playing I will usually start playing that one. If not, I will text and see if they want to play something else, SO I guess for that aspect its good, I wouldn't have to text but other than that, meh.
Last edited by G8GTdriver on 2/17/2010 9:05:41 AM
maxpontiac
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:25:52 AM
maxpontiac
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:24:32 AM
killzone100
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 10:09:27 AM
Reply
InBlackestNight
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 10:30:47 AM
Reply
Cavan
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:19:37 AM
Nynja
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:49:37 AM
Reply
Second, what's the point of having it if none of my PSN friends get the service?
Third, depending on subscription fee this better not be the only feature.
I don't mind paying a price for premium services as long as I am able to utilize them with my friends online and off. I still stand firm with refusing to pay to play. As long as online play remains free, I'm sticking with PS3.
elass0wyp0
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 11:53:28 AM
Reply
Personally, I will not be subscribing to anything ever again. M$ got enough of my money for their ad generator service, or LIVE as it's sometimes called. I'm not falling for that again.
Snorge
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 3:19:59 PM
Reply
Ok I see that many of you dont see the need for cross chat, which is understandable. But look at it like this. How many times have you tried to setup a game with a few friends ala Killzone 2 (Just as an example). Its not the easiest to set the type of game you want to play without sending messages (be it cell phone, ps3 text, or even skype).
It's not the fact that, in this day and age we have many outlets for communication, but the convenience of having the cross game chat. I play both Ps3 and 360 (although if it wasnt for my wife, my 360 wouldn't see the light of day) I definitely prefer my PS3, and just wish we had the "option" to get a few of my friends together and collaborate what game we want to play, be it Killzone 2, Mag, Uncharted 2, Resistance 2, Metal Gear Online (Yes I STILL play that), or even LittleBigPlanet.
It's not the fact that it's on the 360, but rather the fact that it (depending on who you are) is a much requested feature by PS3 owners.
And for some reason people seem to think the cross chat will have all these racist, egotistical bastards cussing and throwing out racial slurs. Unless these people are on your friends list.....you wont have to worry about that.
If you cant tell yet, I want this feature as icing on the greatest cake ever made.
Oh yeah......@ ----------------, I dont think it 1995 anymore. I bought my Ps3 to do everything, not just play games. Your mentality about PS3 ONLY playing games should have dissolved when the PS2 came out with dvd player funtionality in 2000. (10 years ago!) Dude, it's 2010, get with the times.
Cavan
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 3:53:30 PM
iGraves1
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 12:08:52 AM
The people I play with online are personel freinds and family, so instead of having to text, message, or call them it would be great to chat with them from the XMB, and decide what game to play at the same time is great. Also some games that are squad based won't let you chat with other squads, so chatting with someone who didn't fit in your squad would be great
Last edited by iGraves1 on 2/18/2010 12:13:16 AM
geovanwitdakick
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 3:49:14 PM
Reply
the yearly subscribtion fee would be $40-$70 a YEAR. Not per month. Now that we're on that topic, that's A LOT cheaper than what most people pay for their phone yearly. Not to mention that you (at least on Xbox Live) communicate with 8 people at the same time! Tell me a cellphone that can do that, anyone, please...
bridgera
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 5:12:22 PM
SnipeySnake
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 7:42:02 PM
Reply
CrazyIrishBoy
Wednesday, February 17, 2010 @ 9:08:08 PM
Reply
Gabriel013
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 12:50:33 AM
Reply
Cross game chat could be a one off fee.
wiiplay
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 10:56:56 AM
Reply
I also rarely talk while playing my games on the PS3, mainly because my Bluetooth mic is old, and the charge lasts only 30 minutes. I also don't download much dlc, unless it looks extremely fun. But if it is only a a skin of some sort, like to make my LittleBigPlanet sackboy look like a Metal Gear Solid character, even though that does sound extremely cool, I just see no point on buying it.
The price is also very important. I am not willing to pay more than I have to pay for Xbox Live. So maybe $20 a year. I am also not going to subscribe if the subscription only offers me stuff that I can also get with the Xbox Live subscription. Such as cross-game chat.
The PSN already has a built in chat room, as well as a text chat room. So if I want to talk to a friend or family member who lives across the country, I can do so in that chat room.
Also the ability to get demos before everyone else doesn't really appeal to me.
But who knows, maybe after all of the premium features are announced, I might consider it.
Last edited by wiiplay on 2/18/2010 11:04:55 AM
benjasmine
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 10:57:17 AM
Reply
RebelExtrm02
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 11:11:35 AM
Reply
poisonedsodapop
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 11:16:17 AM
Reply
DeathOfChaos
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 11:23:46 AM
Reply
MyWorstNightmar
Thursday, February 18, 2010 @ 2:07:09 PM

See Full Image









Mysterio Spyder
Reply
Tuesday, February 16, 2010 @ 9:22:05 PM