Activision Will Release "Three CoD Titles In Two Years"
Activision is going to be embroiled in quite the lengthy lawsuit with Infinity Ward, but that won't stop the flow of Call of Duty titles.
Despite the fact that ex-IW leaders Vince Zampella and Jason West are suing for the rights to the lucrative franchise, Activision continues to ask developers to produce new installments in the super popular series. We know Treyarch is currently working on what is currently known as "Call of Duty 7" (it will supposedly take place in Vietnam), and there is another CoD project in development at San Francisco studio, Sledgehammer. The latter may even be an "innovative take" on the franchise; i.e, we may see the inclusion of a third-person perspective for the first time. But hey, it doesn't end there: according to TheGamersHub citing a Facebook quote from Activision's Dan Amrich, there will be a third Call of Duty, and it's not that far off. Wrote Amrich:
"As for COD, they’ve confirmed three games in the next two years. Seeing as how there is a pattern of one new COD game every year, this is one new COD game from one new developer, and in a different genre from the core games we’ve seen."
We know we don't have a lot of CoD fans around here but maybe we really will see some freshness and innovation. Even so, three games in two years may be the very definition of over-saturation, and Activision should recall what happened with the music/rhythm genre in 2009; it experienced a 50% decline after the explosion early in the generation. Besides, don't we get a little bored after a while?
4/21/2010 9:19:42 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (108 posts)
laxpro2001
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 11:43:01 PM
Dancemachine55
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 10:33:24 PM
Jamaican_Heat
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 9:44:34 PM
Reply
Natalisrubbish
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 9:48:49 PM
Reply
Milonakis
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 11:31:38 PM
Victor321
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 9:58:44 PM
Reply
If I was someone who never (or rarely) visits a gaming site, such as PSXExtreme, and as a result, never heard or learned of great, exceptional games such as God of War III, Heavy Rain, and much more, then no, I won't get bored.
To put it simply, if I was part of the mainstream audience, then NO. ^.^
And I think I'm reading the headline wrong, but I swear I'm reading "Activision Will Milk The COD Franchise In Two Years", because this is seriously getting ridiculous.
And don't worry, I read the article ;) lol
booze925
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 10:05:49 PM
Reply
if it is truly set in vietnam, we will see a fresh new take on warfare that no game has captured before. treyarch has not slacked on call of duty. they were among the few to pull of the pacific theatre, so i strongly believe they can capture the essence of vietnam.
IW.... im not so sure anymore
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 10:06:56 PM
Reply
johnld
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 3:02:13 AM
shadowpal2
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 10:34:23 PM
Reply
First Guitar Hero...now Call of Duty.
Thank god for Sony's 1st party developers and Kojima with his CONFIDENTIAL GAME(S)! *looks around suspiciously*
Darthvintage
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 9:13:24 AM
BikerSaint
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 10:39:55 PM
Reply
Bugzbunny109
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 11:02:45 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 11:35:01 PM
BTNwarrior
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 11:34:25 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 11:34:36 PM
Reply
RadioHeader
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 5:24:38 AM
Dancemachine55
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 10:38:56 PM
Step 1 - Take a well known and loved franchise.
Step 2 - Make as many games as possible as soon as possible to bank in on the franchise hype.
Step 3 - Once the franchise is dead, take the money, buy another new popular franchise and repeat.
CH1N00K
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 11:41:19 PM
Reply
Do we really need that many COD's in such a short amount of time? Although it's funny, while a lot of other companies are focusing on creating stellar online communities by releasing one game and building off of it with DLC and extra content, Activision is saying don't focus too much on this game, we've got another one coming.. We wouldn't want any of your A.D.D addled brains to focus on one thing for too long, so we'll just keep crapping out new games every few months.
Off course since they don't pay their employees, I guess they are the only company who can afford to keep making games..lol.
BTW off topic, anyone checked out the new 3.30 update yet? anything exciting?
Dancemachine55
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 10:41:13 PM
dachemists
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 11:45:17 PM
Reply
i dont care who gets the money as long as its not in activisons hands
3 games in 2 years???? i wish i never bought MW2, what makes them think i will buy there next game??? they must think we are all stupid, they dont even fix a game that made over a BILLION dollars, yet there thinking about 3 more games in 2 yrs
please!!!
CH1N00K
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 11:52:13 PM
But that worked for MS too...we could fix Vista, but instead..here's Windows 7! Enjoy! Now please bend over while we extract your wallet from your rectum, that's where we left it the last time we raped you.
Last edited by CH1N00K on 4/21/2010 11:53:54 PM
bridgera
Friday, April 23, 2010 @ 12:08:23 PM
LegendaryWolfeh
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:34:12 AM
Reply
bigrailer19
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:34:17 AM
Reply
realmadpuppy
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:48:38 AM
Reply
johnld
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 3:04:47 AM
Him
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 2:15:55 AM
Reply
Jawknee
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 3:36:43 AM
Him
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 8:50:42 AM
Last edited by Him on 4/22/2010 8:54:04 AM
FullmetalX10
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 9:14:15 AM
spiderboi
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 9:31:55 AM
Deleted User
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 11:25:07 AM
And Spider, it's not just marketing. Sales of the PS3 have gone up, but most people would say that's because of the price drop. Right now, even with better marketing behind PS3, 360 is STILL selling better. There is obviously something quality about the 360 or else you would see a tremendous dip in sales.
CH1N00K
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:11:14 PM
Take a look at Avatar the movie. It had pretty effects, it had wow factor, but they kind of dropped the ball with the storyline. When it came down to it, Hurt Locker took home the awards because it had something that Avatar didn't, substance. The sales on Hurt Locker were considerable less than Avatar, but quality was better.
And that's exactly what MS and Activision is doing. The Hype machine is selling the games. Sure they are entertaining, but they aren't that great. I've already heard a few people who are sick of playing MW2 and are going on to other games.
And if they release that many COD's in such a short period, they are going to drive the franchise into the ground and every other game of it's genre are going to go down with it.
Yeah Sales doesn't always mean quality. It might have meant quality once, but now? They are just using the name to squeeze as much money as they can out of it before it dries up. Ford sold a fair amount of Pinto's in it's day.
Take a look at games like Tony Hawk...used to be a quality game, but that dried up. If it weren't for Skate, the genre would be pretty much dead.
And we all have a theory as to why the 360 is still selling but that's a whole other discussion..If you play poker, you'll know what I mean when I say 360 users are "pot committed"
Last edited by CH1N00K on 4/22/2010 12:24:10 PM
Jawknee
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:35:58 PM
I love the Hurt Locker analogy It sold poorly at the box office but it took home the awards and for good reason. Not because its sales but because it was a better movie then Avatar.
Here's were you with poor tastes disagree and repeat the nonsense about sales=equaling quality in the face of facts.
Thumbing down commences in 3,2,1...
Dustinwp
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 5:02:29 PM
MyWorstNightmar
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 5:42:37 PM
Him
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 6:29:01 PM
Dustinwp
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 6:54:25 PM
"You might have your opinion about it and you might be right but normally more sales means its a better game".
You do know every gaming website has their own picks for GotY? I wasn't referring to a single award.
By the way Demons Souls was a good game "Not Great Game" and even that won a GotY award from Gamespot. The point is if so many people thought COD was the best thing since sliced bread then why didn't anyone of the seventeen million people that bought it express that. I will tell you why! Because COD is not a quality product "it's a FAD".
Last edited by Dustinwp on 4/22/2010 6:56:02 PM
bigrailer19
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 7:05:45 PM
So with that said about MW2 I think a lot of people on PSXE dont like FPS im not gonna name names so im not pointing the finger at anyone thats just the vibe. Next i wanna say the reasons MW2 sold so well is because of how great MW WAS. Even though the next COD games will still cater to a huge percentage of gamers which are "twitch" gamers, and COD games will continue to sell in big numbers. We wont see another COD game sell as many as MW2, because people realised MW2 was a let down after the purchase. that dont mean im saying it was a bad game cus i enjoyed it but up to the level of MW it fell short. So with that said MW2 sold well because of the momentum from MW, now that momentum is kinda dwindled in my opinion we wont see another COD games sell like MW2 did.
Every person that bought MW2 had a very good reason too, that reasons was MW was an awesome game, and thats what we expect from sequals. So everyone who is putting the people down who bought it get a life really. you have tastes in games, as do others, if they differ get over it.
and JAWKNEE i may not like jonas brothers either but they sell records because people like it. sometimes with out demos for vids we have to purchase blindly but singles for CD's hit the radio well before release, so your theory fails im sorry. again just because you dont like something doesnt mean your right, or that people will always agree with you.
Last edited by bigrailer19 on 4/22/2010 7:09:42 PM
Dancemachine55
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 10:50:16 PM
Activision hyped the hell out of MW2. And because everyone wants to play online, what game are your friends most likely to have on PS3 or 360?
Modern Warfare 2
While the single player took a huge dive IMO, the multiplayer was only slightly improved, making for a complete ripoff for the consumer.
All games should have at least 9 hours minimum for single player. Look at Naughty Dog, Uncharted 2 had a kickass single player and it's multiplayer is of good quality too.
But 3 COD games over 2 years? I actually bought MW2 Prestige, wish I hadn't now, but there is no way in hell I'm getting these next ones, even if all my friends get them, I am not playing Activision's game anymore.
Rock Band won me over.
Skate 3 will win me over.
And either BF:BC2 or MOH will win me over.
Meanwhile, Activision's work will continue to get staler and staler until they buy another new franchise, milk that and cause another meltdown for a promising devloper.
Wage SLAVES
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 2:24:40 AM
Reply
___________
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 2:44:12 AM
Reply
bigrailer19
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 8:44:49 PM
Fane1024
Saturday, April 24, 2010 @ 4:15:49 PM
OriginalSin
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 3:28:05 AM
Reply
3 COD is 2 years hey? Well even if the one is a "new take" and comes in a 3rd person perspective I don't think, or should I rather say I KNOW it is not a good idea to make 3 in 2 years.
The sad part is there are so many sheep out there that will just buy every installment as they come out... Poor (and I mean literally "poor" after buying all the Activision crap that came out) fools...
But I must say after what Treyarch did with WAW I am curious to see what the can do with the Vietnam setting.But I will me watching the developement of the new Medal Of Honor from here on out.
kraygen
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 5:55:57 AM
kraygen
Friday, April 23, 2010 @ 2:26:47 AM
Jawknee
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:36:33 PM
Godslim
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 5:08:40 PM
Captain Cod
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 5:13:33 AM
Reply
kraygen
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 5:57:31 AM
Reply
Hello, they are not new games, same game, same mechanics, new paint job.
My car is dirty, just because I wash it doesn't mean its a new and different car.
InBlackestNight
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 7:41:33 AM
Reply
FlyingKickPunch
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 6:21:30 PM
Underdog15
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 8:20:25 AM
Reply
FullmetalX10
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 9:17:41 AM
Reply
Darwin1967
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 10:44:31 AM
Reply
FlyingKickPunch
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 6:12:22 PM
Mr Bitey
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:17:42 PM
Reply
Activision flooded the market with Guitar Hero games, until no one wanted them. In a matter of a few years, they took one of the most lucrative games out there, and made it irrelevant.
Obviously they want to milk the COD cow while the milking is good. They are going to end up destroying the franchise. Fans should be upset with this.
CH1N00K
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:37:52 PM
I'm curious to see what the next genre will be. I'm guessing on a hybrid of some sort. We're already seeing RPG/FPS mixes like Fallout 3. That seems the next logical step, although thanks to Gears and Uncharted maybe TPS games will take off..who knows?
Myself? I'd like to see an all in one. A game with the driving mechanics of burnout, the shooting mechanics of Killzone or Socom, the RPG elements of Fallout and maybe mix in a little Ace Combat for fun. Throw it into one big universe and away you go. Only problem is, you put all that into one game and make a great online community for it, you won't ever have to buy another game and that will put a lot of people out of business...lol
Last edited by CH1N00K on 4/22/2010 12:39:48 PM
SilentMassacre
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:50:02 PM
Reply
Jawknee
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 12:53:22 PM
photo K
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 1:14:09 PM
Kai200X
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 3:22:44 PM
rogers71
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 3:40:12 PM
@Jawknee, I agree with you. It is amazing to see everyone that use sales numbers as an argument for how good something is. All sales really mean is that a product had the marketing power behind it.
The Hurt Locker was a perfect example. No advertising but in the end won all the awards.
Jawknee
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 3:47:32 PM
Fane1024
Saturday, April 24, 2010 @ 4:30:01 PM
Russell Burrows
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 3:39:22 PM
Reply
FlyingKickPunch
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 6:17:23 PM
Dancemachine55
Friday, April 23, 2010 @ 7:03:16 AM
Tony Hawk might be milked for a little while longer.
Guitar Hero still has strong brand name power. But do not get me started on Band Hero!!! That game is a joke.
Only reason GH is still doing well in Aus is cos no one has heard of Rock Band here, and Rock Band 2 never came out in Australia. I had to import my copy. Still is my most played music rhythm game next to GH Metallica.
How about Crash Bandicoot? Spiderman? X-MEN?, Spyro? Shrek?
oh!!! I can totally see them milking Shrek games with the fourth Shrek movie coming out.
Honestly, go to the Activision website, Prototype is the ONLY new or different IP listed. I laughed at it.
At least EA is taking risks nowadays. They've changed their business, got a new vision and it's starting to pay off.
It takes a lifetime of doing everything right to be seen as mighty, but only a second of something wrong to lose it all.
Last edited by Dancemachine55 on 4/23/2010 7:05:49 AM
Fane1024
Saturday, April 24, 2010 @ 4:32:02 PM
Jawknee
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 4:16:25 PM
And by the way, i did enjoy World at War(some what. Treyarch are still ok in my book but the fact that Activision calls all the shots in regards to these new "Guitar Hero of Shooters" doesn't bode well for future releases.
Last edited by Jawknee on 4/22/2010 4:19:14 PM
Godslim
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 5:09:28 PM
Jawknee
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 6:01:08 PM
FlyingKickPunch
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 6:22:42 PM
Reply
BikerSaint
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 9:12:55 PM
Reply
He's already shown his true colors.....that he likes playing the role of a company headhunter, rather than acting accordingly as the top boss, plus he's all about the Benji's.
So I believe I know exactly what kotex is up to, and all within the next 5 years......
I believe his game plan is to continue milking every franchise anti-vision's got for all it's worth.
But, as soon as he see's there's about to be no more milk, he'll cash in his biggest stock options yet, he'll cannibalize anti-vision by doing a "grab-by fisting" of all the stock loot & run till he can find another sucker...er.... I mean....company, to destroy too.
Mark my words!
BikerSaint
Thursday, April 22, 2010 @ 9:17:47 PM
Reply
rogers71
Friday, April 23, 2010 @ 3:11:35 AM
I got an email from some other guy telling me that I need to learn how to read the rules of the website and then Ben sent me an email saying I posted a link......which I didn't.
Mr Diamond
Sunday, April 25, 2010 @ 4:09:07 PM
Reply
If you have something like MW2 why are you gonna backtrack to crappy rifles and technology??? That is the reason i never played a CoD game until it came the MW Franchise out!
I hope activision rot in hell and the company collapse if they continue with those games made out of crap!
FoxRacing916
Sunday, April 25, 2010 @ 5:13:38 PM
Reply
Predatoryx
Monday, April 26, 2010 @ 1:13:15 AM
Reply
In this case, MW2 is a FPS + Eye Candy, so it was expected to sell a lot of units, however, it surpass their expectations. Good for them.
Ok, it could be discussed that is a game for masses, we do have videogames thank to those masses. Companies are for-profit entities and they require profit in order to keep growing up and survive. Naughty Dog, Sony, Microsoft, Eat Play Sleep, etc They don't produce games to donate them, games are not open source and they aren't cheap to produce.
It is just natural that they will try to produce as much as possible re-using code and graphics and minimizing the pipeline, design times and mechanics.
The mechanics in GOW3 were the same that GOW1 and 2, with little variation. In fact, they wanted to do that in the previous versions but they never had the budget neither the time. (Just watch the documentary).
However, not because they re-use mechanics means that the game was bad (it was also an eye candy). In GOW the storyline was the key point and if they do the same for COD (a good storyline), maybe there's a chance that they will keep making money.
However, there's a catch. Whenever you release too many games of the same style at the same time, you end up eating your own profits because cash is a scarce resource and players have to choose between them. Probably they will end up buying all the titles but when they drop the price or they would buy used ones that won't deliver profits to Activision.
The movie business is the same: If the movie is a hit, you will release a 2nd part, 3rd, etc... until the movie doesn't make money. Just go back in time... how many Nightmare on Elm Street, Jaws, Halloween, Friday the 13th, etc.. can you recall?... and now, they are re-launching them again! :)
BTW, MW2 is not the best game ever, but I play it once in a while. Nice graphics.
shootu
Wednesday, May 05, 2010 @ 12:41:03 AM

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2









Deleted User []
Reply
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 @ 9:35:56 PM