Pachter: Rockstar Has Erased My Red Dead Skepticism
Red Dead Redemption is one of the better games (and better overall experiences) of the generation. But analyst Michael Pachter wasn't so convinced heading into the game's launch.
He was skeptical about its potential success but in speaking to CVG, he admitted he was just plain wrong. He said Rockstar definitely did the right thing by tackling the Western theme that nobody had really done right in the video game industry (up to this point). Therefore, Pachter probably had good reason to be a little skeptical; although the analogy is a tad inaccurate, it would almost be like expecting a superhero game to score high and sell like mad ('cough' Batman: Arkham Asylum 'cough'). But the "visionaries" at Rockstar most definitely proved themselves. Said Pachter:
"I suppose we should call them visionaries. I have been sceptical [for] a long time, but they always believed that a Western, if done well, would sell well. It looks like they were right all along. Nobody can doubt that they made a great game."
He then jokes that he wants a copy from Rockstar, but they haven't sent him anything since he predicted that Bully wouldn't sell very well. ...maybe this guy needs to put a bit more emphasis on review scores. Anything that scores as high as RDR is bound to sell, almost regardless of setting and premise. And besides, how many have been waiting for the quintessential Western-themed game?
5/20/2010 10:54:58 AM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (31 posts)
Vitron
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 11:16:25 AM
godsman
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 2:09:31 PM
Shams
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 11:42:51 AM
Reply
It think Ben's score is most accurate. A '9.3' means the game is successful in what it aims to do, awesome to the fans, and worth trying to everybody in general. It isn't the end-all and be-all of games that a score closer to a '10' would suggest, but it's pretty darn good.
As this is the third R* game I'm playing in the last couple of weeks, I must say that the term "open-world" suits these games more than "sandbox". "Sandbox" seems like a more fitting label for the genre that contains games like LittleBigPlanet, and ModNation Racers where you can actually do creative stuff.
After playing games by R*, who might as well be called the pioneers of the open-world genre, there obviously is a checklist of themes and features that all their games have in common. I'm not saying that RDR is simply a western, reskinning of GTA4. It's pacing is different, yet the same golden elements that we've come to expect are welcomed. I guess I was expecting something more revolutionary. So I'd say Ben's review was dead-on. I wished I waited for his review, because I would've seen that it is an excellent title, but hardly a D1P. Oh well, a learning lesson.
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 3:30:50 PM
MyWorstNightmar
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 12:03:12 PM
Reply
Sounds a bit cheapskatish saying he wants a free copy of the game though. Go buy it yourself, I am sure you don't work for free.
Does he normally get games for free? If so, I wonder why, since he is an analyst of the industry, not a reviewer.
DeathOfChaos
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 12:15:45 PM
leatherface
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 2:12:10 PM
DeathOfChaos
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 12:14:59 PM
Reply
maxpontiac
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 12:26:03 PM
Reply
Hezzron
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 12:37:51 PM
Reply
Seriously, I don't mind someone stating the obvious. We do it all the time in daily conversation. But why is it "news" when this guy does it?
Kiri
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 1:00:59 PM
FatherSun
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 1:21:53 PM
FM23
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 1:26:11 PM
Reply
Alienange
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 2:03:31 PM
Reply
As Ben made clear in his review, liking western movies really has nothing to do with whether or not you'll enjoy gaming in that time period. However, since we've never truly experienced an epic western themed game, I'd say Pachter had every reason to be skeptical.
He analyses and then predicts. The analysis was accurate. Being wrong about predictions can be just as satisfying as being right.
PS: Will someone now do a proper pirate game?
*sideways glance at Propaganda Games*
Highlander
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 2:39:33 PM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 3:34:17 PM
Reply
MyWorstNightmar
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 9:02:30 PM
Highlander
Friday, May 21, 2010 @ 12:43:34 AM
Reply
___________
Friday, May 21, 2010 @ 9:33:03 AM
Reply
western shooters are a classic, and there really is not a AAA western shooter out there!
gun, and red dead revolver are probably the pick of the litter and there A old and B not exactly stellar.
western shooter is the best type of shooter they could of gone for because 1 its open world everyone loves open world games.
2 we have a million and one science fiction shooters, a million and 1 war shooters, a million and one futuristic shooters but very few western shooters.
sounds like a no brainier to me!
god this guys a douche!
if hes not stating the obvious, hes saying something stupid and short minded like saying insomniac would be crazy not to go multiplatform.
does he not think hmmmmmmmm maybe theres a reason they dont want to?
maybe there getting special privileges there getting now, that they would not be getting if they switched.
he just looks at the cards on the table and never thinks past that, never thinks maybe theres something hidden away.
everything happens for a reason, insomniac are not staying exclusive to sony just because they like them!

See Full Image









Qubex
Reply
Thursday, May 20, 2010 @ 11:06:22 AM
Q!
"play.experience.enjoy"
Last edited by Qubex on 5/20/2010 11:09:22 AM