People Were "Very Critical" Of Demon's Souls At First
Maybe the reason From Software doesn't want to do a sequel to Demon's Souls is because the original was initially met with a ton of skepticism.
Although it's now considered one of the best role-playing games available, and European consumers will finally get a shot at it next week, DS producer Takeshi Kajii said the first showcasing of the promising title in Japan really tanked. Apparently, according to Edge, people were confused and put-off by the gameplay. In fact, the relatively unique approach to an RPG adventure started out by disappointing the heck out of people. Said Kajii:
"When we first demo'd Demon's Souls at the Tokyo Game Show it was nothing short of a disaster. People were initially excited about the idea of a dark fantasy game, but they were so critical of the gameplay. Many people presumed we were still working on the combat, despite it being nearly finished!
The truth is Demon's Souls is just not well suited to previews, particularly at shows. Because of the action-RPG style people simply expected it to handle in the same way as Sengoku Muso. When it didn't, they were left disoriented. Only a handful of players finished the demo. Some even put the controller down at the character-creation screen."
That just has to be disheartening if you're a developer. They must've had serious doubts about the eventual success of Demon's Souls but now, after becoming the darling of the RPG world for many, and even capturing GameSpot's Game of the Year award in 2009, the title has plenty of respect. It's just too bad that Demon's Souls 2 isn't on the horizon...
6/18/2010 12:28:58 PM Ben Dutka
Put this on your webpage or blog:
Email this to a friend
Follow PSX Extreme on Twitter
Comments (58 posts)
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 1:07:47 PM
Scarecrow
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 4:12:10 PM
B-RadGfromOV
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 4:04:13 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 1:06:41 PM
WorldEndsWithMe
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 1:06:04 PM
Reply
FM23
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 1:31:33 PM
Reply
maxpontiac
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 2:05:11 PM
Reply
Scarecrow
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 4:15:51 PM
kraygen
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 6:38:02 PM
Scarecrow
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 4:24:26 PM
Reply
A lot of the "new" gamers are dumber than the NES, SNES, ps1 gamers.
They're "babied" all the time.
Demon's Souls pushes you to WANT to win. It's not the kind of game you can sit back while talking with your friend on your cellphone*
Sad, rpg fans are missing out on the best of this generation.
---
But I don't know what From Software is so scared about? I mean it did do reasonably well; even getting Sony to admit that they missed a great chance by letting ATLUS publish the game in the US instead of doing it themselves.
It's really up to SCEJ (Japan) to FULLY fund a Demon's Souls 2. I think From Software is flat out scared to attempt a sequel.
Trash like Call of Duty gets sequels, and this does not. This wouldn't have happened 'back in the days.'
Last edited by Scarecrow on 6/18/2010 4:26:24 PM
sunspider13
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 5:36:07 PM
marcusfrommo
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 4:32:39 PM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 5:35:34 PM
Heavenly Sword, I can agree with wanting a sequel, but I can understand why Ninja Theory isn't doing it (money), but also, I wouldn't want to see them do something too different to the story that was in the original. I like it when game series (numbered) continue with the same characters and at the end of HS
***SPOILERS*** they were all dead ***END SPOILERS***
Also, GOW 3, that's three, a threequel if you will. was also supposed to be the last of the series, with the exception of Ghost of Sparta, which was alluded to in 3. Why do you want these game series to continue on after their death? That's an Activision and Microsoft tactic, not Sony.
Peace.
Gordo
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 4:37:06 PM
Reply
Looking forward to immersing myself in this for a good while. The Wiki site is excellent as well. Imagine I will be needing that help from the start.
The special edition with the art book, CD and strategy guide that Australia is getting looks sweet. This one will be a keeper!
kraygen
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 6:42:18 PM
shadowscorpio
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 4:42:39 PM
Reply
With that said and even though visually the mechanics, gamplay and graphics still don't appeal to me I'm willing to trust my fellow RPGers on here and give it a shot. I not worried about difficulty seeing as how you are awarded appropriately in this game.
I hope I'm making the right decision by purchasing Demon Souls people...
piratedrunk
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 5:32:40 PM
The other day at EB i saw it was going for $30 new. That is an insanely good deal so I think you can't go wrong picking it up now.
kraygen
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 6:44:08 PM
Mr Bitey
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 8:49:23 PM
Lawless SXE
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 5:41:01 PM
Reply
People are always talking about how they would rather see original ideas, so one comes along, and suddenly you are all wanting to tarnish its legacy by clamouring for a sequel. It doesn't make a whole lot of sense. I'd rather see FromSoftware let Demon's Souls sit, as well as 3D Dot Game Heroes and move onto another new, exclusive title.
One thing I don't understand about y'all is how you lambaste the prevalence of COD, and let Assassin's Creed off with a reprieve. Six games in three years is just a tad worse than six games in six years. Sure, you can bring up the argument that not all of the AC games have been for the big two, but it's still valid damnit.
Also, I know that that was off-topic, but it just seemed to flow off what I was saying.
Peace.
kraygen
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 6:48:10 PM
If they came out with demon's souls 2 with move I'd sell half my video game collection in order to buy the game and 2 move wands so I could play it day 1 if I had to.
There is a lot to demon's souls, but I still wanted more and 1 sequel definitely wouldn't hurt.
FullmetalX10
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 5:51:12 PM
Reply
kraygen
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 6:49:38 PM
natho86
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 7:48:57 PM
Clamedeus
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 6:59:39 PM
Reply
Very good game i love it.
Last edited by Clamedeus on 6/18/2010 7:07:07 PM
marcusfrommo
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 7:08:20 PM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 10:00:56 PM
Sure, I can understand people wanting to see the continuation of games with a great story and compelling characters, ie. RPGs, but I think it's better to, if the developers feel the story is told, reuse the mechanis of the game with a few tweaks in a new environment, like Oblivion to Fallout 3. Same game mechanics for the most part, completely different feeling game.
I don't understand your comment about MGS being exclusive to the 360. Sure, if it was, Microsoft could throw a bag of money at Kojima to make a new one, and he probably would, but that isn't exactly coercion. Coercion means to force someone to do something, and throwing money at something isn't forcing it, it's more like compelling.
Castlevania I, thus far, reserve judgement. It looks and sounds like a GOW knock-off, just like Dante's Inferno. I say this because I haven't played any of the earlier games, and Lords of Shadow reminds me a great deal of God of War. Don't get me wrong, I'll probably still try it out, and reward it on its own merits, but right now I'm on the fence about it.
The reason that there are so few RPGs nowadays, the way I see it, is because of the influx of casual gamers. They are the source of the twitch gaming craze and the 'avid' or 'classic' gamers are pushed to the wayside as devs realise that this is not their audience anymore. Any business is wise to follow the money, and shooters and Wii games is where the money is now.
I make it a point to not buy sports games. If I want to play sports I'll play them IRL. That being said, I bought WWE SVR 2006, 2007 and 2009. I have given up on them as they are always the same tripe, with a few minor differences. Either way, no more for me, and no sports games either.
As far as fighting games are concerned, I purchased Tekken Dark Resurrection (That's not right...) for my psp and SCIV. While I put an untold amount of time into TDR, I got bored with SC very quickly, then trying to go back to Tekken was also boring. Fighting games simply don't hold my interest as no matter how much variation there is, the story is almost always piss-poor and the mechanics are always relatively simple. These games sell because of the name value, and the people that have been born on them and will continue to play them regardless of what happens. As far as them being released every 3-5 years, if they can do something different and compelling with the structure of the game in that time, then why the hell shouldn't they? Sure, I may not like it, but some people obviously do.
Now, to you personally. Learn grammar. Learn to group your ideas. Learn to use the reply button and finally learn to not piss me off.
Sorry about the rant everyone, but I can't resist a challenge.
Scarecrow
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 10:41:25 PM
What's this weird theme you've got 'bout not wanting sequels?
Call of Duty is a different story (I know you're going to look for that). But COD is sorry excuse for a compelling game. It's the same online multiplayer game with all the camping BS in every single game.
In a MGS game you get a full fledged story, environments, and characters. Same would be true for Demon's Souls.
PS: And even then COD is good, it just isn't as good as some make it out to be.
Lawless SXE
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 12:44:16 AM
Scarecrow
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 10:43:29 AM
Fane1024
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 4:24:23 PM
Twitch gaming was FAR more prevalent on the earlier systems than it is today. Old school arcade-style games are "twitchy" in the extreme, requiring fast reflexes and almost no thought. And they are intentionally unforgiving.
Casual gaming is, by contrast, intentionally forgiving, in order to appeal to the masses.
It makes no sense to call COD-heads (particularly those who play it all the time) casual gamers. Going back to PC games, shooter fans are as hardcore as they come.
There are a lot of elements changing the landscape of gaming and they are not all derived from the same source.
Last edited by Fane1024 on 6/19/2010 4:31:16 PM
Lawless SXE
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 5:35:58 PM
Thank you for pointing that out to me.
Scarecrow... in that case, I fear the lack of fear that others have in regards to sequels. It's still contains fear :P
Peace all.
BeezleDrop
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 7:18:11 PM
Reply
natho86
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 7:57:20 PM
Reply
I really hope they do another one, with better advertisment and actually release it all over the world at the same time im pretty sure they would make some money on it.
FM23
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 4:36:06 AM
Reply
I love when 'smart' people point out people who are trying to be smart. Good job and I also agree with you, Demons Souls doesn't need a sequel. Kind of reminds me of how Bioshock didn't need a sequel. Sequels work for MGS and even Assassin Creed, but for the most part many games don't even need sequels unless developers just want to recreate and perfect their intial work. Uncharted 2 and even GOW 3 is a great example, but Bioshock 2 was just another game, not a classic like first and thus its suffer from sequel syndrome. I think the developers are creative enough to make a sequel due to the nature of Demons Souls, as they can actually dive into the backstory of this world, but then again, I think the mystery of this world is the true pleasure. So in the end, I don't think a sequel is needed, but if they can reach sequel excellence like UC2 and AC2 while giving us a deep narrative compared to the first, I am on board, but if it is Bioshock 2 sequel level, please just leave it under wraps. As for now, I need to get my self up to soul level 223...lol
Lawless SXE
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 6:46:07 AM
AC worked because it was planned to be a trilogy from the beginning. Also, they fixed most of the complaints they received about the original.
Bioshock should never have been greenlit for a sequel. Especially one which did away with all of the characters that made the original game so great.
Uncharted 2 was perfect in its execution. They kept all of the best characters (with the exception of Eddie. He stole the show for me.), introduced new diverse characters for the originals to bounce off, and a story that, while not adding anything to the original, kept all of the elements that made Drake's Fortune a GOTY contender and did them better.
GOW3, I will disagree with you though. While it is the logical, and necessary thing to follow GOW2, I would argue that GOW2 was unnecessary. The first one could have stood alone. I'm glad it didn't though as the others gave a really final feel to it.
I'm not saying that Demon's Souls doesn't deserve a sequel, and I probably would buy it too, but I don't see any real reason for them to do another one. As I already said, reuse a modified version of the systems in an all-new game with new environs and give it a new title and voila, new IP, kinda...
I actually wrote a much longer and in-depth post, but my net decided to not let me post it. Grrr...
Also, how high can you raise your character level in Demon's Souls, 223? SERIOUSLY? And why did you put the first smart in quotation marks?
Peace
___________
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 5:46:38 AM
Reply
look at heavy rain, everyone was iffy on that with its QTE fest but now its one of the most popular games!
i really hope it gets a few GOTY awards to try and encourage developers to do something different, take a leap of faith.
instead of following the sheep off the cliff!!!!
marcusfrommo
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 4:20:58 PM
Reply
souls will probably go down as the best sony rpg exclusive of all time. and (i don't know) i think worldwide they barely sold a million if that. fm23, geez, on the demon souls front,then don't purchase it if you don't want the sequel. did you get emotionally excited over twisted metal, i didn't. aside from sports games, why wouldn't companies make sequels to games that are popular? wii's bread and butter is 1st party exclusives. isn't an rpg genre a prequel or sequel at it's core. lawless, fm23, thanks for the critique, are we cool, i'm being serious.
Lawless SXE
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 5:46:44 PM
As I stated, I probably will play Castlevania, and I will reward it on its own merits, but it seems that way to me right now. First person shooters. I've got Resistance 1&2, Killzone 2 and Bioshock in my library, all quite different games in the same genre, but I am very selective and try to make sure that if I am buying games in the same genre that they are different. R:FOM is arcade-ish fun, KZ2 is intense given gaming form and BS is horror.
I think Demon's Souls only sold a half-mil, but as for best sony exclusive RPG, probably not, maybe best PS3 exclusive RPG.
A company wouldn't make a sequel to a popular game out of willpower (I had a better word but it slipped my mind, I think it started with C). If it doesn't need one, then one shouldn't be made, but unfortunately all the see are the dollar signs.
And what's this about RPG's being sequel or prequel at the core?
Are we cool? You told me to grow up, so no, we are not. :P
Peace marcusfrommo.
marcusfrommo
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 11:16:02 PM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Sunday, June 20, 2010 @ 12:26:55 AM
marcusfrommo
Saturday, June 19, 2010 @ 11:48:37 PM
Reply
marcusfrommo
Sunday, June 20, 2010 @ 12:03:42 AM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Sunday, June 20, 2010 @ 12:50:43 AM
Correct me if I'm wrong but hasn't FFXIII sold 5.5mil worldwide with a ratio of about 5:1 for ps3 sales vs 360 sales? I don't think that a specially designed console would have pushed those numbers any higher, and while a collectors edition would have sold like hot-cakes, it would have been aimed at the market that would have bought the game anyway.
I think we got a bit far off-topic here, so I'm going to let this sleeping dog lie from here on out.
Peace.
ExhumeART
Sunday, June 20, 2010 @ 12:39:36 AM
Reply
Last edited by ExhumeART on 6/20/2010 12:40:08 AM
marcusfrommo
Sunday, June 20, 2010 @ 4:34:59 AM
Reply
Lawless SXE
Sunday, June 20, 2010 @ 5:12:56 AM
The paradigm system I only just unlocked and it quickly went on to do my head in. I mean wouldn't it just be easier to do a standard branching tree system than a great circle?
As for the shops, I have not yet bought a single item. I'm fine with what you get dropped from the battles and the treasure spheres.
It's not that there's anything wrong with the game, it's just that it has all these niggling little things that are driving me batty. But no, it's starting to get a lot more interesting. I still prefer VC though, and as for your manga/anime idea, didn't I read here that someone was planning a prequel book or something as such?
I will not deign to respond to your comment on the hotness of the characters. Except to say that Vanille is nummy. I think we've hijacked this thread WAY too much, so this will seriously be my last post in this article. Find another one on topic in which we can continue this discussion and I gladly will.
Peace.
NeotericDope
Monday, June 21, 2010 @ 3:48:39 AM
Reply

Demon's Souls









Evil tele
Reply
Friday, June 18, 2010 @ 12:41:37 PM
Everyone talks about how 'hard' this game is... i still have yet to see what they're talking about