Rockstar: Our Games Are For Adults Because We're Adults
As you may have already noticed, there are instances of pretty controversial situations in Rockstar's latest epic title, Red Dead Redemption. It's hardly surprising, as the game is essentially Grand Theft Auto in the Old West.
Hence, it's bound to raise the ire of many an anti-game activist and/or concerned parent. But this time, before the sh** hits the fan (which may be inevitable, after the reports of killing children and nuns go mainstream), Rockstar has decided to be proactive in their explanations. As most all gamers know, the ESRB places these things called "ratings" on video games - much the same way the MPAA does for movies - and yes, there are indeed plenty of games that aren't made for kids. This isn't 1984. And if you're a responsible parent, chances are, you aren't going to be buying RDR or GTAIV for your 9-year-old; if you do, even Rockstar condemns you. The developer's Lazlow Jones had this to say in a recent interview with the BBC:
"Our games are not designed for young people. If you’re a parent and buy one of our games for your child you’re a terrible parent. We design games for adults because we’re adults. There’s a lot of kids games out there that we’re not interested in playing. Just like you enjoy watching movies and TV shows with adult themes and language and violence that’s the kind of thing we seek to produce."
You know, it's just downright ridiculous that Rockstar should even have to make this statement. The ESRB has done everything they can for quite a long time to educate parents and other consumers, and if such parties wish to remain ignorant and still believe that all games feature nothing more than interactive cartoons, game designers can't be held responsible. No, don't go buy Red Dead Redemption for the kid in 4th grade. While we're talking about it, don't rent Saw for him, either...and don't let him drink the stuff under the sink. Need any other helpful albeit absurdly obvious advice?
5/23/2010 9:24:53 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (95 posts)
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 10:03:47 PM
SmokeyPSD
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 10:13:40 PM
Juanalf
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 10:40:22 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 11:09:33 PM
bigrailer19
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 11:17:20 PM
RDR isnt a GTA clone. Its far from it. I cant compare the two. Im in the same position as you except i had fun with GTA4, it just didnt have any substance. RDR has tons of it for me to grasp on to.
So the missions might be set up kind of similiar, and the gps works the same. Well that could be said about a lot of sand box games. If R* didnt develop this game i dont think it would get the comparison.
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:20:34 AM
godsman
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:38:36 AM
SmokeyPSD
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 1:00:34 AM
Even just herding cattle, is just 1 example of something which is just on a complete level of immersion removed from GTA.
Edit/ I'll rephrase, I'm more like bigrailer, I just found no substance to GTA, no "soul" again. Red Dead Redemption actually has that. Perhaps to truely get the most out of it you need to love spaghetti westerns like me, not many seem to realise it was made to emulate them.
Last edited by SmokeyPSD on 5/24/2010 1:04:27 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 1:26:25 AM
SmokeyPSD
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:35:57 AM
TEG3SH
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 6:05:17 AM
bigrailer19
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 9:37:50 AM
Sure RDR and GTA have similiarites in the way they were developed, were talking about the same developer, they stick to what they know, and what works...
But, GTA had no immersion into it, none what so ever for me. RDR does. And it has a lot of it. The hud may look the same, but what sand box game doesnt have a radar, and a map marker system. There was mjch more thought put into RDR and it has some RPG elements, unlike GTA which was bland from the guns to the so called story. I had fun with GTA but thats it, i absolutely adore RDR though. Two completely different games in my eyes. Again if RDR was developed by someone else it wouldnt be as easily compared to GTA.
But again this is just how I feel. If you guys wanna compare it to GTA thats fine. But personally I dont think it needs to be compared to it to get people to like it! The game can speak volumes about its self the moment you pop it in!
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 10:27:18 AM
Furthermore, this "no depth" statement is just plain wrong. What can you do in RDR you couldn't do in GTAIV? And don't be all surface and cosmetic like with the herding example... You can accept secondary jobs, earn money, purchase property, utilize different modes of travel, follow a storyline, participate in optional missions outside the storyline, purchase items and equipment, etc, etc, etc.
I have yet to find an actual gameplay mechanic in RDR that was not in GTAIV. You can dislike GTAIV all you want; STOP trying to tell people it sucks just because you couldn't find a way to enjoy it. This is ALL personal preference in this argument; you're going to have to accept that.
Mavfan321
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 11:10:25 AM
Silent_J
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:06:14 PM
Last edited by Silent_J on 5/24/2010 3:08:59 PM
TEG3SH
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:47:02 PM
believe me I'm not hating on GTA, after Vice city which is one of my fav game of all time it kindda lost its charms, thats being said I can relate to what ur saying. I loved the first Halo but by the third one I was Kinda feed up with it, the same with GTA or RDR. thats all.
GOW3 got less than a perfect score due to this concept followed by most critics, yes it's great and yes it's awesome but it was the same as 2 & 1 . Thats all I'm saying not hating on anybody or there style of gaming. ;)
bigrailer19
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 6:43:53 PM
Bens defense is all the mechanics are the same, the missions are displayed the same as your do them, the radar is the same, ok so be it. Those elements relate to a ton of sandbox games out there! And its ok to compare games its what relates other games to people.
All im saying is RDR is in its own right able to stand on its own two legs without GTA being compared to it. I liked GTA but not as a story driven game, just as a fun game to play. As I said in another post I could bet 60% of the people who bought and played GTA didnt finish it because, they had more fun just driving the cars, and pickin up hookers, and shootin people in the heads. Well with that said, Riding a horse is awesome but you wouldnt think as much fun as a car you can't jump it ;), but R* pulled it off. Then hookers well, Marstin is married so, that displays great amounts of detail on R* part to relate that, i mean he could be unfaithful. and as you can shoot people in the heads there is a much more at risk in RDR. outside of town you can get away with it, but lose fame and honor, inside town yeah the cops come which makes a fun time, but you still lose fame and honor. There is a bigger sacrifice. and these are just 3 examples but big ones in relation to the story and how you play the game. Something GTA didnt have. It really shows how great a game is when R* can make a western more fun that the often seen city setting, let alone make riding a horse as much fun as driving a car.
Bottom line from here on out, even though GTA is the predecessor, RDR has made the standard. As I said RDR can stand on its own two feet, and it proved that to me as soon as I put it in!
Last edited by bigrailer19 on 5/24/2010 6:48:15 PM
SmokeyPSD
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 6:54:17 PM
I'm not blind, I can see the GTA in it, it is afterall done by the same people. however this time they have actually come of age, and the violent content matches the maturity of the story. The mechanics are however just that, mechanics, I can see a lot in it that is unique to Red Dead, you guys obviously can't and just feel it's GTA on horses, but don't just tell me I'm wrong as my thoughts are my own AND others.
TEG3SH
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 7:23:23 PM
I really know what ur sayin, but as I never played RDR, just playn GTA IV. it could be better it could be the best game ever, I'm certainly not judging that, all I'm sayn I really got kinda bored of GTA IV so thats why I'm passing on RDR.
P.S. I'm one of those guys who just ran over pedestrians and hocked up with hockers so I'm kinda lame. Still kinda kewl though .lol
JcBball717
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 9:25:58 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 10:03:02 PM
Reply
Nynja
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 7:58:01 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:24:51 PM
hellish_devil
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 10:07:05 PM
Reply
So it really depends on the kind of child that plays these "mature" games. Of course, I had a brother that used to tell me that it was a game and not real life, and that really worked.
Last edited by hellish_devil on 5/23/2010 10:10:01 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 10:16:09 PM
photo K
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 10:51:28 PM
But videogames should be treated just like movies. Rate them and parents and distributors (sellers) of the product are responsible for selling and buying. If they ban violent video games they had better ban violent movies to be consistent.
sawao_yamanaka
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 11:01:34 PM
tes37
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 11:50:25 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:18:23 AM
tes37
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:37:01 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:45:34 AM
sawao_yamanaka
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:57:15 AM
spiderboi
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 2:50:48 AM
TEG3SH
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:51:55 PM
Lex Luthor
Sunday, May 30, 2010 @ 3:02:38 PM
MyWorstNightmar
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 10:16:10 PM
Reply
MyWorstNightmar
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 11:03:56 PM
Snaaaake
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 10:37:03 PM
Reply
In the end, the ones at fault are the parents.
They should bear in mind the main objectives for making games are for money and entertainment.
Not once developers made games just so they can corrupt children's mind unless they're a bunch of Satanist.
FullmetalX10
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 7:10:13 AM
sawao_yamanaka
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 11:03:34 PM
CharlesD
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 11:23:27 PM
Reply
tes37
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 11:30:10 PM
Reply
A few times she had to leave the room when I got caught up in some situations she shouldn't see. She is all kinds of jealous because she can't play, but I explained that I was avoiding aspects of the game while she was present and made it appear as if the game were suitable. She doesn't live with me so I don't have to worry about her sneaking around to play it.
Highlander
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:15:19 AM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:19:34 AM
Reply
Ben Dutka PSXE [Administrator]
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:21:49 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:41:49 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 1:21:49 AM
Dancemachine55
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 2:03:51 AM
It's a bit like those who thought Saints Row 2 was the better crim sim over GTA IV. Sure, most will argue against you, but it's just personal preference.
If you think Dante deserves a 9 and Kratos an 8, that's your review and your opinion.
As for me, I agree with metacritic. :P
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 2:16:28 AM
Last edited by WorldEndsWithMe on 5/24/2010 2:19:01 AM
TEG3SH
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:53:41 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:43:12 AM
Reply
sawao_yamanaka
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:59:09 AM
BikerSaint
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 12:57:40 AM
Reply
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 1:22:33 AM
Nlayer
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 9:15:59 AM
ChronowerX_GT
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 1:43:50 AM
Reply
I also admit that I got Vice City when I was 13. I'm 18 now and looking back I think I was too young to play it. And especially San Andreas. I don't think it did me any harm since I was smart enough to know that it's a game and not real life. But it seems that some kids don't know that.
spiderboi
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:23:00 AM
Alienange
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 2:37:20 AM
Reply
In the meantime, yeah, Rockstar has to let people know they're stupid if they buy adult games for children.
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:03:15 AM
Reply
Nynja
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 8:00:20 AM
Hezzron
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 8:42:23 AM
Alienange
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 9:16:14 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:26:34 PM
stemon
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:13:41 AM
Reply
anyway the games industry will always have stigma, remember when mass effect(1) came out ... the media when crazy about the so called sex scenes ..... there is a movie called antichrist with willem defoe the content in that movie is very controversial yet it is being hailed as daring provocative all other big words I cant be arsed to type. Wonder why the media aint up in arms about that....
If I had it my way games would and should be looked at, as a entertainment medium lets face facts the games industry is finally taking its rightful place in what we would call entertainment with millions of dollars invested into it... and as a ADULT I want my entertainment made for ADULTS. as Ben said if parents cant tell the differance between an 18 cert on a movie and a 18 cert on a game ... then something is definatley wrong in the world.
Zorigo
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:36:53 AM
Reply
i was round my mates house, and me and him were playing GTA (san andreas i think) and we let his lil brother have a go, and his mum flipped out. S'all right for me n my mate (we were about 13/14) but dont giv the lil ones ago.
The games are for adults, but if kids want them, they have to ave their parents permission.
You cant blame the games that kids are being influenced, when it clearly says 18.
___________
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:38:00 AM
Reply
why is it that cartoons, books, movies can do what ever they please and no one says boo!
but than a game does something not even half as bad as some of the sh*t i have seen in movies and all hell breaks loose!
and dont give me that its because games are interactive crap!
as for the game so far its ok, kinda boring but ok.
im really missing the duels red dead revolver had, im preying there later in the game or something.
i miss being able to turn on dead eye, mark a few spots on some a$$ hole, hit a button and fill him up with more holes than Swiss cheese!!!
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 4:24:50 AM
Reply
Alienange
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 9:18:31 AM
bigrailer19
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 9:38:26 AM
WorldEndsWithMe
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 3:27:02 PM
Lotusflow3r
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 4:25:45 AM
Reply
Ergi
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 4:31:03 AM
Reply
I'm glad they are willing to do it though because it's the only way we're gonna achieve anything, ever.
Cesar_ser_4
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 5:37:54 AM
Reply
Last edited by Cesar_ser_4 on 5/24/2010 5:38:13 AM
Alienange
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 11:48:15 AM
LightShow
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 8:57:29 AM
Reply
thats right, porn. really, putting "adult" (or for that matter, "mature") in front of anything will cause everyone to think you have sexualized it. this is a gigantic red flag to any parent of a child under the age of 12 and many parents with teenagers.
its an emotional response. giant media backlashes arent from misinformed parents alone. its from a subconscious mental trigger equating "adult" or "mature" with "bad for my kid"
with that understood, if these parents were interested in their childrens hobbies, they'd get themselves informed, theyd read the box before they bought it for their kid, and all this stuff would be irrelevant. unfortunately, lots of parents dont want to bother, and usually dont care until they hear on the news that their kid is killing nuns.
Highlander
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 10:12:43 AM
That said, "games for adults" doesn't quite sound as bad as "adult entertainment", although I suspect a better phrase might be "games for grown-ups", or alternately, "not for children", or even more precisely, "not for under 18s".
However, I suspect it won't matter. the M rating is already ignored by legions of parents who seem to believe that "M for Mature" simply means "M for Mommy doesn't want to hear it anymore". Of course no one wants games released with AO ratings, I mean who wants to buy games rated A$$holes Only?
Last edited by Highlander on 5/24/2010 10:13:56 AM
sawao_yamanaka
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 10:57:42 AM
Snaaaake
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 11:29:11 AM
Reply
Banning video games for good will definitely create some chaos on earth and so yea,.......IN THE END THERE WILL ONLY BE CHAOS!!
maxpontiac
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 11:31:47 AM
Reply
Even with this in mind, I still have to question the reason behind allowing players to kill children in game. It adds NOTHING to the game what-so-ever!
BikerSaint
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 1:23:24 PM
Reply
"PARENTAL GUIDANCE"
Although, if you were to give a lot of those "so called" parents a dictionary opened to that very page, & even highlighted those 2 words for them, they'd still would need at least a few more clues...
plus Vanna White & a couple extra vowels thrown in just for good measure!!!!
Anyways, "KUDO"S to R* for having the stones to tell it like it really TIZ!!!!!!!!
Last edited by BikerSaint on 5/24/2010 1:24:58 PM
JPBooch
Monday, May 24, 2010 @ 2:30:14 PM
Reply
His comment sometimes has profanity in it too. I have a 12 year old daughter and I won't let her within a mile radius of this kid.

Red Dead Redemption









SmokeyPSD
Reply
Sunday, May 23, 2010 @ 9:57:09 PM