Pachter: The World War II Theme Has Run Its Course
You may not have noticed, but over the years, we've seen quite a few games based on World War II. Developers are starting to get away from that now but it's largely due to over-saturation and a general cry from the consumer; "could we have something new, please?!"
And if you're one of the many who voiced such a plea during the early stages of this generation, you should know that Wedbush Morgan analyst Michael Pachter is right there with you. In checking out the latest episode of PachAttack over at GameTrailers, we hear the popular analyst's take on the subject of WWII FPSs. Initially, when asked if he thinks the industry is starting to move away from the common theme, Pachter simply replied, "Gosh, I hope so." These days, though, Battlefield: Bad Company 2, Killzone 2, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, and the new-look Medal of Honor are all examples of huge shooters that no longer focus on the second World War. Pachter goes on to say that "WWII gaming has lasted longer than World War II" itself and he just doesn't understand the public's fascination with the concept. He further theorizes that the reason shooters continue to get bigger recently is because they're getting away from WWII; many publishers really didn't want to do that, at first. Gamers love the tried and true but at some point, no matter how good the idea may be, we all get tired. It's just bound to happen.
I'm sure most of you will agree with Pachter. But then again, let's not forget that we did see what is arguably the best WWII shooter ever with Treyarch's Call of Duty: World at War back in 2008.
4/11/2010 8:59:36 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (50 posts)
Jawknee
Sunday, April 11, 2010 @ 9:52:33 PM
BTNwarrior
Sunday, April 11, 2010 @ 11:17:30 PM
shadowpal2
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 12:16:10 AM
But yea you may be pretty damn right about the whole people getting bored of modern shooters thing. I would think so too, in that case would that mean that the shooter franchise will become...........................EXTINCT!?!?!?!?!
Naaaa...never because there are still a large group that enjoy them...and also there wouldn't be a console without them. Yes...that console.
I loved Pachter's quote on how World War II gaming has lasted longer than World War II - I laughed haha.
johnld
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:00:49 AM
hellish_devil
Sunday, April 11, 2010 @ 9:52:55 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Sunday, April 11, 2010 @ 9:56:54 PM
Reply
I actually liked World at War more then MW2 and slightly more then MW1. The campaign was better and was more fun to play online. There are tanks! But i supposed i am a bit board of WWII weaponry.
BTNwarrior
Sunday, April 11, 2010 @ 11:19:46 PM
Jawknee
Sunday, April 11, 2010 @ 11:34:55 PM
johnld
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:04:41 AM
AcHiLLiA
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 12:28:00 PM
johnld
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:07:57 AM
Beamboom
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:36:07 AM
BikerSaint
Sunday, April 11, 2010 @ 10:30:58 PM
Reply
It is "not" a fact that we're in agreement with Pachter,
The only real fact's that Pachter is finally in agreement with us, the gaming world.
So IMO, now that we're almost 1/4 through 2010 already, his sudden commenting on this now, really is super old news.
johnld
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:12:28 AM
Highlander
Sunday, April 11, 2010 @ 11:46:10 PM
Reply
LimitedVertigo
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 1:19:37 AM
Tim Speed24
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 3:42:00 PM
___________
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 2:29:08 AM
Reply
so can we finally please put these military shooters to bed?
PLEASE???????????????????????????????????????????
honestly theres not enough fingers and toes in the universe to count all the military shooters due out this year!
im really getting sick of them, how about we switch to a decent cop based game?
like swat, or max payne.
the only good cop based game i have played this gen is stranglehold and that was not exactly stellar!
johnld
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:15:47 AM
Godslim
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:52:04 AM
___________
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 8:08:00 AM
Godslim
Tuesday, April 13, 2010 @ 4:36:15 AM
___________
Tuesday, April 13, 2010 @ 7:30:13 AM
Gordo
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 3:43:05 AM
Reply
Lots of line charges against musket, bayonet or cannon balls.
Some one needs to think out of the box. I'm sure they could be excellent and very atmospheric.
I doubt unfortunately, that todays twitch gamers would appreciate such titles so they are probably gone the way of the Dodo.
We need immersion. I want to see a game with me being one of 10,000 soldiers on a battlefield with everyone of the NPCs influencing the battle and smoke, noise and gunfire everywhere.
I dont want to be fighting in a factory, an office block or an alien planet.
I want scale, I want vunerability and I want bayonets. I want to see 10,000 enemies running down the hill all screaming for my blood!
First Person Shooters should be about bringing the intensity closer to the gamer. We need to be within the chaos and part of a larger environment.
Most of the FPS's at the moment are formualic and make the player 100 times more important and stronger than the other NPC's.
Nothing breaks immersion quicker than spawn points and feeling like you have a target on your back.
Illogical? or is anyone else slightly jaded with this generations output... Nothing really revolutionary so far is there...
Last edited by Gordo on 4/12/2010 3:43:43 AM
Beamboom
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:38:32 AM
I guess what I really want is Mass Effect on the PS3... :(
Snaaaake
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 6:50:29 AM
LimitedVertigo
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 7:29:43 AM
swapnilgyani
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:10:56 AM
Reply
johnld
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 4:19:16 AM
Reply
Last edited by johnld on 4/12/2010 4:19:55 AM
mick
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 7:51:19 AM
Reply
br0d1n
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 5:55:28 PM
DeathOfChaos
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 9:51:51 AM
Reply
maxpontiac
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 11:59:12 AM
Reply
SoulController
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 3:50:15 PM
Reply
DemonNeno
Monday, April 12, 2010 @ 7:28:14 PM
Reply
I look at the typical FPS games as a incomplete piece of a a big picture. Kind of like eating S'mores without anything but melted Hershey bars. The games don't have enough to "suck" me into the game play. It's like stripping the focus on a good story to blast crap. Toss in the mix the multi player games with 10 year old kids who spend every second out of school blasting people and.. Well, I don't care to get THAT good at simply shooting people.
Of course, not all FPS are of the same breed. I'm talking about the bulk of them, not all. I'm sure you guys n gals can shoot my statement out of the galaxy with incredible examples, but the point is that these games should be MORE like that and less as they typical turn out to be.
Sorry, it's just a rant.. Just like the plethora of rants I've gone on about RPG games losing their old school RPG vibe.
EDIT: I also MASSIVELY suck at quickly aiming with any controllers analog stick! haha.. I'm too spoiled with my mouse and keyboard, as un-console like as that may be.
Last edited by DemonNeno on 4/12/2010 7:30:14 PM
wiiplay
Tuesday, April 13, 2010 @ 3:47:15 AM
Reply
I guess games about the future are the present, and games about the past are the past?
Meh, what ever! Instead of killing Nazi's I can now kick those green butt aliens back to Pluto! Thank God for video games!

See Full Image









The X Factor 9
Reply
Sunday, April 11, 2010 @ 9:46:37 PM
I'm sure Michael Pachter will catch on. You heard it here first.